1
0
mirror of https://github.com/Mbed-TLS/mbedtls.git synced 2025-07-29 11:41:15 +03:00

Start moving to new design/API

Following discussion in the team, it was deemed preferable for the restart
context to be explicitly managed by the caller.

This commits in the first in a series moving in that directly: it starts by
only changing the public API, while still internally using the old design.
Future commits in that series will change to the new design internally.

The test function was simplified as it no longer makes sense to test for some
memory management errors since that responsibility shifted to the caller.
This commit is contained in:
Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
2017-04-19 10:11:56 +02:00
parent 45fd0164dd
commit b739a712d1
3 changed files with 93 additions and 27 deletions

View File

@ -75,12 +75,14 @@ void ecp_test_vect_restart( int id,
* With MBEDTLS_ECP_WINDOW_SIZE set to 2 (minimum):
* - Random point mult: ~3850M
*/
mbedtls_ecp_restart_ctx ctx;
mbedtls_ecp_group grp;
mbedtls_ecp_point R;
mbedtls_mpi dA, xA, yA, dB, xZ, yZ;
int cnt_restarts;
int ret;
mbedtls_ecp_restart_init( &ctx );
mbedtls_ecp_group_init( &grp ); mbedtls_ecp_point_init( &R );
mbedtls_mpi_init( &dA ); mbedtls_mpi_init( &xA ); mbedtls_mpi_init( &yA );
mbedtls_mpi_init( &dB ); mbedtls_mpi_init( &xZ ); mbedtls_mpi_init( &yZ );
@ -100,7 +102,7 @@ void ecp_test_vect_restart( int id,
/* Base point case */
cnt_restarts = 0;
do {
ret = mbedtls_ecp_mul( &grp, &R, &dA, &grp.G, NULL, NULL );
ret = mbedtls_ecp_mul_restartable( &grp, &R, &dA, &grp.G, NULL, NULL, &ctx );
TEST_ASSERT( ret == 0 || ret == MBEDTLS_ERR_ECP_IN_PROGRESS );
if( ret == MBEDTLS_ERR_ECP_IN_PROGRESS )
@ -114,24 +116,13 @@ void ecp_test_vect_restart( int id,
TEST_ASSERT( cnt_restarts >= min_restarts );
TEST_ASSERT( cnt_restarts <= max_restarts );
/* Do we leak memory when doing it twice in a row? */
do {
ret = mbedtls_ecp_mul( &grp, &R, &dA, &grp.G, NULL, NULL );
TEST_ASSERT( ret == 0 || ret == MBEDTLS_ERR_ECP_IN_PROGRESS );
}
while( ret != 0 );
/* Ok, now start an operation with some arguments, and drop it.
* We'll see if the result of the next operation, with different args,
* are correct regardless (do we discard old context on new args?).
* This also tests that we don't write to R prematurely */
ret = mbedtls_ecp_mul( &grp, &R, &dA, &grp.G, NULL, NULL );
TEST_ASSERT( ret == 0 || ret == MBEDTLS_ERR_ECP_IN_PROGRESS );
/* Prepare context for new operation */
mbedtls_ecp_restart_free( &ctx );
/* Non-base point case */
cnt_restarts = 0;
do {
ret = mbedtls_ecp_mul( &grp, &R, &dB, &R, NULL, NULL );
ret = mbedtls_ecp_mul_restartable( &grp, &R, &dB, &R, NULL, NULL, &ctx );
TEST_ASSERT( ret == 0 || ret == MBEDTLS_ERR_ECP_IN_PROGRESS );
if( ret == MBEDTLS_ERR_ECP_IN_PROGRESS )
@ -145,18 +136,12 @@ void ecp_test_vect_restart( int id,
TEST_ASSERT( cnt_restarts >= min_restarts );
TEST_ASSERT( cnt_restarts <= max_restarts );
/* Do we leak memory when doing it twice in a row? */
do {
ret = mbedtls_ecp_mul( &grp, &R, &dB, &R, NULL, NULL );
TEST_ASSERT( ret == 0 || ret == MBEDTLS_ERR_ECP_IN_PROGRESS );
}
while( ret != 0 );
/* Do we leak memory when not finishing an operation? */
ret = mbedtls_ecp_mul( &grp, &R, &dB, &R, NULL, NULL );
ret = mbedtls_ecp_mul_restartable( &grp, &R, &dB, &R, NULL, NULL, &ctx );
TEST_ASSERT( ret == 0 || ret == MBEDTLS_ERR_ECP_IN_PROGRESS );
exit:
mbedtls_ecp_restart_free( &ctx );
mbedtls_ecp_group_free( &grp ); mbedtls_ecp_point_free( &R );
mbedtls_mpi_free( &dA ); mbedtls_mpi_free( &xA ); mbedtls_mpi_free( &yA );
mbedtls_mpi_free( &dB ); mbedtls_mpi_free( &xZ ); mbedtls_mpi_free( &yZ );