1
0
mirror of https://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git synced 2025-07-30 22:43:12 +03:00

tunables: Fix comparison of tunable values

The simplification of tunable_set interfaces took care of
signed/unsigned conversions while setting values, but comparison with
bounds ended up being incorrect; comparing TUNABLE_SIZE_T values for
example will fail because SIZE_MAX is seen as -1.

Add comparison helpers that take tunable types into account and use
them to do comparison instead.
This commit is contained in:
Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-03-16 18:31:02 +05:30
parent bf6b6243c9
commit d1a3dcabf2
3 changed files with 49 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -107,32 +107,35 @@ do_tunable_update_val (tunable_t *cur, const tunable_val_t *valp,
return;
}
bool unsigned_cmp = unsigned_tunable_type (cur->type.type_code);
val = valp->numval;
min = minp != NULL ? *minp : cur->type.min;
max = maxp != NULL ? *maxp : cur->type.max;
/* We allow only increasingly restrictive bounds. */
if (min < cur->type.min)
if (tunable_val_lt (min, cur->type.min, unsigned_cmp))
min = cur->type.min;
if (max > cur->type.max)
if (tunable_val_gt (max, cur->type.max, unsigned_cmp))
max = cur->type.max;
/* Skip both bounds if they're inconsistent. */
if (min > max)
if (tunable_val_gt (min, max, unsigned_cmp))
{
min = cur->type.min;
max = cur->type.max;
}
/* Write everything out if the value and the bounds are valid. */
if (min <= val && val <= max)
{
cur->val.numval = val;
cur->type.min = min;
cur->type.max = max;
cur->initialized = true;
}
/* Bail out if the bounds are not valid. */
if (tunable_val_lt (val, min, unsigned_cmp)
|| tunable_val_lt (max, val, unsigned_cmp))
return;
cur->val.numval = val;
cur->type.min = min;
cur->type.max = max;
cur->initialized = true;
}
/* Validate range of the input value and initialize the tunable CUR if it looks