mirror of
https://github.com/sqlite/sqlite.git
synced 2025-11-16 23:02:26 +03:00
More work on the new optimizer. Fewer tests fail now. (CVS 2565)
FossilOrigin-Name: ee3a08e353f563c36e904479393fcb56f96ee975
This commit is contained in:
107
src/where.c
107
src/where.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
|
||||
** so is applicable. Because this module is responsible for selecting
|
||||
** indices, you might also think of this module as the "query optimizer".
|
||||
**
|
||||
** $Id: where.c,v 1.152 2005/07/23 22:59:56 drh Exp $
|
||||
** $Id: where.c,v 1.153 2005/07/27 20:41:44 drh Exp $
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#include "sqliteInt.h"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -544,6 +544,14 @@ static int isSortingIndex(
|
||||
nTerm = pOrderBy->nExpr;
|
||||
assert( nTerm>0 );
|
||||
|
||||
/* A UNIQUE index that is fully specified is always a sorting
|
||||
** index.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if( pIdx->onError!=OE_None && nEqCol==pIdx->nColumn ){
|
||||
*pbRev = 0;
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Match terms of the ORDER BY clause against columns of
|
||||
** the index.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -619,6 +627,25 @@ static int sortableByRowid(
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
** Prepare a crude estimate of the logorithm of the input value.
|
||||
** The results need not be exact. This is only used for estimating
|
||||
** the total cost of performing operatings with O(logN) or O(NlogN)
|
||||
** complexity. Because N is just a guess, it is no great tragedy if
|
||||
** logN is a little off.
|
||||
**
|
||||
** We can assume N>=1.0;
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static double estLog(double N){
|
||||
double logN = 1.0;
|
||||
double x = 10.0;
|
||||
while( N>x ){
|
||||
logN = logN+1.0;
|
||||
x *= 10;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return logN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
** Find the best index for accessing a particular table. Return a pointer
|
||||
** to the index, flags that describe how the index should be used, the
|
||||
@@ -668,46 +695,64 @@ static double bestIndex(
|
||||
*ppIndex = 0;
|
||||
bestFlags = WHERE_ROWID_EQ;
|
||||
if( pTerm->operator & WO_EQ ){
|
||||
/* Rowid== is always the best pick. Look no further. Because only
|
||||
** a single row is generated, output is always in sorted order */
|
||||
*pFlags = WHERE_ROWID_EQ;
|
||||
*pnEq = 1;
|
||||
if( pOrderBy ) *pFlags |= WHERE_ORDERBY;
|
||||
TRACE(("... best is rowid\n"));
|
||||
return 0.0;
|
||||
}else if( pTerm->operator & WO_LIST ){
|
||||
/* Rowid IN (LIST): cost is NlogN where N is the number of list
|
||||
** elements. */
|
||||
lowestCost = pTerm->pExpr->pList->nExpr;
|
||||
lowestCost *= estLog(lowestCost);
|
||||
}else{
|
||||
lowestCost = 100.0;
|
||||
/* Rowid IN (SELECT): cost is NlogN where N is the number of rows
|
||||
** in the result of the inner select. We have no way to estimate
|
||||
** that value so make a wild guess. */
|
||||
lowestCost = 200.0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
TRACE(("... rowid IN cost: %g\n", lowestCost));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check for constraints on a range of rowids or a full table scan.
|
||||
/* Estimate the cost of a table scan. If we do not know how many
|
||||
** entries are in the table, use 1 million as a guess.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
pProbe = pSrc->pTab->pIndex;
|
||||
cost = pProbe ? pProbe->aiRowEst[0] : 100000.0;
|
||||
TRACE(("... base cost: %g\n", cost));
|
||||
cost = pProbe ? pProbe->aiRowEst[0] : 1000000.0;
|
||||
TRACE(("... table scan base cost: %g\n", cost));
|
||||
flags = WHERE_ROWID_RANGE;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check for constraints on a range of rowids in a table scan.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
pTerm = findTerm(pWC, iCur, -1, notReady, WO_LT|WO_LE|WO_GT|WO_GE, 0);
|
||||
if( pTerm ){
|
||||
flags = WHERE_ROWID_RANGE;
|
||||
if( findTerm(pWC, iCur, -1, notReady, WO_LT|WO_LE, 0) ){
|
||||
flags |= WHERE_TOP_LIMIT;
|
||||
cost *= 0.25; /* Guess that rowid<EXPR eliminates 75% of the search */
|
||||
cost *= 0.333; /* Guess that rowid<EXPR eliminates two-thirds or rows */
|
||||
}
|
||||
if( findTerm(pWC, iCur, -1, notReady, WO_GT|WO_GE, 0) ){
|
||||
flags |= WHERE_BTM_LIMIT;
|
||||
cost *= 0.25; /* Guess that rowid>EXPR eliminates 75% of the search */
|
||||
cost *= 0.333; /* Guess that rowid>EXPR eliminates two-thirds of rows */
|
||||
}
|
||||
TRACE(("... rowid range cost: %g\n", cost));
|
||||
TRACE(("... rowid range reduces cost to %g\n", cost));
|
||||
}else{
|
||||
flags = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if( pOrderBy && sortableByRowid(iCur, pOrderBy, &rev) ){
|
||||
flags |= WHERE_ORDERBY|WHERE_ROWID_RANGE;
|
||||
cost *= 0.5;
|
||||
if( rev ){
|
||||
flags |= WHERE_REVERSE;
|
||||
|
||||
/* If the table scan does not satisfy the ORDER BY clause, increase
|
||||
** the cost by NlogN to cover the expense of sorting. */
|
||||
if( pOrderBy ){
|
||||
if( sortableByRowid(iCur, pOrderBy, &rev) ){
|
||||
flags |= WHERE_ORDERBY|WHERE_ROWID_RANGE;
|
||||
if( rev ){
|
||||
flags |= WHERE_REVERSE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}else{
|
||||
cost += cost*estLog(cost);
|
||||
TRACE(("... sorting increases cost to %g\n", cost));
|
||||
}
|
||||
TRACE(("... order by reduces cost to %g\n", cost));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if( cost<lowestCost ){
|
||||
lowestCost = cost;
|
||||
@@ -718,7 +763,7 @@ static double bestIndex(
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for(; pProbe; pProbe=pProbe->pNext){
|
||||
int i; /* Loop counter */
|
||||
double inMultiplier = 2.0; /* Includes built-in index lookup penalty */
|
||||
double inMultiplier = 1.0;
|
||||
|
||||
TRACE(("... index %s:\n", pProbe->zName));
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -740,7 +785,7 @@ static double bestIndex(
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
cost = pProbe->aiRowEst[i] * inMultiplier;
|
||||
cost = pProbe->aiRowEst[i] * inMultiplier * estLog(inMultiplier);
|
||||
nEq = i;
|
||||
TRACE(("...... nEq=%d inMult=%g cost=%g\n", nEq, inMultiplier, cost));
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -753,30 +798,32 @@ static double bestIndex(
|
||||
flags = WHERE_COLUMN_RANGE;
|
||||
if( findTerm(pWC, iCur, j, notReady, WO_LT|WO_LE, pProbe) ){
|
||||
flags |= WHERE_TOP_LIMIT;
|
||||
cost *= 0.5;
|
||||
cost *= 0.333;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if( findTerm(pWC, iCur, j, notReady, WO_GT|WO_GE, pProbe) ){
|
||||
flags |= WHERE_BTM_LIMIT;
|
||||
cost *= 0.5;
|
||||
cost *= 0.333;
|
||||
}
|
||||
TRACE(("...... range reduces cost to %g\n", cost));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Reduce the cost substantially if this index can be used to satisfy
|
||||
** the ORDER BY clause
|
||||
/* Add the additional cost of sorting if that is a factor.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if( pOrderBy && (flags & WHERE_COLUMN_IN)==0 &&
|
||||
if( pOrderBy ){
|
||||
if( (flags & WHERE_COLUMN_IN)==0 &&
|
||||
isSortingIndex(pParse, pProbe, pSrc->pTab, iCur, pOrderBy, nEq, &rev) ){
|
||||
if( flags==0 ){
|
||||
flags = WHERE_COLUMN_RANGE;
|
||||
if( flags==0 ){
|
||||
flags = WHERE_COLUMN_RANGE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
flags |= WHERE_ORDERBY;
|
||||
if( rev ){
|
||||
flags |= WHERE_REVERSE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}else{
|
||||
cost += cost*estLog(cost);
|
||||
TRACE(("...... orderby reduces cost to %g\n", cost));
|
||||
}
|
||||
flags |= WHERE_ORDERBY;
|
||||
cost *= 0.5;
|
||||
if( rev ){
|
||||
flags |= WHERE_REVERSE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
TRACE(("...... orderby reduces cost to %g\n", cost));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check to see if we can get away with using just the index without
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user