Create a private hidden __hurd_thread_self alias, and use that one.
Fixes 2f8ecb58a5
"hurd: Fix x86_64 _hurd_tls_fork" and
c7fcce38c8
"hurd: Make sure to not use tcb->self"
Reported-by: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
It is illegal to call thread_get_state () on mach_thread_self (), so
this codepath cannot be used as-is to fork the calling thread's TLS.
Fortunately we can use THREAD_SELF (aka %fs:0x0) to find out the value
of our fs_base without calling into the kernel.
Fixes: f6cf701efc
"hurd: Implement TLS for x86_64"
Checked on x86_64-gnu: fork () now works!
Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20230517191436.73636-8-bugaevc@gmail.com>
Unlike sigstate->thread, tcb->self did not hold a Mach port reference on
the thread port it names. This means that the port can be deallocated,
and the name reused for something else, without anyone noticing. Using
tcb->self will then lead to port use-after-free.
Fortunately nothing was accessing tcb->self, other than it being
intially set to then-valid thread port name upon TCB initialization. To
assert that this keeps being the case without altering TCB layout,
rename self -> self_do_not_use, and stop initializing it.
Also, do not (re-)allocate a whole separate and unused stack for the
main thread, and just exit __pthread_setup early in this case.
Found upon attempting to use tcb->self and getting unexpected crashes.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20230517191436.73636-7-bugaevc@gmail.com>
Properly differentiate between setting up the real TLS with
TLS_INIT_TP, and setting up the early TLS (__init1_tcbhead) in static
builds. In the latter case, don't yet migrate the reply port into the
TCB, and don't yet set __libc_tls_initialized to 1.
This also lets us move the __init1_desc assignment inside
_hurd_tls_init ().
Fixes cd019ddd89
"hurd: Don't leak __hurd_reply_port0"
Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
When glibc is built as a shared library, TLS is always initialized by
the call of TLS_INIT_TP () macro made inside the dynamic loader, prior
to running the main program (see dl-call_tls_init_tp.h). We can take
advantage of this: we know for sure that __LIBC_NO_TLS () will evaluate
to 0 in all other cases, so let the compiler know that explicitly too.
Also, only define _hurd_tls_init () and TLS_INIT_TP () under the same
conditions (either !SHARED or inside rtld), to statically assert that
this is the case.
Other than a microoptimization, this also helps with avoiding awkward
sharing of the __libc_tls_initialized variable between ld.so and libc.so
that we would have to do otherwise -- we know for sure that no sharing
is required, simply because __libc_tls_initialized would always be set
to true inside libc.so.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20230319151017.531737-25-bugaevc@gmail.com>
This reverts commit b37899d34d.
Apparently we load libc.so (and thus start using its functions) before
calling TLS_INIT_TP, so libc.so functions should not actually assume
that TLS is always set up.
Previously, once we set up TLS, we would implicitly switch from using
__hurd_reply_port0 to reply_port inside the TCB, leaving the former
unused. But we never deallocated it, so it got leaked.
Instead, migrate the port into the new TCB's reply_port slot. This
avoids both the port leak and an extra syscall to create a new reply
port for the TCB.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20230319151017.531737-28-bugaevc@gmail.com>
When glibc is built as a shared library, TLS is always initialized by
the call of TLS_INIT_TP () macro made inside the dynamic loader, prior
to running the main program (see dl-call_tls_init_tp.h). We can take
advantage of this: we know for sure that __LIBC_NO_TLS () will evaluate
to 0 in all other cases, so let the compiler know that explicitly too.
Also, only define _hurd_tls_init () and TLS_INIT_TP () under the same
conditions (either !SHARED or inside rtld), to statically assert that
this is the case.
Other than a microoptimization, this also helps with avoiding awkward
sharing of the __libc_tls_initialized variable between ld.so and libc.so
that we would have to do otherwise -- we know for sure that no sharing
is required, simply because __libc_tls_initialized would always be set
to true inside libc.so.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20230319151017.531737-25-bugaevc@gmail.com>
