mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2026-10-23 13:29:09 +03:00
doc: reformat GRAPH_TABLE examples
The GRAPH_TABLE examples in ddl.sgml and queries.sgml were written as single long lines, making their structure harder to read in the generated documentation. Reformat these examples so that the graph name, MATCH clause, and COLUMNS clause appear on separate lines, making them easier to read. Author: Koshino Taiki <koshino@sraoss.co.jp> Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS9P286MB64860BD6CD6D4B4B0E1CEDE894A32@OS9P286MB6486.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Backpatch-through: 19
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5788,7 +5788,9 @@ CREATE PROPERTY GRAPH myshop
|
||||
This graph could then be queried like this:
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
-- get list of customers active today
|
||||
SELECT customer_name FROM GRAPH_TABLE (myshop MATCH (c IS customers)-[IS customer_orders]->(o IS orders WHERE o.ordered_when = current_date) COLUMNS (c.name AS customer_name));
|
||||
SELECT customer_name FROM GRAPH_TABLE (myshop
|
||||
MATCH (c IS customers)-[IS customer_orders]->(o IS orders WHERE o.ordered_when = current_date)
|
||||
COLUMNS (c.name AS customer_name));
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
corresponding approximately to this relational query:
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
@@ -5852,7 +5854,9 @@ CREATE PROPERTY GRAPH myshop
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
With this definition, we can write a query like this:
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
SELECT customer_name FROM GRAPH_TABLE (myshop MATCH (c IS customer)-[IS has_placed]->(o IS "order" WHERE o.ordered_when = current_date) COLUMNS (c.name AS customer_name));
|
||||
SELECT customer_name FROM GRAPH_TABLE (myshop
|
||||
MATCH (c IS customer)-[IS has_placed]->(o IS "order" WHERE o.ordered_when = current_date)
|
||||
COLUMNS (c.name AS customer_name));
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
With the new labels the <literal>MATCH</literal> clause is now more intuitive.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
@@ -5891,7 +5895,9 @@ CREATE PROPERTY GRAPH myshop
|
||||
<literal>employees</literal> table to something, but it is allowed like
|
||||
this.) Then we can run a query like this (incomplete):
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
SELECT ... FROM GRAPH_TABLE (myshop MATCH (IS person WHERE name = '...')-[]->... COLUMNS (...));
|
||||
SELECT ... FROM GRAPH_TABLE (myshop
|
||||
MATCH (IS person WHERE name = '...')-[]->...
|
||||
COLUMNS (...));
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
This would automatically consider both the <literal>customers</literal> and
|
||||
the <literal>employees</literal> tables when looking for an edge with the
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2768,7 +2768,9 @@ SELECT * FROM t;
|
||||
Consider this example from <xref linkend="ddl-property-graphs"/>:
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
-- get list of customers active today
|
||||
SELECT customer_name FROM GRAPH_TABLE (myshop MATCH (c IS customers)-[IS customer_orders]->(o IS orders WHERE o.ordered_when = current_date) COLUMNS (c.name AS customer_name));
|
||||
SELECT customer_name FROM GRAPH_TABLE (myshop
|
||||
MATCH (c IS customers)-[IS customer_orders]->(o IS orders WHERE o.ordered_when = current_date)
|
||||
COLUMNS (c.name AS customer_name));
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
The graph query part happens inside the <literal>GRAPH_TABLE</literal>
|
||||
construct. As far as the rest of the query is concerned, this acts like a
|
||||
@@ -2777,7 +2779,9 @@ SELECT customer_name FROM GRAPH_TABLE (myshop MATCH (c IS customers)-[IS custome
|
||||
names can be assigned to the result, and the result can be joined with
|
||||
other tables, subsequently filtered, and so on, for example:
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
SELECT ... FROM GRAPH_TABLE (mygraph MATCH ... COLUMNS (...)) AS myresult (a, b, c) JOIN othertable USING (a) WHERE b > 0 ORDER BY c;
|
||||
SELECT ... FROM GRAPH_TABLE (mygraph
|
||||
MATCH ...
|
||||
COLUMNS (...)) AS myresult (a, b, c) JOIN othertable USING (a) WHERE b > 0 ORDER BY c;
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2893,8 +2897,9 @@ SELECT ... FROM GRAPH_TABLE (mygraph MATCH ... COLUMNS (...)) AS myresult (a, b,
|
||||
For example (assuming appropriate definitions of the property graph as
|
||||
well as the underlying tables):
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
GRAPH_TABLE (mygraph MATCH (p IS person)-[h IS has]->(a IS account)
|
||||
COLUMNS (p.name AS person_name, h.since AS has_account_since, a.num AS account_number)
|
||||
GRAPH_TABLE (mygraph
|
||||
MATCH (p IS person)-[h IS has]->(a IS account)
|
||||
COLUMNS (p.name AS person_name, h.since AS has_account_since, a.num AS account_number))
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
<literal>WHERE</literal> clauses can be used inside element patterns to
|
||||
filter matches:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user