mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-05-08 07:21:33 +03:00
Revert "Propagate CTE property flags when copying a CTE list into a rule."
This reverts commit ed290896335414c6c069b9ccae1f3dcdd2fac6ba and equivalent back-branch commits. The issue is subtler than I thought, and it's far from new, so just before a release deadline is no time to be fooling with it. We'll consider what to do at a bit more leisure. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJcOf-fAdj=nDKMsRhQzndm-O13NY4dL6xGcEvdX5Xvbbi0V7g@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
9c89c4bd8d
commit
ac1df003f2
@ -530,9 +530,6 @@ rewriteRuleAction(Query *parsetree,
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This could possibly be fixed by using some sort of internally
|
||||
* generated ID, instead of names, to link CTE RTEs to their CTEs.
|
||||
* However, decompiling the results would be quite confusing; note the
|
||||
* merge of hasRecursive flags below, which could change the apparent
|
||||
* semantics of such redundantly-named CTEs.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
foreach(lc, parsetree->cteList)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -554,9 +551,6 @@ rewriteRuleAction(Query *parsetree,
|
||||
/* OK, it's safe to combine the CTE lists */
|
||||
sub_action->cteList = list_concat(sub_action->cteList,
|
||||
copyObject(parsetree->cteList));
|
||||
/* ... and don't forget about the associated flags */
|
||||
sub_action->hasRecursive |= parsetree->hasRecursive;
|
||||
sub_action->hasModifyingCTE |= parsetree->hasModifyingCTE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -1672,33 +1672,6 @@ SELECT * FROM bug6051_2;
|
||||
3
|
||||
(3 rows)
|
||||
|
||||
-- silly example to verify that hasModifyingCTE flag is propagated
|
||||
CREATE TEMP TABLE bug6051_3 AS
|
||||
select a from generate_series(11,13) as a;
|
||||
CREATE RULE bug6051_3_ins AS ON INSERT TO bug6051_3 DO INSTEAD
|
||||
SELECT i FROM bug6051_2;
|
||||
BEGIN; SET LOCAL force_parallel_mode = on;
|
||||
WITH t1 AS ( DELETE FROM bug6051_3 RETURNING * )
|
||||
INSERT INTO bug6051_3 SELECT * FROM t1;
|
||||
i
|
||||
---
|
||||
1
|
||||
2
|
||||
3
|
||||
1
|
||||
2
|
||||
3
|
||||
1
|
||||
2
|
||||
3
|
||||
(9 rows)
|
||||
|
||||
COMMIT;
|
||||
SELECT * FROM bug6051_3;
|
||||
a
|
||||
---
|
||||
(0 rows)
|
||||
|
||||
-- a truly recursive CTE in the same list
|
||||
WITH RECURSIVE t(a) AS (
|
||||
SELECT 0
|
||||
|
@ -773,22 +773,6 @@ INSERT INTO bug6051 SELECT * FROM t1;
|
||||
SELECT * FROM bug6051;
|
||||
SELECT * FROM bug6051_2;
|
||||
|
||||
-- silly example to verify that hasModifyingCTE flag is propagated
|
||||
CREATE TEMP TABLE bug6051_3 AS
|
||||
select a from generate_series(11,13) as a;
|
||||
|
||||
CREATE RULE bug6051_3_ins AS ON INSERT TO bug6051_3 DO INSTEAD
|
||||
SELECT i FROM bug6051_2;
|
||||
|
||||
BEGIN; SET LOCAL force_parallel_mode = on;
|
||||
|
||||
WITH t1 AS ( DELETE FROM bug6051_3 RETURNING * )
|
||||
INSERT INTO bug6051_3 SELECT * FROM t1;
|
||||
|
||||
COMMIT;
|
||||
|
||||
SELECT * FROM bug6051_3;
|
||||
|
||||
-- a truly recursive CTE in the same list
|
||||
WITH RECURSIVE t(a) AS (
|
||||
SELECT 0
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user