1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-10-13 18:28:01 +03:00
Files
postgres/src
Tom Lane 3694b4d7e1 Fix incorrect search for "x?" style matches in creviterdissect().
When the number of allowed iterations is limited (either a "?" quantifier
or a bound expression), the last sub-match has to reach to the end of the
target string.  The previous coding here first tried the shortest possible
match (one character, usually) and then gave up and back-tracked if that
didn't work, typically leading to failure to match overall, as shown in
bug #11478 from Christoph Berg.  The minimum change to fix that would be to
not decrement k before "goto backtrack"; but that would be a pretty stupid
solution, because we'd laboriously try each possible sub-match length
before finally discovering that only ending at the end can work.  Instead,
force the sub-match endpoint limit up to the end for even the first
shortest() call if we cannot have any more sub-matches after this one.

Bug introduced in my rewrite that added the iterdissect logic, commit
173e29aa5d.  The shortest-first search code
was too closely modeled on the longest-first code, which hasn't got this
issue since it tries a match reaching to the end to start with anyway.
Back-patch to all affected branches.
2014-09-23 20:26:14 -04:00
..
2014-08-09 00:07:00 -04:00
2014-06-28 21:46:15 +02:00
2014-06-28 21:46:15 +02:00