The ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE implementation can issue DROP INDEX and
CREATE INDEX to refit existing indexes for the new column type. Since
this CREATE INDEX is an implementation detail of an index alteration,
the ensuing DefineIndex() should skip ACL checks specific to index
creation. It already skips the namespace ACL check. Make it skip the
tablespace ACL check, too. Back-patch to 9.2 (all supported versions).
Reviewed by Tom Lane.
The S/390 members of the buildfarm are showing failures indicating
that they're having trouble with the rint() calls I added yesterday.
There's no good reason for that, and I wonder if it is a compiler bug
similar to the one we worked around in d9476b838. Try to fix it using
the same method as before, namely to store the result of rint() back
into a "double" variable rather than immediately converting to int64.
(This isn't entirely waving a dead chicken, since on machines with
wider-than-double float registers, the extra store forces a width
conversion. I don't know if S/390 is like that, but it seems worth
trying.)
In passing, merge duplicate ereport() calls in float8_timestamptz().
Per buildfarm.
When converting a float value to integer microseconds, we should be careful
to round the value to the nearest integer, typically with rint(); simply
assigning to an int64 variable will truncate, causing apparently off-by-one
values in cases that should work. Most places in the datetime code got
this right, but not these two.
float8_timestamptz() is new as of commit e511d878f (9.6). Previous
versions effectively depended on interval_mul() to do roundoff correctly,
which it does, so this fixes an accuracy regression in 9.6.
The problem in make_interval() dates to its introduction in 9.4. Aside
from being careful to round not truncate, let's incorporate the hours and
minutes inputs into the result with exact integer arithmetic, rather than
risk introducing roundoff error where there need not have been any.
float8_timestamptz() problem reported by Erik Nordström, though this is
not his proposed patch. make_interval() problem found by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHuQZDS76jTYk3LydPbKpNfw9KbACmD=49dC4BrzHcfPv6yA1A@mail.gmail.com
The CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY bug can only be triggered by row updates,
not inserts, since the problem would arise from an update incorrectly
being made HOT. Noted by Alvaro.
The problem with the original coding here is that we might receive (and
clear) a relcache invalidation signal for the target relation down inside
one of the index_open calls we're doing. Since the target is open, we
would not drop the relcache entry, just reset its rd_indexvalid and
rd_indexlist fields. But RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap() kept going, and
would eventually cache and return potentially-obsolete attribute bitmaps.
The case where this matters is where the inval signal was from a CREATE
INDEX CONCURRENTLY telling us about a new index on a formerly-unindexed
column. (In all other cases, the lock we hold on the target rel should
prevent any concurrent change in index state.) Even just returning the
stale attribute bitmap is not such a problem, because it shouldn't matter
during the transaction in which we receive the signal. What hurts is
caching the stale data, because it can survive into later transactions,
breaking CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY's expectation that later transactions
will not create new broken HOT chains. The upshot is that there's a window
for building corrupted indexes during CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
This patch fixes the problem by rechecking that the set of index OIDs
is still the same at the end of RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap() as it was
at the start. If not, we loop back and try again. That's a little
more than is strictly necessary to fix the bug --- in principle, we
could return the stale data but not cache it --- but it seems like a
bad idea on general principles for relcache to return data it knows
is stale.
There might be more hazards of the same ilk, or there might be a better
way to fix this one, but this patch definitely improves matters and seems
unlikely to make anything worse. So let's push it into today's releases
even as we continue to study the problem.
Pavan Deolasee and myself
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABOikdM2MUq9cyZJi1KyLmmkCereyGp5JQ4fuwKoyKEde_mzkQ@mail.gmail.com
If we forcibly place a Material node atop a finished subplan, we need
to move any initPlans attached to the subplan up to the Material node,
in order to keep SS_finalize_plan() happy. I'd figured this out in
commit 7b67a0a49 for the case of materializing a cursor plan, but out of
an abundance of caution, I put the initPlan movement hack at the call
site for that case, rather than inside materialize_finished_plan().
That was the wrong thing, because it turns out to also be necessary for
the only other caller of materialize_finished_plan(), ie subselect.c.
We lacked any test cases that exposed the mistake, but bug#14524 from
Wei Congrui shows that it's possible to get an initPlan reference into
the top tlist in that case too, and then SS_finalize_plan() complains.
Hence, move the hack into materialize_finished_plan().
In HEAD, also relocate some recently-added tests in subselect.sql, which
I'd unthinkingly dropped into the middle of a sequence of related tests.
Report: https://postgr.es/m/20170202060020.1400.89021@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Doing so doesn't seem to be within the purpose of the per user
connection limits, and has particularly unfortunate effects in
conjunction with parallel queries.
Backpatch to 9.6 where parallel queries were introduced.
David Rowley, reviewed by Robert Haas and Albe Laurenz.
In commit 23f34fa, we changed how ACLs were handled to use the new
pg_init_privs catalog and to dump out the ACL commands as REVOKE+GRANT
combinations instead of trying to REVOKE all rights always and then
GRANT back just the ones which were in place.
Unfortunately, the DEFAULT PRIVILEGES system didn't quite get the
correct treatment with this change and ended up (incorrectly) only
including positive GRANTs instead of both the REVOKEs and GRANTs
necessary to preserve the correct privileges.
There are only a couple cases where such REVOKEs are possible because,
generally speaking, there's few rights which exist on objects by
default to be revoked.
Examples of REVOKEs which weren't being correctly preserved are when
privileges are REVOKE'd from the creator/owner, like so:
ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES
FOR ROLE myrole
REVOKE SELECT ON TABLES FROM myrole;
or when other default privileges are being revoked, such as EXECUTE
rights granted to public for functions:
ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES
FOR ROLE myrole
REVOKE EXECUTE ON FUNCTIONS FROM PUBLIC;
Fix this by correctly working out what the correct REVOKE statements are
(if any) and dump them out, just as we do for everything else.
Noticed while developing additional regression tests for pg_dump, which
will be landing shortly.
Back-patch to 9.6 where the bug was introduced.
As pointed out by Alvaro, we actually use perltidy on the perl scripts
in the source tree, so go back to the results of a perltidy run for the
test_pg_dump TAP script.
To make it look slightly less tragic, I changed most of the independent
arguments into long-form single arguments (eg: -f file.sql changed to be
--file=file.sql) to avoid having them confusingly split across lines due
to perltidy.
Back-patch to 9.6, as the last patch was.
DST law changes in northern Cyprus (new zone Asia/Famagusta), Russia (new
zone Europe/Saratov), Tonga, Antarctica/Casey. Historical corrections for
Asia/Aqtau, Asia/Atyrau, Asia/Gaza, Asia/Hebron, Italy, Malta. Replace
invented zone abbreviation "TOT" for Tonga with numeric UTC offset; but
as in the past, we'll keep accepting "TOT" for input.
In commit 6c268df, pg_init_privs was added to track the initial
privileges of catalog objects and extensions. Unfortunately, that
commit didn't include understanding of ALTER EXTENSION ADD/DROP, which
allows the objects associated with an extension to be changed after the
initial CREATE EXTENSION script has been run.
The result of this meant that ACLs for objects added through
ALTER EXTENSION ADD were not recorded into pg_init_privs and we would
end up including those ACLs in pg_dump when we shouldn't have.
This commit corrects that by making sure to have pg_init_privs updated
when ALTER EXTENSION ADD/DROP is run, recording the permissions as they
are at ALTER EXTENSION ADD time, and removing any if/when ALTER
EXTENSION DROP is called.
This issue was pointed out by Moshe Jacobson as commentary on bug #14456
(which was actually a bug about versions prior to 9.6 not handling
custom ACLs on extensions correctly, an issue now addressed with
pg_init_privs in 9.6).
Back-patch to 9.6 where pg_init_privs was introduced.
The formatting of the perl hashes used in the TAP tests for test_pg_dump
was rather horribly inconsistent and made it more difficult than it
really should have been to add new tests or adjust what tests are for
what runs, etc.
Reformat to clean that all up.
Whitespace-only changes.
The new function allows to cast from one NodeTag based type to
another, while asserting that the conversion is valid. This replaces
the common pattern of doing a cast and a Assert(IsA(ptr, type))
close-by.
As this seems likely to be used pervasively, we decided to backpatch
this change the addition of this macro. Otherwise backpatched fixes
are more likely not to work on back-branches.
On branches before 9.6, where we do not yet rely on inline functions
being available, the type assertion is only performed if PG_USE_INLINE
support is detected. The cast obviously is performed regardless.
For the benefit of verifying the macro compiles in the back-branches,
this commit contains a single use of the new macro. On master, a
somewhat larger conversion will be committed separately.
Author: Peter Eisentraut and Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c5d387d9-3440-f5e0-f9d4-71d53b9fbe52@2ndquadrant.com
Backpatch: 9.2-
Our current DDL only allows a database name to be specified in COMMENT
ON DATABASE, which Andrew Dunstan reports to make this test fail on the
buildfarm. Remove the line until we gain a DDL command that allows the
current database to be operated on without having the specify it by
name.
Backpatch to 9.5, where these tests appeared.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e6084b89-07a7-7e57-51ee-d7b8fc9ec864@2ndQuadrant.com
Hot_standby_feedback could be reset by reload and worked correctly, but if
the server was restarted rather than reloaded the xmin was not reset.
Force reset always if hot_standby_feedback is enabled at startup.
Ants Aasma, Craig Ringer
Reported-by: Ants Aasma
!foo means "the tsvector does not contain foo", and therefore it should
match an empty tsvector. ts_match_vq() overenthusiastically supposed
that an empty tsvector could never match any query, so it forcibly
returned FALSE, the wrong answer. Remove the premature optimization.
Our behavior on this point was inconsistent, because while seqscans and
GIST index searches both failed to match empty tsvectors, GIN index
searches would find them, since GIN scans don't rely on ts_match_vq().
That makes this certainly a bug, not a debatable definition disagreement,
so back-patch to all supported branches.
Report and diagnosis by Tom Dunstan (bug #14515); added test cases by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170126025524.1434.97828@wrigleys.postgresql.org
When (1) autovacuum = off and (2) there's at least one database with
an XID age greater than autovacuum_freeze_max_age and (3) all tables
in that database that need vacuuming are already being processed by a
worker and (4) the autovacuum launcher is started, a kind of infinite
loop occurs. The launcher starts a worker and immediately exits. The
worker, finding no worker to do, immediately starts the launcher,
supposedly so that the next database can be processed. But because
datfrozenxid for that database hasn't been advanced yet, the new
worker gets put right back into the same database as the old one,
where it once again starts the launcher and exits. High-speed ping
pong ensues.
There are several possible ways to break the cycle; this seems like
the safest one.
Amit Khandekar (code) and Robert Haas (comments), reviewed by
Álvaro Herrera.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9eWejf72HKquKSzax0r+epS=nAbQKNnykkMA0E8c+rMDg@mail.gmail.com
When considering a sequence's Data entry in dumpSequenceData, we were
actually looking at the sequence definition's dump flag to decide if we
should dump the data or not. That's generally fine, except for when the
sequence data entry was created by processExtensionTables() because it's
a config sequence. In that case, the sequence itself won't be marked as
dumping data because it's part of an extension, leading to the need for
processExtensionTables() to create the sequence data entry.
This leads to extension config sequence data not being included in the
dump when it should be. Fix this by looking at the sequence data's dump
flag instead, just as dumpTableData() was doing for tables (which is why
config tables were correctly being handled), and add a regression test
to make sure we don't break it moving forward.
All of this is a bit round-about since we can now represent which
components of a given dump item should be dumped out through the dump
flag. A future improvement might be to change checkExtensionMembership()
to check for config sequences/tables and set the dump flag based on that
directly, possibly removing the need for processExtensionTables().
Bug found by Daniele Varrazzo.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+mi_8ZmxQM7+nZ7pJ8uyfxc9V3o=UAG14dVqvftdmvw8OJ3gQ@mail.gmail.com
Patch by Michael Paquier, with some tweaking of the regression tests by
me.
Back-patch to 9.6 where the bug was introduced.
Thinko in commit a4523c5aa. It doesn't really affect anything at
present, but it would be a problem if any tests added later in this
file ought to get index-only-scan plans. Back-patch, like the previous
commit, just to avoid surprises in case we add such a test and then
back-patch it.
Nikita Glukhov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8b70135d-ad38-bdd8-ac92-71e2b3c273cf@postgrespro.ru
These macros work fine when they are used directly in an "if" test or
similar, but as soon as the return values are assigned to boolean
variables (or passed as boolean arguments to some function), they become
bugs, hopefully caught by compiler warnings. To avoid future problems,
fix the definitions so that they return actual booleans.
To further minimize the risk that somebody uses them in back-patched
fixes that only work correctly in branches starting from the current
master and not in old ones, back-patch the change to supported branches
as appropriate.
See also commit af4472bcb8, and the long
discussion (and larger patch) in the thread mentioned in its commit
message.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18672.1483022414@sss.pgh.pa.us
These resulted in wrong answers if the relabeled argument could be matched
to an index column, as shown in bug #14504 from Evgeniy Kozlov. We might
be able to resurrect these optimizations by adjusting the planner's
treatment of RelabelType, or by adjusting btree's rules for selecting
comparison functions, but either solution will take careful analysis
and does not sound like a fit candidate for backpatching.
I left the catalog infrastructure in place and just reduced the transform
functions to always-return-NULL. This would be necessary anyway in the
back branches, and it doesn't seem important to be more invasive in HEAD.
Bug introduced by commit b8a18ad48. Back-patch to 9.5 where that came in.
Report: https://postgr.es/m/20170118144828.1432.52823@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18771.1484759439@sss.pgh.pa.us
Previously multiple sessions could execute pg_start_backup() and
pg_stop_backup() to start and stop an exclusive backup at the same time.
This could trigger the assertion failure of
"FailedAssertion("!(XLogCtl->Insert.exclusiveBackup)".
This happend because, even while pg_start_backup() was starting
an exclusive backup, other session could run pg_stop_backup()
concurrently and mark the backup as not-in-progress unconditionally.
This patch introduces ExclusiveBackupState indicating the state of
an exclusive backup. This state is used to ensure that there is only
one session running pg_start_backup() or pg_stop_backup() at
the same time, to avoid the assertion failure.
Back-patch to all supported versions.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-By: Kyotaro Horiguchi and me
Reported-By: Andreas Seltenreich
Discussion: <87mvktojme.fsf@credativ.de>
A client copy can't work inside a function because the FE/BE wire protocol
doesn't support nesting of a COPY operation within query results. (Maybe
it could, but the protocol spec doesn't suggest that clients should support
this, and libpq for one certainly doesn't.)
In most PLs, this prohibition is enforced by spi.c, but SQL functions don't
use SPI. A comparison of _SPI_execute_plan() and init_execution_state()
shows that rejecting client COPY is the only discrepancy in what they
allow, so there's no other similar bugs.
This is an astonishingly ancient oversight, so back-patch to all supported
branches.
Report: https://postgr.es/m/BY2PR05MB2309EABA3DEFA0143F50F0D593780@BY2PR05MB2309.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
In 9.5, the default pg_ctl stop mode was changed from "smart" to "fast".
pg_upgrade still thought the default mode was "smart" and only specified
the mode when "fast" was asked for. This results in using "fast" all
the time. It's not clear what the effect in practice is, but fix it
nonetheless to restore the previous behavior.
For a partial path, the cardinality estimate needs to reflect the
number of rows we think each worker will see, rather than the total
number of rows; otherwise, costing will go wrong. The previous coding
got this completely wrong for parallel joins.
Unfortunately, this change may destabilize plans for users of 9.6 who
have enabled parallel query, but since 9.6 is still fairly new I'm
hoping expectations won't be too settled yet. Also, this is really a
brown-paper-bag bug, so leaving it unfixed for the entire lifetime of
9.6 seems unwise.
Related reports (whose import I initially failed to recognize) by
Tomas Vondra and Tom Lane.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaDxZ5z5Kw_oCQoymNxNoVaTCXzPaODcOuao=CzK8dMZw@mail.gmail.com
pg_restore will currently accept invalid values for the number of
parallel jobs to run (eg: -1), unlike pg_dump which does check that the
value provided is reasonable.
Worse, '-1' is actually a valid, independent, parameter (as an alias for
--single-transaction), leading to potentially completely unexpected
results from a command line such as:
-> pg_restore -j -1
Where a user would get neither parallel jobs nor a single-transaction.
Add in validity checking of the parallel jobs option, as we already have
in pg_dump, before we try to open up the archive. Also move the check
that we haven't been asked to run more parallel jobs than possible on
Windows to the same place, so we do all the option validity checking
before opening the archive.
Back-patch all the way, though for 9.2 we're adding the Windows-specific
check against MAXIMUM_WAIT_OBJECTS as that check wasn't back-patched
originally.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170110044815.GC18360%40tamriel.snowman.net
The previous --path documentation and --help output were wrong in both
its meaning and the defaults.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Backpatch-through: 9.6
When using pg_dump --strict-names and a schema pattern which doesn't
match any schemas (eg: --schema='nonexistant*'), we were incorrectly
throwing an error claiming no tables were found when, really, there
were no schemas found:
-> pg_dump --strict-names --schema='nonexistant*'
pg_dump: no matching tables were found for pattern "nonexistant*"
Fix that by changing the error message to say 'schemas' instead, since
that is what we are actually complaining about.
Noticed while testing pg_dump error cases.
Back-patch to 9.6 where --strict-names and this error message were
introduced.
Including the program name twice is not helpful:
-> pg_dump -j -1
pg_dump: pg_dump: invalid number of parallel jobs
Correct by removing the progname from the exit_horribly() call used when
validating the number of parallel jobs.
Noticed while testing various pg_dump error cases.
Back-patch to 9.3 where parallel pg_dump was added.
If inherited tables don't have exactly the same schema, the USING clause
in an ALTER TABLE / SET DATA TYPE misbehaves when applied to the
children tables since commit 9550e8348b. Starting with that commit,
the attribute numbers in the USING expression are fixed during parse
analysis. This can lead to bogus errors being reported during
execution, such as:
ERROR: attribute 2 has wrong type
DETAIL: Table has type smallint, but query expects integer.
Since it wouldn't do to revert to the original coding, we now apply a
transformation to map the attribute numbers to the correct ones for each
child.
Reported by Justin Pryzby
Analysis by Tom Lane; patch by me.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170102225618.GA10071@telsasoft.com
... and therefore we ought not to tell XLogRegisterBuffer the opposite,
when writing XLog for a brin update that moves the index tuple to a
different page. Otherwise, xlog insertion would try to "compress the
hole" when producing a full-page image for it; but since we don't update
pd_lower/upper, the hole covers the whole page. On WAL replay, the
revmap page becomes empty and so the entire portion of the index is
useless and needs to be recomputed.
This is low-probability: a BRIN update only moves an index tuple to a
different page when the summary tuple is larger than the existing one,
which doesn't happen with fixed-width datatypes. Also, the revmap
page must be first after a checkpoint.
Report and patch: Kuntal Ghosh
Bug is alleged to have detected by a WAL-consistency-checking tool.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGz5QCJ=00UQjScSEFbV=0qO5ShTZB9WWz_Fm7+Wd83zPs9Geg@mail.gmail.com
I posted a test case demonstrating the problem, but I'm refraining from
adding it to the test suite; if the WAL consistency tool makes it in,
that will be a better way to catch this from regressing. (We should
definitely have someting that causes not-same-page updates, though.)
findTableByOid() is allowed to return NULL and we should therefore be
checking for that case. getOwnedSeqs() and dumpSequence() shouldn't
ever actually see this happen, but given odd circumstances it might and
commit f9e439b1 probably shouldn't have removed that check.
Pointed out by Coverity. Initial patch from Michael Paquier.
Back-patch to 9.6, where that commit had removed the check.
This fixes problems where a plan must change but fails to do so,
as seen in a bug report from Rajkumar Raghuwanshi.
For ALTER FOREIGN TABLE OPTIONS, do this through the standard method of
forcing a relcache flush on the table. For ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER
and ALTER SERVER, just flush the whole plan cache on any change in
pg_foreign_data_wrapper or pg_foreign_server. That matches the way
we handle some other low-probability cases such as opclass changes, and
it's unclear that the case arises often enough to be worth working harder.
Besides, that gives a patch that is simple enough to back-patch with
confidence.
Back-patch to 9.3. In principle we could apply the code change to 9.2 as
well, but (a) we lack postgres_fdw to test it with, (b) it's doubtful that
anyone is doing anything exciting enough with FDWs that far back to need
this desperately, and (c) the patch doesn't apply cleanly.
Patch originally by Amit Langote, reviewed by Etsuro Fujita and Ashutosh
Bapat, who each contributed substantial changes as well.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKcux6m5cA6rRPTKkqVdJ-R=KKDfe35Q_ZuUqxDSV_4hwga=og@mail.gmail.com
Commit 4aec49899e reorganized the order
of operations here so that we no longer increment the number of "extra
waits" before locking the semaphore, but it did not change the
starting value of extraWaits from 0 to -1 to compensate. In the worst
case, this could leak a semaphore count, but that seems to be unlikely
in practice.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1JyVqXiMba+-a589Rk0pyHsyKkGxeumVKjU6Y74hdrVLQ@mail.gmail.com
Amit Kapila, per an off-list report by Dilip Kumar. Reviewed by me.
array_fill(..., array[0]) produced an empty array, which is probably
what users expect, but it was a one-dimensional zero-length array
which is not our standard representation of empty arrays. Also, for
no very good reason, it rejected empty input arrays; that case should
be allowed and produce an empty output array.
In passing, remove the restriction that the input array(s) have lower
bound 1. That seems rather pointless, and it would have needed extra
complexity to make the check deal with empty input arrays.
Per bug #14487 from Andrew Gierth. It's been broken all along, so
back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170105152156.10135.64195@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Inheritance operations must treat the OID column, if any, much like
regular user columns. But MergeAttributesIntoExisting() neglected to
do that, leading to weird results after a table with OIDs is associated
to a parent with OIDs via ALTER TABLE ... INHERIT.
Report and patch by Amit Langote, reviewed by Ashutosh Bapat, some
adjustments by me. It's been broken all along, so back-patch to
all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cb13cfe7-a48c-5720-c383-bb843ab28298@lab.ntt.co.jp
configure can only probe the existence of gcc intrinsics, not how well
they're implemented, and unfortunately the answer is sometimes "badly".
In particular we've found that multiple compilers fail to implement
char-width __sync_lock_test_and_set() correctly on PPC; and even a correct
implementation would necessarily be pretty inefficient, since that hardware
has only a word-wide primitive to work with.
Given the knowledge we've accumulated in s_lock.h, it appears that it's
best to rely on int-width TAS operations on most non-Intel architectures.
Hence, pick int not char when both are nominally available to us in
generic-gcc.h (note that that code is not used for x86[_64]).
Back-patch to fix regression test failures on FreeBSD/PPC. Ordinarily
back-patching a change like this would be verboten because of ABI breakage.
But since pg_atomic_flag is not yet used in any Postgres data structure,
there's no ABI to break. It seems safer to back-patch to avoid possible
gotchas, if someday we do back-patch something that uses pg_atomic_flag.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/25414.1483076673@sss.pgh.pa.us
