mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-04-24 10:47:04 +03:00
C comment: fix wording about shared memory message queue
Reported-by: Tels Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e66e05bc55f5ce904e361ad17a3395ae.squirrel@sm.webmail.pair.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
851a26e266
commit
bc0021ef09
@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ shm_mq_sendv(shm_mq_handle *mqh, shm_mq_iovec *iov, int iovcnt, bool nowait)
|
||||
return SHM_MQ_DETACHED;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the counterpary is known to have attached, we can read mq_receiver
|
||||
* If the counterparty is known to have attached, we can read mq_receiver
|
||||
* without acquiring the spinlock and assume it isn't NULL. Otherwise,
|
||||
* more caution is needed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -1203,9 +1203,9 @@ shm_mq_inc_bytes_read(shm_mq *mq, Size n)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Separate prior reads of mq_ring from the increment of mq_bytes_read
|
||||
* which follows. Pairs with the full barrier in shm_mq_send_bytes(). We
|
||||
* only need a read barrier here because the increment of mq_bytes_read is
|
||||
* actually a read followed by a dependent write.
|
||||
* which follows. This pairs with the full barrier in shm_mq_send_bytes().
|
||||
* We only need a read barrier here because the increment of mq_bytes_read
|
||||
* is actually a read followed by a dependent write.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
pg_read_barrier();
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user