mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-05-28 05:21:27 +03:00
Revert bogus fixes of HOT-freezing bug
It turns out we misdiagnosed what the real problem was. Revert the previous changes, because they may have worse consequences going forward. A better fix is forthcoming. The simplistic test case is kept, though disabled. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20171102112019.33wb7g5wp4zpjelu@alap3.anarazel.de
This commit is contained in:
parent
769756fb74
commit
7a95966bc0
@ -2060,7 +2060,8 @@ heap_hot_search_buffer(ItemPointer tid, Relation relation, Buffer buffer,
|
||||
* broken.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (TransactionIdIsValid(prev_xmax) &&
|
||||
!HeapTupleUpdateXmaxMatchesXmin(prev_xmax, heapTuple->t_data))
|
||||
!TransactionIdEquals(prev_xmax,
|
||||
HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(heapTuple->t_data)))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -2243,7 +2244,7 @@ heap_get_latest_tid(Relation relation,
|
||||
* tuple. Check for XMIN match.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (TransactionIdIsValid(priorXmax) &&
|
||||
!HeapTupleUpdateXmaxMatchesXmin(priorXmax, tp.t_data))
|
||||
!TransactionIdEquals(priorXmax, HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(tp.t_data)))
|
||||
{
|
||||
UnlockReleaseBuffer(buffer);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
@ -2275,50 +2276,6 @@ heap_get_latest_tid(Relation relation,
|
||||
} /* end of loop */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* HeapTupleUpdateXmaxMatchesXmin - verify update chain xmax/xmin lineage
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Given the new version of a tuple after some update, verify whether the
|
||||
* given Xmax (corresponding to the previous version) matches the tuple's
|
||||
* Xmin, taking into account that the Xmin might have been frozen after the
|
||||
* update.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool
|
||||
HeapTupleUpdateXmaxMatchesXmin(TransactionId xmax, HeapTupleHeader htup)
|
||||
{
|
||||
TransactionId xmin = HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(htup);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the xmax of the old tuple is identical to the xmin of the new one,
|
||||
* it's a match.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (TransactionIdEquals(xmax, xmin))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the Xmin that was in effect prior to a freeze matches the Xmax,
|
||||
* it's good too.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (HeapTupleHeaderXminFrozen(htup) &&
|
||||
TransactionIdEquals(HeapTupleHeaderGetRawXmin(htup), xmax))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* When a tuple is frozen, the original Xmin is lost, but we know it's a
|
||||
* committed transaction. So unless the Xmax is InvalidXid, we don't know
|
||||
* for certain that there is a match, but there may be one; and we must
|
||||
* return true so that a HOT chain that is half-frozen can be walked
|
||||
* correctly.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We no longer freeze tuples this way, but we must keep this in order to
|
||||
* interpret pre-pg_upgrade pages correctly.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (TransactionIdEquals(xmin, FrozenTransactionId) &&
|
||||
TransactionIdIsValid(xmax))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* UpdateXmaxHintBits - update tuple hint bits after xmax transaction ends
|
||||
@ -5736,7 +5693,8 @@ l4:
|
||||
* end of the chain, we're done, so return success.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (TransactionIdIsValid(priorXmax) &&
|
||||
!HeapTupleUpdateXmaxMatchesXmin(priorXmax, mytup.t_data))
|
||||
!TransactionIdEquals(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(mytup.t_data),
|
||||
priorXmax))
|
||||
{
|
||||
result = HeapTupleMayBeUpdated;
|
||||
goto out_locked;
|
||||
@ -6430,23 +6388,14 @@ FreezeMultiXactId(MultiXactId multi, uint16 t_infomask,
|
||||
Assert(TransactionIdIsValid(xid));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The updating transaction cannot possibly be still running, but
|
||||
* verify whether it has committed, and request to set the
|
||||
* COMMITTED flag if so. (We normally don't see any tuples in
|
||||
* this state, because they are removed by page pruning before we
|
||||
* try to freeze the page; but this can happen if the updating
|
||||
* transaction commits after the page is pruned but before
|
||||
* HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum).
|
||||
* If the xid is older than the cutoff, it has to have aborted,
|
||||
* otherwise the tuple would have gotten pruned away.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (TransactionIdPrecedes(xid, cutoff_xid))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (TransactionIdDidCommit(xid))
|
||||
*flags = FRM_MARK_COMMITTED | FRM_RETURN_IS_XID;
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
*flags |= FRM_INVALIDATE_XMAX;
|
||||
xid = InvalidTransactionId; /* not strictly necessary */
|
||||
}
|
||||
Assert(!TransactionIdDidCommit(xid));
|
||||
*flags |= FRM_INVALIDATE_XMAX;
|
||||
xid = InvalidTransactionId; /* not strictly necessary */
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -6519,16 +6468,13 @@ FreezeMultiXactId(MultiXactId multi, uint16 t_infomask,
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* It's an update; should we keep it? If the transaction is known
|
||||
* aborted or crashed then it's okay to ignore it, otherwise not.
|
||||
* Note that an updater older than cutoff_xid cannot possibly be
|
||||
* committed, because HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum would have returned
|
||||
* HEAPTUPLE_DEAD and we would not be trying to freeze the tuple.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* As with all tuple visibility routines, it's critical to test
|
||||
* TransactionIdIsInProgress before TransactionIdDidCommit,
|
||||
* because of race conditions explained in detail in tqual.c.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We normally don't see committed updating transactions earlier
|
||||
* than the cutoff xid, because they are removed by page pruning
|
||||
* before we try to freeze the page; but it can happen if the
|
||||
* updating transaction commits after the page is pruned but
|
||||
* before HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(xid) ||
|
||||
TransactionIdIsInProgress(xid))
|
||||
@ -6553,6 +6499,13 @@ FreezeMultiXactId(MultiXactId multi, uint16 t_infomask,
|
||||
* we can ignore it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Since the tuple wasn't marked HEAPTUPLE_DEAD by vacuum, the
|
||||
* update Xid cannot possibly be older than the xid cutoff.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
Assert(!TransactionIdIsValid(update_xid) ||
|
||||
!TransactionIdPrecedes(update_xid, cutoff_xid));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we determined that it's an Xid corresponding to an update
|
||||
* that must be retained, additionally add it to the list of
|
||||
@ -6631,10 +6584,7 @@ FreezeMultiXactId(MultiXactId multi, uint16 t_infomask,
|
||||
*
|
||||
* It is assumed that the caller has checked the tuple with
|
||||
* HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum() and determined that it is not HEAPTUPLE_DEAD
|
||||
* (else we should be removing the tuple, not freezing it). However, note
|
||||
* that we don't remove HOT tuples even if they are dead, and it'd be incorrect
|
||||
* to freeze them (because that would make them visible), so we mark them as
|
||||
* update-committed, and needing further freezing later on.
|
||||
* (else we should be removing the tuple, not freezing it).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* NB: cutoff_xid *must* be <= the current global xmin, to ensure that any
|
||||
* XID older than it could neither be running nor seen as running by any
|
||||
@ -6745,22 +6695,7 @@ heap_prepare_freeze_tuple(HeapTupleHeader tuple, TransactionId cutoff_xid,
|
||||
else if (TransactionIdIsNormal(xid))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (TransactionIdPrecedes(xid, cutoff_xid))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Must freeze regular XIDs older than the cutoff. We must not
|
||||
* freeze a HOT-updated tuple, though; doing so would bring it
|
||||
* back to life.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (HeapTupleHeaderIsHotUpdated(tuple))
|
||||
{
|
||||
frz->t_infomask |= HEAP_XMAX_COMMITTED;
|
||||
totally_frozen = false;
|
||||
changed = true;
|
||||
/* must not freeze */
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
freeze_xmax = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
freeze_xmax = true;
|
||||
else
|
||||
totally_frozen = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ heap_prune_chain(Relation relation, Buffer buffer, OffsetNumber rootoffnum,
|
||||
* Check the tuple XMIN against prior XMAX, if any
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (TransactionIdIsValid(priorXmax) &&
|
||||
!HeapTupleUpdateXmaxMatchesXmin(priorXmax, htup))
|
||||
!TransactionIdEquals(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(htup), priorXmax))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ heap_get_root_tuples(Page page, OffsetNumber *root_offsets)
|
||||
htup = (HeapTupleHeader) PageGetItem(page, lp);
|
||||
|
||||
if (TransactionIdIsValid(priorXmax) &&
|
||||
!HeapTupleUpdateXmaxMatchesXmin(priorXmax, htup))
|
||||
!TransactionIdEquals(priorXmax, HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(htup)))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Remember the root line pointer for this item */
|
||||
|
@ -2018,17 +2018,17 @@ lazy_record_dead_tuple(LVRelStats *vacrelstats,
|
||||
ItemPointer itemptr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The array must never overflow, since we rely on all deletable tuples
|
||||
* being removed; inability to remove a tuple might cause an old XID to
|
||||
* persist beyond the freeze limit, which could be disastrous later on.
|
||||
* The array shouldn't overflow under normal behavior, but perhaps it
|
||||
* could if we are given a really small maintenance_work_mem. In that
|
||||
* case, just forget the last few tuples (we'll get 'em next time).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (vacrelstats->num_dead_tuples >= vacrelstats->max_dead_tuples)
|
||||
elog(ERROR, "dead tuple array overflow");
|
||||
|
||||
vacrelstats->dead_tuples[vacrelstats->num_dead_tuples] = *itemptr;
|
||||
vacrelstats->num_dead_tuples++;
|
||||
pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_VACUUM_NUM_DEAD_TUPLES,
|
||||
vacrelstats->num_dead_tuples);
|
||||
if (vacrelstats->num_dead_tuples < vacrelstats->max_dead_tuples)
|
||||
{
|
||||
vacrelstats->dead_tuples[vacrelstats->num_dead_tuples] = *itemptr;
|
||||
vacrelstats->num_dead_tuples++;
|
||||
pgstat_progress_update_param(PROGRESS_VACUUM_NUM_DEAD_TUPLES,
|
||||
vacrelstats->num_dead_tuples);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -2595,7 +2595,8 @@ EvalPlanQualFetch(EState *estate, Relation relation, int lockmode,
|
||||
* atomic, and Xmin never changes in an existing tuple, except to
|
||||
* invalid or frozen, and neither of those can match priorXmax.)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!HeapTupleUpdateXmaxMatchesXmin(priorXmax, tuple.t_data))
|
||||
if (!TransactionIdEquals(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(tuple.t_data),
|
||||
priorXmax))
|
||||
{
|
||||
ReleaseBuffer(buffer);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
@ -2742,7 +2743,8 @@ EvalPlanQualFetch(EState *estate, Relation relation, int lockmode,
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* As above, if xmin isn't what we're expecting, do nothing.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!HeapTupleUpdateXmaxMatchesXmin(priorXmax, tuple.t_data))
|
||||
if (!TransactionIdEquals(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(tuple.t_data),
|
||||
priorXmax))
|
||||
{
|
||||
ReleaseBuffer(buffer);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
@ -146,9 +146,6 @@ extern void heap_get_latest_tid(Relation relation, Snapshot snapshot,
|
||||
ItemPointer tid);
|
||||
extern void setLastTid(const ItemPointer tid);
|
||||
|
||||
extern bool HeapTupleUpdateXmaxMatchesXmin(TransactionId xmax,
|
||||
HeapTupleHeader htup);
|
||||
|
||||
extern BulkInsertState GetBulkInsertState(void);
|
||||
extern void FreeBulkInsertState(BulkInsertState);
|
||||
extern void ReleaseBulkInsertStatePin(BulkInsertState bistate);
|
||||
|
@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ test: update-locked-tuple
|
||||
test: propagate-lock-delete
|
||||
test: tuplelock-conflict
|
||||
test: tuplelock-update
|
||||
test: freeze-the-dead
|
||||
test: nowait
|
||||
test: nowait-2
|
||||
test: nowait-3
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user