mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-05-02 11:44:50 +03:00
2a0af7fe46
The complement-class escapes \D, \S, \W are now allowed within bracket expressions. There is no semantic difficulty with doing that, but the rather hokey macro-expansion-based implementation previously used here couldn't cope. Also, invent "word" as an allowed character class name, thus "\w" is now equivalent to "[[:word:]]" outside brackets, or "[:word:]" within brackets. POSIX allows such implementation-specific extensions, and the same name is used in e.g. bash. One surprising compatibility issue this raises is that constructs such as "[\w-_]" are now disallowed, as our documentation has always said they should be: character classes can't be endpoints of a range. Previously, because \w was just a macro for "[:alnum:]_", such a construct was read as "[[:alnum:]_-_]", so it was accepted so long as the character after "-" was numerically greater than or equal to "_". Some implementation cleanup along the way: * Remove the lexnest() hack, and in consequence clean up wordchrs() to not interact with the lexer. * Fix colorcomplement() to not be O(N^2) in the number of colors involved. * Get rid of useless-as-far-as-I-can-see calls of element() on single-character character element names in brackpart(). element() always maps these to the character itself, and things would be quite broken if it didn't --- should "[a]" match something different than "a" does? Besides, the shortcut path in brackpart() wasn't doing this anyway, making it even more inconsistent. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2845172.1613674385@sss.pgh.pa.us Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3220564.1613859619@sss.pgh.pa.us