1
0
mirror of https://github.com/sqlite/sqlite.git synced 2025-11-15 11:41:13 +03:00
Files
sqlite/test/e_select.test
dan 8663d0fb80 Add test cases to e_select.test.
FossilOrigin-Name: 9db26d5ef5a4c6f9fe0adf2ff306f6f07b6cc60c
2010-09-06 18:50:55 +00:00

359 lines
13 KiB
Plaintext

# 2010 July 16
#
# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
#
# May you do good and not evil.
# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
#
#***********************************************************************
#
# This file implements tests to verify that the "testable statements" in
# the lang_select.html document are correct.
#
set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl
do_execsql_test e_select-1.0 {
CREATE TABLE t1(a, b);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('a', 'one');
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('b', 'two');
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('c', 'three');
CREATE TABLE t2(a, b);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES('a', 'I');
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES('b', 'II');
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES('c', 'III');
CREATE TABLE t3(a, c);
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES('a', 1);
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES('b', 2);
CREATE TABLE t4(a, c);
INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('a', NULL);
INSERT INTO t4 VALUES('b', 2);
} {}
set t1_cross_t2 [list \
a one a I a one b II \
a one c III b two a I \
b two b II b two c III \
c three a I c three b II \
c three c III \
]
set t1_cross_t1 [list \
a one a one a one b two \
a one c three b two a one \
b two b two b two c three \
c three a one c three b two \
c three c three \
]
# This proc is a specialized version of [do_execsql_test].
#
# The second argument to this proc must be a SELECT statement that
# features a cross join of some time. Instead of the usual ",",
# "CROSS JOIN" or "INNER JOIN" join-op, the string %JOIN% must be
# substituted.
#
# This test runs the SELECT three times - once with:
#
# * s/%JOIN%/,/
# * s/%JOIN%/INNER JOIN/
# * s/%JOIN%/CROSS JOIN/
#
# and checks that each time the results of the SELECT are $res.
#
proc do_join_test {tn select res} {
foreach {tn2 joinop} [list 1 , 2 "CROSS JOIN" 3 "INNER JOIN"] {
set S [string map [list %JOIN% $joinop] $select]
uplevel do_execsql_test $tn.$tn2 [list $S] [list $res]
}
}
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# The following tests check that all paths on the syntax diagrams on
# the lang_select.html page may be taken.
#
# EVIDENCE-OF: R-18428-22111 -- syntax diagram join-constraint
#
do_join_test e_select-0.1.1 {
SELECT count(*) FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (t1.a=t2.a)
} {3}
do_join_test e_select-0.1.2 {
SELECT count(*) FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 USING (a)
} {3}
do_join_test e_select-0.1.3 {
SELECT count(*) FROM t1 %JOIN% t2
} {9}
do_catchsql_test e_select-0.1.4 {
SELECT count(*) FROM t1, t2 ON (t1.a=t2.a) USING (a)
} {1 {cannot have both ON and USING clauses in the same join}}
do_catchsql_test e_select-0.1.5 {
SELECT count(*) FROM t1, t2 USING (a) ON (t1.a=t2.a)
} {1 {near "ON": syntax error}}
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# The following tests focus on FROM clause (join) processing.
#
# EVIDENCE-OF: R-26491-65072 If the join-op is a comma (","), then the
# composite dataset is the cartesian product of the sets of records from
# the left and right sides of the join-op.
#
do_execsql_test e_select-1.1.2 { SELECT * FROM t1, t2 } $t1_cross_t2
do_execsql_test e_select-1.1.3 { SELECT * FROM t1 AS x, t1 AS y} $t1_cross_t1
# EVIDENCE-OF: R-22228-15000 If the join-op is a "CROSS JOIN" or "INNER
# JOIN", then the composite dataset is created in the same way as for
# the comma join-op.
#
foreach {tn select res} [list \
1 { SELECT * FROM t1 CROSS JOIN t2 } $t1_cross_t2 \
2 { SELECT * FROM t1 AS y CROSS JOIN t1 AS x } $t1_cross_t1 \
3 { SELECT * FROM t1 INNER JOIN t2 } $t1_cross_t2 \
4 { SELECT * FROM t1 AS y INNER JOIN t1 AS x } $t1_cross_t1 \
] {
do_execsql_test e_select-1.2.$tn $select $res
}
# EVIDENCE-OF: R-00387-12725 If there is an ON clause specified, then
# the ON expression is evaluated for each row of the cartesian product
# and the result cast to a numeric value as if by a CAST expression. All
# rows for which the expression evaluates to NULL or zero (integer value
# 0 or real value 0.0) are excluded from the composite dataset.
#
# Each of the SELECT statements below is executed three times - once with
# the string %JOIN% replaced with a comma, once with "CROSS JOIN" and once
# with "INNER JOIN". The test shows that the results of the query are the
# same in each case.
#
foreach {tn select res} [list \
1 { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (1) } $t1_cross_t2 \
2 { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (0) } [list] \
3 { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (NULL) } [list] \
4 { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON ('abc') } [list] \
5 { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON ('1ab') } $t1_cross_t2 \
6 { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (0.9) } $t1_cross_t2 \
7 { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON ('0.9') } $t1_cross_t2 \
8 { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (0.0) } [list] \
\
9 { SELECT t1.b, t2.b FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (t1.a = t2.a) } \
{one I two II three III} \
10 { SELECT t1.b, t2.b FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (t1.a = 'a') } \
{one I one II one III} \
11 { SELECT t1.b, t2.b
FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (CASE WHEN t1.a = 'a' THEN NULL ELSE 1 END) } \
{two I two II two III three I three II three III} \
] {
do_join_test e_select-1.3.$tn $select $res
}
# EVIDENCE-OF: R-63358-54862 If there is a USING clause specified as
# part of the join-constraint, then each of the column names specified
# must exist in the datasets to both the left and right of the join-op.
#
foreach {tn select col} {
1 { SELECT * FROM t1, t3 USING (b) } "b"
2 { SELECT * FROM t3, t1 USING (c) } "c"
3 { SELECT * FROM t3, (SELECT a AS b, b AS c FROM t1) USING (a) } "a"
} {
set err "cannot join using column $col - column not present in both tables"
do_catchsql_test e_select-1.4.$tn $select [list 1 $err]
}
# EVIDENCE-OF: R-42568-37000 For each pair of namesake columns, the
# expression "lhs.X = rhs.X" is evaluated for each row of the cartesian
# product and the result cast to a numeric value. All rows for which one
# or more of the expressions evaluates to NULL or zero are excluded from
# the result set.
#
foreach {tn select res} {
1 { SELECT * FROM t1, t3 USING (a) } {a one 1 b two 2}
2 { SELECT * FROM t3, t4 USING (a,c) } {b 2}
} {
do_execsql_test e_select-1.5.$tn $select $res
}
# EVIDENCE-OF: R-54046-48600 When comparing values as a result of a
# USING clause, the normal rules for handling affinities, collation
# sequences and NULL values in comparisons apply.
#
# EVIDENCE-OF: R-35466-18578 The column from the dataset on the
# left-hand side of the join operator is considered to be on the
# left-hand side of the comparison operator (=) for the purposes of
# collation sequence and affinity precedence.
#
do_execsql_test e_select-1.6.0 {
CREATE TABLE t5(a COLLATE nocase, b COLLATE binary);
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES('AA', 'cc');
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES('BB', 'dd');
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(NULL, NULL);
CREATE TABLE t6(a COLLATE binary, b COLLATE nocase);
INSERT INTO t6 VALUES('aa', 'cc');
INSERT INTO t6 VALUES('bb', 'DD');
INSERT INTO t6 VALUES(NULL, NULL);
} {}
foreach {tn select res} {
1 { SELECT * FROM t5 %JOIN% t6 USING (a) } {AA cc cc BB dd DD}
2 { SELECT * FROM t6 %JOIN% t5 USING (a) } {}
3 { SELECT * FROM (SELECT a COLLATE nocase, b FROM t6) %JOIN% t5 USING (a) }
{aa cc cc bb DD dd}
4 { SELECT * FROM t5 %JOIN% t6 USING (a,b) } {AA cc}
5 { SELECT * FROM t6 %JOIN% t5 USING (a,b) } {}
} {
do_join_test e_select-1.6.$tn $select $res
}
# EVIDENCE-OF: R-57047-10461 For each pair of columns identified by a
# USING clause, the column from the right-hand dataset is omitted from
# the joined dataset.
#
# EVIDENCE-OF: R-56132-15700 This is the only difference between a USING
# clause and its equivalent ON constraint.
#
foreach {tn select res} {
1a { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 USING (a) }
{a one I b two II c three III}
1b { SELECT * FROM t1 %JOIN% t2 ON (t1.a=t2.a) }
{a one a I b two b II c three c III}
2a { SELECT * FROM t3 %JOIN% t4 USING (a) }
{a 1 {} b 2 2}
2b { SELECT * FROM t3 %JOIN% t4 ON (t3.a=t4.a) }
{a 1 a {} b 2 b 2}
3a { SELECT * FROM t3 %JOIN% t4 USING (a,c) } {b 2}
3b { SELECT * FROM t3 %JOIN% t4 ON (t3.a=t4.a AND t3.c=t4.c) } {b 2 b 2}
4a { SELECT * FROM (SELECT a COLLATE nocase, b FROM t6) AS x
%JOIN% t5 USING (a) }
{aa cc cc bb DD dd}
4b { SELECT * FROM (SELECT a COLLATE nocase, b FROM t6) AS x
%JOIN% t5 ON (x.a=t5.a) }
{aa cc AA cc bb DD BB dd}
} {
do_join_test e_select-1.7.$tn $select $res
}
# EVIDENCE-OF: R-04095-00676 If the join-op is a "LEFT JOIN" or "LEFT
# OUTER JOIN", then the composite dataset is created as for an "INNER
# JOIN". Except, after the ON or USING filtering clauses have been
# applied, an extra row is added to the output for each row in the
# original left-hand input dataset (if any) that corresponds to no rows
# at all in the composite dataset.
#
do_execsql_test e_select-1.8.0 {
CREATE TABLE t7(a, b, c);
CREATE TABLE t8(a, d, e);
INSERT INTO t7 VALUES('x', 'ex', 24);
INSERT INTO t7 VALUES('y', 'why', 25);
INSERT INTO t8 VALUES('x', 'abc', 24);
INSERT INTO t8 VALUES('z', 'ghi', 26);
} {}
do_execsql_test e_select-1.8.1a {
SELECT count(*) FROM t7 JOIN t8 ON (t7.a=t8.a)
} {1}
do_execsql_test e_select-1.8.1b {
SELECT count(*) FROM t7 LEFT JOIN t8 ON (t7.a=t8.a)
} {2}
do_execsql_test e_select-1.8.2a {
SELECT count(*) FROM t7 JOIN t8 USING (a)
} {1}
do_execsql_test e_select-1.8.2b {
SELECT count(*) FROM t7 LEFT JOIN t8 USING (a)
} {2}
# EVIDENCE-OF: R-15607-52988 The added rows contain NULL values in the
# columns that would normally contain values copied from the right-hand
# input dataset.
#
do_execsql_test e_select-1.9.1a {
SELECT * FROM t7 JOIN t8 ON (t7.a=t8.a)
} {x ex 24 x abc 24}
do_execsql_test e_select-1.9.1b {
SELECT * FROM t7 LEFT JOIN t8 ON (t7.a=t8.a)
} {x ex 24 x abc 24 y why 25 {} {} {}}
do_execsql_test e_select-1.9.2a {
SELECT * FROM t7 JOIN t8 USING (a)
} {x ex 24 abc 24}
do_execsql_test e_select-1.9.2b {
SELECT * FROM t7 LEFT JOIN t8 USING (a)
} {x ex 24 abc 24 y why 25 {} {}}
# EVIDENCE-OF: R-01809-52134 If the NATURAL keyword is added to any of
# the join-ops, then an implicit USING clause is added to the
# join-constraints. The implicit USING clause contains each of the
# column names that appear in both the left and right-hand input
# datasets.
#
foreach {tn s1 s2 res} {
1 { SELECT * FROM t7 JOIN t8 USING (a) }
{ SELECT * FROM t7 NATURAL JOIN t8 }
{x ex 24 abc 24}
2 { SELECT * FROM t8 JOIN t7 USING (a) }
{ SELECT * FROM t8 NATURAL JOIN t7 }
{x abc 24 ex 24}
3 { SELECT * FROM t7 LEFT JOIN t8 USING (a) }
{ SELECT * FROM t7 NATURAL LEFT JOIN t8 }
{x ex 24 abc 24 y why 25 {} {}}
4 { SELECT * FROM t8 LEFT JOIN t7 USING (a) }
{ SELECT * FROM t8 NATURAL LEFT JOIN t7 }
{x abc 24 ex 24 z ghi 26 {} {}}
5 { SELECT * FROM t3 JOIN t4 USING (a,c) }
{ SELECT * FROM t3 NATURAL JOIN t4 }
{b 2}
6 { SELECT * FROM t3 LEFT JOIN t4 USING (a,c) }
{ SELECT * FROM t3 NATURAL LEFT JOIN t4 }
{a 1 b 2}
} {
do_execsql_test e_select-1.10.${tn}a $s1 $res
do_execsql_test e_select-1.10.${tn}b $s2 $res
}
# EVIDENCE-OF: R-49566-01570 If the left and right-hand input datasets
# feature no common column names, then the NATURAL keyword has no effect
# on the results of the join.
#
do_execsql_test e_select-1.11.0 {
CREATE TABLE t10(x, y);
INSERT INTO t10 VALUES(1, 'true');
INSERT INTO t10 VALUES(0, 'false');
} {}
foreach {tn s1 s2 res} {
1 { SELECT a, x FROM t1 CROSS JOIN t10 }
{ SELECT a, x FROM t1 NATURAL CROSS JOIN t10 }
{a 1 a 0 b 1 b 0 c 1 c 0}
} {
do_execsql_test e_select-1.11.${tn}a $s1 $res
do_execsql_test e_select-1.11.${tn}b $s2 $res
}
# EVIDENCE-OF: R-39625-59133 A USING or ON clause may not be added to a
# join that specifies the NATURAL keyword.
#
foreach {tn sql} {
1 {SELECT * FROM t1 NATURAL LEFT JOIN t2 USING (a)}
2 {SELECT * FROM t1 NATURAL LEFT JOIN t2 ON (t1.a=t2.a)}
3 {SELECT * FROM t1 NATURAL LEFT JOIN t2 ON (45)}
} {
do_catchsql_test e_select-1.12.$tn "
$sql
" {1 {a NATURAL join may not have an ON or USING clause}}
}
finish_test