When generating window_pathkeys, distinct_pathkeys, or sort_pathkeys,
we failed to realize that the grouping/ordering expressions might be
nullable by grouping sets. As a result, we may incorrectly deem that
the PathKeys are redundant by EquivalenceClass processing and thus
remove them from the pathkeys list. That would lead to wrong results
in some cases.
To fix this issue, we mark the grouping expressions nullable by
grouping sets if that is the case. If the grouping expression is a
Var or PlaceHolderVar or constructed from those, we can just add the
RT index of the RTE_GROUP RTE to the existing nullingrels field(s);
otherwise we have to add a PlaceHolderVar to carry on the nullingrel
bit.
However, we have to manually remove this nullingrel bit from
expressions in various cases where these expressions are logically
below the grouping step, such as when we generate groupClause pathkeys
for grouping sets, or when we generate PathTarget for initial input to
grouping nodes.
Furthermore, in set_upper_references, the targetlist and quals of an
Agg node should have nullingrels that include the effects of the
grouping step, ie they will have nullingrels equal to the input
Vars/PHVs' nullingrels plus the nullingrel bit that references the
grouping RTE. In order to perform exact nullingrels matches, we also
need to manually remove this nullingrel bit.
Bump catversion because this changes the querytree produced by the
parser.
Thanks to Tom Lane for the idea to invent a new kind of RTE.
Per reports from Geoff Winkless, Tobias Wendorff, Richard Guo from
various threads.
Author: Richard Guo
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Sutou Kouhei
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4_dp7e7oTwaiZeBX8+P1rXw4ThkZxh1QG81rhu9Z47VsQ@mail.gmail.com
If there are subqueries in the grouping expressions, each of these
subqueries in the targetlist and HAVING clause is expanded into
distinct SubPlan nodes. As a result, only one of these SubPlan nodes
would be converted to reference to the grouping key column output by
the Agg node; others would have to get evaluated afresh. This is not
efficient, and with grouping sets this can cause wrong results issues
in cases where they should go to NULL because they are from the wrong
grouping set. Furthermore, during re-evaluation, these SubPlan nodes
might use nulled column values from grouping sets, which is not
correct.
This issue is not limited to subqueries. For other types of
expressions that are part of grouping items, if they are transformed
into another form during preprocessing, they may fail to match lower
target items. This can also lead to wrong results with grouping sets.
To fix this issue, we introduce a new kind of RTE representing the
output of the grouping step, with columns that are the Vars or
expressions being grouped on. In the parser, we replace the grouping
expressions in the targetlist and HAVING clause with Vars referencing
this new RTE, so that the output of the parser directly expresses the
semantic requirement that the grouping expressions be gotten from the
grouping output rather than computed some other way. In the planner,
we first preprocess all the columns of this new RTE and then replace
any Vars in the targetlist and HAVING clause that reference this new
RTE with the underlying grouping expressions, so that we will have
only one instance of a SubPlan node for each subquery contained in the
grouping expressions.
Bump catversion because this changes the querytree produced by the
parser.
Thanks to Tom Lane for the idea to invent a new kind of RTE.
Per reports from Geoff Winkless, Tobias Wendorff, Richard Guo from
various threads.
Author: Richard Guo
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat, Sutou Kouhei
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4_dp7e7oTwaiZeBX8+P1rXw4ThkZxh1QG81rhu9Z47VsQ@mail.gmail.com
In label_sort_with_costsize, the cost_sort function is called with the
parameters 'input_disabled_nodes' and 'input_cost' in the wrong order.
This does not cause any plan diffs in the regression tests, because
label_sort_with_costsize is only used to label the Sort node nicely
for EXPLAIN, and cost numbers are not displayed in regression tests.
Oversight in e22253467. Fixed by passing arguments in the right
order.
Per report from Alexander Lakhin running UBSan.
Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a9b7231d-68bc-f117-a07c-96688f3e6aef@gmail.com
When generating paths for the ORDER BY clause, one thing we need to
ensure is that the output paths project the correct final_target. To
achieve this, in create_ordered_paths, we compare the pathtarget of
each generated path with the given 'target', and add a post-sort
projection step if the two targets do not match.
Currently we perform a simple pointer comparison between the two
targets. It turns out that this is not sufficient. Each sorted_path
generated in create_ordered_paths initially projects the correct
target required by the preceding steps of sort. If it is the same
pointer as sort_input_target, pointer comparison suffices, because
sort_input_target is always identical to final_target when no
post-sort projection is needed.
However, sorted_path's initial pathtarget may not be the same pointer
as sort_input_target, because in apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths, if
the target to be applied has the same expressions as the existing
reltarget, we only inject the sortgroupref info into the existing
pathtargets, rather than create new projection paths. As a result,
pointer comparison in create_ordered_paths is not reliable.
Instead, we can compare PathTarget.exprs to determine whether a
projection step is needed. If the expressions match, we can be
confident that a post-sort projection is not required.
It could be argued that this change adds extra check cost each time we
decide whether a post-sort projection is needed. However, as
explained in apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths, by avoiding the creation
of projection paths, we save effort both immediately and at plan
creation time. This, I think, justifies the extra check cost.
There are two ensuing plan changes in the regression tests, but they
look reasonable and are exactly what we are fixing here. So no
additional test cases are added.
No backpatch as this could result in plan changes.
Author: Richard Guo
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, David Rowley, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs48TosSvmnz88663_2yg3hfeOFss-J2PtnENDH6J_rLnRQ@mail.gmail.com
When creating merge or hash join plans in createplan.c, the merge or
hash clauses may need to get commuted to ensure that the outer var is
on the left and the inner var is on the right if they are not already
in the expected form. This requires that their operators have
commutators. Failing to find a commutator at this stage would result
in 'ERROR: could not find commutator for operator xxx', with no
opportunity to select an alternative plan.
Typically, this is not an issue because mergejoinable or hashable
operators are expected to always have valid commutators. But in some
artificial cases this assumption may not hold true. Therefore, here
in this patch we check the validity of commutators for clauses in the
form "inner op outer" when selecting mergejoin/hash clauses, and
consider a clause unusable for the current pair of outer and inner
relations if it lacks a commutator.
There are not (and should not be) any such operators built into
Postgres that are mergejoinable or hashable but have no commutators;
so we leverage the alias type 'int8alias1' created in equivclass.sql
to build the test case. This is why the test case is included in
equivclass.sql rather than in join.sql.
Although this is arguably a bug fix, it cannot be reproduced without
installing an incomplete opclass, which is unlikely to happen in
practice, so no back-patch.
Reported-by: Alexander Pyhalov
Author: Richard Guo
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c59ec04a2fef94d9ffc35a9b17dfc081@postgrespro.ru
Commit 2489d76c4 removed some logic from pullup_replace_vars()
that avoided wrapping a PlaceHolderVar around a pulled-up
subquery output expression if the expression could be proven
to go to NULL anyway (because it contained Vars or PHVs of the
pulled-up relation and did not contain non-strict constructs).
But removing that logic turns out to cause performance regressions
in some cases, because the extra PHV blocks subexpression folding,
and will do so even if outer-join reduction later turns it into a
no-op with no phnullingrels bits. This can for example prevent
an expression from being matched to an index.
The reason for always adding a PHV was to ensure we had someplace
to put the varnullingrels marker bits of the Var being replaced.
However, it turns out we can optimize in exactly the same cases that
the previous code did, because we can instead attach the needed
varnullingrels bits to the contained Var(s)/PHV(s).
This is not a complete solution --- it would be even better if we
could remove PHVs after reducing them to no-ops. It doesn't look
practical to back-patch such an improvement, but this change seems
safe and at least gets rid of the performance-regression cases.
Per complaint from Nikhil Raj. Back-patch to v16 where the
problem appeared.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAG1ps1xvnTZceKK24OUfMKLPvDP2vjT-d+F2AOCWbw_v3KeEgg@mail.gmail.com
Now that disable_cost is not included in the cost estimate, there's
no visible sign in EXPLAIN output of which plan nodes are disabled.
Fix that by propagating the number of disabled nodes from Path to
Plan, and then showing it in the EXPLAIN output.
There is some question about whether this is a desirable change.
While I personally believe that it is, it seems best to make it a
separate commit, in case we decide to back out just this part, or
rework it.
Reviewed by Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, and David Rowley.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZ_+MS+o6NeGK2xyBv-xM+w1AfFVuHE4f_aq6ekHv7YSQ@mail.gmail.com
Previously, when a path type was disabled by e.g. enable_seqscan=false,
we either avoided generating that path type in the first place, or
more commonly, we added a large constant, called disable_cost, to the
estimated startup cost of that path. This latter approach can distort
planning. For instance, an extremely expensive non-disabled path
could seem to be worse than a disabled path, especially if the full
cost of that path node need not be paid (e.g. due to a Limit).
Or, as in the regression test whose expected output changes with this
commit, the addition of disable_cost can make two paths that would
normally be distinguishible in cost seem to have fuzzily the same cost.
To fix that, we now count the number of disabled path nodes and
consider that a high-order component of both the startup cost and the
total cost. Hence, the path list is now sorted by disabled_nodes and
then by total_cost, instead of just by the latter, and likewise for
the partial path list. It is important that this number is a count
and not simply a Boolean; else, as soon as we're unable to respect
disabled path types in all portions of the path, we stop trying to
avoid them where we can.
Because the path list is now sorted by the number of disabled nodes,
the join prechecks must compute the count of disabled nodes during
the initial cost phase instead of postponing it to final cost time.
Counts of disabled nodes do not cross subquery levels; at present,
there is no reason for them to do so, since the we do not postpone
path selection across subquery boundaries (see make_subplan).
Reviewed by Andres Freund, Heikki Linnakangas, and David Rowley.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZ_+MS+o6NeGK2xyBv-xM+w1AfFVuHE4f_aq6ekHv7YSQ@mail.gmail.com
When a partition is detached and immediately dropped, a prepared
statement could try to compute a new partition descriptor that includes
it. This leads to this kind of error:
ERROR: could not open relation with OID 457639
Avoid this by skipping the partition in expand_partitioned_rtentry if it
doesn't exist.
Noted by me while investigating bug #18559. Kuntal Gosh helped to
identify the exact failure.
Backpatch to 14, where DETACH CONCURRENTLY was introduced.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202408122233.bo4adt3vh5bi@alvherre.pgsql
To deparse a reference to a field of a RECORD-type output of a
subquery, EXPLAIN normally digs down into the subquery's plan to try
to discover exactly which anonymous RECORD type is meant. However,
this can fail if the subquery has been optimized out of the plan
altogether on the grounds that no rows could pass the WHERE quals,
which has been possible at least since 3fc6e2d7f. There isn't
anything remaining in the plan tree that would help us, so fall back
to printing the field name as "fN" for the N'th column of the record.
(This will actually be the right thing some of the time, since it
matches the column names we assign to RowExprs.)
In passing, fix a comment typo in create_projection_plan, which
I noticed while experimenting with an alternative fix for this.
Per bug #18576 from Vasya B. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Richard Guo and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18576-9feac34e132fea9e@postgresql.org
When pg_dump retrieves the list of database objects and performs the
data dump, there was possibility that objects are replaced with others
of the same name, such as views, and access them. This vulnerability
could result in code execution with superuser privileges during the
pg_dump process.
This issue can arise when dumping data of sequences, foreign
tables (only 13 or later), or tables registered with a WHERE clause in
the extension configuration table.
To address this, pg_dump now utilizes the newly introduced
restrict_nonsystem_relation_kind GUC parameter to restrict the
accesses to non-system views and foreign tables during the dump
process. This new GUC parameter is added to back branches too, but
these changes do not require cluster recreation.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch
Security: CVE-2024-7348
Backpatch-through: 12
To determine if the two relations being joined can use partitionwise
join, we need to verify the existence of equi-join conditions
involving pairs of matching partition keys for all partition keys.
Currently we do that by looking through the join's restriction
clauses. However, it has been discovered that this approach is
insufficient, because there might be partition keys known equal by a
specific EC, but they do not form a join clause because it happens
that other members of the EC than the partition keys are constrained
to become a join clause.
To address this issue, in addition to examining the join's restriction
clauses, we also check if any partition keys are known equal by ECs,
by leveraging function exprs_known_equal(). To accomplish this, we
enhance exprs_known_equal() to check equality per the semantics of the
opfamily, if provided.
It could be argued that exprs_known_equal() could be called O(N^2)
times, where N is the number of partition key expressions, resulting
in noticeable performance costs if there are a lot of partition key
expressions. But I think this is not a problem. The number of a
joinrel's partition key expressions would only be equal to the join
degree, since each base relation within the join contributes only one
partition key expression. That is to say, it does not scale with the
number of partitions. A benchmark with a query involving 5-way joins
of partitioned tables, each with 3 partition keys and 1000 partitions,
shows that the planning time is not significantly affected by this
patch (within the margin of error), particularly when compared to the
impact caused by partitionwise join.
Thanks to Tom Lane for the idea of leveraging exprs_known_equal() to
check if partition keys are known equal by ECs.
Author: Richard Guo, Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Ashutosh Bapat, Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAN_9JTzo_2F5dKLqXVtDX5V6dwqB0Xk+ihstpKEt3a1LT6X78A@mail.gmail.com
Parameterized partial paths are not supported, and we have several
checks in try_partial_xxx_path functions to enforce this. For a
partial nestloop join path, we need to ensure that if the inner path
is parameterized, the parameterization is fully satisfied by the
proposed outer path. For a partial merge/hashjoin join path, we need
to ensure that the inner path is not parameterized. In all cases, we
need to ensure that the outer path is not parameterized.
However, the comment in try_partial_hashjoin_path does not describe
this correctly. This patch fixes that.
In addtion, this patch simplifies the checks peformed in
try_partial_hashjoin_path and try_partial_mergejoin_path with the help
of macro PATH_REQ_OUTER, and also adds asserts that the outer path is
not parameterized in try_partial_xxx_path functions.
Author: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs48mKJ6g_GnYNa7dnw04MHaMK-jnAEBrMVhTp2uUg3Ut4A@mail.gmail.com
In sort_inner_and_outer, we create mergejoin join paths by explicitly
sorting both relations on each possible ordering of the available
mergejoin clauses. However, if there are no available mergejoin
clauses, we can skip this process entirely.
This patch introduces a check for mergeclause_list at the beginning of
sort_inner_and_outer and exits the function if it is found to be
empty. This might help skip all the statements that come before the
call to select_outer_pathkeys_for_merge, including the build of
UniquePaths in the case of JOIN_UNIQUE_OUTER or JOIN_UNIQUE_INNER.
I doubt there's any measurable performance improvement, but throughout
the run of the regression tests, sort_inner_and_outer is called a
total of 44,424 times. Among these calls, there are 11,064 instances
where mergeclause_list is found to be empty, which accounts for
approximately one-fourth. I think this suggests that implementing
this shortcut is worthwhile.
Author: Richard Guo
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs48RKiZGFEd5A0JtztRY5ZdvVvNiHh0AKeuoz21F+0dVjQ@mail.gmail.com
In try_partitionwise_join, we aim to break down the join between two
partitioned relations into joins between matching partitions. To
achieve this, we iterate through each pair of partitions from the two
joining relations and create child-join relations for them. With
potentially thousands of partitions, the local objects allocated in
each iteration can accumulate significant memory usage. Therefore, we
opt to eagerly free these local objects at the end of each iteration.
In line with this approach, this patch frees the bitmap set that
represents the relids of child-join relations at the end of each
iteration. Additionally, it modifies build_child_join_rel() to reuse
the AppendRelInfo structures generated within each iteration.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat
Reviewed-by: David Christensen, Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAExHW5s4EqY43oB=ne6B2=-xLgrs9ZGeTr1NXwkGFt2j-OmaQQ@mail.gmail.com
We don't currently support parameterized MergeAppend paths: there's
little use for an ordered path on the inside of a nestloop. Given
this, we can simplify create_merge_append_path by directly setting
param_info to NULL instead of calling get_appendrel_parampathinfo. We
can also simplify the Assert for child paths a little bit.
This change won't make any measurable difference in performance; it's
just for clarity's sake.
Author: Richard Guo
Reviewed-by: Alena Rybakina, Paul A Jungwirth
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4_n1bgH2nACMuGsXZct3KH6PBFS0tPdQsXdstRfyxTunQ@mail.gmail.com
In create_gather_merge_path, we should always guarantee that the
subpath is adequately ordered, and we do not add a Sort node in
createplan.c for a Gather Merge node. Therefore, the 'else' branch in
create_gather_merge_path, which computes the cost for a Sort node, is
redundant.
This patch removes the redundant code and emits an error if the
subpath is not sufficiently ordered. Meanwhile, this patch changes
the check for the subpath's pathkeys in create_gather_merge_plan to an
Assert.
Author: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs48u=0bWf3epVtULjJ-=M9Hbkz+ieZQAOS=BfbXZFqbDCg@mail.gmail.com
In the case of a parallel plan, when computing the number of tuples
processed per worker, we divide the total number of tuples by the
parallel_divisor obtained from get_parallel_divisor(), which accounts
for the leader's contribution in addition to the number of workers.
Accordingly, when estimating the number of tuples for gather (merge)
nodes, we should multiply the number of tuples per worker by the same
parallel_divisor to reverse the division. However, currently we use
parallel_workers rather than parallel_divisor for the multiplication.
This could result in an underestimation of the number of tuples for
gather (merge) nodes, especially when there are fewer than four
workers.
This patch fixes this issue by using the same parallel_divisor for the
multiplication. There is one ensuing plan change in the regression
tests, but it looks reasonable and does not compromise its original
purpose of testing parallel-aware hash join.
In passing, this patch removes an unnecessary assignment for path.rows
in create_gather_merge_path, and fixes an uninitialized-variable issue
in generate_useful_gather_paths.
No backpatch as this could result in plan changes.
Author: Anthonin Bonnefoy
Reviewed-by: Rafia Sabih, Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAO6_Xqr9+51NxgO=XospEkUeAg-p=EjAWmtpdcZwjRgGKJ53iA@mail.gmail.com
Previously, the code charged disable_cost for CurrentOfExpr, and then
subtracted disable_cost from the cost of a TID path that used
CurrentOfExpr as the TID qual, effectively disabling all paths except
that one. Now, we instead suppress generation of the disabled paths
entirely, and generate only the one that the executor will actually
understand.
With this approach, we do not need to rely on disable_cost being
large enough to prevent the wrong path from being chosen, and we
save some CPU cycle by avoiding generating paths that we can't
actually use. In my opinion, the code is also easier to understand
like this.
Patch by me. Review by Heikki Linnakangas.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/591b3596-2ea0-4b8e-99c6-fad0ef2801f5@iki.fi
If we intend to generate a Memoize node on top of a path, we need
cache keys of some sort. Currently we search for the cache keys in
the parameterized clauses of the path as well as the lateral_vars of
its parent. However, it turns out that this is not sufficient because
there might be lateral references derived from PlaceHolderVars, which
we fail to take into consideration.
This oversight can cause us to miss opportunities to utilize the
Memoize node. Moreover, in some plans, failing to recognize all the
cache keys could result in performance regressions. This is because
without identifying all the cache keys, we would need to purge the
entire cache every time we get a new outer tuple during execution.
This patch fixes this issue by extracting lateral Vars from within
PlaceHolderVars and subsequently including them in the cache keys.
In passing, this patch also includes a comment clarifying that Memoize
nodes are currently not added on top of join relation paths. This
explains why this patch only considers PlaceHolderVars that are due to
be evaluated at baserels.
Author: Richard Guo
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, David Rowley, Andrei Lepikhov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs48jLxn0pAPZpJ50EThZ569Xrw+=4Ac3QvkpQvNszbeoNg@mail.gmail.com
When generating non-parallel nestloop paths for each available outer
path, we always consider materializing the cheapest inner path if
feasible. Similarly, in this patch, we also consider materializing
the cheapest inner path when building partial nestloop paths. This
approach potentially reduces the need to rescan the inner side of a
partial nestloop path for each outer tuple.
Author: Tender Wang
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo, Robert Haas, David Rowley, Alena Rybakina
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Rybak, Paul Jungwirth, Yuki Fujii
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXNkPmtEXNfVQMou_7NqQmFABca9f4etjBtdbbm0ZKDmWvw@mail.gmail.com
Hash joins can support semijoin with the LHS input on the right, using
the existing logic for inner join, combined with the assurance that only
the first match for each inner tuple is considered, which can be
achieved by leveraging the HEAP_TUPLE_HAS_MATCH flag. This can be very
useful in some cases since we may now have the option to hash the
smaller table instead of the larger.
Merge join could likely support "Right Semi Join" too. However, the
benefit of swapping inputs tends to be small here, so we do not address
that in this patch.
Note that this patch also modifies a test query in join.sql to ensure it
continues testing as intended. With this patch the original query would
result in a right-semi-join rather than semi-join, compromising its
original purpose of testing the fix for neqjoinsel's behavior for
semi-joins.
Author: Richard Guo
Reviewed-by: wenhui qiu, Alena Rybakina, Japin Li
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs4_X1mN=ic+SxcyymUqFx9bB8pqSLTGJ-F=MHy4PW3eRXw@mail.gmail.com
All the errors triggered in the code paths patched here would cause the
backend to issue an internal_error errcode, which is a state that should
be used only for "can't happen" situations. However, these code paths
are reachable by the regression tests, and could be seen by users in
valid cases. Some regression tests expect internal errcodes as they
manipulate the backend state to cause corruption (like checksums), or
use elog() because it is more convenient (like injection points), these
have no need to change.
This reduces the number of internal failures triggered in a check-world
by more than half, while providing correct errcodes for these valid
cases.
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Zic_GNgos5sMxKoa@paquier.xyz
In cost_memoize_rescan(), when calculating the hit_ratio using the calls
and ndistinct estimations, if the value that was set in
MemoizePath.calls had not been processed through clamp_row_est(), then it
was possible that it was set to some non-integer value which could result
in ndistinct being 1 higher than calls due to estimate_num_groups()
performing clamp_row_est() on its input_rows. This could result in
hit_ratio values slightly below 0.0, which would cause an Assert failure.
The value of MemoizePath.calls comes from the final parameter in the
create_memoize_path() function, of which we only have one true caller of.
That caller passes outer_path->rows. All the core code I looked at
always seems to call clamp_row_est() on the Path.rows, so there might
have been no issues with any core Paths causing troubles here. The bug
report was about a CustomPath with a non-clamped row estimated.
The misbehavior as a result of this seems to be mostly limited to the
Assert() failing. Aside from that, it seems the Memoize costs would
just come out slightly higher than they should have, which is likely
fairly harmless.
Reported-by: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@heterodb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOP8fzZnTU+N64UYJYogb1hN-5hFP+PwTb3m_cnGAD7EsQwrKw@mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo
Backpatch-through: 14, where Memoize was introduced
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in a few places. These
inconsistencies were all introduced during Postgres 17 development.
pg_bsd_indent still has a couple of similar inconsistencies, which I
(pgeoghegan) have left untouched for now.
This commit was written with help from clang-tidy, by mechanically
applying the same rules as similar clean-up commits (the earliest such
commit was commit 035ce1fe).
infer_arbiter_indexes failed to renumber varnos in index expressions
or predicates that it got from the catalogs. This escaped detection
up to now because the stored varnos in such trees will be 1, and an
INSERT's result relation is usually the first rangetable entry,
so that that was fine. However, in cases such as inserting through
an updatable view, it's not fine, leading to failure to match the
expressions to the query with ensuing "there is no unique or exclusion
constraint matching the ON CONFLICT specification" errors.
Fix by copy-and-paste from get_relation_info().
Per bug #18502 from Michael Wang. Back-patch to all supported
versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18502-545b53f5b81e54e0@postgresql.org
0452b461bc made optimizer explore alternative orderings of group-by pathkeys.
It eliminated preprocess_groupclause(), which was intended to match items
between GROUP BY and ORDER BY. Instead, get_useful_group_keys_orderings()
function generates orderings of GROUP BY elements at the time of grouping
paths generation. The get_useful_group_keys_orderings() function takes into
account 3 orderings of GROUP BY pathkeys and clauses: original order as written
in GROUP BY, matching ORDER BY clauses as much as possible, and matching the
input path as much as possible. Given that even before 0452b461b,
preprocess_groupclause() could change the original order of GROUP BY clauses
we don't need to consider it apart from ordering matching ORDER BY clauses.
This commit restores preprocess_groupclause() to provide an ordering of
GROUP BY elements matching ORDER BY before generation of paths. The new
version of preprocess_groupclause() takes into account an incremental sort.
The get_useful_group_keys_orderings() function now takes into 2 orderings of
GROUP BY elements: the order generated preprocess_groupclause() and the order
matching the input path as much as possible.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdvyWLMGwvxaf%3D7KAp-z-4mxbSH8ti2f6mNOQv5metZFzg%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov, Pavel Borisov
0452b461bc made optimizer explore alternative orderings of group-by pathkeys.
The PathKeyInfo data structure was used to store the particular ordering of
group-by pathkeys and corresponding clauses. It turns out that PathKeyInfo
is not the best name for that purpose. This commit renames this data structure
to GroupByOrdering, and revises its comment.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/db0fc3a4-966c-4cec-a136-94024d39212d%40postgrespro.ru
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Author: Andrei Lepikhov
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Borisov
This commit introduces invariants checking of generated orderings
in get_useful_group_keys_orderings() for assert-enabled builds.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a663f0f6-cbf6-49aa-af2e-234dc6768a07%40postgrespro.ru
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Author: Andrei Lepikhov
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Borisov
0452b461bc made get_eclass_for_sort_expr() always set
EquivalenceClass.ec_sortref if it's not done yet. This leads to an asymmetric
situation when whoever first looks for the EquivalenceClass sets the
ec_sortref. It is also counterintuitive that get_eclass_for_sort_expr()
performs modification of data structures.
This commit makes make_pathkeys_for_sortclauses_extended() responsible for
setting EquivalenceClass.ec_sortref. Now we set the
EquivalenceClass.ec_sortref's needed to explore alternative GROUP BY ordering
specifically during building pathkeys by the list of grouping clauses.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17037754-f187-4138-8285-0e2bfebd0dea%40postgrespro.ru
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Author: Andrei Lepikhov
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Borisov
This reverts commit 7204f35919,
thus restoring 66c0185a3 (Allow planner to use Merge Append to
efficiently implement UNION) as well as the follow-on commits
d5d2205c8, 3b1a7eb28, 7487044d6.
Per further discussion on pgsql-release, we wish to ship beta1 with
this feature, and patch the bug that was found just before wrap,
rather than shipping beta1 with the feature reverted.
This reverts 66c0185a3 (Allow planner to use Merge Append to
efficiently implement UNION) as well as the follow-on commits
d5d2205c8, 3b1a7eb28, 7487044d6. In addition to those, 07746a8ef
had to be removed then re-applied in a different place, because
66c0185a3 moved the relevant code.
The reason for this last-minute thrashing is that depesz found a
case in which the patched code creates a completely wrong plan
that silently gives incorrect query results. It's unclear what
the cause is or how many cases are affected, but with beta1 wrap
staring us in the face, there's no time for closer investigation.
After we figure that out, we can decide whether to un-revert this
for beta2 or hold it for v18.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Zktzf926vslR35Fv@depesz.com
(also some private discussion among pgsql-release)
This feature set did not handle empty ranges correctly, and it's now
too late for PostgreSQL 17 to fix it.
The following commits are reverted:
6db4598fcb Add stratnum GiST support function
46a0cd4cef Add temporal PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints
86232a49a4 Fix comment on gist_stratnum_btree
030e10ff1a Rename pg_constraint.conwithoutoverlaps to conperiod
a88c800deb Use daterange and YMD in without_overlaps tests instead of tsrange.
5577a71fb0 Use half-open interval notation in without_overlaps tests
34768ee361 Add temporal FOREIGN KEY contraints
482e108cd3 Add test for REPLICA IDENTITY with a temporal key
c3db1f30cb doc: clarify PERIOD and WITHOUT OVERLAPS in CREATE TABLE
144c2ce0cc Fix ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING/UPDATE for temporal indexes
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d0b64a7a-dfe4-4b84-a906-c7dedfa40a3e@eisentraut.org
There are some problems with the new way to handle these constraints
that were detected at the last minute, and require fixes that appear too
invasive to be doing this late in the cycle. Revert this (again) for
now, we'll try again with these problems fixed.
The following commits are reverted:
b0e96f3119 Catalog not-null constraints
9b581c5341 Disallow changing NO INHERIT status of a not-null constraint
d0ec2ddbe0 Fix not-null constraint test
ac22a9545c Move privilege check to the right place
b0f7dd915b Check stack depth in new recursive functions
3af7217942 Update information_schema definition for not-null constraints
c3709100be Fix propagating attnotnull in multiple inheritance
d9f686a72e Fix restore of not-null constraints with inheritance
d72d32f52d Don't try to assign smart names to constraints
0cd711271d Better handle indirect constraint drops
13daa33fa5 Disallow NO INHERIT not-null constraints on partitioned tables
d45597f72f Disallow direct change of NO INHERIT of not-null constraints
21ac38f498 Fix inconsistencies in error messages
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202405110940.joxlqcx4dogd@alvherre.pgsql
A PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE constraint with WITHOUT OVERLAPS will be a
GiST index, not a B-Tree, but it will still have indisunique set. The
code for ON CONFLICT fails if it sees a non-btree index that has
indisunique. This commit fixes that and adds some tests. But now
that we can't just test indisunique, we also need some extra checks to
prevent DO UPDATE from running against a WITHOUT OVERLAPS constraint
(because the conflict could happen against more than one row, and we'd
only update one).
Author: Paul A. Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1426589a-83cb-4a89-bf40-713970c07e63@illuminatedcomputing.com
The initial building of RestrictInfos and SpecialJoinInfos tends to
create structures that share relid sets (such as syn_lefthand and
outer_relids). There's nothing wrong with that in itself, but when
we modify those relid sets during join removal, we have to be sure
not to corrupt the values that other structures are pointing at.
remove_rel_from_query() was careless about this. It accidentally
worked anyway because (1) we'd never be reducing the sets to empty,
so they wouldn't get pfree'd; and (2) the in-place modification is the
same one that we did or will apply to the other struct's relid set,
so that there wasn't visible corruption at the end of the process.
While there's no live bug in a standard build, of course this is way
too fragile to accept going forward. (Maybe we should back-patch
this change too for safety, but I've refrained for now.)
This bug was exposed by the recent invention of REALLOCATE_BITMAPSETS.
Commit e0477837c had installed a fix, but that went away with the
reversion of SJE, so now we need to fix it again.
David Rowley and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxFVQmr4=JWHAOSLuKA5Zy9H26nY6tVrRFBOekHoALyCkQ@mail.gmail.com
The executor only supports CurrentOfExpr as the sole tidqual of a
TidScan plan node. tidpath.c failed to take any particular care about
that, but would just take the first ctid equality qual it could find
in the target relation's baserestrictinfo list. Originally that was
fine because the grammar prevents any other WHERE conditions from
being combined with CURRENT OF <cursor>. However, if the relation has
RLS visibility policies then those would get included in the list.
Should such a policy include a condition on ctid, we'd typically grab
the wrong qual and produce a malfunctioning plan.
To fix, introduce a simplistic priority ordering scheme for which ctid
equality qual to prefer. Real-world cases involving more than one
such qual are so rare that it doesn't seem worth going to any great
trouble to choose one over another, so I didn't work very hard; but
this code could be extended in future if someone thinks differently.
It's extremely difficult to think of a reasonable use-case for an RLS
restriction involving ctid, and certainly we've heard no field reports
of this failure. So this doesn't seem worthy of back-patching, but
in the name of cleanliness let's fix it going forward.
Patch by me, per report from Robert Haas.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3914881.1715038270@sss.pgh.pa.us
The code change this made might well be fine to keep, but the
comment justifying it by reference to self-join removal isn't.
Let's just go back to the status quo ante, pending a more thorough
review/redesign of SJE.
(I found this by grepping to see if any references to self-join
removal remained in the tree.)
94985c210 added code to detect when WindowFuncs were monotonic and
allowed additional quals to be "pushed down" into the subquery to be
used as WindowClause runConditions in order to short-circuit execution
in nodeWindowAgg.c.
The Node representation of runConditions wasn't well selected and
because we do qual pushdown before planning the subquery, the planning
of the subquery could perform subquery pull-up of nested subqueries.
For WindowFuncs with args, the arguments could be changed after pushing
the qual down to the subquery.
This was made more difficult by the fact that the code duplicated the
WindowFunc inside an OpExpr to include in the WindowClauses runCondition
field. This could result in duplication of subqueries and a pull-up of
such a subquery could result in another initplan parameter being issued
for the 2nd version of the subplan. This could result in errors such as:
ERROR: WindowFunc not found in subplan target lists
To fix this, we change the node representation of these run conditions
and instead of storing an OpExpr containing the WindowFunc in a list
inside WindowClause, we now store a new node type named
WindowFuncRunCondition within a new field in the WindowFunc. These get
transformed into OpExprs later in planning once subquery pull-up has been
performed.
This problem did exist in v15 and v16, but that was fixed by 9d36b883b
and e5d20bbd.
Cat version bump due to new node type and modifying WindowFunc struct.
Bug: #18305
Reported-by: Zuming Jiang
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18305-33c49b4c830b37b3%40postgresql.org
When building a join clause derived from an EquivalenceClass, if the
clause is to be used with an appendrel child relation then make sure
its clause_relids include the relids of that child relation.
Normally this would be true already because the EquivalenceMember
would be a Var of that relation. However, if the appendrel represents
a flattened UNION ALL construct then some child EquivalenceMembers
could be constants with no relids. The resulting under-marked clause
is problematic because it could mislead join_clause_is_movable_into
about where the clause should be evaluated. We do not have an example
showing incorrect plan generation, but there are existing cases in
the regression tests that will fail the Asserts this patch adds to
get_baserel_parampathinfo. A similarly wrong conclusion about a
clause being considered by get_joinrel_parampathinfo would lead to
wrong placement of the clause. (This also squares with the way
that clause_relids is calculated for non-equijoin clauses in
adjust_appendrel_attrs.)
The other reason for wanting these new Asserts is that the previous
blithe assumption that the results of generate_join_implied_equalities
"necessarily satisfy join_clause_is_movable_into" turns out to be
wrong pre-v16. If it's still wrong it'd be good to find out.
Per bug #18429 from Benoît Ryder. The bug as filed was fixed by
commit 2489d76c4, but these changes correlate with the fix we
will need to apply in pre-v16 branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18429-8982d4a348cc86c6@postgresql.org
Commit 2ed8f9a01 intended to institute a policy that if a
RangeTblFunction has a coldeflist, then the function return type is
certainly RECORD, and we should use the coldeflist as the source of
truth about what the columns of the record type are. When the
original function has been folded to a constant, inspection of the
constant might give a different answer. This situation will lead to
a tuple-type-mismatch error at execution, but up until that point we
need to consistently believe the coldeflist, or we'll have problems
from different bits of code reaching different conclusions.
expandRTE didn't get that memo though, and would try to produce a
tupdesc based on the constant in this situation, leading to an
assertion failure. (Desultory testing suggests that non-assert
builds often manage to give the expected error, although I also
saw a "cache lookup failed for type 0" error, and it seems at
least possible that a crash could happen.)
Some other callers of get_expr_result_type and get_expr_result_tupdesc
were also being incautious about this. While none of them seem to
have actual bugs, they're working harder than necessary in this case,
besides which it seems safest to have an explicit policy of not using
those functions on an RTE with a coldeflist. Adjust the code
accordingly, and add commentary to funcapi.c about this policy.
Also fix an obsolete comment that claimed "get_expr_result_type()
doesn't know how to extract type info from a RECORD constant".
That hasn't been true since commit d57534740.
Per bug #18422 from Alexander Lakhin.
As with the previous commit, back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18422-89ca86c8eac5246d@postgresql.org
