Now that all of the infrastructure for devices.Emulator is in place, we
can finally implement minimal transition rules for devices cgroups. This
allows for minimal disruption to running containers if a rule update is
requested. Only in very rare circumstances (black-list cgroups and mode
switching) will a clear-all rule be written. As a result, containers
should no longer see spurious errors.
A similar issue affects the cgroupv2 devices setup, but that is a topic
for another time (as the solution is drastically different).
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
These lists have been in the codebase for a very long time, and have
been unused for a large portion of that time -- specconv doesn't
generate them and the only user of these flags has been tests (which
doesn't inspire much confidence).
In addition, we had an incorrect implementation of a white-list policy.
This wasn't exploitable because all of our users explicitly specify
"deny all" as the first rule, but it was a pretty glaring issue that
came from the "feature" that users can select whether they prefer a
white- or black- list. Fix this by always writing a deny-all rule (which
is what our users were doing anyway, to work around this bug).
This is one of many changes needed to clean up the devices cgroup code.
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
split fs2 package from fs, as mixing up fs and fs2 is very likely to result in
unmaintainable code.
Inspired by containerd/cgroups#109
Fix#2157
Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <akihiro.suda.cz@hco.ntt.co.jp>
When in a non-initial user namespace you cannot update the devices
cgroup whitelist (or blacklist). The kernel won't allow it. So
detect that case and don't try.
This is a step to being able to run docker/runc containers inside a user
namespaced container.
Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>
Apply and Set are two separate operations, and it doesn't make sense to
group the two together (especially considering that the bootstrap
process is added to the cgroup as well). The only exception to this is
the memory cgroup, which requires the configuration to be set before
processes can join.
One of the weird cases to deal with is systemd. Systemd sets some of the
cgroup configuration options, but not all of them. Because memory is a
special case, we need to explicitly set memory in the systemd Apply().
Otherwise, the rest can be safely re-applied in .Set() as usual.
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.com>
Apply and Set are two separate operations, and it doesn't make sense to
group the two together (especially considering that the bootstrap
process is added to the cgroup as well). The only exception to this is
the memory cgroup, which requires the configuration to be set before
processes can join.
Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.com>
This allows us to distinguish cases where a container
needs to just join the paths or also additionally
set cgroups settings. This will help in implementing
cgroupsPath support in the spec.
Signed-off-by: Mrunal Patel <mrunalp@gmail.com>
The former cgroup entry is confusing, separate it to parent
and name.
Rename entry `c` to `config`.
Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>
'parent' function is confusing with parent cgroup, it's actually
parent path, so rename it to parentPath.
The name 'data' is too common to be identified, rename it to cgroupData
which is exactly what it is.
Signed-off-by: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>
