Commit 597a87ccc introduced a latch pointer variable to replace use
of a long-lived shared latch in the shared WalRcvData structure.
This was not well thought out, because there are now hazards of the
pointer variable changing while it's being inspected by another
process. This could obviously lead to a core dump in code like
if (WalRcv->latch)
SetLatch(WalRcv->latch);
and there's a more remote risk of a torn read, if we have any
platforms where reading/writing a pointer is not atomic.
An actual problem would occur only if the walreceiver process
exits (gracefully) while the startup process is trying to
signal it, but that seems well within the realm of possibility.
To fix, treat the pointer variable (not the referenced latch)
as being protected by the WalRcv->mutex spinlock. There
remains a race condition that we could apply SetLatch to a
process latch that no longer belongs to the walreceiver, but
I believe that's harmless: at worst it'd cause an extra wakeup
of the next process to use that PGPROC structure.
Back-patch to v10 where the faulty code was added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/22735.1507048202@sss.pgh.pa.us
1. Since commit b1a9bad9e744 we had pstrdup() inside a
spinlock-protected critical section; reported by Andreas Seltenreich.
Turn those into strlcpy() to stack-allocated variables instead.
Backpatch to 9.6.
2. Since commit 9ed551e0a4fd we had a pfree() uselessly inside a
spinlock-protected critical section. Tom Lane noticed in code review.
Move down. Backpatch to 9.6.
3. Since commit 64233902d22b we had GetCurrentTimestamp() (a kernel
call) inside a spinlock-protected critical section. Tom Lane noticed in
code review. Move it up. Backpatch to 9.2.
4. Since commit 1bb2558046cc we did elog(PANIC) while holding spinlock.
Tom Lane noticed in code review. Release spinlock before dying.
Backpatch to 9.2.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87h8vhtgj2.fsf@ansel.ydns.eu
Buildfarm members skink and sungazer have both recently failed this
test, with symptoms indicating that the default 3-second timeout
isn't quite enough for those very slow systems. There's no reason
to be miserly with this timeout, so boost it to 60 seconds.
Back-patch to all versions containing this test. That may be overkill,
because the failure has only been observed in the v10 branch, but
I don't feel like having to revisit this later.
If --rate was used to throttle pgbench, it failed to sleep when it had
nothing to do, leading to a busy-wait with 100% CPU usage. This bug was
introduced in the refactoring in v10. Before that, sleep() was called with
a timeout, even when there were no file descriptors to wait for.
Reported by Jeff Janes, patch by Fabien COELHO. Backpatch to v10.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMkU%3D1x5hoX0pLLKPRnXCy0T8uHoDvXdq%2B7kAM9eoC9_z72ucw%40mail.gmail.com
get_rel_oids used to not take any relation locks at all, but that stopped
being a good idea with commit 3c3bb9933, which inserted a syscache lookup
into the function. A concurrent DROP TABLE could now produce "cache lookup
failed", which we don't want to have happen in normal operation. The best
solution seems to be to transiently take a lock on the relation named by
the RangeVar (which also makes the result of RangeVarGetRelid a lot less
spongy). But we shouldn't hold the lock beyond this function, because we
don't want VACUUM to lock more than one table at a time. (That would not
be a big problem right now, but it will become one after the pending
feature patch to allow multiple tables to be named in VACUUM.)
In passing, adjust vacuum_rel and analyze_rel to document that we don't
trust the passed RangeVar to be accurate, and allow the RangeVar to
possibly be NULL --- which it is anyway for a whole-database VACUUM,
though we accidentally didn't crash for that case.
The passed RangeVar is in fact inaccurate when dealing with a child
partition, as of v10, and it has been wrong for a whole long time in the
case of vacuum_rel() recursing to a TOAST table. None of these things
present visible bugs up to now, because the passed RangeVar is in fact
only consulted for autovacuum logging, and in that particular context it's
always accurate because autovacuum doesn't let vacuum.c expand partitions
nor recurse to toast tables. Still, this seems like trouble waiting to
happen, so let's nail the door at least partly shut. (Further cleanup
is planned, in HEAD only, as part of the pending feature patch.)
Fix some sadly inaccurate/obsolete comments too. Back-patch to v10.
Michael Paquier and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/25023.1506107590@sss.pgh.pa.us
For \d sequencename, the psql code just did SELECT * FROM sequencename
to get the information to display, but this does not contain much
interesting information anymore in PostgreSQL 10, because the metadata
has been moved to a separate system catalog.
This patch creates a newly designed sequence display that is not merely
an extension of the general relation/table display as it was previously.
Example:
PostgreSQL 9.6:
=> \d foobar
Sequence "public.foobar"
Column | Type | Value
---------------+---------+---------------------
sequence_name | name | foobar
last_value | bigint | 1
start_value | bigint | 1
increment_by | bigint | 1
max_value | bigint | 9223372036854775807
min_value | bigint | 1
cache_value | bigint | 1
log_cnt | bigint | 0
is_cycled | boolean | f
is_called | boolean | f
PostgreSQL 10 before this change:
=> \d foobar
Sequence "public.foobar"
Column | Type | Value
------------+---------+-------
last_value | bigint | 1
log_cnt | bigint | 0
is_called | boolean | f
New:
=> \d foobar
Sequence "public.foobar"
Type | Start | Minimum | Maximum | Increment | Cycles? | Cache
--------+-------+---------+---------------------+-----------+---------+-------
bigint | 1 | 1 | 9223372036854775807 | 1 | no | 1
Reviewed-by: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
Vacuum calls page-level HOT prune to remove dead HOT tuples before doing
liveness checks (HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum) on the remaining tuples. But
concurrent transaction commit/abort may turn DEAD some of the HOT tuples
that survived the prune, before HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum tests them.
This happens to activate the code that decides to freeze the tuple ...
which resuscitates it, duplicating data.
(This is especially bad if there's any unique constraints, because those
are now internally violated due to the duplicate entries, though you
won't know until you try to REINDEX or dump/restore the table.)
One possible fix would be to simply skip doing anything to the tuple,
and hope that the next HOT prune would remove it. But there is a
problem: if the tuple is older than freeze horizon, this would leave an
unfrozen XID behind, and if no HOT prune happens to clean it up before
the containing pg_clog segment is truncated away, it'd later cause an
error when the XID is looked up.
Fix the problem by having the tuple freezing routines cope with the
situation: don't freeze the tuple (and keep it dead). In the cases that
the XID is older than the freeze age, set the HEAP_XMAX_COMMITTED flag
so that there is no need to look up the XID in pg_clog later on.
An isolation test is included, authored by Michael Paquier, loosely
based on Daniel Wood's original reproducer. It only tests one
particular scenario, though, not all the possible ways for this problem
to surface; it be good to have a more reliable way to test this more
fully, but it'd require more work.
In message https://postgr.es/m/20170911140103.5akxptyrwgpc25bw@alvherre.pgsql
I outlined another test case (more closely matching Dan Wood's) that
exposed a few more ways for the problem to occur.
Backpatch all the way back to 9.3, where this problem was introduced by
multixact juggling. In branches 9.3 and 9.4, this includes a backpatch
of commit e5ff9fefcd50 (of 9.5 era), since the original is not
correctable without matching the coding pattern in 9.5 up.
Reported-by: Daniel Wood
Diagnosed-by: Daniel Wood
Reviewed-by: Yi Wen Wong, Michaël Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E5711E62-8FDF-4DCA-A888-C200BF6B5742@amazon.com
float8_numeric() and float4_numeric() failed to consider the possibility
that the input is an IEEE infinity. The results depended on the
platform-specific behavior of sprintf(): on most platforms you'd get
something like
ERROR: invalid input syntax for type numeric: "inf"
but at least on Windows it's possible for the conversion to succeed and
deliver a finite value (typically 1), due to a nonstandard output format
from sprintf and lack of syntax error checking in these functions.
Since our numeric type lacks the concept of infinity, a suitable conversion
is impossible; the best thing to do is throw an explicit error before
letting sprintf do its thing.
While at it, let's use snprintf not sprintf. Overrunning the buffer
should be impossible if sprintf does what it's supposed to, but this
is cheap insurance against a stack smash if it doesn't.
Problem reported by Taiki Kondo. Patch by me based on fix suggestion
from KaiGai Kohei. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/12A9442FBAE80D4E8953883E0B84E088C8C7A2@BPXM01GP.gisp.nec.co.jp
This reverts commit 15bc038f9, along with the followon commits 1635e80d3
and 984c92074 that tried to clean up the problems exposed by bug #14825.
The result was incomplete because it failed to address parallel-query
requirements. With 10.0 release so close upon us, now does not seem like
the time to be adding more code to fix that. I hope we can un-revert this
code and add the missing parallel query support during the v11 cycle.
Back-patch to v10.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170922185904.1448.16585@wrigleys.postgresql.org
posix_fallocate() is not quite a drop-in replacement for fallocate(),
because it is defined to return the error code as its function result,
not in "errno". I (tgl) missed this because RHEL6's version seems
to set errno as well. That is not the case on more modern Linuxen,
though, as per buildfarm results.
Aside from fixing the return-convention confusion, remove the test
for ENOSYS; we expect that glibc will mask that for posix_fallocate,
though it does not for fallocate. Keep the test for EINTR, because
POSIX specifies that as a possible result, and buildfarm results
suggest that it can happen in practice.
Back-patch to 9.4, like the previous commit.
Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1002664500.12301802.1471008223422.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com
The blacklist mechanism added by the preceding commit directly fixes
most of the practical cases that the same-transaction test was meant
to cover. What remains is use-cases like
begin;
create type e as enum('x');
alter type e add value 'y';
-- use 'y' somehow
commit;
However, because the same-transaction test is heuristic, it fails on
small variants of that, such as renaming the type or changing its
owner. Rather than try to explain the behavior to users, let's
remove it and just have a rule that the newly added value can't be
used before being committed, full stop. Perhaps later it will be
worth the implementation effort and overhead to have a more accurate
test for type-was-created-in-this-transaction. We'll wait for some
field experience with v10 before deciding to do that.
Back-patch to v10.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170922185904.1448.16585@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Commit 15bc038f9 allowed ALTER TYPE ADD VALUE to be executed inside
transaction blocks, by disallowing the use of the added value later
in the same transaction, except under limited circumstances. However,
the test for "limited circumstances" was heuristic and could reject
references to enum values that were created during CREATE TYPE AS ENUM,
not just later. This breaks the use-case of restoring pg_dump scripts
in a single transaction, as reported in bug #14825 from Balazs Szilfai.
We can improve this by keeping a "blacklist" table of enum value OIDs
created by ALTER TYPE ADD VALUE during the current transaction. Any
visible-but-uncommitted value whose OID is not in the blacklist must
have been created by CREATE TYPE AS ENUM, and can be used safely
because it could not have a lifespan shorter than its parent enum type.
This change also removes the restriction that a renamed enum value
can't be used before being committed (unless it was on the blacklist).
Andrew Dunstan, with cosmetic improvements by me.
Back-patch to v10.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170922185904.1448.16585@wrigleys.postgresql.org
A FOR ALL TABLES publication naturally considers all base tables to be a
candidate for replication. This includes transient heaps that are
created during a table rewrite during DDL. This causes failures on the
subscriber side because it will not have a table like pg_temp_16386 to
receive data (and if it did, it would be the wrong table).
The prevent this problem, we filter out any tables that match this
naming pattern and match an actual table from FOR ALL TABLES
publications. This is only a heuristic, meaning that user tables that
match that naming could accidentally be omitted. A more robust solution
might require an explicit marking of such tables in pg_class somehow.
Reported-by: yxq <yxq@o2.pl>
Bug: #14785
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
On Linux, shared memory segments created with shm_open() are backed by
swap files created in tmpfs. If the swap file needs to be extended,
but there's no tmpfs space left, you get a very unfriendly SIGBUS trap.
To avoid this, force allocation of the full request size when we create
the segment. This adds a few cycles, but none that we wouldn't expend
later anyway, assuming the request isn't hugely bigger than the actual
need.
Make this code #ifdef __linux__, because (a) there's not currently a
reason to think the same problem exists on other platforms, and (b)
applying posix_fallocate() to an FD created by shm_open() isn't very
portable anyway.
Back-patch to 9.4 where the DSM code came in.
Thomas Munro, per a bug report from Amul Sul
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1002664500.12301802.1471008223422.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com
There is no reason to ever prevent the use of SortSupport on Windows
when ICU locales are used. We previously avoided SortSupport on Windows
with UTF-8 server encoding and a non C-locale due to restrictions in
Windows' libc functionality.
This is now considered to be a restriction in one platform's libc
collation provider, and not a more general platform restriction.
Reported-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
One test case was meant to check that pg_basebackup does not succeed
when a slot is specified with -S but WAL streaming is not selected,
which used to require specifying -X stream. Since -X stream is the
default in PostgreSQL 10, this test case no longer covers that meaning,
but the pg_basebackup invocation happened to fail anyway for the
unrelated reason that the specified replication slot does not exist. To
fix, move the test case to later in the file where the slot does exist,
and add -X none to the invocation so that it covers the originally meant
behavior.
extracted from a patch by Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>
In two cases, we set a different umask for some piece of code and
restore it afterwards. But if the contained code errors out, the umask
is not restored. So add TRY/CATCH blocks to fix that.
The placement of the ifdef blocks in formatting.c was pretty bogus, so
the code failed to compile if USE_WIDE_UPPER_LOWER was not defined.
Reported-by: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
This patch absorbs a few unreleased fixes in the IANA code.
It corresponds to commit 2d8b944c1cec0808ac4f7a9ee1a463c28f9cd00a
in https://github.com/eggert/tz. Non-cosmetic changes include:
TZDEFRULESTRING is updated to match current US DST practice,
rather than what it was over ten years ago. This only matters
for interpretation of POSIX-style zone names (e.g., "EST5EDT"),
and only if the timezone database doesn't include either an exact
match for the zone name or a "posixrules" entry. The latter
should not be true in any current Postgres installation, but
this could possibly matter when using --with-system-tzdata.
Get rid of a nonportable use of "++var" on a bool var.
This is part of a larger fix that eliminates some vestigial
support for consecutive leap seconds, and adds checks to
the "zic" compiler that the data files do not specify that.
Remove a couple of ancient compatibility hacks. The IANA
crew think these are obsolete, and I tend to agree. But
perhaps our buildfarm will think different.
Back-patch to all supported branches, in line with our policy
that all branches should be using current IANA code. Before v10,
this includes application of current pgindent rules, to avoid
whitespace problems in future back-patches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dsWhf-0000pT-F9@gemulon.postgresql.org
Previously, the code didn't think about this case and would just try to
analyze such a column twice. That would fail at the point of inserting
the second version of the pg_statistic row, with obscure error messsages
like "duplicate key value violates unique constraint" or "tuple already
updated by self", depending on context and PG version. We could allow
the case by ignoring duplicate column specifications, but it seems better
to reject it explicitly.
The bogus error messages seem like arguably a bug, so back-patch to
all supported versions.
Nathan Bossart, per a report from Michael Paquier, and whacked
around a bit by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E061A8E3-5E3D-494D-94F0-E8A9B312BBFC@amazon.com
pg_newlocale_from_collation() used malloc() and strdup() directly,
which is generally not per backend coding style, and it didn't bother
to check for failure results, but would just SIGSEGV instead. Also,
if one of the numerous error checks in the middle of the function
failed, the already-allocated memory would be leaked permanently.
Admittedly, it's not a lot of memory, but it could build up if this
function were called repeatedly for a bad collation.
The first two problems are easily cured by palloc'ing in TopMemoryContext
instead of calling libc directly. We can fairly easily dodge the leakage
problem for the struct pg_locale_struct by filling in a temporary variable
and allocating permanent storage only once we reach the bottom of the
function. It's harder to get rid of the potential leakage for ICU's copy
of the collcollate string, but at least that's only allocated after most
of the error checks; so live with that aspect.
Back-patch to v10 where this code came in, with one or another of the
ICU patches.
005_encoding.pl neglected to wait for the subscriber's initial
synchronization to happen. While we have not seen this fail in
the buildfarm, it's pretty easy to demonstrate there's an issue
by hacking logicalrep_worker_launch() to fail most of the time.
Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/27032.1505749806@sss.pgh.pa.us
If we failed to get a background worker slot, the code just walked
away from the logicalrep-worker slot it already had, leaving that
looking like the worker is still starting up. This led to an indefinite
hang in subscription startup, as reported by Thomas Munro. We must
release the slot on failure.
Also fix a thinko: we must capture the worker slot's generation before
releasing LogicalRepWorkerLock the first time, else testing to see if
it's changed is pretty meaningless.
BTW, the CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in WaitForReplicationWorkerAttach is a
ticking time bomb, even without considering the possibility of elog(ERROR)
in one of the other functions it calls. Really, this entire business needs
a redesign with some actual thought about error recovery. But for now
I'm just band-aiding the case observed in testing.
Back-patch to v10 where this code was added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=2bP3TBMFBArP6o20AZaRduWjMnjCjt22hSdnA-EvrtCw@mail.gmail.com
When ALTER SUBSCRIPTION DISABLE is run in the same transaction before
DROP SUBSCRIPTION, the latter will hang because workers will still be
running, not having seen the DISABLE committed, and DROP SUBSCRIPTION
will wait until the workers have vacated the replication origin slots.
Previously, DROP SUBSCRIPTION killed the logical replication workers
immediately only if it was going to drop the replication slot, otherwise
it scheduled the worker killing for the end of the transaction, as a
result of 7e174fa793a2df89fe03d002a5087ef67abcdde8. This, however,
causes the present problem. To fix, kill the workers immediately in all
cases. This covers all cases: A subscription that doesn't have a
replication slot must be disabled. It was either disabled in the same
transaction, or it was already disabled before the current transaction,
but then there shouldn't be any workers left and this won't make a
difference.
Reported-by: Arseny Sher <a.sher@postgrespro.ru>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/87mv6av84w.fsf%40ars-thinkpad
AfterTriggerEndQuery correctly notes that the query_stack could get
repalloc'd during a trigger firing, but it nonetheless passes the address
of a query_stack entry to afterTriggerInvokeEvents, so that if such a
repalloc occurs, afterTriggerInvokeEvents is already working with an
obsolete dangling pointer while it scans the rest of the events. Oops.
The only code at risk is its "delete_ok" cleanup code, so we can
prevent unsafe behavior by passing delete_ok = false instead of true.
However, that could have a significant performance penalty, because the
point of passing delete_ok = true is to not have to re-scan possibly
a large number of dead trigger events on the next time through the loop.
There's more than one way to skin that cat, though. What we can do is
delete all the "chunks" in the event list except the last one, since
we know all events in them must be dead. Deleting the chunks is work
we'd have had to do later in AfterTriggerEndQuery anyway, and it ends
up saving rescanning of just about the same events we'd have gotten
rid of with delete_ok = true.
In v10 and HEAD, we also have to be careful to mop up any per-table
after_trig_events pointers that would become dangling. This is slightly
annoying, but I don't think that normal use-cases will traverse this code
path often enough for it to be a performance problem.
It's pretty hard to hit this in practice because of the unlikelihood
of the query_stack getting resized at just the wrong time. Nonetheless,
it's definitely a live bug of ancient standing, so back-patch to all
supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2891.1505419542@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit 0f79440fb introduced mechanism to keep AFTER STATEMENT triggers
from firing more than once per statement, which was formerly possible
if more than one FK enforcement action had to be applied to a given
table. Add a similar mechanism for BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, so that
we don't have the unexpected situation of firing BEFORE STATEMENT
triggers more often than AFTER STATEMENT.
As with the previous patch, back-patch to v10.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/22315.1505584992@sss.pgh.pa.us
The standard says that all changes of the same kind (insert, update, or
delete) caused in one table by a single SQL statement should be reported
in a single transition table; and by that, they mean to include foreign key
enforcement actions cascading from the statement's direct effects. It's
also reasonable to conclude that if the standard had wCTEs, they would say
that effects of wCTEs applying to the same table as each other or the outer
statement should be merged into one transition table. We weren't doing it
like that.
Hence, arrange to merge tuples from multiple update actions into a single
transition table as much as we can. There is a problem, which is that if
the firing of FK enforcement triggers and after-row triggers with
transition tables is interspersed, we might need to report more tuples
after some triggers have already seen the transition table. It seems like
a bad idea for the transition table to be mutable between trigger calls.
There's no good way around this without a major redesign of the FK logic,
so for now, resolve it by opening a new transition table each time this
happens.
Also, ensure that AFTER STATEMENT triggers fire just once per statement,
or once per transition table when we're forced to make more than one.
Previous versions of Postgres have allowed each FK enforcement query
to cause an additional firing of the AFTER STATEMENT triggers for the
referencing table, but that's certainly not per spec. (We're still
doing multiple firings of BEFORE STATEMENT triggers, though; is that
something worth changing?)
Also, forbid using transition tables with column-specific UPDATE triggers.
The spec requires such transition tables to show only the tuples for which
the UPDATE trigger would have fired, which means maintaining multiple
transition tables or else somehow filtering the contents at readout.
Maybe someday we'll bother to support that option, but it looks like a
lot of trouble for a marginal feature.
The transition tables are now managed by the AfterTriggers data structures,
rather than being directly the responsibility of ModifyTable nodes. This
removes a subtransaction-lifespan memory leak introduced by my previous
band-aid patch 3c4359521.
In passing, refactor the AfterTriggers data structures to reduce the
management overhead for them, by using arrays of structs rather than
several parallel arrays for per-query-level and per-subtransaction state.
I failed to resist the temptation to do some copy-editing on the SGML
docs about triggers, above and beyond merely documenting the effects
of this patch.
Back-patch to v10, because we don't want the semantics of transition
tables to change post-release.
Patch by me, with help and review from Thomas Munro.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170909064853.25630.12825@wrigleys.postgresql.org
During the development of d47cfef711 the CFI()s in ExecScan() were
moved back and forth, ending up in the wrong place. Thus queries that
largely spend their time in ExecScan(), and have neither projection
nor a qual, can't be cancelled in a timely manner.
Reported-By: Jeff Janes
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1weDXp8eLLPt9SO1LEUsJYYK9cScaGhLKpuN+WbYo9b5g@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 10, as d47cfef711
The order in which GRANTs are output is important as GRANTs which have
been GRANT'd by individuals via WITH GRANT OPTION GRANTs have to come
after the GRANT which included the WITH GRANT OPTION. This happens
naturally in the backend during normal operation as we only change
existing ACLs in-place, only add new ACLs to the end, and when removing
an ACL we remove any which depend on it also.
Also, adjust the comments in acl.h to make this clear.
Unfortunately, the updates to pg_dump to handle initial privileges
involved pulling apart ACLs and then combining them back together and
could end up putting them back together in an invalid order, leading to
dumps which wouldn't restore.
Fix this by adjusting the queries used by pg_dump to ensure that the
ACLs are rebuilt in the same order in which they were originally.
Back-patch to 9.6 where the changes for initial privileges were done.
The previous error message when attempting to run a general SQL command
in a physical replication WAL sender was a bit sloppy.
Reported-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
When copying from an active database tree, it's possible for files to be
deleted after we see them in a readdir() scan but before we can open them.
(Once we've got a file open, we don't expect any further errors from it
getting unlinked, though.) Tweak RecursiveCopy so it can cope with this
case, so as to avoid irreproducible test failures.
Back-patch to 9.6 where this code was added. In v10 and HEAD, also
remove unused "use RecursiveCopy" in one recovery test script.
Michael Paquier and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/24621.1504924323@sss.pgh.pa.us
