You've already forked matrix-js-sdk
mirror of
https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-js-sdk.git
synced 2025-08-06 12:02:40 +03:00
Support MSC4222 state_after
(#4487)
* WIP support for state_after
* Fix sliding sync sdk / embedded tests
* Allow both state & state_after to be undefined
Since it must have allowed state to be undefined previously: the test
had it as such.
* Fix limited sync handling
* Need to use state_after being undefined
if state can be undefined anyway
* Make sliding sync sdk tests pass
* Remove deprecated interfaces & backwards-compat code
* Remove useless assignment
* Use updates unstable prefix
* Clarify docs
* Remove additional semi-backwards compatible overload
* Update unstable prefixes
* Iterate
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
* Iterate
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
* Fix test
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
* Iterate
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
* Iterate
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
* Add test for MSC4222 behaviour
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
* Improve coverage
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
* Iterate
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
* Fix tests
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
* Iterate
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
* Tidy
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
* Add comments to explain why things work as they are.
* Fix sync accumulator for state_after sync handling
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
* Add tests
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
* Revert "Fix room state being updated with old (now overwritten) state and emitting for those updates. (#4242)"
This reverts commit 957329b218
.
* Fix Sync Accumulator toJSON putting start timeline state in state_after field
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
* Update tests
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
* Add test case
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
* Iterate
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Hugh Nimmo-Smith <hughns@matrix.org>
Co-authored-by: Michael Telatynski <7t3chguy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Timo <toger5@hotmail.de>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ describe("MatrixClient event timelines", function () {
|
||||
|
||||
const prom = emitPromise(room, ThreadEvent.Update);
|
||||
// Assume we're seeing the reply while loading backlog
|
||||
await room.addLiveEvents([THREAD_REPLY2]);
|
||||
await room.addLiveEvents([THREAD_REPLY2], { addToState: false });
|
||||
httpBackend
|
||||
.when(
|
||||
"GET",
|
||||
@@ -1155,7 +1155,7 @@ describe("MatrixClient event timelines", function () {
|
||||
});
|
||||
await flushHttp(prom);
|
||||
// but while loading the metadata, a new reply has arrived
|
||||
await room.addLiveEvents([THREAD_REPLY3]);
|
||||
await room.addLiveEvents([THREAD_REPLY3], { addToState: false });
|
||||
const thread = room.getThread(THREAD_ROOT_UPDATED.event_id!)!;
|
||||
// then the events should still be all in the right order
|
||||
expect(thread.events.map((it) => it.getId())).toEqual([
|
||||
@@ -1247,7 +1247,7 @@ describe("MatrixClient event timelines", function () {
|
||||
|
||||
const prom = emitPromise(room, ThreadEvent.Update);
|
||||
// Assume we're seeing the reply while loading backlog
|
||||
await room.addLiveEvents([THREAD_REPLY2]);
|
||||
await room.addLiveEvents([THREAD_REPLY2], { addToState: false });
|
||||
httpBackend
|
||||
.when(
|
||||
"GET",
|
||||
@@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ describe("MatrixClient event timelines", function () {
|
||||
});
|
||||
await flushHttp(prom);
|
||||
// but while loading the metadata, a new reply has arrived
|
||||
await room.addLiveEvents([THREAD_REPLY3]);
|
||||
await room.addLiveEvents([THREAD_REPLY3], { addToState: false });
|
||||
const thread = room.getThread(THREAD_ROOT_UPDATED.event_id!)!;
|
||||
// then the events should still be all in the right order
|
||||
expect(thread.events.map((it) => it.getId())).toEqual([
|
||||
@@ -1560,7 +1560,7 @@ describe("MatrixClient event timelines", function () {
|
||||
thread.initialEventsFetched = true;
|
||||
const prom = emitPromise(room, ThreadEvent.NewReply);
|
||||
respondToEvent(THREAD_ROOT_UPDATED);
|
||||
await room.addLiveEvents([THREAD_REPLY2]);
|
||||
await room.addLiveEvents([THREAD_REPLY2], { addToState: false });
|
||||
await httpBackend.flushAllExpected();
|
||||
await prom;
|
||||
expect(thread.length).toBe(2);
|
||||
@@ -1685,7 +1685,7 @@ describe("MatrixClient event timelines", function () {
|
||||
thread.initialEventsFetched = true;
|
||||
const prom = emitPromise(room, ThreadEvent.Update);
|
||||
respondToEvent(THREAD_ROOT_UPDATED);
|
||||
await room.addLiveEvents([THREAD_REPLY_REACTION]);
|
||||
await room.addLiveEvents([THREAD_REPLY_REACTION], { addToState: false });
|
||||
await httpBackend.flushAllExpected();
|
||||
await prom;
|
||||
expect(thread.length).toBe(1); // reactions don't count towards the length of a thread
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user