mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-05-02 11:44:50 +03:00
Last-minute updates for release notes.
Add entries for security issues. Security: CVE-2014-0060 through CVE-2014-0067
This commit is contained in:
parent
ff3d533e58
commit
4bde115e7e
@ -40,6 +40,145 @@
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Shore up <literal>GRANT ... WITH ADMIN OPTION</> restrictions
|
||||
(Noah Misch)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Granting a role without <literal>ADMIN OPTION</> is supposed to
|
||||
prevent the grantee from adding or removing members from the granted
|
||||
role, but this restriction was easily bypassed by doing <literal>SET
|
||||
ROLE</> first. The security impact is mostly that a role member can
|
||||
revoke the access of others, contrary to the wishes of his grantor.
|
||||
Unapproved role member additions are a lesser concern, since an
|
||||
uncooperative role member could provide most of his rights to others
|
||||
anyway by creating views or <literal>SECURITY DEFINER</> functions.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0060)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Prevent privilege escalation via manual calls to PL validator
|
||||
functions (Andres Freund)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The primary role of PL validator functions is to be called implicitly
|
||||
during <command>CREATE FUNCTION</>, but they are also normal SQL
|
||||
functions that a user can call explicitly. Calling a validator on
|
||||
a function actually written in some other language was not checked
|
||||
for and could be exploited for privilege-escalation purposes.
|
||||
The fix involves adding a call to a privilege-checking function in
|
||||
each validator function. Non-core procedural languages will also
|
||||
need to make this change to their own validator functions, if any.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0061)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Avoid multiple name lookups during table and index DDL
|
||||
(Robert Haas, Andres Freund)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
If the name lookups come to different conclusions due to concurrent
|
||||
activity, we might perform some parts of the DDL on a different table
|
||||
than other parts. At least in the case of <command>CREATE INDEX</>,
|
||||
this can be used to cause the permissions checks to be performed
|
||||
against a different table than the index creation, allowing for a
|
||||
privilege escalation attack.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0062)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Prevent buffer overrun with long datetime strings (Noah Misch)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The <literal>MAXDATELEN</> constant was too small for the longest
|
||||
possible value of type <type>interval</>, allowing a buffer overrun
|
||||
in <function>interval_out()</>. Although the datetime input
|
||||
functions were more careful about avoiding buffer overrun, the limit
|
||||
was short enough to cause them to reject some valid inputs, such as
|
||||
input containing a very long timezone name. The <application>ecpg</>
|
||||
library contained these vulnerabilities along with some of its own.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0063)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Prevent buffer overrun due to integer overflow in size calculations
|
||||
(Noah Misch, Heikki Linnakangas)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Several functions, mostly type input functions, calculated an
|
||||
allocation size without checking for overflow. If overflow did
|
||||
occur, a too-small buffer would be allocated and then written past.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0064)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Prevent overruns of fixed-size buffers
|
||||
(Peter Eisentraut, Jozef Mlich)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Use <function>strlcpy()</> and related functions to provide a clear
|
||||
guarantee that fixed-size buffers are not overrun. Unlike the
|
||||
preceding items, it is unclear whether these cases really represent
|
||||
live issues, since in most cases there appear to be previous
|
||||
constraints on the size of the input string. Nonetheless it seems
|
||||
prudent to silence all Coverity warnings of this type.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0065)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Avoid crashing if <function>crypt()</> returns NULL (Honza Horak,
|
||||
Bruce Momjian)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
There are relatively few scenarios in which <function>crypt()</>
|
||||
could return NULL, but <filename>contrib/chkpass</> would crash
|
||||
if it did. One practical case in which this could be an issue is
|
||||
if <application>libc</> is configured to refuse to execute unapproved
|
||||
hashing algorithms (e.g., <quote>FIPS mode</>).
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0066)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Document risks of <literal>make check</> in the regression testing
|
||||
instructions (Noah Misch, Tom Lane)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Since the temporary server started by <literal>make check</>
|
||||
uses <quote>trust</> authentication, another user on the same machine
|
||||
could connect to it as database superuser, and then potentially
|
||||
exploit the privileges of the operating-system user who started the
|
||||
tests. A future release will probably incorporate changes in the
|
||||
testing procedure to prevent this risk, but some public discussion is
|
||||
needed first. So for the moment, just warn people against using
|
||||
<literal>make check</> when there are untrusted users on the
|
||||
same machine.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0067)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Fix possible mis-replay of WAL records when some segments of a
|
||||
|
@ -34,6 +34,145 @@
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Shore up <literal>GRANT ... WITH ADMIN OPTION</> restrictions
|
||||
(Noah Misch)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Granting a role without <literal>ADMIN OPTION</> is supposed to
|
||||
prevent the grantee from adding or removing members from the granted
|
||||
role, but this restriction was easily bypassed by doing <literal>SET
|
||||
ROLE</> first. The security impact is mostly that a role member can
|
||||
revoke the access of others, contrary to the wishes of his grantor.
|
||||
Unapproved role member additions are a lesser concern, since an
|
||||
uncooperative role member could provide most of his rights to others
|
||||
anyway by creating views or <literal>SECURITY DEFINER</> functions.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0060)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Prevent privilege escalation via manual calls to PL validator
|
||||
functions (Andres Freund)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The primary role of PL validator functions is to be called implicitly
|
||||
during <command>CREATE FUNCTION</>, but they are also normal SQL
|
||||
functions that a user can call explicitly. Calling a validator on
|
||||
a function actually written in some other language was not checked
|
||||
for and could be exploited for privilege-escalation purposes.
|
||||
The fix involves adding a call to a privilege-checking function in
|
||||
each validator function. Non-core procedural languages will also
|
||||
need to make this change to their own validator functions, if any.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0061)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Avoid multiple name lookups during table and index DDL
|
||||
(Robert Haas, Andres Freund)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
If the name lookups come to different conclusions due to concurrent
|
||||
activity, we might perform some parts of the DDL on a different table
|
||||
than other parts. At least in the case of <command>CREATE INDEX</>,
|
||||
this can be used to cause the permissions checks to be performed
|
||||
against a different table than the index creation, allowing for a
|
||||
privilege escalation attack.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0062)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Prevent buffer overrun with long datetime strings (Noah Misch)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The <literal>MAXDATELEN</> constant was too small for the longest
|
||||
possible value of type <type>interval</>, allowing a buffer overrun
|
||||
in <function>interval_out()</>. Although the datetime input
|
||||
functions were more careful about avoiding buffer overrun, the limit
|
||||
was short enough to cause them to reject some valid inputs, such as
|
||||
input containing a very long timezone name. The <application>ecpg</>
|
||||
library contained these vulnerabilities along with some of its own.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0063)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Prevent buffer overrun due to integer overflow in size calculations
|
||||
(Noah Misch, Heikki Linnakangas)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Several functions, mostly type input functions, calculated an
|
||||
allocation size without checking for overflow. If overflow did
|
||||
occur, a too-small buffer would be allocated and then written past.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0064)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Prevent overruns of fixed-size buffers
|
||||
(Peter Eisentraut, Jozef Mlich)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Use <function>strlcpy()</> and related functions to provide a clear
|
||||
guarantee that fixed-size buffers are not overrun. Unlike the
|
||||
preceding items, it is unclear whether these cases really represent
|
||||
live issues, since in most cases there appear to be previous
|
||||
constraints on the size of the input string. Nonetheless it seems
|
||||
prudent to silence all Coverity warnings of this type.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0065)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Avoid crashing if <function>crypt()</> returns NULL (Honza Horak,
|
||||
Bruce Momjian)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
There are relatively few scenarios in which <function>crypt()</>
|
||||
could return NULL, but <filename>contrib/chkpass</> would crash
|
||||
if it did. One practical case in which this could be an issue is
|
||||
if <application>libc</> is configured to refuse to execute unapproved
|
||||
hashing algorithms (e.g., <quote>FIPS mode</>).
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0066)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Document risks of <literal>make check</> in the regression testing
|
||||
instructions (Noah Misch, Tom Lane)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Since the temporary server started by <literal>make check</>
|
||||
uses <quote>trust</> authentication, another user on the same machine
|
||||
could connect to it as database superuser, and then potentially
|
||||
exploit the privileges of the operating-system user who started the
|
||||
tests. A future release will probably incorporate changes in the
|
||||
testing procedure to prevent this risk, but some public discussion is
|
||||
needed first. So for the moment, just warn people against using
|
||||
<literal>make check</> when there are untrusted users on the
|
||||
same machine.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0067)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Fix possible mis-replay of WAL records when some segments of a
|
||||
|
@ -34,6 +34,145 @@
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Shore up <literal>GRANT ... WITH ADMIN OPTION</> restrictions
|
||||
(Noah Misch)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Granting a role without <literal>ADMIN OPTION</> is supposed to
|
||||
prevent the grantee from adding or removing members from the granted
|
||||
role, but this restriction was easily bypassed by doing <literal>SET
|
||||
ROLE</> first. The security impact is mostly that a role member can
|
||||
revoke the access of others, contrary to the wishes of his grantor.
|
||||
Unapproved role member additions are a lesser concern, since an
|
||||
uncooperative role member could provide most of his rights to others
|
||||
anyway by creating views or <literal>SECURITY DEFINER</> functions.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0060)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Prevent privilege escalation via manual calls to PL validator
|
||||
functions (Andres Freund)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The primary role of PL validator functions is to be called implicitly
|
||||
during <command>CREATE FUNCTION</>, but they are also normal SQL
|
||||
functions that a user can call explicitly. Calling a validator on
|
||||
a function actually written in some other language was not checked
|
||||
for and could be exploited for privilege-escalation purposes.
|
||||
The fix involves adding a call to a privilege-checking function in
|
||||
each validator function. Non-core procedural languages will also
|
||||
need to make this change to their own validator functions, if any.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0061)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Avoid multiple name lookups during table and index DDL
|
||||
(Robert Haas, Andres Freund)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
If the name lookups come to different conclusions due to concurrent
|
||||
activity, we might perform some parts of the DDL on a different table
|
||||
than other parts. At least in the case of <command>CREATE INDEX</>,
|
||||
this can be used to cause the permissions checks to be performed
|
||||
against a different table than the index creation, allowing for a
|
||||
privilege escalation attack.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0062)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Prevent buffer overrun with long datetime strings (Noah Misch)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The <literal>MAXDATELEN</> constant was too small for the longest
|
||||
possible value of type <type>interval</>, allowing a buffer overrun
|
||||
in <function>interval_out()</>. Although the datetime input
|
||||
functions were more careful about avoiding buffer overrun, the limit
|
||||
was short enough to cause them to reject some valid inputs, such as
|
||||
input containing a very long timezone name. The <application>ecpg</>
|
||||
library contained these vulnerabilities along with some of its own.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0063)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Prevent buffer overrun due to integer overflow in size calculations
|
||||
(Noah Misch, Heikki Linnakangas)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Several functions, mostly type input functions, calculated an
|
||||
allocation size without checking for overflow. If overflow did
|
||||
occur, a too-small buffer would be allocated and then written past.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0064)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Prevent overruns of fixed-size buffers
|
||||
(Peter Eisentraut, Jozef Mlich)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Use <function>strlcpy()</> and related functions to provide a clear
|
||||
guarantee that fixed-size buffers are not overrun. Unlike the
|
||||
preceding items, it is unclear whether these cases really represent
|
||||
live issues, since in most cases there appear to be previous
|
||||
constraints on the size of the input string. Nonetheless it seems
|
||||
prudent to silence all Coverity warnings of this type.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0065)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Avoid crashing if <function>crypt()</> returns NULL (Honza Horak,
|
||||
Bruce Momjian)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
There are relatively few scenarios in which <function>crypt()</>
|
||||
could return NULL, but <filename>contrib/chkpass</> would crash
|
||||
if it did. One practical case in which this could be an issue is
|
||||
if <application>libc</> is configured to refuse to execute unapproved
|
||||
hashing algorithms (e.g., <quote>FIPS mode</>).
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0066)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Document risks of <literal>make check</> in the regression testing
|
||||
instructions (Noah Misch, Tom Lane)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Since the temporary server started by <literal>make check</>
|
||||
uses <quote>trust</> authentication, another user on the same machine
|
||||
could connect to it as database superuser, and then potentially
|
||||
exploit the privileges of the operating-system user who started the
|
||||
tests. A future release will probably incorporate changes in the
|
||||
testing procedure to prevent this risk, but some public discussion is
|
||||
needed first. So for the moment, just warn people against using
|
||||
<literal>make check</> when there are untrusted users on the
|
||||
same machine.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0067)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Fix possible mis-replay of WAL records when some segments of a
|
||||
|
@ -34,6 +34,145 @@
|
||||
|
||||
<itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Shore up <literal>GRANT ... WITH ADMIN OPTION</> restrictions
|
||||
(Noah Misch)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Granting a role without <literal>ADMIN OPTION</> is supposed to
|
||||
prevent the grantee from adding or removing members from the granted
|
||||
role, but this restriction was easily bypassed by doing <literal>SET
|
||||
ROLE</> first. The security impact is mostly that a role member can
|
||||
revoke the access of others, contrary to the wishes of his grantor.
|
||||
Unapproved role member additions are a lesser concern, since an
|
||||
uncooperative role member could provide most of his rights to others
|
||||
anyway by creating views or <literal>SECURITY DEFINER</> functions.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0060)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Prevent privilege escalation via manual calls to PL validator
|
||||
functions (Andres Freund)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The primary role of PL validator functions is to be called implicitly
|
||||
during <command>CREATE FUNCTION</>, but they are also normal SQL
|
||||
functions that a user can call explicitly. Calling a validator on
|
||||
a function actually written in some other language was not checked
|
||||
for and could be exploited for privilege-escalation purposes.
|
||||
The fix involves adding a call to a privilege-checking function in
|
||||
each validator function. Non-core procedural languages will also
|
||||
need to make this change to their own validator functions, if any.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0061)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Avoid multiple name lookups during table and index DDL
|
||||
(Robert Haas, Andres Freund)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
If the name lookups come to different conclusions due to concurrent
|
||||
activity, we might perform some parts of the DDL on a different table
|
||||
than other parts. At least in the case of <command>CREATE INDEX</>,
|
||||
this can be used to cause the permissions checks to be performed
|
||||
against a different table than the index creation, allowing for a
|
||||
privilege escalation attack.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0062)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Prevent buffer overrun with long datetime strings (Noah Misch)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The <literal>MAXDATELEN</> constant was too small for the longest
|
||||
possible value of type <type>interval</>, allowing a buffer overrun
|
||||
in <function>interval_out()</>. Although the datetime input
|
||||
functions were more careful about avoiding buffer overrun, the limit
|
||||
was short enough to cause them to reject some valid inputs, such as
|
||||
input containing a very long timezone name. The <application>ecpg</>
|
||||
library contained these vulnerabilities along with some of its own.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0063)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Prevent buffer overrun due to integer overflow in size calculations
|
||||
(Noah Misch, Heikki Linnakangas)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Several functions, mostly type input functions, calculated an
|
||||
allocation size without checking for overflow. If overflow did
|
||||
occur, a too-small buffer would be allocated and then written past.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0064)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Prevent overruns of fixed-size buffers
|
||||
(Peter Eisentraut, Jozef Mlich)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Use <function>strlcpy()</> and related functions to provide a clear
|
||||
guarantee that fixed-size buffers are not overrun. Unlike the
|
||||
preceding items, it is unclear whether these cases really represent
|
||||
live issues, since in most cases there appear to be previous
|
||||
constraints on the size of the input string. Nonetheless it seems
|
||||
prudent to silence all Coverity warnings of this type.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0065)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Avoid crashing if <function>crypt()</> returns NULL (Honza Horak,
|
||||
Bruce Momjian)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
There are relatively few scenarios in which <function>crypt()</>
|
||||
could return NULL, but <filename>contrib/chkpass</> would crash
|
||||
if it did. One practical case in which this could be an issue is
|
||||
if <application>libc</> is configured to refuse to execute unapproved
|
||||
hashing algorithms (e.g., <quote>FIPS mode</>).
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0066)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Document risks of <literal>make check</> in the regression testing
|
||||
instructions (Noah Misch, Tom Lane)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Since the temporary server started by <literal>make check</>
|
||||
uses <quote>trust</> authentication, another user on the same machine
|
||||
could connect to it as database superuser, and then potentially
|
||||
exploit the privileges of the operating-system user who started the
|
||||
tests. A future release will probably incorporate changes in the
|
||||
testing procedure to prevent this risk, but some public discussion is
|
||||
needed first. So for the moment, just warn people against using
|
||||
<literal>make check</> when there are untrusted users on the
|
||||
same machine.
|
||||
(CVE-2014-0067)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Fix possible mis-replay of WAL records when some segments of a
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user