1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-11-01 21:31:19 +03:00
Files
postgres/src/interfaces/ecpg
Tom Lane cc4f6b7786 Clean up assorted misuses of snprintf()'s result value.
Fix a small number of places that were testing the result of snprintf()
but doing so incorrectly.  The right test for buffer overrun, per C99,
is "result >= bufsize" not "result > bufsize".  Some places were also
checking for failure with "result == -1", but the standard only says
that a negative value is delivered on failure.

(Note that this only makes these places correct if snprintf() delivers
C99-compliant results.  But at least now these places are consistent
with all the other places where we assume that.)

Also, make psql_start_test() and isolation_start_test() check for
buffer overrun while constructing their shell commands.  There seems
like a higher risk of overrun, with more severe consequences, here
than there is for the individual file paths that are made elsewhere
in the same functions, so this seemed like a worthwhile change.

Also fix guc.c's do_serialize() to initialize errno = 0 before
calling vsnprintf.  In principle, this should be unnecessary because
vsnprintf should have set errno if it returns a failure indication ...
but the other two places this coding pattern is cribbed from don't
assume that, so let's be consistent.

These errors are all very old, so back-patch as appropriate.  I think
that only the shell command overrun cases are even theoretically
reachable in practice, but there's not much point in erroneous error
checks.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17245.1534289329@sss.pgh.pa.us
2018-08-15 16:29:31 -04:00
..

src/interfaces/ecpg/README.dynSQL

descriptor statements have the following shortcomings

- input descriptors (USING DESCRIPTOR <name>) are not supported

  Reason: to fully support dynamic SQL the frontend/backend communication
          should change to recognize input parameters.
          Since this is not likely to happen in the near future and you
          can cover the same functionality with the existing infrastructure
          (using s[n]printf), I'll leave the work to someone else.