mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-04-27 22:56:53 +03:00
Call pqPipelineFlush from PQsendFlushRequest
When PQsendFlushRequest() was added by commit 69cf1d5429d4, we argued against adding a PQflush() call in it[1]. This is still the right decision: if the user wants a flush to occur, they can just call that. However, we failed to realize that the message bytes could still be given to the kernel for transmitting when this can be made without blocking. That's what pqPipelineFlush() does, and it is done for every single other message type sent by libpq, so do that. (When the socket is in blocking mode this may indeed block, but that's what all the other libpq message-sending routines do, too.) [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202106252352.5ca4byasfun5%40alvherre.pgsql Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGECzQTxZRevRWkKodE-SnJk1Yfm4eKT+8E4Cyq3MJ9YKTnNew@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
b7caeaff31
commit
42f8326851
@ -3235,6 +3235,14 @@ PQsendFlushRequest(PGconn *conn)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Give the data a push (in pipeline mode, only if we're past the size
|
||||
* threshold). In nonblock mode, don't complain if we're unable to send
|
||||
* it all; PQgetResult() will do any additional flushing needed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (pqPipelineFlush(conn) < 0)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user