mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-05-08 07:21:33 +03:00
pg_waldump: Fix --bkp-details to not issue spurious newlines for FPWs.
The additional newline seems to have accidentally been introduced in 2c03216d831, in 9.5. The newline is only issued when an FPW is present for the block reference. While there could be an argument that removing the newlines in the back branches could cause a problem for somebody parsing the pg_waldump output, the likelihood of that seems small enough. It seems at least equally likely that the randomness of when newlines are issued causes problems. Author: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191029233341.4gnyau7e5v2lh5sc@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch: 9.5, like 2c03216d831.
This commit is contained in:
parent
95f2efd504
commit
bc4f56c181
@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ XLogDumpDisplayRecord(XLogDumpConfig *config, XLogReaderState *record)
|
||||
if (record->blocks[block_id].bimg_info &
|
||||
BKPIMAGE_IS_COMPRESSED)
|
||||
{
|
||||
printf(" (FPW); hole: offset: %u, length: %u, compression saved: %u\n",
|
||||
printf(" (FPW); hole: offset: %u, length: %u, compression saved: %u",
|
||||
record->blocks[block_id].hole_offset,
|
||||
record->blocks[block_id].hole_length,
|
||||
BLCKSZ -
|
||||
@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ XLogDumpDisplayRecord(XLogDumpConfig *config, XLogReaderState *record)
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
printf(" (FPW); hole: offset: %u, length: %u\n",
|
||||
printf(" (FPW); hole: offset: %u, length: %u",
|
||||
record->blocks[block_id].hole_offset,
|
||||
record->blocks[block_id].hole_length);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user