mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-04-25 21:42:33 +03:00
Further adjust comment in get_partition_dispatch_recurse.
In editing 09b12d52db1cf1a4c72d876f3fb6c9d06919e51a I made it wrong; fix that and try to more clearly explain the situation. Patch by me, reviewed by David Rowley and Amit Langote Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobAq+mA5hzm0a5OS38qQY5758DDDGqa3sBJN4hvir-H9w@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
dbccdd375b
commit
b949bbcb7e
@ -973,11 +973,13 @@ get_partition_dispatch_recurse(Relation rel, Relation parent,
|
||||
* The 'indexes' array is used when searching for a partition matching a
|
||||
* given tuple. The actual value we store here depends on whether the
|
||||
* array element belongs to a leaf partition or a subpartitioned table.
|
||||
* For leaf partitions we store the 0-based index into *leaf_part_oids,
|
||||
* and for sub-partitioned tables we store a negative version of the
|
||||
* 1-based index into the *pds list. When searching, if we see a negative
|
||||
* value, the search must continue in the corresponding sub-partition;
|
||||
* otherwise, we've identified the correct partition.
|
||||
* For leaf partitions we store the index into *leaf_part_oids, and for
|
||||
* sub-partitioned tables we store a negative version of the index into
|
||||
* the *pds list. Both indexes are 0-based, but the first element of the
|
||||
* *pds list is the root partition, so 0 always means the first leaf. When
|
||||
* searching, if we see a negative value, the search must continue in the
|
||||
* corresponding sub-partition; otherwise, we've identified the correct
|
||||
* partition.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
pd->indexes = (int *) palloc(partdesc->nparts * sizeof(int));
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < partdesc->nparts; i++)
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user