mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-05-03 22:24:49 +03:00
Recognize GROUPING() as a aggregate expression.
Previously GROUPING() was not recognized as a aggregate expression, erroneously allowing the planner to move it from HAVING to WHERE. Author: Jeevan Chalke Reviewed-By: Andrew Gierth Discussion: CAM2+6=WG9omG5rFOMAYBweJxmpTaapvVp5pCeMrE6BfpCwr4Og@mail.gmail.com Backpatch: 9.5, where grouping sets were introduced
This commit is contained in:
parent
65b86c1767
commit
3500d1cc78
@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ make_ands_implicit(Expr *clause)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* contain_agg_clause
|
||||
* Recursively search for Aggref nodes within a clause.
|
||||
* Recursively search for Aggref/GroupingFunc nodes within a clause.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns true if any aggregate found.
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -417,6 +417,11 @@ contain_agg_clause_walker(Node *node, void *context)
|
||||
Assert(((Aggref *) node)->agglevelsup == 0);
|
||||
return true; /* abort the tree traversal and return true */
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (IsA(node, GroupingFunc))
|
||||
{
|
||||
Assert(((GroupingFunc *) node)->agglevelsup == 0);
|
||||
return true; /* abort the tree traversal and return true */
|
||||
}
|
||||
Assert(!IsA(node, SubLink));
|
||||
return expression_tree_walker(node, contain_agg_clause_walker, context);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -486,6 +486,68 @@ having exists (select 1 from onek b where sum(distinct a.four) = b.four);
|
||||
9 | 3
|
||||
(25 rows)
|
||||
|
||||
-- HAVING with GROUPING queries
|
||||
select ten, grouping(ten) from onek
|
||||
group by grouping sets(ten) having grouping(ten) >= 0
|
||||
order by 2,1;
|
||||
ten | grouping
|
||||
-----+----------
|
||||
0 | 0
|
||||
1 | 0
|
||||
2 | 0
|
||||
3 | 0
|
||||
4 | 0
|
||||
5 | 0
|
||||
6 | 0
|
||||
7 | 0
|
||||
8 | 0
|
||||
9 | 0
|
||||
(10 rows)
|
||||
|
||||
select ten, grouping(ten) from onek
|
||||
group by grouping sets(ten, four) having grouping(ten) > 0
|
||||
order by 2,1;
|
||||
ten | grouping
|
||||
-----+----------
|
||||
| 1
|
||||
| 1
|
||||
| 1
|
||||
| 1
|
||||
(4 rows)
|
||||
|
||||
select ten, grouping(ten) from onek
|
||||
group by rollup(ten) having grouping(ten) > 0
|
||||
order by 2,1;
|
||||
ten | grouping
|
||||
-----+----------
|
||||
| 1
|
||||
(1 row)
|
||||
|
||||
select ten, grouping(ten) from onek
|
||||
group by cube(ten) having grouping(ten) > 0
|
||||
order by 2,1;
|
||||
ten | grouping
|
||||
-----+----------
|
||||
| 1
|
||||
(1 row)
|
||||
|
||||
select ten, grouping(ten) from onek
|
||||
group by (ten) having grouping(ten) >= 0
|
||||
order by 2,1;
|
||||
ten | grouping
|
||||
-----+----------
|
||||
0 | 0
|
||||
1 | 0
|
||||
2 | 0
|
||||
3 | 0
|
||||
4 | 0
|
||||
5 | 0
|
||||
6 | 0
|
||||
7 | 0
|
||||
8 | 0
|
||||
9 | 0
|
||||
(10 rows)
|
||||
|
||||
-- FILTER queries
|
||||
select ten, sum(distinct four) filter (where four::text ~ '123') from onek a
|
||||
group by rollup(ten);
|
||||
|
@ -154,6 +154,23 @@ select ten, sum(distinct four) from onek a
|
||||
group by grouping sets((ten,four),(ten))
|
||||
having exists (select 1 from onek b where sum(distinct a.four) = b.four);
|
||||
|
||||
-- HAVING with GROUPING queries
|
||||
select ten, grouping(ten) from onek
|
||||
group by grouping sets(ten) having grouping(ten) >= 0
|
||||
order by 2,1;
|
||||
select ten, grouping(ten) from onek
|
||||
group by grouping sets(ten, four) having grouping(ten) > 0
|
||||
order by 2,1;
|
||||
select ten, grouping(ten) from onek
|
||||
group by rollup(ten) having grouping(ten) > 0
|
||||
order by 2,1;
|
||||
select ten, grouping(ten) from onek
|
||||
group by cube(ten) having grouping(ten) > 0
|
||||
order by 2,1;
|
||||
select ten, grouping(ten) from onek
|
||||
group by (ten) having grouping(ten) >= 0
|
||||
order by 2,1;
|
||||
|
||||
-- FILTER queries
|
||||
select ten, sum(distinct four) filter (where four::text ~ '123') from onek a
|
||||
group by rollup(ten);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user