macros, but only at explicit CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() calls. Not clear
whether overenthusiastic acceptance of interrupts accounts for any real
bugs, but it definitely seems risky and unnecessary.
to insert the same key into a supposedly unique index. The bug is of
low probability, and may not explain any of the recent reports of
duplicated rows; but a bug is a bug.
cases which should have worked but did not.
Now supports julian day (J2452271), ISO time labels (T040506) and various
combinations of spaces and run-togethers of dates, times, and time zones.
All regression tests pass, and I have more tests to add after the 7.2
release (don't want to require changes to the ancillary horology result
files until after then).
'volatile' pointers to access those structures, so that optimizing
compilers will not decide to move the structure accesses outside of the
spinlock-acquire-to-spinlock-release sequence. There are no known bugs
in these uses at present, but based on bad experience with lwlock.c,
it seems prudent to ensure that we protect these other uses too.
Per pghackers discussion around 12-Dec. (Note: it should not be
necessary to worry about structures protected by LWLocks, since the
LWLock acquire and release operations are not inline macros.)
machines. I have just been observing some scenarios where set_ps_display
accounts for more than 10% of the backend CPU, and this loop has to be
the reason.
do not use the undo pointer anyway. This is a quick-hack solution for
the three-way deadlock condition discussed in pghackers 17-Dec-01.
Need to find a better way of doing it.
requests for implicit trivial coercions. Prevents sillinesses like
this one:
regression=# select x.int8_tbl.q1 from int8_tbl x;
ERROR: fmgr_info: function 270997776: cache lookup failed
set-returning functions in its target list. This ensures that we
won't rewrite the query in a way that places set-returning functions
into quals (WHERE clauses). Cf. bug reports from Joe Conway.
to use and significantly faster. This tweak saves 25% (!) of the runtime
of COPY IN in a test with 8000-character lines. I wouldn't normally
commit a performance improvement this late in the cycle, but 25% got
my attention...
remove brain-dead rule that double quotes are needed if and only if the
datatype is pass-by-reference; neither direction of the implication holds
water. Instead, examine the actual data string to see if it contains
any characters that force us to quote it.
Add some documentation about quoting of array values, which was previously
explained nowhere AFAICT.
