mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-04-22 23:02:54 +03:00
Base LWLock limits directly on MAX_BACKENDS
Jacob reported that comments for LW_SHARED_MASK referenced a MAX_BACKENDS limit of 2^23-1, but that MAX_BACKENDS is actually limited to 2^18-1. The limit was lowered in 48354581a49c, but the comment in lwlock.c wasn't updated. Instead of just fixing the comment, it seems better to directly base the lwlock defines on MAX_BACKENDS and add static assertions to ensure that there is enough space. That way there's no comment that can go out of sync in the future. As part of that change I noticed that for some reason the high bit wasn't used for flags, which seems somewhat odd. Redefine the flag values to start at the highest bit. Reported-by: Jacob Brazeal <jacob.brazeal@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jacob Brazeal <jacob.brazeal@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+COZaBO_s3LfALq=b+HcBHFSOEGiApVjrRacCe4VP9m7CJsNQ@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
6394a3a61c
commit
cd3ccf88aa
@ -91,19 +91,29 @@
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#define LW_FLAG_HAS_WAITERS ((uint32) 1 << 30)
|
||||
#define LW_FLAG_RELEASE_OK ((uint32) 1 << 29)
|
||||
#define LW_FLAG_LOCKED ((uint32) 1 << 28)
|
||||
#define LW_FLAG_HAS_WAITERS ((uint32) 1 << 31)
|
||||
#define LW_FLAG_RELEASE_OK ((uint32) 1 << 30)
|
||||
#define LW_FLAG_LOCKED ((uint32) 1 << 29)
|
||||
#define LW_FLAG_BITS 3
|
||||
#define LW_FLAG_MASK (((1<<LW_FLAG_BITS)-1)<<(32-LW_FLAG_BITS))
|
||||
|
||||
#define LW_VAL_EXCLUSIVE ((uint32) 1 << 24)
|
||||
/* assumes MAX_BACKENDS is a (power of 2) - 1, checked below */
|
||||
#define LW_VAL_EXCLUSIVE (MAX_BACKENDS + 1)
|
||||
#define LW_VAL_SHARED 1
|
||||
|
||||
#define LW_LOCK_MASK ((uint32) ((1 << 25)-1))
|
||||
/* Must be greater than MAX_BACKENDS - which is 2^23-1, so we're fine. */
|
||||
#define LW_SHARED_MASK ((uint32) ((1 << 24)-1))
|
||||
/* already (power of 2)-1, i.e. suitable for a mask */
|
||||
#define LW_SHARED_MASK MAX_BACKENDS
|
||||
#define LW_LOCK_MASK (MAX_BACKENDS | LW_VAL_EXCLUSIVE)
|
||||
|
||||
StaticAssertDecl(LW_VAL_EXCLUSIVE > (uint32) MAX_BACKENDS,
|
||||
"MAX_BACKENDS too big for lwlock.c");
|
||||
|
||||
StaticAssertDecl(((MAX_BACKENDS + 1) & MAX_BACKENDS) == 0,
|
||||
"MAX_BACKENDS + 1 needs to be a power of 2");
|
||||
|
||||
StaticAssertDecl((MAX_BACKENDS & LW_FLAG_MASK) == 0,
|
||||
"MAX_BACKENDS and LW_FLAG_MASK overlap");
|
||||
|
||||
StaticAssertDecl((LW_VAL_EXCLUSIVE & LW_FLAG_MASK) == 0,
|
||||
"LW_VAL_EXCLUSIVE and LW_FLAG_MASK overlap");
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* There are three sorts of LWLock "tranches":
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user