After scanning the line pointers on a heap page during the first phase
of vacuum, we use the information collected to decide whether to use
the assembled freeze plans.
Move this decision logic into a helper function to improve readability.
While here, rename a PruneState member and disambiguate some local
variables in heap_page_prune_and_freeze().
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2wk7jo4m4qwh5sn33pfgerdjfujebbccsmmlownybddbh6nawl%40mdyyqpqzxjek
The present coding of dblink's get_rel_from_relname() predates the
introduction of RangeVarGetRelidExtended(), which provides a way to
check permissions before locking the relation. This commit adjusts
get_rel_from_relname() to use that function.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aOgmi6avE6qMw_6t%40nathan
Previously WinCheckAndInitializeNullTreatment() used elog() to emit an
error message. ereport() should be used instead because it's a
user-facing error. Also use existing get_func_name() to get a
function's name, rather than own implementation.
Moreover add an assertion to validate winobj parameter, just like
other window function API.
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Author: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2952409.1760023154%40sss.pgh.pa.us
get_pg_version() is able to return a version number, that can be used
for comparisons based on PG_VERSION_NUM. A macro is added to convert
the result to a major version number, to work with PG_MAJORVERSION_NUM.
It is possible to pass to the routine an optional argument, where the
contents retrieved from PG_VERSION are saved. This requirement matters
for some of the frontend code (one example: pg_upgrade wants that for
tablespace paths with a version number strictly older than v10).
This will be used by a set of follow-up patches, to be consumed in
various frontend tools that duplicate a logic similar to do what this
new routine does, like:
- pg_resetwal
- pg_combinebackup
- pg_createsubscriber
- pg_upgrade
This routine supports both the post-v10 version number and the older
flavor (aka 9.6), as required at least by pg_upgrade.
Author: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aOiirvWJzwdVCXph@paquier.xyz
The version number calculated by read_pg_version_file() is multiplied
once by 10000, to be able to do comparisons based on PG_VERSION_NUM or
equivalents with a minor version included. However, the version number
given sync_pgdata() was multiplied by 10000 a second time, leading to an
overestimated number.
This issue was harmless (still incorrect) as pg_combinebackup does not
support versions of Postgres older than v10, and sync_pgdata() only
includes a version check due to the rename of pg_xlog/ to pg_wal/. This
folder rename happened in the development cycle of v10. This would
become a problem if in the future sync_pgdata() is changed to have more
version-specific checks.
Oversight in dc21234005, so backpatch down to v17.
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aOil5d0y87ZM_wsZ@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 17
Instead of emitting a separate XLOG_HEAP2_VISIBLE WAL record for each
page that becomes all-visible in vacuum's third phase, specify the VM
changes in the already emitted XLOG_HEAP2_PRUNE_VACUUM_CLEANUP record.
Visibility checks are now performed before marking dead items unused.
This is safe because the heap page is held under exclusive lock for the
entire operation.
This reduces the number of WAL records generated by VACUUM phase III by
up to 50%.
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/CAAKRu_ZMw6Npd_qm2KM%2BFwQ3cMOMx1Dh3VMhp8-V7SOLxdK9-g%40mail.gmail.com
log_error() would probably fail completely if used, and would
certainly print garbage for anything that needed to be interpolated
into the message, because it was failing to use the correct printing
subroutine for a va_list argument.
This bug likely went undetected because the error cases this code
is used for are rarely exercised - they only occur when Windows
security API calls fail catastrophically (out of memory, security
subsystem corruption, etc).
The FRONTEND variant can be fixed just by calling vfprintf()
instead of fprintf(). However, there was no va_list variant
of write_stderr(), so create one by refactoring that function.
Following the usual naming convention for such things, call
it vwrite_stderr().
Author: Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAF+pBj8goe4fRmZ0V3Cs6eyWzYLvK+HvFLYEYWG=TzaM+tWPnw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
There was some confusion around how to adjust the n_distinct estimates
for partitioned tables. Here we try and clarify that
n_distinct_inherited needs to be adjusted rather than n_distinct.
Also fix some slightly misleading text which was talking about table
size rather than table rows, fix a grammatical error, and adjust some
text which indicated that ANALYZE was performing calculations based on
the n_distinct settings. Really it's the query planner that does this
and ANALYZE only stores the overridden n_distinct estimate value in
pg_statistic.
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrL7a-ZytM1SP8Uk9nEw9bR2CPzVb+uP+bcNj=_q-ZmVw@mail.gmail.com
I was distressed to find that reading an LZ4-compressed toc.dat
file was hundreds of times slower than it ought to be. On
investigation, the blame mostly affixes to LZ4Stream_read_overflow's
habit of memmove'ing all the remaining buffered data after each read
operation. Since reading a TOC file tends to involve a lot of small
(even one-byte) decompression calls, that amounts to an O(N^2) cost.
This could have been fixed with a minimal patch, but to my
eyes LZ4Stream_read_internal and LZ4Stream_read_overflow are
badly-written spaghetti code; in particular the eol_flag logic
is inefficient and duplicative. I chose to throw the code
away and rewrite from scratch. This version is about sixty
lines shorter as well as not having the performance issue.
Fortunately, AFAICT the only way to get to this problem is to
manually LZ4-compress the toc.dat and/or blobs.toc files within a
directory-style archive; in the main data files, we read blocks
that are large enough that the O(N^2) behavior doesn't manifest.
Few people do that, which likely explains the lack of field
complaints. Otherwise this performance bug might be considered
bad enough to warrant back-patching.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3515357.1760128017@sss.pgh.pa.us
Both of these modules dumped each bit of output that they got from
the underlying compression library as a separate "data block" in
the emitted archive file. In the case of zstd this'd frequently
result in block sizes well under 100 bytes; lz4 is a little better
but still produces blocks around 300 bytes, at least in the test
case I tried. This bloats the archive file a little bit compared
to larger block sizes, but the real problem is that when pg_restore
has to skip each data block rather than seeking directly to some
target data, tiny block sizes are enormously inefficient.
Fix both modules so that they fill their allocated buffer reasonably
well before dumping a data block. In the case of lz4, also delete
some redundant logic that caused the lz4 frame header to be emitted
as a separate data block. (That saves little, but I see no reason
to expend extra code to get worse results.)
I fixed the "stream API" code too. In those cases, feeding small
amounts of data to fwrite() probably doesn't have any meaningful
performance consequences. But it seems like a bad idea to leave
the two sets of code doing the same thing in two different ways.
In passing, remove unnecessary "extra paranoia" check in
_ZstdWriteCommon. _CustomWriteFunc (the only possible referent
of cs->writeF) already protects itself against zero-length writes,
and it's really a modularity violation for _ZstdWriteCommon to know
that the custom format disallows empty data blocks. Also, fix
Zstd_read_internal to do less work when passed size == 0.
Reported-by: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis@gmx.net>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3515357.1760128017@sss.pgh.pa.us
pg_dump expects a read request of zero bytes to be a no-op; see for
example ReadStr(). Gzip_read got this wrong and falsely supposed
that the resulting gzret == 0 indicated an error. We could complicate
that error-checking logic some more, but it seems best to just fall
out immediately when passed size == 0.
This bug breaks the nominally-supported case of manually gzip'ing
the toc.dat file within a directory-style dump, so back-patch to v16
where this code came in. (Prior branches already have a short-circuit
for size == 0 before their only gzread call.)
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3515357.1760128017@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 16
Since protocol version 3.2 the CancelRequest does not have a fixed size
length anymore. The protocol docs still listed the length field to be a
constant number though. This fixes that.
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Reported-by: Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 18
Remove a variable that is no longer in use following commit 9a2e2a28.
It's not immediately clear why there were no compiler warnings about
this oversight.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Backpatch-through: 18
In commit a45c78e32 I removed the only regression test case that
reaches this function, because it turns out that we only use it
if reading an LZ4-compressed blobs.toc file in a directory dump,
and that is a state that has to be created manually. That seems
like a bad thing to not test, not so much for LZ4Stream_gets()
itself as because it means the squirrely eol_flag logic in
LZ4Stream_read_internal() is not tested.
The reason for the change was that I thought the lz4 program did not
have any way to perform compression without explicit specification
of the output file name. However, it turns out that the syntax
synopsis in its man page is a lie, and if you read enough of the
man page you find out that with "-m" it will do what's needful.
So restore the manual compression step in that test case.
Noted while testing some proposed changes in pg_dump's compression
logic.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3515357.1760128017@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 17
Commit 71f4c8c6f7 (which implemented DETACH CONCURRENTLY) added code
to create a separate table constraint when a table is detached
concurrently, identical to the partition constraint, on the theory that
such a constraint was needed in case the optimizer had constructed any
query plans that depended on the constraint being there. However, that
theory was apparently bogus because any such plans would be invalidated.
For hash partitioning, those constraints are problematic, because their
expressions reference the OID of the parent partitioned table, to which
the detached table is no longer related; this causes all sorts of
problems (such as inability of restoring a pg_dump of that table, and
the table no longer working properly if the partitioned table is later
dropped).
We'd like to get rid of all those constraints. In fact, for branch
master, do that -- no longer create any substitute constraints.
However, out of fear that some users might somehow depend on these
constraints for other partitioning strategies, for stable branches
(back to 14, which added DETACH CONCURRENTLY), only do it for hash
partitioning.
(If you repeatedly DETACH CONCURRENTLY and then ATTACH a partition, then
with this constraint addition you don't need to scan the table in the
ATTACH step, which presumably is good. But if users really valued this
feature, they would have requested that it worked for non-concurrent
DETACH also.)
Author: Haiyang Li <mohen.lhy@alibaba-inc.com>
Reported-by: Fei Changhong <feichanghong@qq.com>
Reported-by: Haiyang Li <mohen.lhy@alibaba-inc.com>
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18371-7fef49f63de13f02@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19070-781326347ade7c57@postgresql.org
An assertion in _bt_killitems expected the scan's currPos state to
contain a valid LSN, saved from when currPos's page was initially read.
The assertion failed to account for the fact that even logged relations
can have leaf pages with an invalid LSN when built with wal_level set to
"minimal". Remove the faulty assertion.
Oversight in commit e6eed40e (though note that the assertion was
backpatched to stable branches before 18 by commit 7c319f54).
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-By: Matthijs van der Vleuten <postgresql@zr40.nl>
Bug: #19082
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19082-628e62160dbbc1c1@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
An error happening while a slot data is saved on disk in
SaveSlotToPath() could cause a state.tmp file (temporary file holding
the slot state data, renamed to its permanent name at the end of the
function) to remain around after it has been created. This temporary
file is created with O_EXCL, meaning that if an existing state.tmp is
found, its creation would fail. This would prevent the slot data to be
saved, requiring a manual intervention to remove state.tmp before being
able to save again a slot. Possible scenarios where this temporary file
could remain on disk is for example a ENOSPC case (no disk space) while
writing, syncing or renaming it. The bug reports point to a write
failure as the principal cause of the problems.
Using O_TRUNC has been argued back in 2019 as a potential solution to
discard any temporary file that could exist. This solution was rejected
as O_EXCL can also act as a safety measure when saving the slot state,
crash recovery offering cleanup guarantees post-crash. This commit uses
the alternative approach that has been suggested by Andres Freund back
in 2019. When the temporary state file cannot be written, synced,
closed or renamed (note: not when created!), an unlink() is used to
remove the temporary state file while holding the in-progress I/O
LWLock, so as any follow-up attempts to save a slot's data would not
choke on an existing file that remained around because of a previous
failure.
This problem has been reported a few times across the years, going back
to 2019, but for some reason I have never come back to do something
about it and it has been forgotten. A recent report has reminded me
that this was still a problem.
Reported-by: Kevin K Biju <kevinkbiju@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>
Reported-by: Grigory Smolkin <g.smolkin@postgrespro.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAM45KeHa32soKL_G8Vk38CWvTBeOOXcsxAPAs7Jt7yPRf2mbVA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3559061693910326@qy4q4a6esb2lebnz.sas.yp-c.yandex.net
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/08bbfab1-a61d-3750-fc18-4ab2c1aa7f09@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 13
test_random_operations() did not check the result returned by
bms_is_member() in its last phase, when checking that the contents of
the bitmap match with what is expected. This was impacting the
reliability of the function and the coverage it could provide.
This commit improves the whole function, adding more checks based on
bms_is_member(), using a bitmap and a secondary array that tracks the
members added by random additions and deletions.
While on it, more comments are added to document the internals of the
function.
Reported-by: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Author: Greg Burd <greg@burd.me>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAq_zOSA2NUQSWePTGV_=90Uw0WcXxGOWnN-vwF046OOqA@mail.gmail.com
The processing of the PARALLEL option for VACUUM was not quite
following what the DefElem code had intended. defGetInt32() already has
code to handle missing parameters and returns a perfectly good error
message for when that happens.
Here we get rid of the ExecVacuum() error:
ERROR: parallel option requires a value between 0 and N
and leave defGetInt32() handle it, which will give:
ERROR: parallel requires an integer value
defGetInt32() was already handling the non-integer parameter case, so it
may as well handle the missing parameter case too.
Additionally, parameterize the option name to make translator work easier,
and also use errhint_internal() rather than errhint() for the
BUFFER_USAGE_LIMIT option since there isn't any work for a translator to
do for "%s".
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvovH14tNWB+WvP6TSbfi7-=TysQ9h5tQ5AgavwyWRWKHA@mail.gmail.com
An error context callback function might leak some memory into
ErrorContext, since those functions are run with ErrorContext as
current context. In the case where the elevel is ERROR, this is
no problem since the code level that catches the error should do
FlushErrorState to clean up, and that will reset ErrorContext.
However, if the elevel is less than ERROR then no such cleanup occurs.
In principle, repeated leaks while emitting log messages or client
notices could accumulate arbitrarily much leaked data, if no ERROR
occurs in the session.
To fix, let errfinish() perform an ErrorContext reset if it is
at the outermost error nesting level. (If it isn't, we'll delay
cleanup until the outermost nesting level is exited.)
The only actual leakage of this sort that I've been able to observe
within our regression tests was recently introduced by commit
f727b63e8. While it seems plausible that there are other such
leaks not reached in the regression tests, the lack of field
reports suggests that they're not a big problem. Accordingly,
I won't take the risk of back-patching this now. We can always
back-patch later if we get field reports of leaks.
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/jngsjonyfscoont4tnwi2qoikatpd5hifsg373vmmjvugwiu6g@m6opxh7uisgd
While pgoutput caches relation synchronization information in
RelationSyncCache that resides in CacheMemoryContext, each entry's
information (such as row filter expressions and column lists) is
stored in the entry's private memory context (entry_cxt in
RelationSyncEntry), which is a descendant memory context of the
decoding context. If a logical decoding invoked via SQL functions like
pg_logical_slot_get_binary_changes fails with an error, subsequent
logical decoding executions could access already-freed memory of the
entry's cache, resulting in a crash.
With this change, it's ensured that RelationSyncCache is cleaned up
even in error cases by using a memory context reset callback function.
Backpatch to 15, where entry_cxt was introduced for column filtering
and row filtering.
While the backbranches v13 and v14 have a similar issue where
RelationSyncCache persists even after an error when pgoutput is used
via SQL API, we decided not to backport this fix. This decision was
made because v13 is approaching its final minor release, and we won't
have an chance to fix any new issues that might arise. Additionally,
since using pgoutput via SQL API is not a common use case, the risk
outwights the benefit. If we receive bug reports, we can consider
backporting the fixes then.
Author: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm0x-aCehgt8Bevs2cm=uhmwS28MvbYq1=s2Ekf0aDPkOA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
Some of the buildfarm is still unhappy with WinGetFuncArgInPartition
even after 2273fa32b. While it seems to be just very old compilers,
we can suppress the warnings and arguably make the code more readable
by not initializing these variables till closer to where they are
used. While at it, make a couple of cosmetic comment improvements.
The creation of a replication slot done in a specific database on a
publisher was logged twice, with the second log not mentioning the
database where the slot creation happened. This commit removes the
information logged after a slot has been successfully created, moving
the information about the publisher from the second to the first log.
Note that failing a slot creation is also logged, so there is no loss of
information.
Author: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+Pv7qDvLbDgc9PQGhULT3rPXTxdu_=w+iW-kMs+zPADR+w@mail.gmail.com
This patch adds support for the ALL SEQUENCES clause in publications,
enabling synchronization/replication of all sequences that is useful for
upgrades.
Publications can now include all sequences via FOR ALL SEQUENCES.
psql enhancements:
\d shows publications for a given sequence.
\dRp indicates if a publication includes all sequences.
ALL SEQUENCES can be combined with ALL TABLES, but not with other options
like TABLE or TABLES IN SCHEMA. We can extend support for more granular
clauses in future.
The view pg_publication_sequences provides information about the mapping
between publications and sequences.
This patch enables publishing of sequences; subscriber-side support will
be added in upcoming patches.
Author: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Author: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1LC+KJiAkSrpE_NwvNdidw9F2os7GERUeSxSKv71gXysQ@mail.gmail.com
SQL/JSON functions such as JSON_VALUE could fail with "unrecognized
node type" errors when a DEFAULT clause contained an explicit COLLATE
expression. That happened because assign_collations_walker() could
invoke exprSetCollation() on a JsonBehavior expression whose DEFAULT
still contained a CollateExpr, which exprSetCollation() does not
handle.
For example:
SELECT JSON_VALUE('{"a":1}', '$.c' RETURNING text
DEFAULT 'A' COLLATE "C" ON EMPTY);
Fix by validating in transformJsonBehavior() that the DEFAULT
expression's collation matches the enclosing JSON expression’s
collation. In exprSetCollation(), replace the recursive call on the
JsonBehavior expression with an assertion that its collation already
matches the target, since the parser now enforces that condition.
Reported-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Author: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxHVwYYSyiVQ6o+PsRX6zQ7rAFinh_fv1kCfTsT1xG4Zeg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17
truncate_useless_pathkeys() seems to have neglected to account for
PathKeys that might be useful for WindowClause evaluation. Modify it so
that it properly accounts for that.
Making this work required adjusting two things:
1. Change from checking query_pathkeys to check sort_pathkeys instead.
2. Add explicit check for window_pathkeys
For #1, query_pathkeys gets set in standard_qp_callback() according to the
sort order requirements for the first operation to be applied after the
join planner is finished, so this changes depending on which upper
planner operations a particular query needs. If the query has window
functions and no GROUP BY, then query_pathkeys gets set to
window_pathkeys. Before this change, this meant PathKeys useful for the
ORDER BY were not accounted for in queries with window functions.
Because of #1, #2 is now required so that we explicitly check to ensure
we don't truncate away PathKeys useful for window functions.
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvrj3HTKmXoLMbUjTO=_MNMxM=cnuCSyBKidAVibmYPnrg@mail.gmail.com
Previously StrategyGetBuffer() acquired the buffer header spinlock for every
buffer, whether it was reusable or not. If reusable, it'd be returned, with
the lock held, to GetVictimBuffer(), which then would pin the buffer with
PinBuffer_Locked(). That's somewhat violating the spirit of the guidelines for
holding spinlocks (i.e. that they are only held for a few lines of consecutive
code) and necessitates using PinBuffer_Locked(), which scales worse than
PinBuffer() due to holding the spinlock. This alone makes it worth changing
the code.
However, the main reason to change this is that a future commit will make
PinBuffer_Locked() slower (due to making UnlockBufHdr() slower), to gain
scalability for the much more common case of pinning a pre-existing buffer. By
pinning the buffer with a single atomic operation, iff the buffer is reusable,
we avoid any potential regression for miss-heavy workloads. There strictly are
fewer atomic operations for each potential buffer after this change.
The price for this improvement is that freelist.c needs two CAS loops and
needs to be able to set up the resource accounting for pinned buffers. The
latter is achieved by exposing a new function for that purpose from bufmgr.c,
that seems better than exposing the entire private refcount infrastructure.
The improvement seems worth the complexity.
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fvfmkr5kk4nyex56ejgxj3uzi63isfxovp2biecb4bspbjrze7@az2pljabhnff
We're planning to merge buffer content locks into BufferDesc.state. To reduce
the size of that patch, centralize calls to BufferDescriptorGetContentLock().
The biggest part of the change is in assertions, by introducing
BufferIsLockedByMe[InMode]() (and removing BufferIsExclusiveLocked()). This
seems like an improvement even without aforementioned plans.
Additionally replace some direct calls to LWLockAcquire() with calls to
LockBuffer().
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fvfmkr5kk4nyex56ejgxj3uzi63isfxovp2biecb4bspbjrze7@az2pljabhnff
BM_PERMANENT is defined as 1U<<31, which is a negative number when interpreted
as a signed integer. Unfortunately the mask variable in BufferSync() was
signed. This has been wrong for a long time, but failed to fail, due to
integer conversion rules.
However, in an upcoming patch the width of the state variable will be
increased, with the wrong signedness leading to never flushing permanent
buffers - luckily caught in a test.
It seems better to fix this separately, instead of doing so as part of a
large, otherwise mechanical, patch.
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fvfmkr5kk4nyex56ejgxj3uzi63isfxovp2biecb4bspbjrze7@az2pljabhnff
While testing a new potential use for ReadRecentBuffer(), Andres
reported that it scales badly when called concurrently for the same
buffer by many backends. Instead of a naive (but wrong) coding with
PinBuffer(), it used the spinlock, so that it could be careful to pin
only if the buffer was valid and holding the expected block, to avoid
breaking invariants in eg GetVictimBuffer(). Unfortunately that made it
less scalable than PinBuffer(), which uses compare-exchange instead.
We can fix that by giving PinBuffer() a new skip_if_not_valid mode that
doesn't pin invalid buffers. It might occasionally skip when it
shouldn't due to the unlocked read of the header flags, but that's
unlikely and perfectly acceptable for an opportunistic optimisation
routine, and it can only succeed when it really should due to the
compare-exchange loop.
Note that this fixes ReadRecentBuffer()'s failure to bump the usage
count. While this could be seen as a bug, there currently aren't cases
affected by this in core, so it doesn't seem worth backpatching that portion.
Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230627020546.t6z4tntmj7wmjrfh%40awork3.anarazel.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fvfmkr5kk4nyex56ejgxj3uzi63isfxovp2biecb4bspbjrze7@az2pljabhnff
In the same spirit as 3bf905692, assume that all compilers we still
support provide the NAN macro, and get rid of workarounds for that.
The C standard allows implementations to omit NAN if the underlying
float arithmetic lacks quiet (non-signaling) NaNs. However, we've
required that feature for years: the workarounds only supported
lack of the macro, not lack of the functionality. I put in a
compile-time #error if there's no macro, just for clarity.
Also fix up the copies of these functions in ecpglib, and leave
a breadcrumb for the next hacker who touches them.
History of the hacks being removed here can be found in commits
1bc2d544b, 4d17a2146, cec8394b5.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1952095.1759764279@sss.pgh.pa.us
These hooks allow plugins to get control at the earliest point at
which the PlannerGlobal object is fully initialized, and then just
before it gets destroyed. This is useful in combination with the
extendable plan state facilities (see extendplan.h) and perhaps for
other purposes as well.
Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYWKHU2hKr62Toyzh-kTDEnMDeLw7gkOOnjL-TnOUq0kQ@mail.gmail.com
This allows extensions to have access to any data they've stored
in the ExplainState during planning. Unfortunately, it won't help
with EXPLAIN EXECUTE is used, but since that case is less common,
this still seems like an improvement.
Since planner() has quite a few arguments now, also add some
documentation of those arguments and the return value.
Author: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>
Co-authored-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYWKHU2hKr62Toyzh-kTDEnMDeLw7gkOOnjL-TnOUq0kQ@mail.gmail.com
