mirror of
https://sourceware.org/git/glibc.git
synced 2025-07-29 11:41:21 +03:00
Update.
* posix/bug-regex11.c: Add some more tests which fail so far. Disable them. Patch by Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>. 2003-10-05 Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org> * posix/bug-regex11.c: Add more backreference-related test cases. (main): Show the failing regex in the error messages. * posix/regexec.c (check_dst_limits_calc_pos): Simplify some nested conditionals. Replace if's with a switch statement. (check_dst_limits_calc_pos <TYPE_BKREF>): Rename parameter NODE to FROM_NODE, it shadows a local variable; don't recurse if FROM_NODE does not change in the recursive invocation, fixing an infinite loop in the ()\1*\1* regex. (sift_states_backward): Fix function comment. * posix/regcomp.c (calc_epsdest): Add an assertion. 2003-10-06 Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
19
ChangeLog
19
ChangeLog
@ -1,3 +1,22 @@
|
||||
2003-10-06 Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* posix/bug-regex11.c: Add some more tests which fail so far.
|
||||
Disable them. Patch by Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>.
|
||||
|
||||
2003-10-05 Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
|
||||
|
||||
* posix/bug-regex11.c: Add more backreference-related test cases.
|
||||
(main): Show the failing regex in the error messages.
|
||||
* posix/regexec.c (check_dst_limits_calc_pos):
|
||||
Simplify some nested conditionals. Replace if's with a switch
|
||||
statement.
|
||||
(check_dst_limits_calc_pos <TYPE_BKREF>): Rename parameter NODE to
|
||||
FROM_NODE, it shadows a local variable; don't recurse if FROM_NODE
|
||||
does not change in the recursive invocation, fixing an infinite loop
|
||||
in the ()\1*\1* regex.
|
||||
(sift_states_backward): Fix function comment.
|
||||
* posix/regcomp.c (calc_epsdest): Add an assertion.
|
||||
|
||||
2003-10-06 Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* manual/examples/testopt.c: Fix warnings. Better error message
|
||||
|
@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct
|
||||
/* Test for newline handling in regex. */
|
||||
{ "[^~]*~", "\nx~y", 0, 2, { { 0, 3 }, { -1, -1 } } },
|
||||
/* Other tests. */
|
||||
{ "a(.*)b", "a b", REG_EXTENDED, 2, { { 0, 3 }, { 1, 2 } } },
|
||||
{ ".*|\\([KIO]\\)\\([^|]*\\).*|?[KIO]", "10~.~|P|K0|I10|O16|?KSb", 0, 3,
|
||||
{ { 0, 21 }, { 15, 16 }, { 16, 18 } } },
|
||||
{ ".*|\\([KIO]\\)\\([^|]*\\).*|?\\1", "10~.~|P|K0|I10|O16|?KSb", 0, 3,
|
||||
@ -52,6 +53,18 @@ struct
|
||||
/* Here ^ cannot be treated as an anchor according to POSIX. */
|
||||
{ "(^|foo)bar", "(^|foo)bar", 0, 2, { { 0, 10 }, { -1, -1 } } },
|
||||
{ "(foo|^)bar", "(foo|^)bar", 0, 2, { { 0, 10 }, { -1, -1 } } },
|
||||
/* More tests on backreferences. */
|
||||
{ "()\\1*\\1*", "", REG_EXTENDED, 2, { { 0, 0 }, { 0, 0 } } },
|
||||
{ "([0-9]).*\\1(a*)", "7;7a6", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 4 }, { 0, 1 }, { 3, 4 } } },
|
||||
{ "([0-9]).*\\1(a*)", "7;7a", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 4 }, { 0, 1 }, { 3, 4 } } },
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
/* XXX This test seems wrong. --drepper */
|
||||
{ "()(b)\\1c\\2", "bcb", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 3 }, { 0, 0 }, { 1, 2 } } },
|
||||
|
||||
/* XXX Not used since they fail so far. */
|
||||
{ "(b())\\2\\1", "bbbb", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 2 }, { 0, 1 }, { 1, 1 } } },
|
||||
{ "(bb())\\2\\1", "bbbb", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 4 }, { 0, 2 }, { 2, 2 } } },
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
@ -71,14 +84,14 @@ main (void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
char buf[500];
|
||||
regerror (n, &re, buf, sizeof (buf));
|
||||
printf ("regcomp %zd failed: %s\n", i, buf);
|
||||
printf ("%s: regcomp %zd failed: %s\n", tests[i].pattern, i, buf);
|
||||
ret = 1;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (regexec (&re, tests[i].string, tests[i].nmatch, rm, 0))
|
||||
{
|
||||
printf ("regexec %zd failed\n", i);
|
||||
printf ("%s: regexec %zd failed\n", tests[i].pattern, i);
|
||||
ret = 1;
|
||||
regfree (&re);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
@ -90,8 +103,8 @@ main (void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (tests[i].rm[n].rm_so == -1 && tests[i].rm[n].rm_eo == -1)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
printf ("regexec match failure rm[%d] %d..%d\n",
|
||||
n, rm[n].rm_so, rm[n].rm_eo);
|
||||
printf ("%s: regexec %zd match failure rm[%d] %d..%d\n",
|
||||
tests[i].pattern, i, n, rm[n].rm_so, rm[n].rm_eo);
|
||||
ret = 1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1387,7 +1387,7 @@ update_regs (dfa, pmatch, cur_node, cur_idx, nmatch)
|
||||
away the node `a'.
|
||||
ii. If 'b' is in the STATE_LOG[STR_IDX+strlen('s')] but 'b' is
|
||||
throwed away, we throw away the node `a'.
|
||||
3. When 0 <= STR_IDX < n and 'a' epsilon transit to 'b':
|
||||
3. When 0 <= STR_IDX < MATCH_LAST and 'a' epsilon transit to 'b':
|
||||
i. If 'b' isn't in the STATE_LOG[STR_IDX], we throw away the
|
||||
node `a'.
|
||||
ii. If 'b' is in the STATE_LOG[STR_IDX] but 'b' is throwed away,
|
||||
@ -1724,60 +1724,98 @@ check_dst_limits (dfa, limits, mctx, dst_node, dst_idx, src_node, src_idx)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
check_dst_limits_calc_pos (dfa, mctx, limit, eclosures, subexp_idx, node,
|
||||
check_dst_limits_calc_pos (dfa, mctx, limit, eclosures, subexp_idx, from_node,
|
||||
str_idx)
|
||||
re_dfa_t *dfa;
|
||||
re_match_context_t *mctx;
|
||||
re_node_set *eclosures;
|
||||
int limit, subexp_idx, node, str_idx;
|
||||
int limit, subexp_idx, from_node, str_idx;
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct re_backref_cache_entry *lim = mctx->bkref_ents + limit;
|
||||
int pos = (str_idx < lim->subexp_from ? -1
|
||||
: (lim->subexp_to < str_idx ? 1 : 0));
|
||||
if (pos == 0
|
||||
&& (str_idx == lim->subexp_from || str_idx == lim->subexp_to))
|
||||
{
|
||||
int node_idx;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If we are outside the range of the subexpression, return -1 or 1. */
|
||||
if (str_idx < lim->subexp_from)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (lim->subexp_to < str_idx)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If we are within the subexpression, return 0. */
|
||||
if (str_idx != lim->subexp_from && str_idx != lim->subexp_to)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Else, we are on the boundary: examine the nodes on the epsilon
|
||||
closure. */
|
||||
for (node_idx = 0; node_idx < eclosures->nelem; ++node_idx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int node = eclosures->elems[node_idx];
|
||||
re_token_type_t type= dfa->nodes[node].type;
|
||||
if (type == OP_BACK_REF)
|
||||
switch (dfa->nodes[node].type)
|
||||
{
|
||||
case OP_BACK_REF:
|
||||
{
|
||||
int bi = search_cur_bkref_entry (mctx, str_idx);
|
||||
for (; bi < mctx->nbkref_ents; ++bi)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct re_backref_cache_entry *ent = mctx->bkref_ents + bi;
|
||||
int dst, cpos;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If this backreference goes beyond the point we're
|
||||
examining, don't go any further. */
|
||||
if (ent->str_idx > str_idx)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
if (ent->node == node && ent->subexp_from == ent->subexp_to)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int cpos, dst;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ent->node != node || ent->subexp_from != ent->subexp_to)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Recurse trying to reach the OP_OPEN_SUBEXP and
|
||||
OP_CLOSE_SUBEXP cases below. But, if the
|
||||
destination node is the same node as the source
|
||||
node, don't recurse because it would cause an
|
||||
infinite loop: a regex that exhibits this behavior
|
||||
is ()\1*\1* */
|
||||
dst = dfa->edests[node].elems[0];
|
||||
if (dst == from_node)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (str_idx == lim->subexp_from)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
else /* if (str_idx == lim->subexp_to) */
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
cpos = check_dst_limits_calc_pos (dfa, mctx, limit,
|
||||
dfa->eclosures + dst,
|
||||
subexp_idx, dst,
|
||||
str_idx);
|
||||
if ((str_idx == lim->subexp_from && cpos == -1)
|
||||
|| (str_idx == lim->subexp_to && cpos == 0))
|
||||
return cpos;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (cpos == -1 && str_idx == lim->subexp_from)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cpos == 0 /* && str_idx == lim->lim->subexp_to */)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (type == OP_OPEN_SUBEXP && subexp_idx == dfa->nodes[node].opr.idx
|
||||
&& str_idx == lim->subexp_from)
|
||||
{
|
||||
pos = -1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (type == OP_CLOSE_SUBEXP && subexp_idx == dfa->nodes[node].opr.idx
|
||||
&& str_idx == lim->subexp_to)
|
||||
|
||||
case OP_OPEN_SUBEXP:
|
||||
if (str_idx == lim->subexp_from && subexp_idx == dfa->nodes[node].opr.idx)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case OP_CLOSE_SUBEXP:
|
||||
if (str_idx == lim->subexp_to && subexp_idx == dfa->nodes[node].opr.idx)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
default:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (node_idx == eclosures->nelem && str_idx == lim->subexp_to)
|
||||
pos = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return pos;
|
||||
|
||||
if (str_idx == lim->subexp_to)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
else
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check the limitations of sub expressions LIMITS, and remove the nodes
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user