mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-04-22 23:02:54 +03:00
Adjust behavior of row_security GUC to match the docs.
Some time back we agreed that row_security=off should not be a way to bypass RLS entirely, but only a way to get an error if it was being applied. However, the code failed to act that way for table owners. Per discussion, this is a must-fix bug for 9.5.0. Adjust the logic in rls.c to behave as expected; also, modify the error message to be more consistent with the new interpretation. The regression tests need minor corrections as well. Also update the comments about row_security in ddl.sgml to be correct. (The official description of the GUC in config.sgml is already correct.) I failed to resist the temptation to do some other very minor cleanup as well, such as getting rid of a duplicate extern declaration.
This commit is contained in:
parent
8978eb03a8
commit
5d35438273
@ -1572,11 +1572,7 @@ REVOKE ALL ON accounts FROM PUBLIC;
|
||||
bypass the row security system when accessing a table. Table owners
|
||||
normally bypass row security as well, though a table owner can choose to
|
||||
be subject to row security with <link linkend="sql-altertable">ALTER
|
||||
TABLE ... FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY</>. Even in a table with that option
|
||||
selected, the table owner will bypass row security if the
|
||||
<xref linkend="guc-row-security"> configuration parameter is set
|
||||
to <literal>off</>; this setting is typically used for purposes such as
|
||||
backup and restore.
|
||||
TABLE ... FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY</>.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
@ -1606,14 +1602,6 @@ REVOKE ALL ON accounts FROM PUBLIC;
|
||||
of all roles that they are a member of.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Referential integrity checks, such as unique or primary key constraints
|
||||
and foreign key references, always bypass row security to ensure that
|
||||
data integrity is maintained. Care must be taken when developing
|
||||
schemas and row level policies to avoid <quote>covert channel</> leaks of
|
||||
information through such referential integrity checks.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
As a simple example, here is how to create a policy on
|
||||
the <literal>account</> relation to allow only members of
|
||||
@ -1773,6 +1761,26 @@ postgres=> update passwd set pwhash = 'abc';
|
||||
UPDATE 1
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Referential integrity checks, such as unique or primary key constraints
|
||||
and foreign key references, always bypass row security to ensure that
|
||||
data integrity is maintained. Care must be taken when developing
|
||||
schemas and row level policies to avoid <quote>covert channel</> leaks of
|
||||
information through such referential integrity checks.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
In some contexts it is important to be sure that row security is
|
||||
not being applied. For example, when taking a backup, it could be
|
||||
disastrous if row security silently caused some rows to be omitted
|
||||
from the backup. In such a situation, you can set the
|
||||
<xref linkend="guc-row-security"> configuration parameter
|
||||
to <literal>off</>. This does not in itself bypass row security;
|
||||
what it does is throw an error if any query's results would get filtered
|
||||
by a policy. The reason for the error can then be investigated and
|
||||
fixed.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
For additional details see <xref linkend="sql-createpolicy">
|
||||
and <xref linkend="sql-altertable">.
|
||||
|
@ -17,18 +17,17 @@
|
||||
#include "access/htup.h"
|
||||
#include "access/htup_details.h"
|
||||
#include "access/transam.h"
|
||||
#include "catalog/pg_class.h"
|
||||
#include "catalog/namespace.h"
|
||||
#include "catalog/pg_class.h"
|
||||
#include "miscadmin.h"
|
||||
#include "utils/acl.h"
|
||||
#include "utils/builtins.h"
|
||||
#include "utils/elog.h"
|
||||
#include "utils/lsyscache.h"
|
||||
#include "utils/rls.h"
|
||||
#include "utils/syscache.h"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
extern int check_enable_rls(Oid relid, Oid checkAsUser, bool noError);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* check_enable_rls
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -52,20 +51,21 @@ extern int check_enable_rls(Oid relid, Oid checkAsUser, bool noError);
|
||||
int
|
||||
check_enable_rls(Oid relid, Oid checkAsUser, bool noError)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Oid user_id = checkAsUser ? checkAsUser : GetUserId();
|
||||
HeapTuple tuple;
|
||||
Form_pg_class classform;
|
||||
bool relrowsecurity;
|
||||
bool relforcerowsecurity;
|
||||
Oid user_id = checkAsUser ? checkAsUser : GetUserId();
|
||||
bool amowner;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Nothing to do for built-in relations */
|
||||
if (relid < FirstNormalObjectId)
|
||||
if (relid < (Oid) FirstNormalObjectId)
|
||||
return RLS_NONE;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Fetch relation's relrowsecurity and relforcerowsecurity flags */
|
||||
tuple = SearchSysCache1(RELOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(relid));
|
||||
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(tuple))
|
||||
return RLS_NONE;
|
||||
|
||||
classform = (Form_pg_class) GETSTRUCT(tuple);
|
||||
|
||||
relrowsecurity = classform->relrowsecurity;
|
||||
@ -88,41 +88,45 @@ check_enable_rls(Oid relid, Oid checkAsUser, bool noError)
|
||||
return RLS_NONE_ENV;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Table owners generally bypass RLS, except if row_security=true and the
|
||||
* table has been set (by an owner) to FORCE ROW SECURITY, and this is not
|
||||
* a referential integrity check.
|
||||
* Table owners generally bypass RLS, except if the table has been set (by
|
||||
* an owner) to FORCE ROW SECURITY, and this is not a referential
|
||||
* integrity check.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Return RLS_NONE_ENV to indicate that this decision depends on the
|
||||
* environment (in this case, the user_id).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (pg_class_ownercheck(relid, user_id))
|
||||
amowner = pg_class_ownercheck(relid, user_id);
|
||||
if (amowner)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If row_security=true and FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY has been set on
|
||||
* the relation then we return RLS_ENABLED to indicate that RLS should
|
||||
* still be applied. If we are in a SECURITY_NOFORCE_RLS context or if
|
||||
* row_security=false then we return RLS_NONE_ENV.
|
||||
* If FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY has been set on the relation then we
|
||||
* should return RLS_ENABLED to indicate that RLS should be applied.
|
||||
* If not, or if we are in an InNoForceRLSOperation context, we return
|
||||
* RLS_NONE_ENV.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The SECURITY_NOFORCE_RLS indicates that we should not apply RLS even
|
||||
* if the table has FORCE RLS set- IF the current user is the owner.
|
||||
* This is specifically to ensure that referential integrity checks are
|
||||
* able to still run correctly.
|
||||
* InNoForceRLSOperation indicates that we should not apply RLS even
|
||||
* if the table has FORCE RLS set - IF the current user is the owner.
|
||||
* This is specifically to ensure that referential integrity checks
|
||||
* are able to still run correctly.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This is intentionally only done after we have checked that the user
|
||||
* is the table owner, which should always be the case for referential
|
||||
* integrity checks.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (row_security && relforcerowsecurity && !InNoForceRLSOperation())
|
||||
return RLS_ENABLED;
|
||||
else
|
||||
if (!relforcerowsecurity || InNoForceRLSOperation())
|
||||
return RLS_NONE_ENV;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* row_security GUC says to bypass RLS, but user lacks permission */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We should apply RLS. However, the user may turn off the row_security
|
||||
* GUC to get a forced error instead.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!row_security && !noError)
|
||||
ereport(ERROR,
|
||||
(errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
|
||||
errmsg("insufficient privilege to bypass row-level security")));
|
||||
errmsg("query would be affected by row-level security policy for table \"%s\"",
|
||||
get_rel_name(relid)),
|
||||
amowner ? errhint("To disable the policy for the table's owner, use ALTER TABLE NO FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY.") : 0));
|
||||
|
||||
/* RLS should be fully enabled for this relation. */
|
||||
return RLS_ENABLED;
|
||||
|
@ -2728,8 +2728,8 @@ COPY (SELECT * FROM copy_t ORDER BY a ASC) TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ',';
|
||||
-- Check COPY TO as user with permissions.
|
||||
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION rls_regress_user1;
|
||||
SET row_security TO OFF;
|
||||
COPY (SELECT * FROM copy_t ORDER BY a ASC) TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --fail - insufficient to bypass rls
|
||||
ERROR: insufficient privilege to bypass row-level security
|
||||
COPY (SELECT * FROM copy_t ORDER BY a ASC) TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --fail - would be affected by RLS
|
||||
ERROR: query would be affected by row-level security policy for table "copy_t"
|
||||
SET row_security TO ON;
|
||||
COPY (SELECT * FROM copy_t ORDER BY a ASC) TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --ok
|
||||
0,cfcd208495d565ef66e7dff9f98764da
|
||||
@ -2769,8 +2769,8 @@ COPY (SELECT * FROM copy_t ORDER BY a ASC) TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --ok
|
||||
-- Check COPY TO as user without permissions. SET row_security TO OFF;
|
||||
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION rls_regress_user2;
|
||||
SET row_security TO OFF;
|
||||
COPY (SELECT * FROM copy_t ORDER BY a ASC) TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --fail - insufficient to bypass rls
|
||||
ERROR: insufficient privilege to bypass row-level security
|
||||
COPY (SELECT * FROM copy_t ORDER BY a ASC) TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --fail - would be affected by RLS
|
||||
ERROR: query would be affected by row-level security policy for table "copy_t"
|
||||
SET row_security TO ON;
|
||||
COPY (SELECT * FROM copy_t ORDER BY a ASC) TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --fail - permission denied
|
||||
ERROR: permission denied for relation copy_t
|
||||
@ -2793,8 +2793,8 @@ COPY copy_rel_to TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ',';
|
||||
-- Check COPY TO as user with permissions.
|
||||
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION rls_regress_user1;
|
||||
SET row_security TO OFF;
|
||||
COPY copy_rel_to TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --fail - insufficient to bypass rls
|
||||
ERROR: insufficient privilege to bypass row-level security
|
||||
COPY copy_rel_to TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --fail - would be affected by RLS
|
||||
ERROR: query would be affected by row-level security policy for table "copy_rel_to"
|
||||
SET row_security TO ON;
|
||||
COPY copy_rel_to TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --ok
|
||||
-- Check COPY TO as user with permissions and BYPASSRLS
|
||||
@ -2822,8 +2822,8 @@ COPY copy_t FROM STDIN; --ok
|
||||
-- Check COPY FROM as user with permissions.
|
||||
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION rls_regress_user1;
|
||||
SET row_security TO OFF;
|
||||
COPY copy_t FROM STDIN; --fail - insufficient privilege to bypass rls.
|
||||
ERROR: insufficient privilege to bypass row-level security
|
||||
COPY copy_t FROM STDIN; --fail - would be affected by RLS.
|
||||
ERROR: query would be affected by row-level security policy for table "copy_t"
|
||||
SET row_security TO ON;
|
||||
COPY copy_t FROM STDIN; --fail - COPY FROM not supported by RLS.
|
||||
ERROR: COPY FROM not supported with row-level security
|
||||
@ -3181,8 +3181,7 @@ SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION rls_regress_user0;
|
||||
DROP TABLE r1;
|
||||
DROP TABLE r2;
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY applies RLS to owners but
|
||||
-- only when row_security = on
|
||||
-- FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY applies RLS to owners too
|
||||
--
|
||||
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION rls_regress_user0;
|
||||
SET row_security = on;
|
||||
@ -3215,30 +3214,16 @@ TABLE r1;
|
||||
(0 rows)
|
||||
|
||||
SET row_security = off;
|
||||
-- Shows all rows
|
||||
-- these all fail, would be affected by RLS
|
||||
TABLE r1;
|
||||
a
|
||||
----
|
||||
10
|
||||
20
|
||||
(2 rows)
|
||||
|
||||
-- Update all rows
|
||||
ERROR: query would be affected by row-level security policy for table "r1"
|
||||
HINT: To disable the policy for the table's owner, use ALTER TABLE NO FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY.
|
||||
UPDATE r1 SET a = 1;
|
||||
TABLE r1;
|
||||
a
|
||||
---
|
||||
1
|
||||
1
|
||||
(2 rows)
|
||||
|
||||
-- Delete all rows
|
||||
ERROR: query would be affected by row-level security policy for table "r1"
|
||||
HINT: To disable the policy for the table's owner, use ALTER TABLE NO FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY.
|
||||
DELETE FROM r1;
|
||||
TABLE r1;
|
||||
a
|
||||
---
|
||||
(0 rows)
|
||||
|
||||
ERROR: query would be affected by row-level security policy for table "r1"
|
||||
HINT: To disable the policy for the table's owner, use ALTER TABLE NO FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY.
|
||||
DROP TABLE r1;
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY does not break RI
|
||||
@ -3349,14 +3334,10 @@ TABLE r1;
|
||||
(0 rows)
|
||||
|
||||
SET row_security = off;
|
||||
-- Rows shown now
|
||||
-- fail, would be affected by RLS
|
||||
TABLE r1;
|
||||
a
|
||||
----
|
||||
10
|
||||
20
|
||||
(2 rows)
|
||||
|
||||
ERROR: query would be affected by row-level security policy for table "r1"
|
||||
HINT: To disable the policy for the table's owner, use ALTER TABLE NO FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY.
|
||||
SET row_security = on;
|
||||
-- Error
|
||||
INSERT INTO r1 VALUES (10), (20) RETURNING *;
|
||||
@ -3377,7 +3358,7 @@ ALTER TABLE r1 FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;
|
||||
-- Works fine
|
||||
UPDATE r1 SET a = 30;
|
||||
-- Show updated rows
|
||||
SET row_security = off;
|
||||
ALTER TABLE r1 NO FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;
|
||||
TABLE r1;
|
||||
a
|
||||
----
|
||||
@ -3393,7 +3374,7 @@ TABLE r1;
|
||||
10
|
||||
(1 row)
|
||||
|
||||
SET row_security = on;
|
||||
ALTER TABLE r1 FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;
|
||||
-- Error
|
||||
UPDATE r1 SET a = 30 RETURNING *;
|
||||
ERROR: new row violates row-level security policy for table "r1"
|
||||
|
@ -1014,7 +1014,7 @@ COPY (SELECT * FROM copy_t ORDER BY a ASC) TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ',';
|
||||
-- Check COPY TO as user with permissions.
|
||||
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION rls_regress_user1;
|
||||
SET row_security TO OFF;
|
||||
COPY (SELECT * FROM copy_t ORDER BY a ASC) TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --fail - insufficient to bypass rls
|
||||
COPY (SELECT * FROM copy_t ORDER BY a ASC) TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --fail - would be affected by RLS
|
||||
SET row_security TO ON;
|
||||
COPY (SELECT * FROM copy_t ORDER BY a ASC) TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --ok
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ COPY (SELECT * FROM copy_t ORDER BY a ASC) TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --ok
|
||||
-- Check COPY TO as user without permissions. SET row_security TO OFF;
|
||||
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION rls_regress_user2;
|
||||
SET row_security TO OFF;
|
||||
COPY (SELECT * FROM copy_t ORDER BY a ASC) TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --fail - insufficient to bypass rls
|
||||
COPY (SELECT * FROM copy_t ORDER BY a ASC) TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --fail - would be affected by RLS
|
||||
SET row_security TO ON;
|
||||
COPY (SELECT * FROM copy_t ORDER BY a ASC) TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --fail - permission denied
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ COPY copy_rel_to TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ',';
|
||||
-- Check COPY TO as user with permissions.
|
||||
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION rls_regress_user1;
|
||||
SET row_security TO OFF;
|
||||
COPY copy_rel_to TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --fail - insufficient to bypass rls
|
||||
COPY copy_rel_to TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --fail - would be affected by RLS
|
||||
SET row_security TO ON;
|
||||
COPY copy_rel_to TO STDOUT WITH DELIMITER ','; --ok
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ COPY copy_t FROM STDIN; --ok
|
||||
-- Check COPY FROM as user with permissions.
|
||||
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION rls_regress_user1;
|
||||
SET row_security TO OFF;
|
||||
COPY copy_t FROM STDIN; --fail - insufficient privilege to bypass rls.
|
||||
COPY copy_t FROM STDIN; --fail - would be affected by RLS.
|
||||
SET row_security TO ON;
|
||||
COPY copy_t FROM STDIN; --fail - COPY FROM not supported by RLS.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1315,8 +1315,7 @@ DROP TABLE r1;
|
||||
DROP TABLE r2;
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
-- FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY applies RLS to owners but
|
||||
-- only when row_security = on
|
||||
-- FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY applies RLS to owners too
|
||||
--
|
||||
SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION rls_regress_user0;
|
||||
SET row_security = on;
|
||||
@ -1342,16 +1341,10 @@ DELETE FROM r1;
|
||||
TABLE r1;
|
||||
|
||||
SET row_security = off;
|
||||
-- Shows all rows
|
||||
-- these all fail, would be affected by RLS
|
||||
TABLE r1;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Update all rows
|
||||
UPDATE r1 SET a = 1;
|
||||
TABLE r1;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Delete all rows
|
||||
DELETE FROM r1;
|
||||
TABLE r1;
|
||||
|
||||
DROP TABLE r1;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1469,7 +1462,7 @@ INSERT INTO r1 VALUES (10), (20);
|
||||
TABLE r1;
|
||||
|
||||
SET row_security = off;
|
||||
-- Rows shown now
|
||||
-- fail, would be affected by RLS
|
||||
TABLE r1;
|
||||
|
||||
SET row_security = on;
|
||||
@ -1497,7 +1490,7 @@ ALTER TABLE r1 FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;
|
||||
UPDATE r1 SET a = 30;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Show updated rows
|
||||
SET row_security = off;
|
||||
ALTER TABLE r1 NO FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;
|
||||
TABLE r1;
|
||||
-- reset value in r1 for test with RETURNING
|
||||
UPDATE r1 SET a = 10;
|
||||
@ -1505,7 +1498,7 @@ UPDATE r1 SET a = 10;
|
||||
-- Verify row reset
|
||||
TABLE r1;
|
||||
|
||||
SET row_security = on;
|
||||
ALTER TABLE r1 FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Error
|
||||
UPDATE r1 SET a = 30 RETURNING *;
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user