mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2026-10-23 13:29:09 +03:00
c9c660e6ae
Prior to v18, the total cost of a plan was just one number, a
floating-point value. Commit e222534679
introduced a second component, the number of disabled_nodes at or
below that level of the plan tree. Unfortunately, I (rhaas) failed
to realize that GEQO extracts the cost from each candidate plan and
compares it directly as a measure of fitness.
This means that, at least in principle, it's possible for GEQO to
prefer a plan with more disabled_nodes and lower cost over one with
fewer disabled_nodes and higher cost, which is incorrect. It may be
possible for that to become a practical issue in v18, but it's much
more likely to become an issue in v19 due to pg_plan_advice. Hence,
since the straightforward fix breaks ABI compatibility, back-patch
only to v19.
Backpatch-through: 19
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYmXy-jiP5qDhqNEiYFEBzQsArO6O2d9E8szNZqi1bePQ@mail.gmail.com