kostja@bodhi.(none) 11c57540f7 A fix and a test case for Bug#24918 drop table and lock / inconsistent ...

between perm and temp tables. Review fixes.

The original bug report complains that if we locked a temporary table
with LOCK TABLES statement, we would not leave LOCK TABLES mode
when this temporary table is dropped.

Additionally, the bug was escalated when it was discovered than
when a temporary transactional table that was previously
locked with LOCK TABLES statement was dropped, futher actions with
this table, such as UNLOCK TABLES, would lead to a crash.

The problem originates from incomplete support of transactional temporary
tables. When we added calls to handler::store_lock()/handler::external_lock()
to operations that work with such tables, we only covered the normal
server code flow and did not cover LOCK TABLES mode. 
In LOCK TABLES mode, ::external_lock(LOCK) would sometimes be called without
matching ::external_lock(UNLOCK), e.g. when a transactional temporary table
was dropped. Additionally, this table would be left in the list of LOCKed 
TABLES.

The patch aims to address this inadequacy. Now, whenever an instance
of 'handler' is destroyed, we assert that it was priorly
external_lock(UNLOCK)-ed. All the places that violate this assert
were fixed.

This patch introduces no changes in behavior -- the discrepancy in
behavior will be fixed when we start calling ::store_lock()/::external_lock()
for all tables, regardless whether they are transactional or not, 
temporary or not.

2007-07-27 16:37:29 +04:00

298 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw