We forgot to convert the model indices to view indices in searchModelCommits.
This needs to be done for search results to be highlighted correctly in the
"divergence from upstream" view, which adds "--- Remote/Local ---" entries, and
during a rebase, where we have "--- Pending rebase todos ---" and "--- Commits
---" which offset view indices from model indices.
I have seen cases where during a rebase (two nonModelItems) all entries in
viewIndicesByModelIndex beyond the second nonModelItem were off by 4 rather than
2 as I would expect. The only explanation I have for this is that the function
was called concurrently.
Improve this by working on a local variable and only assign to self at the end;
this is not a real fix for the concurrency issue of course, but it makes it much
less likely to be a problem in practice.
This doesn't change behavior, just makes the code a little bit easier to
understand: the outermost condition is "do we show a popup and is the mouse
event for some other view than the focused one". Only if that's true do we need
to define the isCommitMessageView function, and check whether both views belong
to the commit message editor.
Previously a click was detected as a double-click whenever the click was on the
already selected line, regardless of how long ago the last click was (or even
when it wasn't selected by clicking at all). Now that gocui supports proper
double-click detection, we can do better.
The rationale for this is the same as in the previous commit; however, for these
functions we only allow a single controller to set them, because they are event
handlers and it doesn't make sense for multiple controllers to handle them.
Trying to do this would previously have the second one silently overwrite the
first one's.
We don't currently have this in lazygit, but I ran into the situation once
during development, and it can lead to bugs that are hard to diagnose.
Instead of holding a list of functions, we could also have added a panic in case
the function was set already; this would have been good enough for the current
state, and enough to catch mistakes early in the future. However, I decided to
allow multiple controllers to attach these functions, because I can't see a
reason not to.
These are never called on the context, they only exist to satisfy the
HasKeybindings interface. But that's wrong, HasKeybindings has nothing to do
with focus handling or rendering the main view. Remove them from that interface
and add them to IController instead.
Similar to what was done in 457cdce61d, and for the same reason.
However, instead of waiting and fixing them one by one as we see them fail, I
decided to go about it more systematically. To do that, I added calls to
`time.Sleep(1 * time.Second)` in all the Shell.Commit* helper functions; this
ensures that all the commits we make get different committer time stamps, making
all these tests fail. With this I'm pretty confident that we're good now.
When entering filtering we would only call FocusLine, which takes care of
highlighting the selected line in the commits list, but not of re-rendering the
main view. HandleFocus does that.
When exiting filtering, the HandleFocus call was missing entirely.
The tests needed to be reworked a little bit to make this testable.
Now that -committerdate is the default sort order, we could get different
results for the sort order of the branches list depending on whether the commits
on both branches have the same committer time stamp (likely in an integration
test, since git time stamps have second resolution), in which case git will fall
back to alphabetical order, or not (rare, but possible), in which case master
will have the newer commit and will come first. Make this stable by forcing the
sort order to alphabetical.
We might have more tests with this problem, we'll just have to fix them one by
one as we see them fail.
At the same time, we change the defaults for both of them to "date" (they were
"recency" and "alphabetical", respectively, before). This is the reason we need
to touch so many integration tests. For some of them I decided to adapt the test
assertions to the changed sort order; for others, I added a SetupConfig step to
set the order back to "recency" so that I don't have to change what the test
does (e.g. how many SelectNextItem() calls are needed to get to a certain
branch).
When toggling the value in the UI we simply overwrite the value in UserConfig;
this would be bad if there was ever a chance that we want to write the user
config back to disk, but it is very unlikely that we can do that, because
currently we have no way to tell which parts of the config come from the global
config file and which ones come from a repo-local one.
The version choice is a little arbitrary, but see discussion at
https://github.com/jesseduffield/lazygit/pull/4559#issuecomment-2876201680.
The main reason why I'm updating the version now is that versions before 2.27
had a bug with branch sorting, where sorting by -committerdate (which will be
our default soon) would sort branches that point at the same commit in reverse
alphabetical order rather than alphabetical order. While this is only slightly
annoying but not a huge deal for users, it makes maintaining our integration
tests across versions very hard. So I wanted to update to at least 2.27 to get
around this problem, and went with 2.32 after the discussion linked to above.
The choice of which versions to run integration tests on is pretty arbitrary
too, I just picked some at random which are about 5 to 6 minor versions apart.
It's a very common pattern in the code base to have some code that we want to
run either directly, or with a confirmation, depending on some condition. In
most cases this is solved by creating a local helper function that we call
either directly or from within the HandleConfirm of the confirmation; provide a
convenience helper that makes this easier.
These were found by commenting out the initialization of the struct literal in
EnglishTranslationSet.TranslationSet(), and then running
$ punused pkg/i18n/**/*.go
Punused can be installed with `go install github.com/bep/punused@latest`.
The code was copied from StagingController in 0496e3af50, and I did add the new
text in that commit, I just forgot to adapt the code to actually use it.
If the hunk to be selected was partially scrolled offscreen, the view wouldn't
scroll enough to make it completely visible (the last line of the hunk was still
offscreen).
This is only a minimal fix for a pressing problem. The code to handle scrolling
after selection changes has lots of problems, and is also inconsistent between
list views and the patch explorer, but cleaning this up needs more time than I
have right now.
