Commits 742869946 et al turn out to be a couple bricks shy of a load.
We were dumping the stored values of GUC_LIST_QUOTE variables as they
appear in proconfig or setconfig catalog columns. However, although that
quoting rule looks a lot like SQL-identifier double quotes, there are two
critical differences: empty strings ("") are legal, and depending on which
variable you're considering, values longer than NAMEDATALEN might be valid
too. So the current technique fails altogether on empty-string list
entries (as reported by Steven Winfield in bug #15248) and it also risks
truncating file pathnames during dump/reload of GUC values that are lists
of pathnames.
To fix, split the stored value without any downcasing or truncation,
and then emit each element as a SQL string literal.
This is a tad annoying, because we now have three copies of the
comma-separated-string splitting logic in varlena.c as well as a fourth
one in dumputils.c. (Not to mention the randomly-different-from-those
splitting logic in libpq...) I looked at unifying these, but it would
be rather a mess unless we're willing to tweak the API definitions of
SplitIdentifierString, SplitDirectoriesString, or both. That might be
worth doing in future; but it seems pretty unsafe for a back-patched
bug fix, so for now accept the duplication.
Back-patch to all supported branches, as the previous fix was.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7585.1529435872@sss.pgh.pa.us
In commit 84940644de93, bms_add_range was added with an API to fail with
an error if an empty range was specified. This seems arbitrary and
unhelpful, so turn that case into a no-op instead. Callers that require
further verification on the arguments or result can apply them by
themselves.
This fixes the bug that partition pruning throws an API error for a case
involving the default partition of a default partition, as in the
included test case.
Reported-by: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>
Diagnosed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16590.1532622503@sss.pgh.pa.us
"make installcheck" and some related cases, when invoked from the toplevel
directory, start out by doing "make all" in src/test/regress. Since that's
one make recursion level down, the submake-generated-headers target will
do nothing, causing us to fail to create/update generated headers before
building pg_regress. This is, I believe, a new failure mode induced by
commit 3b8f6e75f, so let's fix it. To do so, we have to invoke
submake-generated-headers at the top level.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0401efec-68f1-679d-3ea3-21d4e8dd11af@gmail.com
pg_dump knew about printing ALTER TABLE ... REPLICA IDENTITY USING INDEX
for indexes declared as indexes, but it failed to print that for indexes
declared as unique or primary-key constraints. Per report from Achilleas
Mantzios.
This has been broken since the feature was introduced, AFAICS.
Back-patch to 9.4.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1e6cc5ad-b84a-7c07-8c08-a4d0c3cdc938@matrix.gatewaynet.com
As written, this policy constrained only the post-image not the pre-image
of rows, meaning that users could delete other users' rows or take
ownership of such rows, contrary to what the docs claimed would happen.
We need two separate policies to achieve the documented effect.
While at it, try to explain what's happening a bit more fully.
Per report from Олег Самойлов. Back-patch to 9.5 where this was added.
Thanks to Stephen Frost for off-list discussion.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3298321532002010@sas1-2b3c3045b736.qloud-c.yandex.net
Affected test queries have been testing the wrong thing since their
introduction in commit 4c1383efd132e4f532213c8a8cc63a455f55e344.
Back-patch to 9.3 (all supported versions).
Commit 5770172cb0c9df9e6ce27c507b449557e5b45124 documented secure schema
usage, and that advice suffices for using unqualified names securely.
Document, in typeconv-func primarily, the additional issues that arise
with qualified names. Back-patch to 9.3 (all supported versions).
Reviewed by Jonathan S. Katz.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180721012446.GA1840594@rfd.leadboat.com
Previously pg_upgrade checked for the pid file and started/stopped the
server to force a clean shutdown. However, "pg_ctl -m immediate"
removes the pid file but doesn't do a clean shutdown, so check
pg_controldata for a clean shutdown too.
Diagnosed-by: Vimalraj A
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFKBAK5e4Q-oTUuPPJ56EU_d2Rzodq6GWKS3ncAk3xo7hAsOZg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.3
During parallel index scans, if the current page to be read is deleted, we
skip it and try to get the next page for a scan without releasing the buffer
lock on the current page. To get the next page, sometimes it needs to wait
for another process to complete its scan and advance it to the next page.
Now, it is quite possible that the master backend has errored out before
advancing the scan and issued a termination signal for all workers. The
workers failed to notice the termination request during wait because the
interrupts are held due to buffer lock on the previous page. This lead to
all workers being stuck.
The fix is to release the buffer lock on current page before trying to get
the next page. We are already doing same in backward scans, but missed
it for forward scans.
Reported-by: Victor Yegorov
Bug: 15290
Diagnosed-by: Thomas Munro and Amit Kapila
Author: Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro
Tested-By: Thomas Munro and Victor Yegorov
Backpatch-through: 10 where parallel index scans were introduced
Discussion:https://postgr.es/m/153228422922.1395.1746424054206154747@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Depending on the platform used, this can cause a crash in the worst
case, or an unhelpful error message, so fail gracefully.
Author: Fabien Coelho
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.21.1807262302550.29874@lancre
Backpatch: 11-, where hash() has been added in pgbench.
We suppressed one of these test cases in commit feb1cc559 because
it was failing to produce the expected results on CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS
buildfarm members. But now we need another test with similar behavior,
so let's set up a test file that is expected to vary between regular and
CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS cases, and provide variant expected files.
Someday we should fix plpgsql's failure for change-of-field-type, and
then the discrepancy will go away and we can fold these tests back
into plpgsql_record.sql. But today is not that day.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87wotkfju1.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Since commit 6719b238e it's been possible for the values of plpgsql
record field variables to be exposed to the planner as Params.
(Before that, plpgsql never supplied values for such variables during
planning, so that the problematic code wasn't reached.) Other places
that touch potentially-type-mutable Params either cope gracefully or
do runtime-test-and-ereport checks that the type is what they expect.
But eval_const_expressions() just had an Assert, meaning that it either
failed the assertion or risked crashes due to using an incompatible
value.
In this case, rather than throwing an ereport immediately, we can just
not perform a const-substitution in case of a mismatch. This seems
important for the same reason that the Param fetch was speculative:
we might not actually reach this part of the expression at runtime.
Test case will follow in a separate commit.
Patch by me, pursuant to bug report from Andrew Gierth.
Back-patch to v11 where the previous commit appeared.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87wotkfju1.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Due to inlining it previously was possible that an ExprContext's
shutdown callback pointed to a JITed function. As the JIT context
previously was shut down before the shutdown callbacks were called,
that could lead to segfaults. Fix the ordering.
Reported-By: Dmitry Dolgov
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+q6zcWO7CeAJtHBxgcHn_hj+PenM=tvG0RJ93X1uEJ86+76Ug@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 11-, where JIT compilation was added
Previously the attribute was only checked for external functions
inlined, not "static" functions that had to be inlined as
dependencies.
This isn't really a bug, but makes debugging a bit harder. The new
behaviour also makes more sense. Therefore backpatch.
Author: Andres Freund
Backpatch: 11-, where JIT compilation was added
In a USE_UNNAMED_SEMAPHORES build, the default on Linux and FreeBSD
since commit ecb0d20a, we have an array of sem_t objects. This
turned out to reduce performance compared to the previous default
USE_SYSV_SEMAPHORES on an 8 socket system. Testing showed that the
lost performance could be regained by padding the array elements so
that they have their own cache lines. This matches what we do for
similar hot arrays (see LWLockPadded, WALInsertLockPadded).
Back-patch to 10, where unnamed semaphores were adopted as the default
semaphore interface on those operating systems.
Author: Thomas Munro
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Reported-by: Mithun Cy
Tested-by: Mithun Cy, Tom Lane, Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD__OugYDM3O%2BdyZnnZSbJprSfsGFJcQ1R%3De59T3hcLmDug4_w%40mail.gmail.com
Commit 4b0d28de06 has removed the prior checkpoint and related
facilities but has left WAL recycling based on the LSN of the prior
checkpoint, which causes incorrect calculations for WAL removal and
recycling for max_wal_size and min_wal_size. This commit changes things
so as the base calculation point is the last checkpoint generated.
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180723.135748.42558387.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Backpatch: 11-, where the prior checkpoint has been removed.
During the work of upstreaming my previous patches for gdb and perf
support the API changed. Adapt. Normally this wouldn't necessarily be
something to backpatch, but the previous API wasn't upstream, and at
least the gdb support is quite useful for debugging.
Author: Andres Freund
Backpatch: 11, where LLVM based JIT support was added.
The JIT compiled implementation missed maintaining
AggState->{current_set,curaggcontext}. That could lead to trouble
because the transition value could be allocated in the wrong context.
Reported-By: Rushabh Lathia
Diagnosed-By: Dmitry Dolgov
Author: Dmitry Dolgov, with minor changes by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGPqQf165-=+Drw3Voim7M5EjHT1zwPF9BQRjLFQzCzYnNZEiQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 11-, where JIT compilation support was added
I blew the dust off a Bourne shell (file date 1996, yea verily) and
tried to run test.sh with it. It mostly worked, but I found that the
temp-directory creation code introduced by commit be76a6d39 was not
compatible, for a couple of reasons: this shell thinks "set -e" should
force an exit if a command within backticks fails, and it also thinks code
within braces should be executed by a sub-shell, meaning that variable
settings don't propagate back up to the parent shell. In view of Victor
Wagner's report that Solaris is still using pre-POSIX shells, seems like
we oughta make this case work. It's not like the code is any less
idiomatic this way; the prior coding technique appeared nowhere else.
(There is a remaining bash-ism here, which is that $RANDOM doesn't do
what the code hopes in non-bash shells. But the use of $$ elsewhere in
that path should be enough to ensure uniqueness and some amount of
randomness, so I think it's okay as-is.)
Back-patch to all supported branches, as the previous commit was.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180720153820.69e9ae6c@fafnir.local.vm
Double-quote $PGDATA in "find" commands introduced by commit da9b580d8,
in case that path contains spaces or other special characters.
Adjust a few other places so that quoting is done more consistently.
None of the others are actual bugs AFAICS, but it's confusing to readers
if the same thing is done differently in different places.
Noted by Tels.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c96303c04c360bbedaa04f90f515745b.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com
Most of test.sh uses traditional backtick syntax for command substitution,
but commit da9b580d8 introduced two uses of $(...) syntax, which is not
recognized by very old shells. Bring those into line with the rest.
Victor Wagner
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180720153820.69e9ae6c@fafnir.local.vm
When built using OpenSSL, pg_strong_random() uses RAND_bytes() to
generate the random number. On very rare occasions that can fail, if
its PRNG has not been seeded with enough data. Additionally, once it
does fail, all subsequent calls will also fail until more seed data is
added. Since this is required during backend startup, this can result
in all new backends failing to start until a postmaster restart.
Guard against that by checking the state of OpenSSL's PRNG using
RAND_status(), and if necessary (very rarely), seeding it using
RAND_poll().
Back-patch to v10, where pg_strong_random() was introduced.
Dean Rasheed and Michael Paquier.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCXMtxbzSAvyKKk5uCRf9pNt4UV%2BF_5v%3DgLfJUuPxU4Ytg%40mail.gmail.com
PostgreSQL 9.4 introduces posting list compression in GIN. This feature
supports online upgrade, so that after pg_upgrade uncompressed posting
lists are compressed on-the-fly. Underlying code appears to always
expect at least one item on uncompressed posting list page. But there
could be completely empty pages, because VACUUM never deletes leftmost
and rightmost pages from posting trees. This commit fixes that.
Reported-by: Sivasubramanian Ramasubramanian
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1531867212836.63354%40amazon.com
Author: Sivasubramanian Ramasubramanian, Alexander Korotkov
Backpatch-through: 9.4
transformPartitionSpec rejected duplicate simple partition columns
(e.g., "PARTITION BY RANGE (x,x)") but paid no attention to expression
columns, resulting in inconsistent behavior. Worse, cases like
"PARTITION BY RANGE (x,(x))") were accepted but would then result in
dump/reload failures, since the expression (x) would get simplified
to a plain column later.
There seems no better reason for this restriction than there was for
the one against duplicate included index columns (cf commit 701fd0bbc),
so let's just remove it.
Back-patch to v10 where this code was added.
Report and patch by Yugo Nagata.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180712165939.36b12aff.nagata@sraoss.co.jp
This is essential information when looking at an index that has
"included" columns. Per discussion, follow the style used in \dC
and some other places: column header is "Key?" and values are "yes"
or "no" (all translatable).
While at it, revise describeOneTableDetails to be a bit more maintainable:
avoid hard-wired column numbers and multiple repetitions of what needs
to be identical test logic. This also results in the emitted catalog
query corresponding more closely to what we print, which should be a
benefit to users of ECHO_HIDDEN mode, and perhaps a bit faster too
(the old logic sometimes asked for values it would not print, even
ones that are fairly expensive to get).
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21724.1531943735@sss.pgh.pa.us
The multi-argument form of pg_get_indexdef() failed to print anything when
asked to print a single index column that is an included column rather than
a key column. This seems an unintentional result of someone having tried
to take a short-cut and use the attrsOnly flag for two different purposes.
To fix, split said flag into two flags, attrsOnly which suppresses
non-attribute info, and keysOnly which suppresses included columns.
Add a test case using psql's \d command, which relies on that function.
(It's mighty tempting at this point to replace pg_get_indexdef_worker's
mess of boolean flag arguments with a single bitmask-of-flags argument,
which would allow making the call sites much more self-documenting.
But I refrained for the moment.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/21724.1531943735@sss.pgh.pa.us
The code added by 9c7d06d60680 was a bit obscure; clarify that by
rewriting the comments. Lack of clarity has already caused bugs, so
it's a worthy goal.
Co-authored-by: Arseny Sher <a.sher@postgrespro.ru>
Co-authored-by: Michaël Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Petr Jelínek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87y3fgoyrn.fsf@ars-thinkpad
GatherMergePath (introduced in 10) and CustomPath (introduced in 9.5)
have gone missing. The order of the Path nodes was inconsistent with
what is listed in nodes.h, so make the order consistent at the same time
to ease future checks and additions.
Author: Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBQMLoc=ohH-oocuAPsELrmk8_EsRJjOyR8FQLZkbE0wA@mail.gmail.com
Instead of MergeAppendPath, MergeAppend nodes were considered. This
code is not covered by any tests now, which should be addressed at some
point.
This is an oversight from f49842d, which introduced partition-wise joins
in v11, so back-patch down to that.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180718062202.GC8565@paquier.xyz
This script supposed that if it turned hot_standby_feedback on and then
shut down the standby server, at least one feedback message would be
guaranteed to be sent before the standby stops. But there is no such
guarantee, if the standby's walreceiver process is slow enough --- and
we've seen multiple failures in the buildfarm showing that that does
happen in practice. While we could rearrange the walreceiver logic to
make it less likely, it seems probably impossible to create a really
bulletproof guarantee of that sort; and if we tried, we might create
situations where the walreceiver wouldn't react in a timely manner to
shutdown commands. It seems better instead to remove the script's
assumption that feedback will occur before shutdown.
But once we do that, these last few tests seem quite redundant with
the earlier tests in the script. So let's just drop them altogether
and save some buildfarm cycles.
Backpatch to v10 where these tests were added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1922.1531592205@sss.pgh.pa.us
The initial version of the included-index-column feature stated that
included columns couldn't be the same as any key column of the index.
While it'd be pretty silly to do that, since the included column would be
entirely redundant, we've never prohibited redundant index columns before
so it's not very consistent to do so here. Moreover, the prohibition
was itself badly implemented, so that it failed to reject columns that
were effectively identical but not spelled quite alike, as reported by
Aditya Toshniwal.
(Moreover, it's not hard to imagine that for some non-btree index types,
such cases would be non-silly anyhow: the index might use a lossy
representation for key columns but be able to support retrieval of the
original form of included columns.)
Hence, let's just drop the prohibition.
In passing, do some copy-editing on the documentation for the
included-column feature.
Yugo Nagata; documentation and test corrections by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAM9w-_mhBCys4fQNfaiQKTRrVWtoFrZ-wXmDuE9Nj5y-Y7aDKQ@mail.gmail.com
A collection of typos I happened to spot while reading code, as well as
grepping for common mistakes.
Backpatch to all supported versions, as applicable, to avoid conflicts
when backporting other commits in the future.
It's more logical this way, since the new ordering matches the way the
tables are created; but in any case, the previous location of PARTITION OF
did not appear carefully chosen anyway (since it didn't match the
location in which it appears in the synopsys either, which is what we
normally do.)
In the PARTITION BY stanza, add a link to the partitioning section in
the DDL chapter, too.
Suggested-by: David G. Johnston
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwY4Ld7ecxL_KAmaxwt0FUu5VcPPN2L4dh+3BeYbrdBa5g@mail.gmail.com
The existing error message was complaining that the column is not an
expression, which is not correct. Introduce a suitable wording
variation and a test.
Co-authored-by: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180628182803.e4632d5a.nagata@sraoss.co.jp
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
The original code was unable to prune partitions that could not possibly
contain NULL values, when the query specified less than all columns in a
multicolumn partition key. Reorder the if-tests so that it is, and add
more commentary and regression tests.
Reported-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Co-authored-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Co-authored-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFjFpRc7qjLUfXLVBBC_HAnx644sjTYM=qVoT3TJ840HPbsTXw@mail.gmail.com
Since the old logic was completely unaware of subtransactions, a
change made in a subsequently-aborted subtransaction would still cause
workers to be stopped at toplevel transaction commit. Fix that by
managing a stack of worker lists rather than just one.
Amit Khandekar and Robert Haas
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9eaG_mWqiOTA2LfAug-VRNn1hrhf50Xi1YroxL37QkZNg@mail.gmail.com
Update links that resulted in redirects. Most are changes from http to
https, but there are also some other minor edits. (There are still some
redirects where the target URL looks less elegant than the one we
currently have. I have left those as is.)
In final_cost_hashjoin(), commit 9c7f5229a allowed inner_unique cases
to follow a code path previously used only for SEMI/ANTI joins; but it
neglected to fix an if-test within that path that assumed SEMI and ANTI
were the only possible cases. This resulted in a wrong value for
hashjointuples, and an ensuing bad cost estimate, for inner_unique normal
joins. Fortunately, for inner_unique normal joins we can assume the number
of joined tuples is the same as for a SEMI join; so there's no need for
more code, we just have to invert the test to check for ANTI not SEMI.
It turns out that in two contrib tests in which commit 9c7f5229a
changed the plan expected for a query, the change was actually wrong
and induced by this estimation error, not by any real improvement.
Hence this patch also reverts those changes.
Per report from RK Korlapati. Backpatch to v10 where the error was
introduced.
David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+SNy03bhq0fodsfOkeWDCreNjJVjsdHwUsb7AG=jpe0PtZc_g@mail.gmail.com
