mirror of
https://github.com/sqlite/sqlite.git
synced 2025-11-12 13:01:09 +03:00
Add some extra comments to the header in test_async.c. (CVS 4407)
FossilOrigin-Name: 79cf4e886cd5f1cd22574ce13135d4e32c1047b6
This commit is contained in:
@@ -42,6 +42,11 @@
|
||||
** written directly to disk, but is placed in the "write-queue" to be
|
||||
** handled by the background thread.
|
||||
**
|
||||
** When files opened with the asynchronous vfs are read from
|
||||
** (using sqlite3OsRead()), the data is read from the file on
|
||||
** disk and the write-queue, so that from the point of view of
|
||||
** the vfs reader the OsWrite() appears to have already completed.
|
||||
**
|
||||
** The special vfs is registered (and unregistered) by calls to
|
||||
** function asyncEnable() (see below).
|
||||
**
|
||||
@@ -56,15 +61,48 @@
|
||||
** run out of memory. Users of this technique may want to keep track of
|
||||
** the quantity of pending writes and stop accepting new write requests
|
||||
** when the buffer gets to be too big.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
** If this symbol is defined, then file-system locks are obtained as
|
||||
** required. This slows things down, but allows multiple processes
|
||||
** to access the database concurrently. If this symbol is not defined,
|
||||
** then connections from within a single process will respect each
|
||||
** others database locks, but external connections will not - leading
|
||||
** to database corruption.
|
||||
**
|
||||
** LOCKING + CONCURRENCY
|
||||
**
|
||||
** Multiple connections from within a single process that use this
|
||||
** implementation of asynchronous IO may access a single database
|
||||
** file concurrently. From the point of view of the user, if all
|
||||
** connections are from within a single process, there is no difference
|
||||
** between the concurrency offered by "normal" SQLite and SQLite
|
||||
** using the asynchronous backend.
|
||||
**
|
||||
** If connections from within multiple database files may access the
|
||||
** database file, the ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING symbol (see below) must be
|
||||
** defined. If it is not defined, then no locks are established on
|
||||
** the database file. In this case, if multiple processes access
|
||||
** the database file, corruption will quickly result.
|
||||
**
|
||||
** If ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING is defined (the default), then connections
|
||||
** from within multiple processes may access a single database file
|
||||
** without risking corruption. However concurrency is reduced as
|
||||
** follows:
|
||||
**
|
||||
** * When a connection using asynchronous IO begins a database
|
||||
** transaction, the database is locked immediately. However the
|
||||
** lock is not released until after all relevant operations
|
||||
** in the write-queue have been flushed to disk. This means
|
||||
** (for example) that the database may remain locked for some
|
||||
** time after a "COMMIT" or "ROLLBACK" is issued.
|
||||
**
|
||||
** * If an application using asynchronous IO executes transactions
|
||||
** in quick succession, other database users may be effectively
|
||||
** locked out of the database. This is because when a BEGIN
|
||||
** is executed, a database lock is established immediately. But
|
||||
** when the corresponding COMMIT or ROLLBACK occurs, the lock
|
||||
** is not released until the relevant part of the write-queue
|
||||
** has been flushed through. As a result, if a COMMIT is followed
|
||||
** by a BEGIN before the write-queue is flushed through, the database
|
||||
** is never unlocked,preventing other processes from accessing
|
||||
** the database.
|
||||
**
|
||||
** Defining ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING when using an NFS or other remote
|
||||
** file-system may slow things down, as synchronous round-trips to the
|
||||
** server may be required to establish database file locks.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -77,7 +115,6 @@
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#if OS_UNIX && SQLITE_THREADSAFE
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
** This demo uses pthreads. If you do not have a pthreads implementation
|
||||
** for your operating system, you will need to recode the threading
|
||||
@@ -128,12 +165,24 @@ static void asyncTrace(const char *zFormat, ...){
|
||||
** * See the last two paragraphs under "The Writer Thread" for
|
||||
** an assumption to do with file-handle synchronization by the Os.
|
||||
**
|
||||
** Deadlock prevention:
|
||||
**
|
||||
** There are three mutex used by the system: the "writer" mutex,
|
||||
** the "queue" mutex and the "lock" mutex. Rules are:
|
||||
**
|
||||
** * It is illegal to block on the writer mutex when any other mutex
|
||||
** are held, and
|
||||
**
|
||||
** * It is illegal to block on the queue mutex when the lock mutex
|
||||
** is held.
|
||||
**
|
||||
** i.e. mutex's must be grabbed in the order "writer", "queue", "lock".
|
||||
**
|
||||
** File system operations (invoked by SQLite thread):
|
||||
**
|
||||
** xOpenXXX (three versions)
|
||||
** xOpen
|
||||
** xDelete
|
||||
** xFileExists
|
||||
** xSyncDirectory
|
||||
**
|
||||
** File handle operations (invoked by SQLite thread):
|
||||
**
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user