Both views replace the umoptions field with NULL when the user does not
meet qualifications to see it. They used different qualifications, and
pg_user_mappings documented qualifications did not match its implemented
qualifications. Make its documentation and implementation match those
of user_mapping_options. One might argue for stronger qualifications,
but these have long, documented tenure. pg_user_mappings has always
exhibited this problem, so back-patch to 9.2 (all supported versions).
Michael Paquier and Feike Steenbergen. Reviewed by Jeff Janes.
Reported by Andrew Wheelwright.
Security: CVE-2017-7486
<!-- doc/src/sgml/README.links -->
Linking within SGML documents can be confusing, so here is a summary:
Intra-document Linking
----------------------
<xref>
use to get chapter/section number from the title of the target
link, or xreflabel if defined at the target, or refentrytitle if target
is a refentry; has no close tag
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/documentation/reference/html/xref.html
<link>
use to supply text for the link, requires </link>
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/documentation/reference/html/link.html
linkend=
controls the target of the link/xref, required
endterm=
for <xref>, allows the text of the link/xref to be taken from a
different link target title
External Linking
----------------
<ulink>
like <link>, but uses a URL (not a document target); requires
</ulink>; if no text is specified, the URL appears as the link
text
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/documentation/reference/html/ulink.html
url=
used by <ulink> to specify the URL, required
Guidelines
----------
o If you want to supply text, use <link>, else <xref>
o Do not use text with <ulink> so the URL appears in printed output
o Specific nouns like GUC variables, SQL commands, and contrib modules
usually have xreflabels