> * Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
> Currently, ALTER USER and ALTER DATABASE support per-user and
> per-database defaults. Consider adding per-user-and-database
> defaults so things like search_path can be defaulted for a
> specific user connecting to a specific database.
>
>
present; intervening positions are filled with nulls. This behavior
is required by SQL99 but was not implementable before 8.2 due to lack
of support for nulls in arrays. I have only made it work for the
one-dimensional case, which is all that SQL99 requires. It seems quite
complex to get it right in higher dimensions, and since we never allowed
extension at all in higher dimensions, I think that must count as a
future feature addition not a bug fix.
the SQL spec, viz IS NULL is true if all the row's fields are null, IS NOT
NULL is true if all the row's fields are not null. The former coding got
this right for a limited number of cases with IS NULL (ie, those where it
could disassemble a ROW constructor at parse time), but was entirely wrong
for IS NOT NULL. Per report from Teodor.
I desisted from changing the behavior for arrays, since on closer inspection
it's not clear that there's any support for that in the SQL spec. This
probably needs more consideration.
< o Add command to archive partially filled write-ahead logs? [pitr]
<
< Currently only full WAL files are archived. This means that the
< most recent transactions aren't available for recovery in case
< of a disk failure.
<
Reorder:
< o %Create dump tool for write-ahead logs for use in determining
< transaction id for point-in-time recovery
> o %Create dump tool for write-ahead logs for use in determining
> transaction id for point-in-time recovery
not in the character set supported by DocBook nor standard HTML. (Sorry
Volkan.) Also replace random character-set references by a pointer to
the actual standard.
Stark, additional fixes and editorialization by Neil Conway. Greg's patch
description:
Some more doc patches for partitioned tables. In particular replace
the caveat that INCLUDING CONSTRAINTS doesn't exist and replace it
with documentation of, well, INCLUDING CONSTRAINTS.
Also, there was an instance of "LIKE WITH DEFAULTS" which is
actually spelled "LIKE INCLUDING DEFAULTS".
