unknown 15e00f1f3d BUG#15872: Don't run the range analyzer on "t1.keypart NOT IN (const1, ..., )", as that consumes ...

too much memory. Instead, either create the equvalent SEL_TREE manually, or create only two ranges that
strictly include the area to scan
(Note: just to re-iterate: increasing NOT_IN_IGNORE_THRESHOLD will make optimization run slower for big 
IN-lists, but the server will not run out of memory. O(N^2) memory use has been eliminated)


mysql-test/r/func_in.result:
  Testcase for BUG#15872
mysql-test/t/func_in.test:
  Testcase for BUG#15872
sql/item.cc:
  BUG#15872: Added Item_decimal::set_decimal_value()
sql/item.h:
  UG#15872: Added Item_decimal::set_decimal_value()
sql/item_cmpfunc.h:
  BUG#15872: Added in_vector::create_item(), in_vector::value_to_item() and their implementations in concrete
  classes.
sql/opt_range.cc:
  BUG#15872: Don't run the range analyzer on "t1.keypart NOT IN (const1, ..., )", as that 
  consumes too much memory. Instead, either 
   A) create the equivalent SEL_TREE manually, making use of the fact that item_not_in->array
      has an ordered IN-list, or
   B) create only two ranges: (-inf|NULL) < X < min_value_from_in_list,  max_value_from_in_list < X
  (Choose #B if the IN-list has > 10K elements)

2006-04-25 23:33:31 +04:00

6.2 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw