init_htab(), with #define HASH_DEBUG, prints a bunch of hashtable
parameters. It used to also print nentries, but commit 44ca4022f changed
that to "hash_get_num_entries(hctl)", which is wrong (the parameter should
be "hashp").
Rather than correct the coding, though, let's just remove that field from
the printout. The table must be empty, since we just finished building
it, so expensively calculating the number of entries is rather pointless.
Moreover hash_get_num_entries makes assumptions (about not needing locks)
which we could do without in debugging code.
Noted by Choi Doo-Won in bug #14764. Back-patch to 9.6 where the
faulty code was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170802032353.8424.12274@wrigleys.postgresql.org
XLByteToSeg and XLByteToPrevSeg calculate only a segment number. The
definition of these macros were modified by commit
dfda6ebaec6763090fb78b458a979b558c50b39b but the comment remain
unchanged.
Patch by Yugo Nagata. Back patched to 9.3 and beyond.
Previously the docs just said "5.8 or later". Experimentation shows
that while you can build on Unix from a git checkout with 5.8.0,
compiling recent PL/Perl requires at least 5.8.1, and you won't be
able to run the TAP tests with less than 5.8.3 because that's when
they added "prove". (I do not have any information on just what the
MSVC build scripts require.)
Since all these versions are quite ancient, let's not split hairs
in the docs, but just say that 5.8.3 is the minimum requirement.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16894.1501392088@sss.pgh.pa.us
The comment for dumpACL() got neglected when initacls and initracls were
added and the discussion of what 'racls' is wasn't very clear either.
Per complaint from Tom.
Fix assorted places that had not bothered with the convention of
prefixing catalog and function names with "pg_catalog.". That
could possibly result in query failure when running with a nondefault
search_path. Also fix two places that weren't quoting OID literals.
I think the latter hasn't mattered much since about 7.3, but it's still
a bad idea to be doing it in 99 places and not in 2 others.
Also remove a useless EXISTS sub-select that someone had stuck into
describeOneTableDetails' queries for child tables. We just got the OID
out of pg_class, so I hardly see how checking that it exists in pg_class
was doing anything helpful.
In passing, try to improve the emitted formatting of a couple of
these queries, though I didn't work really hard on that. And merge
unnecessarily duplicative coding in some other places.
Much of this was new in HEAD, but some was quite old; back-patch
as appropriate.
If several sessions are concurrently locking a tuple update chain with
nonconflicting lock modes using an old snapshot, and they all succeed,
it may happen that some of them fail because of restarting the loop (due
to a concurrent Xmax change) and getting an error in the subsequent pass
while trying to obtain a tuple lock that they already have in some tuple
version.
This can only happen with very high concurrency (where a row is being
both updated and FK-checked by multiple transactions concurrently), but
it's been observed in the field and can have unpleasant consequences
such as an FK check failing to see a tuple that definitely exists:
ERROR: insert or update on table "child_table" violates foreign key constraint "fk_constraint_name"
DETAIL: Key (keyid)=(123456) is not present in table "parent_table".
(where the key is observably present in the table).
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170714210011.r25mrff4nxjhmf3g@alvherre.pgsql
This module becomes much more useful if we allow it to be used as base
class for external projects. To achieve this, change the exported
get_new_node function into a class method instead, and use the standard
Perl idiom of accepting the class as first argument. This method works
as expected for subclasses. The standalone function is kept for
backwards compatibility, though it could be removed in pg11.
Author: Chap Flackman, based on an earlier patch from Craig Ringer
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMsr+YF8kO+4+K-_U4PtN==2FndJ+5Bn6A19XHhMiBykEwv0wA@mail.gmail.com
Trading a little too heavily on letting the code path be the same whether
we were creating shared data structures or only attaching to them,
InitPredicateLocks() inserted the "scratch" PredicateLockTargetHash entry
unconditionally. This is just wrong if we're in a postmaster child,
which would only reach this code in EXEC_BACKEND builds. Most of the
time, the hash_search(HASH_ENTER) call would simply report that the
entry already existed, causing no visible effect since the code did not
bother to check for that possibility. However, if this happened while
some other backend had transiently removed the "scratch" entry, then
that other backend's eventual RestoreScratchTarget would suffer an
assert failure; this appears to be the explanation for a recent failure
on buildfarm member culicidae. In non-assert builds, there would be
no visible consequences there either. But nonetheless this is a pretty
bad bug for EXEC_BACKEND builds, for two reasons:
1. Each new backend would perform the hash_search(HASH_ENTER) call
without holding any lock that would prevent concurrent access to the
PredicateLockTargetHash hash table. This creates a low but certainly
nonzero risk of corruption of that hash table.
2. In the event that the race condition occurred, by reinserting the
scratch entry too soon, we were defeating the entire purpose of the
scratch entry, namely to guarantee that transaction commit could move
hash table entries around with no risk of out-of-memory failure.
The odds of an actual OOM failure are quite low, but not zero, and if
it did happen it would again result in corruption of the hash table.
The user-visible symptoms of such corruption are a little hard to predict,
but would presumably amount to misbehavior of SERIALIZABLE transactions
that'd require a crash or postmaster restart to fix.
To fix, just skip the hash insertion if IsUnderPostmaster. I also
inserted a bunch of assertions that the expected things happen
depending on whether IsUnderPostmaster is true. That might be overkill,
since most comparable code in other functions isn't quite that paranoid,
but once burnt twice shy.
In passing, also move a couple of lines to places where they seemed
to make more sense.
Diagnosis of problem by Thomas Munro, patch by me. Back-patch to
all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10593.1500670709@sss.pgh.pa.us
If the user modifies a view that has CHECK OPTIONs and this gets
translated into a modification to an underlying relation which happens
to be a foreign table, the check options should be enforced. In the
normal code path, that was happening properly, but it was not working
properly for "direct" modification because the whole operation gets
pushed to the remote side in that case and we never have an option to
enforce the constraint against individual tuples. Fix by disabling
direct modification when there is a need to enforce CHECK OPTIONs.
Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Kyotaro Horiguchi and by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/f8a48f54-6f02-9c8a-5250-9791603171ee@lab.ntt.co.jp
Various cases involving renaming of view columns are handled by having
make_viewdef pass down the view's current relation tupledesc to
get_query_def, which then takes care to use the column names from the
tupledesc for the output column names of the SELECT. For some reason
though, we'd missed teaching make_ruledef to do similarly when it is
printing an ON SELECT rule, even though this is exactly the same case.
The results from pg_get_ruledef would then be different and arguably wrong.
In particular, this breaks pre-v10 versions of pg_dump, which in some
situations would define views by means of emitting a CREATE RULE ... ON
SELECT command. Third-party tools might not be happy either.
In passing, clean up some crufty code in make_viewdef; we'd apparently
modernized the equivalent code in make_ruledef somewhere along the way,
and missed this copy.
Per report from Gilles Darold. Back-patch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ec05659a-40ff-4510-fc45-ca9d965d0838@dalibo.com
pg_dump with the --clean option failed to emit DROP EVENT TRIGGER
commands for event triggers. In a closely related oversight,
it also did not emit ALTER OWNER commands for event triggers.
Since only superusers can create event triggers, the latter oversight
is of little practical consequence ... but if we're going to record
an owner for event triggers, then surely pg_dump should preserve it.
Per complaint from Greg Atkins. Back-patch to 9.3 where event triggers
were introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170722191142.yi4e7tzcg3iacclg@gmail.com
When incrementally updating a file larger than 2GB, the old code could
either fail outright (if the client asked the server for bytes beyond
the 2GB boundary) or fail to copy all the blocks that had actually
been modified (if the server reported a file size to the client in
excess of 2GB), resulting in data corruption. Generally, such files
won't occur anyway, but they might if using a non-default segment size
or if there the directory contains stray files unrelated to
PostgreSQL. Fix by a more prudent choice of data types.
Even with these improvements, this code still uses a mix of different
types (off_t, size_t, uint64, int64) to represent file sizes and
offsets, not all of which necessarily have the same width or
signedness, so further cleanup might be in order here. However, at
least now they all have the potential to be 64 bits wide on 64-bit
platforms.
Kuntal Ghosh and Michael Paquier, with a tweak by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAGz5QC+8gbkz=Brp0TgoKNqHWTzonbPtPex80U0O6Uh_bevbaA@mail.gmail.com
The new test cases added in commit 8bf58c0d9 turn out to have output
that can vary depending on the lc_messages setting prevailing on the
test server. Hide the remote end's error messages to ensure stable
output. This isn't a terribly desirable solution; we'd rather know
that the connection failed for the expected reason and not some other
one. But there seems little choice for the moment.
Per buildfarm.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18419.1500658570@sss.pgh.pa.us
Previously, postgres_fdw would keep on using an existing connection even
if the user did ALTER SERVER or ALTER USER MAPPING commands that should
affect connection parameters. Teach it to watch for catcache invals
on these catalogs and re-establish connections when the relevant catalog
entries change. Per bug #14738 from Michal Lis.
In passing, clean up some rather crufty decisions in commit ae9bfc5d6
about where fields of ConnCacheEntry should be reset. We now reset
all the fields whenever we open a new connection.
Kyotaro Horiguchi, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat and myself.
Back-patch to 9.3 where postgres_fdw appeared.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170710113917.7727.10247@wrigleys.postgresql.org
SLRU buffer lwlocks are allocated twice by oversight in commit
fe702a7b3f9f2bc5bf6d173166d7d55226af82c8 where that locks were moved to
separate tranche. The bug doesn't have user-visible effects except small
overspending of shared memory.
Backpatch to 9.6 where it was introduced.
Alexander Korotkov with small editorization by me.
Claiming that NATURAL JOIN is equivalent to CROSS JOIN when there are
no common column names is only strictly correct if it's an inner join;
you can't say e.g. CROSS LEFT JOIN. Better to explain it as meaning
JOIN ON TRUE, instead. Per a suggestion from David Johnston.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwb+mYszQhDS9f_dqRrk1=Pe-S6D=XMkAXcDf4ykKPmgKQ@mail.gmail.com
Normally, a JoinExpr would have empty "quals" only if it came from CROSS
JOIN syntax. However, it's possible to get to this state by specifying
NATURAL JOIN between two tables with no common column names, and there
might be other ways too. The code previously printed no ON clause if
"quals" was empty; that's right for CROSS JOIN but syntactically invalid
if it's some type of outer join. Fix by printing ON TRUE in that case.
This got broken by commit 2ffa740be, which stopped using NATURAL JOIN
syntax in ruleutils output due to its brittleness in the face of
column renamings. Back-patch to 9.3 where that commit appeared.
Per report from Tushar Ahuja.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/98b283cd-6dda-5d3f-f8ac-87db8c76a3da@enterprisedb.com
It seems pretty confusing to have tests named both largeobject and
large_object. The latter is of very recent vintage (commit ff992c074),
so get rid of it in favor of merging into the former.
Also, enable the LO comment test that was added by commit 70ad7ed4e,
since the later commit added the then-missing pg_upgrade functionality.
The large_object.sql test case is almost completely redundant with that,
but not quite: it seems like creating a user-defined LO with an OID in
the system range might be an interesting case for pg_upgrade, so let's
keep it.
Like the earlier patch, back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18665.1500306372@sss.pgh.pa.us
In the frontend Makefiles that pull in libpgfeutils, we'd generally
done it like this:
LDFLAGS += -L$(top_builddir)/src/fe_utils -lpgfeutils $(libpq_pgport)
That method is badly broken, as seen in bug #14742 from Chris Ruprecht.
The -L flag for src/fe_utils ends up being placed after whatever random
-L flags are in LDFLAGS already. That puts us at risk of pulling in
libpgfeutils.a from some previous installation rather than the freshly
built one in src/fe_utils. Also, the lack of an "override" is hazardous
if someone tries to specify some LDFLAGS on the make command line.
The correct way to do it is like this:
override LDFLAGS := -L$(top_builddir)/src/fe_utils -lpgfeutils $(libpq_pgport) $(LDFLAGS)
so that libpgfeutils, along with libpq, libpgport, and libpgcommon, are
guaranteed to be pulled in from the build tree and not from any referenced
system directory, because their -L flags will appear first.
In some places we'd been even lazier and done it like this:
LDFLAGS += -L$(top_builddir)/src/fe_utils -lpgfeutils -lpq
which is subtly wrong in an additional way: on platforms where we can't
restrict the symbols exported by libpq.so, it allows libpgfeutils to
latch onto libpgport and libpgcommon symbols from libpq.so, rather than
directly from those static libraries as intended. This carries hazards
like those explained in the comments for the libpq_pgport macro.
In addition to fixing the broken libpgfeutils usages, I tried to
standardize on using $(libpq_pgport) like so:
override LDFLAGS := $(libpq_pgport) $(LDFLAGS)
even where libpgfeutils is not in the picture. This makes no difference
right now but will hopefully discourage future mistakes of the same ilk.
And it's more like the way we handle CPPFLAGS in libpq-using Makefiles.
In passing, just for consistency, make pgbench include PTHREAD_LIBS the
same way everyplace else does, ie just after LIBS rather than in some
random place in the command line. This might have practical effect if
there are -L switches in that macro on some platform.
It looks to me like the MSVC build scripts are not affected by this
error, but someone more familiar with them than I might want to double
check.
Back-patch to 9.6 where libpgfeutils was introduced. In 9.6, the hazard
this error creates is that a reinstallation might link to the prior
installation's copy of libpgfeutils.a and thereby fail to absorb a
minor-version bug fix.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170714125106.9231.13772@wrigleys.postgresql.org
When writing a backup to stdout with pg_basebackup on Windows, put stdout
to binary mode. Any CR bytes in the output will otherwise be output
incorrectly as CR+LF.
In the passing, standardize on using "_setmode" instead of "setmode", for
the sake of consistency. They both do the same thing, but according to
MSDN documentation, setmode is deprecated.
Fixes bug #14634, reported by Henry Boehlert. Patch by Haribabu Kommi.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170428082818.24366.13134@wrigleys.postgresql.org
The grammar will only accept something syntactically similar to a function
call in a function-in-FROM expression. However, there are various ways
to input something that ruleutils.c won't deparse that way, potentially
leading to a view or rule that fails dump/reload. Fix by inserting a
dummy CAST around anything that isn't going to deparse as a function
(which is one of the ways to get something like that in there in the
first place).
In HEAD, also make use of the infrastructure added by this to avoid
emitting unnecessary parentheses in CREATE INDEX deparsing. I did
not change that in back branches, thinking that people might find it
to be unexpected/unnecessary behavioral change.
In HEAD, also fix incorrect logic for when to add extra parens to
partition key expressions. Somebody apparently thought they could
get away with simpler logic than pg_get_indexdef_worker has, but
they were wrong --- a counterexample is PARTITION BY LIST ((a[1])).
Ignoring the prettyprint flag for partition expressions isn't exactly
a nice solution anyway.
This has been broken all along, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10477.1499970459@sss.pgh.pa.us
The race condition goes like this:
1. GetNewTransactionId advances nextXid e.g. from 100 to 101
2. GetOldestActiveTransactionId reads the new nextXid, 101
3. GetOldestActiveTransactionId loops through the proc array. There are no
active XIDs there, so it returns 101 as the oldest active XID.
4. GetNewTransactionid stores XID 100 to MyPgXact->xid
So, GetOldestActiveTransactionId returned XID 101, even though 100 only
just started and is surely still running.
This would be hard to hit in practice, and even harder to spot any ill
effect if it happens. GetOldestActiveTransactionId is only used when
creating a checkpoint in a master server, and the race condition can only
happen on an online checkpoint, as there are no backends running during a
shutdown checkpoint. The oldestActiveXid value of an online checkpoint is
only used when starting up a hot standby server, to determine the starting
point where pg_subtrans is initialized from. For the race condition to
happen, there must be no other XIDs in the proc array that would hold back
the oldest-active XID value, which means that the missed XID must be a top
transaction's XID. However, pg_subtrans is not used for top XIDs, so I
believe an off-by-one error is in fact inconsequential. Nevertheless, let's
fix it, as it's clearly wrong and the fix is simple.
This has been wrong ever since hot standby was introduced, so backport to
all supported versions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e7258662-82b6-7a45-56d4-99b337a32bf7@iki.fi
Further investigation shows that ruleutils isn't quite up to speed either
for cases where we have a domain-over-array: it needs to be prepared to
look past a CoerceToDomain at the top level of field and element
assignments, else it decompiles them incorrectly. Potentially this would
result in failure to dump/reload a rule, if it looked like the one in the
new test case. (I also added a test for EXPLAIN; that output isn't broken,
but clearly we need more test coverage here.)
Like commit b1cb32fb6, this bug is reachable in cases we already support,
so back-patch all the way.
compute_tsvector_stats() detoasted and kept in memory every tsvector value
in the sample, but that can be a lot of memory. The original bug report
described a case using over 10 gigabytes, with statistics target of 10000
(the maximum).
To fix, allocate a separate copy of just the lexemes that we keep around,
and free the detoasted tsvector values as we go. This adds some palloc/pfree
overhead, when you have a lot of distinct lexemes in the sample, but it's
better than running out of memory.
Fixes bug #14654 reported by James C. Reviewed by Tom Lane. Backport to
all supported versions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170514200602.1451.46797@wrigleys.postgresql.org
If the number of tuples in the heap exceeds approximately INT_MAX/2,
this loop's calculation "2*i+1" could overflow, resulting in a crash.
Fix it by using unsigned int rather than int for the relevant local
variables; that shouldn't cost anything extra on any popular hardware.
Per bug #14722 from Sergey Koposov.
Original patch by Sergey Koposov, modified by me per a suggestion
from Heikki Linnakangas to use unsigned int not int64.
Back-patch to 9.4, where tuplesort.c grew the ability to sort as many
as INT_MAX tuples in-memory (commit 263865a48).
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170629161637.1478.93109@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Commit 14e8803f1 removed the locking in SyncRepWaitForLSN, but that
introduced a race condition, where SyncRepWaitForLSN might see
syncRepState already set to SYNC_REP_WAIT_COMPLETE, but the process was
not yet removed from the queue. That tripped the assertion, that the
process should no longer be in the uqeue. Reorder the operations in
SyncRepWakeQueue to remove the process from the queue first, and update
syncRepState only after that, and add a memory barrier in between to make
sure the operations are made visible to other processes in that order.
Fixes bug #14721 reported by Const Zhang. Analysis and fix by Thomas Munro.
Backpatch down to 9.5, where the locking was removed.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170629023623.1480.26508%40wrigleys.postgresql.org
We allow INSERT and UPDATE commands to assign to the same column more than
once, as long as the assignments are to subfields or elements rather than
the whole column. However, this failed when the target column was a domain
over array rather than plain array. Fix by teaching process_matched_tle()
to look through CoerceToDomain nodes, and add relevant test cases.
Also add a group of test cases exercising domains over array of composite.
It's doubtless accidental that CREATE DOMAIN allows this case while not
allowing straight domain over composite; but it does, so we'd better make
sure we don't break it. (I could not find any documentation mentioning
either side of that, so no doc changes.)
It's been like this for a long time, so back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4206.1499798337@sss.pgh.pa.us
We've heard occasional reports of backend launch failing because
pgwin32_ReserveSharedMemoryRegion() fails, indicating that something
has already used that address space in the child process. It's not
very clear what, given that we disable ASLR in Windows builds, but
suspicion falls on antivirus products. It'd be better if we didn't
have to disable ASLR, anyway. So let's try to ameliorate the problem
by retrying the process launch after such a failure, up to 100 times.
Patch by me, based on previous work by Amit Kapila and others.
This is a longstanding issue, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1+R6hSx6t_yvwtx+NRzneVp+MRqXAdGJZChcau8Uij-8g@mail.gmail.com
Original wording had confusingly vague antecedent for "they", so replace
that with a more repetitive but clearer formulation. In passing, make the
link to the installation requirements section more specific. Per gripe
from Martin Mai, though this is not the fix he initially proposed.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAN_NWRu-cWuNaiXUjV3m4H-riWURuPW=j21bSaLADs6rjjzXgQ@mail.gmail.com
It's possible for WalSndWaitForWal to be asked to wait for WAL that doesn't
exist yet. That's fine, in fact it's the normal situation if we're caught
up; but when the client requests shutdown we should not keep waiting.
The previous coding could wait indefinitely if the source server was idle.
In passing, improve the rather weak comments in this area, and slightly
rearrange some related code for better readability.
Back-patch to 9.4 where this code was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14154.1498781234@sss.pgh.pa.us
