In the unlikely scenario that you have a remote branch on `origin` called
`foo`, and a local tag called `origin/foo`, git changes the behavior of
the previous command such that it produces
```
$ git for-each-ref --sort=refname --format=%(refname:short) refs/remotes
origin/branch1
remotes/origin/foo
```
with `remotes/` prepended. Presumably this is to disambiguate it from
the local tag `origin/foo`. Unfortunately, this breaks the existing
behavior of this function, so the remote branch is never shown.
By changing the command, we now get
```
$ git for-each-ref --sort=refname --format=%(refname) refs/remotes
refs/remotes/origin/branch1
refs/remotes/origin/foo
```
This allows easy parsing based on the `/`, and none of the code outside
this function has to change.
----
We previously were not showing remote HEADs for modern git versions
based on how they were formatted from "%(refname:short)".
We have decided that this is a feature, not a bug, so we are building
that into the code here.
Previously we would enter a newline at the password prompt, which would cause
the fetch to fail. The problem with this was that if you have many remotes, the
fetch would sometimes hang for some reason; I don't totally understand how that
happened, but I guess the many ssh processes requesting passwords would somehow
interfere with each other. Avoid this by simply killing the git fetch process
the moment it requests the first password.
This is a regression introduced with a199ed1396c; it is important to use a PTY
even with credentialStrategy=FAIL, otherwise the fetch command will spew the
credentials request into the UI and then hang.
This fixes the problem that background fetching makes lazygit hang when the
fetch request needs to prompt for a passphrase. For Mac users who use the
keychain to store their ssh passphrases, this can happen when lazygit is running
while the machine goes to sleep, because macOS looks the keychain in that case.
This now allows for leaving the status panel and returning back to the
same log command. Previously any return to the status panel would result
in the next command in the list being shown. Now, you need to press `a`,
with a log command being rendered, to rotate to the next
allBranchesLogCmd.
BeginInteractiveRebaseForCommit is used for all the patch commands, and for
rewording. It works by setting the commit we want to stop at to 'edit'; this
doesn't work for merge commits. This wasn't a problem for the patch commands so
far, because you typically don't use custom patches with merge commits (although
we don't prevent this; maybe we should?).
However, it was a problem when you tried to reword a merge commit; this
previously failed with an error, as the test added in the previous commit
demonstrated.
Also, we want to add a new patch command that has to stop *before* the selected
commit (pull patch to new commit before the original one), and this wouldn't
work for the first commit in a feature branch, because it would have to set the
last commit before that to 'edit', which isn't possible if that's a merge (which
is likely).
To fix all this, use a 'break' before the selected commit if the commit is a
merge. It is important that we only do it in that case and not always, otherwise
we would break the new regression tests that were added a few commits ago.
This decouples StreamOutput from whether a PTY is used. In most cases we just
want to see the output in the log window, but don't have to use a PTY, e.g. for
the bisect commands.
This has the implication that custom commands that are using "stream: true" no
longer use a PTY. In most cases that's probably a good thing, but we're going to
add a separate pty config for those who really wanted this.
Change the base type of some of our enums from int to uint8, and reorder fields
for better packing. This reduces the size of models.Commit from 152 to 132 bytes
on my machine.
This doesn't improve overall memory usage significantly, but why not save a
little bit of memory if it's easy.
We need to pass %P instead of %p in the format string of the git log command, so
that the parent hashes have the full length and can be shared with the real
hashes.
This in itself is not an improvement, because hashes are unique (they are shared
between real commits and rebase todos, but there are so few of those that it
doesn't matter). However, it becomes an improvement once we also store parent
hashes in the same pool; but the real motivation for this change is to also
reuse the hash pointers in Pipe objects later in the branch. This will be a big
win because in a merge-heavy git repo there are many more Pipe instances than
commits.
Fish shell does not support "&&" and "||" operators like
POSIX-compatible shells. Instead, it uses a different syntax structure
based on begin/end and if/else.
This caused existing lazygit nvim-remote integration templates to break
when fish was the user's default shell.
This commit adds explicit fish shell detection using the FISH_VERSION
environment variable, and provides fish-compatible templates that
correctly handle launching Neovim or sending remote commands via $NVIM.
Fixes behavior where edits would not open in a new Neovim tab or line
navigation would fail when $NVIM was set.
Ensures smoother editing experience for users running fish shell
(supported since Nov 2012 with FISH_VERSION).
We do this because
- it's closer to what you would do on the command line
- it simplifies the code a bit
- it will allow us to support cherry-picking merge commits.
What happens here is that when stopping on an "edit" todo entry, we rely on the
assumption that if the .git/rebase-merge/amend file exists, the command was
successful, and if it doesn't, there was a conflict. The problem is that when
you stop on an edit command, and then run a multi-commit cherry-pick or rebase,
this will delete the amend file. You may or may not consider this a bug in git;
to work around it, we also check the existence of the rebase-merge/message file,
which will be deleted as well by the cherry-pick or revert.
MergeRebasingCommits already merges the rebasing commits into the commits slice
that is passed in, so it doesn't make sense to append the result to commits
again. It isn't a problem, but only because commits is always empty.
It is useful to see if the conflicted commit was a "pick" or an "edit". What's
more, we're about to add support for showing cherry-picks and reverts, and
seeing that a conflicted commit was a revert is important because its diff is
backwards compared to the diff of the conflicting files in the Files panel.
This is equivalent in the current state of the code, but it will no longer be
after the next commit, because we will introduce a new status value
StatusConflicted. And in a later PR we might add yet another value
StatusCherryPicking to distinguish rebase todos from cherry-pick todos; using
commit.IsTODO is a safer way to check whether a commit is any of these.
It looks like enums.go was supposed to be file that collects a bunch of enums,
but actually there's only one in there, and since it has methods, it deserves to
be in a file of its own, named after the type.
- Remove REBASE_MODE_NORMAL. It is not the "normal" mode anyway, rather a legacy
mode; we have removed support for it in eb0f7e3d02, so there's no point in
representing it in the enum.
- Remove distinction between REBASE_MODE_REBASING and REBASE_MODE_INTERACTIVE;
these are the same now.
- Rename StatusCommands.IsInInteractiveRebase to IsInRebase.
- Remove StatusCommands.RebaseMode; use StatusCommands.IsInRebase instead.
All test cases set it to enums.REBASE_MODE_NONE, so we can simplify things a
little bit by hard-coding that. This makes the changes in the following commits
a little easier.
This makes it possible to use date and time in initial values like this:
```yaml
initialValue: 'ruudk/{{ runCommand "date +\"%Y/%-m\"" }}/'
```
I want to use this to configure my BranchPrefix like this:
```yaml
git:
branchPrefix: 'ruudk/{{ runCommand "date +\"%Y/%-m\"" }}/'
```
For the less common conflict types DD, AU, UA, DU, and UD, we would previously
only show "* Unmerged path" in the main view, which isn't helpful. Also, for
some of these we would split the main view and show this text both in the
unstaged changes and staged changes views, which is a bit embarrassing.
Improve this by offering more explanation about what's going on, and what the
most likely way to resolve the situation is for each case.
