mirror of
https://git.libssh.org/projects/libssh.git
synced 2025-08-01 11:26:52 +03:00
doc: Documentation of curve25519-sha256@libssh.org
This commit is contained in:
119
doc/curve25519-sha256@libssh.org.txt
Normal file
119
doc/curve25519-sha256@libssh.org.txt
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
|
||||
curve25519-sha256@libssh.org.txt Aris Adamantiadis <aris@badcode.be>
|
||||
21/9/2013
|
||||
|
||||
1. Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
This document describes the key exchange methode curve25519-sha256@libssh.org
|
||||
for SSH version 2 protocol. It is provided as an alternative to the existing
|
||||
key exchange mechanisms based on either Diffie-Hellman or Elliptic Curve Diffie-
|
||||
Hellman [RFC5656].
|
||||
The reason is the following : During summer of 2013, revelations from ex-
|
||||
consultant at NSA Edward Snowden gave proof that NSA willingly inserts backdoors
|
||||
into softwares, hardware components and published standards. While it is still
|
||||
believed that the mathematics behind ECC cryptography are still sound and solid,
|
||||
some people (including Bruce Schneier [SCHNEIER]), showed their lack of confidence
|
||||
in NIST-published curves such as nistp256, nistp384, nistp521, for which constant
|
||||
parameters (including the generator point) are defined without explanation. It
|
||||
is also believed that NSA had a word to say in their definition. These curves
|
||||
are not the most secure or fastest possible for their key sizes [DJB], and
|
||||
researchers think it is possible that NSA have ways of cracking NIST curves.
|
||||
It is also interesting to note that SSH belongs to the list of protocols the NSA
|
||||
claims to be able to eavesdrop. Having a secure replacement would make passive
|
||||
attacks much harder if such a backdoor exists.
|
||||
|
||||
However an alternative exists in the form of Curve25519. This algorithm has been
|
||||
proposed in 2006 by DJB [Curve25519]. Its main stengths are its speed, its
|
||||
constant-time run time (and resistance against side-channel attacks), and its
|
||||
lack of nebulous hard-coded constants.
|
||||
|
||||
The reference version being used in this document is the one described in
|
||||
[Curve25519] as implemented in the library NaCl [NaCl].
|
||||
This document does not attempts to provide alternatives to the ecdsa-sha1-*
|
||||
authentication keys.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Key exchange
|
||||
|
||||
The key exchange procedure is very similar to the one described chapter 4 of
|
||||
[RFC5656]. Public ephemeral keys are transmitted over SSH encapsulated into
|
||||
standard SSH strings.
|
||||
|
||||
The following is an overview of the key exchange process:
|
||||
|
||||
Client Server
|
||||
------ ------
|
||||
Generate ephemeral key pair.
|
||||
SSH_MSG_KEX_ECDH_INIT -------->
|
||||
Verify that client public key
|
||||
length is 32 bytes.
|
||||
Generate ephemeral key pair.
|
||||
Compute shared secret.
|
||||
Generate and sign exchange hash.
|
||||
<-------- SSH_MSG_KEX_ECDH_REPLY
|
||||
Verify that server public key length is 32 bytes.
|
||||
* Verify host keys belong to server.
|
||||
Compute shared secret.
|
||||
Generate exchange hash.
|
||||
Verify server's signature.
|
||||
|
||||
* Optional but strongly recommanded as this protects against MITM attacks.
|
||||
|
||||
This is implemented using the same messages as described in RFC5656 chapter 4
|
||||
|
||||
3. Method Name
|
||||
|
||||
The name of this key exchange method is "curve25519-sha256@libssh.org".
|
||||
|
||||
4. Implementation considerations
|
||||
|
||||
The whole method is based on the curve25519 scalar multiplication. In this
|
||||
method, a private key is a scalar of 256 bits, and a public key is a point
|
||||
of 256 bits.
|
||||
|
||||
4.1. Private key generation
|
||||
|
||||
A 32 bytes private key should be generated for each new connection,
|
||||
using a secure PRNG. The following actions must be done on the private key:
|
||||
mysecret[0] &= 248;
|
||||
mysecret[31] &= 127;
|
||||
mysecret[31] |= 64;
|
||||
In order to keep the key valid. However, many cryptographic libraries will do
|
||||
this automatically.
|
||||
It should be noted that, in opposition to NIST curves, no special validation
|
||||
should be done to ensure the result is a valid and secure private key.
|
||||
|
||||
4.2 Public key generation
|
||||
|
||||
The 32 bytes public key of either a client or a server must be generated using
|
||||
the 32 bytes private key and a common generator base. This base is defined as 9
|
||||
followed by all zeroes:
|
||||
const unsigned char basepoint[32] = {9};
|
||||
|
||||
The public key is calculated using the cryptographic scalar multiplication:
|
||||
const unsigned char privkey[32];
|
||||
unsigned char pubkey[32];
|
||||
crypto_scalarmult (pubkey, privkey, basepoint);
|
||||
However some cryptographic libraries may provide a combined function:
|
||||
crypto_scalarmult_base (pubkey, privkey);
|
||||
|
||||
It should be noted that, in opposition to NIST curves, no special validation
|
||||
should be done to ensure the received public keys are valid curves point. The
|
||||
Curve25519 algorithm ensure that every possible public key maps to a valid
|
||||
ECC Point.
|
||||
|
||||
4.3 Shared secret generation
|
||||
|
||||
The shared secret, k, is defined in SSH specifications to be a big integer.
|
||||
This number is calculated using the following procedure:
|
||||
|
||||
X is the 32 bytes point obtained by the scalar multiplication of the other
|
||||
side's public key and the local private key scalar.
|
||||
|
||||
The whole 32 bytes of the number X are then converted into a big integer k.
|
||||
This conversion follows the network byte order. This step differs from
|
||||
RFC5656.
|
||||
|
||||
[RFC5656] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5656
|
||||
[SCHNEIER] https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/09/the_nsa_is_brea.html#c1675929
|
||||
[DJB] http://cr.yp.to/talks/2013.05.31/slides-dan+tanja-20130531-4x3.pdf
|
||||
[Curve25519] "Curve25519: new Diffie-Hellman speed records."
|
||||
http://cr.yp.to/ecdh/curve25519-20060209.pdf
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user