When providing tab completion for ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES, we are
including the list of roles as possible options for completion after the
GRANT or REVOKE. Further, we accept FOR ROLE/IN SCHEMA at the same time
and in either order, but the tab completion was only working for one or
the other. Lastly, we weren't using the actual list of allowed kinds of
objects for default privileges for completion after the 'GRANT X ON' but
instead were completeing to what 'GRANT X ON' supports, which isn't the
ssame at all.
Address these issues by improving the forward tab-completion for ALTER
DEFAULT PRIVILEGES and then constrain and correct how the tail
completion is done when it is for ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES.
Back-patch the forward/tail tab-completion to 9.6, where we made it easy
to handle such cases.
For 9.5 and earlier, correct the initial tab-completion to at least be
correct as far as it goes and then add a check for GRANT/REVOKE to only
tab-complete when the GRANT/REVOKE is the start of the command, so we
don't try to do tab-completion after we get to the GRANT/REVOKE part of
the ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES command, which is better than providing
incorrect completions.
Initial patch for master and 9.6 by Gilles Darold, though I cleaned it
up and added a few comments. All bugs in the 9.5 and earlier patch are
mine.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1614593c-e356-5b27-6dba-66320a9bc68b@dalibo.com
Table partitioning is like table inheritance and reuses much of the
existing infrastructure, but there are some important differences.
The parent is called a partitioned table and is always empty; it may
not have indexes or non-inherited constraints, since those make no
sense for a relation with no data of its own. The children are called
partitions and contain all of the actual data. Each partition has an
implicit partitioning constraint. Multiple inheritance is not
allowed, and partitioning and inheritance can't be mixed. Partitions
can't have extra columns and may not allow nulls unless the parent
does. Tuples inserted into the parent are automatically routed to the
correct partition, so tuple-routing ON INSERT triggers are not needed.
Tuple routing isn't yet supported for partitions which are foreign
tables, and it doesn't handle updates that cross partition boundaries.
Currently, tables can be range-partitioned or list-partitioned. List
partitioning is limited to a single column, but range partitioning can
involve multiple columns. A partitioning "column" can be an
expression.
Because table partitioning is less general than table inheritance, it
is hoped that it will be easier to reason about properties of
partitions, and therefore that this will serve as a better foundation
for a variety of possible optimizations, including query planner
optimizations. The tuple routing based which this patch does based on
the implicit partitioning constraints is an example of this, but it
seems likely that many other useful optimizations are also possible.
Amit Langote, reviewed and tested by Robert Haas, Ashutosh Bapat,
Amit Kapila, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi, Corey Huinker, Jaime Casanova,
Rushabh Lathia, Erik Rijkers, among others. Minor revisions by me.
We have had support for restrictive RLS policies since 9.5, but they
were only available through extensions which use the appropriate hooks.
This adds support into the grammer, catalog, psql and pg_dump for
restrictive RLS policies, thus reducing the cases where an extension is
necessary.
In passing, also move away from using "AND"d and "OR"d in comments.
As pointed out by Alvaro, it's not really appropriate to attempt
to make verbs out of "AND" and "OR", so reword those comments which
attempted to.
Reviewed By: Jeevan Chalke, Dean Rasheed
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20160901063404.GY4028@tamriel.snowman.net
For ALTER TYPE .. RENAME, add "VALUE" to the list of possible
completions. Complete ALTER TYPE .. RENAME VALUE with possible
enum values. After that, complete with "TO".
Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker, reviewed by Artur Zakirov.
The details of commit 52803098ab were
based on a misunderstanding of the role inheritance allowing use
of a database for a template. While the CREATEDB privilege is not
inherited, the database ownership is privileges are.
Pointed out by Vitaly Burovoy and Tom Lane.
Fix provided by Tom Lane, reviewed by Vitaly Burovoy.
Offer a list of available versions for that extension. Formerly, since
there was no special support for this, it triggered off the UPDATE
keyword and offered a list of table names --- not too helpful.
Jeff Janes, reviewed by Gerdan Santos
Patch: <CAMkU=1z0gxEOLg2BWa69P4X4Ot8xBxipGUiGkXe_tC+raj79-Q@mail.gmail.com>
This terminology provoked widespread complaints. So, instead, rename
the GUC max_parallel_degree to max_parallel_workers_per_gather
(leaving room for a possible future GUC max_parallel_workers that acts
as a system-wide limit), and rename the parallel_degree reloption to
parallel_workers. Rename structure members to match.
These changes create a dump/restore hazard for users of PostgreSQL
9.6beta1 who have set the reloption (or applied the GUC using ALTER
USER or ALTER DATABASE).
\crosstabview is a completely different way to display results from a
query: instead of a vertical display of rows, the data values are placed
in a grid where the column and row headers come from the data itself,
similar to a spreadsheet.
The sort order of the horizontal header can be specified by using
another column in the query, and the vertical header determines its
ordering from the order in which they appear in the query.
This only allows displaying a single value in each cell. If more than
one value correspond to the same cell, an error is thrown. Merging of
values can be done in the query itself, if necessary. This may be
revisited in the future.
Author: Daniel Verité
Reviewed-by: Pavel Stehule, Dean Rasheed
The code that estimates what parallel degree should be uesd for the
scan of a relation is currently rather stupid, so add a parallel_degree
reloption that can be used to override the planner's rather limited
judgement.
Julien Rouhaud, reviewed by David Rowley, James Sewell, Amit Kapila,
and me. Some further hacking by me.
\gexec executes the just-entered query, like \g, but instead of printing
the results it takes each field as a SQL command to send to the server.
Computing a series of queries to be executed is a fairly common thing,
but up to now you always had to resort to kluges like writing the queries
to a file and then inputting the file. Now it can be done with no
intermediate step.
The implementation is fairly straightforward except for its interaction
with FETCH_COUNT. ExecQueryUsingCursor isn't capable of being called
recursively, and even if it were, its need to create a transaction
block interferes unpleasantly with the desired behavior of \gexec after
a failure of a generated query (i.e., that it can continue). Therefore,
disable use of ExecQueryUsingCursor when doing the master \gexec query.
We can still apply it to individual generated queries, however, and there
might be some value in doing so.
While testing this feature's interaction with single-step mode, I (tgl) was
led to conclude that SendQuery needs to recognize SIGINT (cancel_pressed)
as a negative response to the single-step prompt. Perhaps that's a
back-patchable bug fix, but for now I just included it here.
Corey Huinker, reviewed by Jim Nasby, Daniel Vérité, and myself
Often, upon getting an unexpected error in psql, one's first wish is that
the verbosity setting had been higher; for example, to be able to see the
schema-name field or the server code location info. Up to now the only way
has been to adjust the VERBOSITY variable and repeat the failing query.
That's a pain, and it doesn't work if the error isn't reproducible.
This commit adds a psql feature that redisplays the most recent server
error at full verbosity, without needing to make any variable changes or
re-execute the failed command. We just need to hang onto the latest error
PGresult in case the user executes \errverbose, and then apply libpq's
new PQresultVerboseErrorMessage() function to it. This will consume
some trivial amount of psql memory, but otherwise the cost when the
feature isn't used should be negligible.
Alex Shulgin, reviewed by Daniel Vérité, some improvements by me
The existing code confuses the byte length of the string (which is
relevant when passing it to pg_strncasecmp) with the character length
of the string (which is relevant when it is used with the SQL substring
function). Separate those two concepts.
Report and patch by Kyotaro Horiguchi, reviewed by Thomas Munro and
reviewed and further revised by me.
Add
- ALTER SYSTEM SET/RESET ... -> GUC variables
- ALTER TABLE ... SET WITH -> OIDS
- ALTER DATABASE/FUNCTION/ROLE/USER ... SET/RESET -> GUC variables
- ALTER DATABASE/FUNCTION/ROLE/USER ... SET ... -> FROM CURRENT/TO
- ALTER DATABASE/FUNCTION/ROLE/USER ... SET ... TO/= -> possible values
Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Masahiko Sawada
Add
- ALTER FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER -> RENAME TO
- ALTER SERVER -> RENAME TO
- ALTER SERVER ... VERSION ... -> OPTIONS
- CREATE FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER -> OPTIONS
- CREATE SERVER -> OPTIONS
- CREATE|ALTER USER MAPPING -> OPTIONS
From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
The completion of CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY was lacking in several ways
compared to a plain CREATE INDEX command:
- CREATE INDEX <name> ON completes table names, but didn't with
CONCURRENTLY.
- CREATE INDEX completes ON and existing index names, but with
CONCURRENTLY it only completed ON.
- CREATE INDEX <name> completes ON, but didn't with CONCURRENTLY.
These are now all fixed.
The previous code supported a syntax like CREATE INDEX name
CONCURRENTLY, which never existed. Mistake introduced in commit
37ec19a15c. Remove the addition of
CONCURRENTLY at that point.
This requires adding some more infrastructure to handle both case-sensitive
and case-insensitive matching, as well as the ability to match a prefix of
a previous word. So it ends up being about a wash line-count-wise, but
it's just as big a readability win here as in the SQL tab completion rules.
Michael Paquier, some adjustments by me
In the refactoring in commit d37b816dc9,
we mostly kept to the original design whereby only the last few words
on the line were matched to identify a completable pattern. However,
after commit d854118c8d, there's really
no reason to do it like that: where it's sensible, we can use patterns
that expect to match the entire input line. And mostly, it's sensible.
Matching the entire line greatly reduces the odds of a false match that
leads to offering irrelevant completions. Moreover (though I've not
tried to measure this), it should make tab completion faster since
many of the patterns will be discarded after a single integer comparison
that finds that the wrong number of words appear on the line.
There are certain identifiable places where we still need to use
TailMatches because the statement in question is allowed to appear
embedded in a larger statement. These are just a small minority of
the existing patterns, though, so the benefit of switching where
possible is large.
It's possible that this patch has removed some within-line matching
behaviors that are in fact desirable, but we can put those back when
we get complaints. Most of the removed behaviors are certainly silly.
Michael Paquier, with some further adjustments by me
Yesterday in commit d854118c8, I had a serious brain fade leading me to
underestimate the number of words that the tab-completion logic could
divide a line into. On input such as "(((((", each character will get
seen as a separate word, which means we do indeed sometimes need more
space for the words than for the original line. Fix that.
psql offered USING, WHERE, and SET in this context, but SET is not a valid
possibility here. Seems to have been a thinko in commit f5ab0a14ea
which added DELETE's USING option.
Up to now, the tab completion logic has only examined the last few words
of the current input line; "last few" being originally as few as four
words, but lately up to nine words. Furthermore, it only looked at what
libreadline considers the current line of input, which made it rather
myopic if you split your command across lines. This was tolerable,
sort of, so long as the match patterns were only designed to consider the
last few words of input; but with the recent addition of HeadMatches()
and Matches() matching rules, we really have to do better if we want
those to behave sanely.
Hence, change the code to break the entire line down into words, and to
include any previous lines in the command buffer along with the active
readline input buffer.
This will be a little bit slower than the previous coding, but some
measurements say that even a query of several thousand characters can be
parsed in a hundred or so microseconds on modern machines; so it's really
not going to be significant for interactive tab completion. To reduce
the cost some, I arranged to avoid the per-word malloc calls that used
to occur: all the words are now kept in one malloc'd buffer.
Replace tests like
else if (pg_strcasecmp(prev4_wd, "CREATE") == 0 &&
pg_strcasecmp(prev3_wd, "TRIGGER") == 0 &&
(pg_strcasecmp(prev_wd, "BEFORE") == 0 ||
pg_strcasecmp(prev_wd, "AFTER") == 0))
with new notation like this:
else if (TailMatches4("CREATE", "TRIGGER", MatchAny, "BEFORE|AFTER"))
In addition, provide some macros COMPLETE_WITH_LISTn() to reduce the amount
of clutter needed to specify a small number of predetermined completion
alternatives.
This makes the code substantially more compact: tab-complete.c gets over a
thousand lines shorter in this patch, despite the addition of a couple of
hundred lines of infrastructure for the new notations. The new way of
specifying match rules seems a whole lot more readable and less
error-prone, too.
There's a lot more that could be done now to make matching faster and more
reliable; for example I suspect that most of the TailMatches() rules should
now be Matches() rules. That would allow them to be skipped after a single
integer comparison if there aren't the right number of words on the line,
and it would reduce the risk of unintended matches. But for now, (mostly)
refrain from reworking any match rules in favor of just converting what
we've got into the new notation.
Thomas Munro, reviewed by Michael Paquier, some adjustments by me
Previously the completion used the wrong word to match 'BY'. This was
introduced brokenly, in b2de2a. While at it, also add completion of
IN TABLESPACE ... OWNED BY and fix comments referencing nonexistent
syntax.
Reported-By: Michael Paquier
Author: Michael Paquier and Andres Freund
Discussion: CAB7nPqSHDdSwsJqX0d2XzjqOHr==HdWiubCi4L=Zs7YFTUne8w@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 9.4, like the commit introducing the bug
Complete "ALTER POLICY" with a policy name, as we do for DROP POLICY.
And, complete "ALTER POLICY polname ON" with a table name that has such
a policy, as we do for DROP POLICY, rather than with any table name
at all.
Masahiko Sawada
Once upon a time we did not have a separate CREATEROLE privilege, and
CREATEUSER effectively meant SUPERUSER. When we invented CREATEROLE
(in 8.1) we also added SUPERUSER so as to have a less confusing keyword
for this role property. However, we left CREATEUSER in place as a
deprecated synonym for SUPERUSER, because of backwards-compatibility
concerns. It's still there and is still confusing people, as for example
in bug #13694 from Justin Catterson. 9.6 will be ten years or so later,
which surely ought to be long enough to end the deprecation and just
remove these old keywords. Hence, do so.
Without CASCADE, if an extension has an unfullfilled dependency on
another extension, CREATE EXTENSION ERRORs out with "required extension
... is not installed". That is annoying, especially when that dependency
is an implementation detail of the extension, rather than something the
extension's user can make sense of.
In addition to CASCADE this also includes a small set of regression
tests around CREATE EXTENSION.
Author: Petr Jelinek, editorialized by Michael Paquier, Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Michael Paquier, Andres Freund, Jeff Janes
Discussion: 557E0520.3040800@2ndquadrant.com
Previously "GRANT * ON * TO " was tab-completed to add an extra "TO",
rather than with a list of roles. This is the bug that commit 2f88807
introduced unexpectedly. This commit fixes that incorrect tab-completion.
Thomas Munro, reviewed by Jeff Janes.
Per discussion, nowadays it is possible to have tablespaces that have
wildly different I/O characteristics from others. Setting different
effective_io_concurrency parameters for those has been measured to
improve performance.
Author: Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed by: Andres Freund
Remove the code in plpgsql that suppressed the innermost line of CONTEXT
for messages emitted by RAISE commands. That was never more than a quick
backwards-compatibility hack, and it's pretty silly in cases where the
RAISE is nested in several levels of function. What's more, it violated
our design theory that verbosity of error reports should be controlled
on the client side not the server side.
To alleviate the resulting noise increase, introduce a feature in libpq
and psql whereby the CONTEXT field of messages can be suppressed, either
always or only for non-error messages. Printing CONTEXT for errors only
is now their default behavior.
The actual code changes here are pretty small, but the effects on the
regression test outputs are widespread. I had to edit some of the
alternative expected outputs by hand; hopefully the buildfarm will soon
find anything I fat-fingered.
In passing, fix up (again) the output line counts in psql's various
help displays. Add some commentary about how to verify them.
Pavel Stehule, reviewed by Petr Jelínek, Jeevan Chalke, and others
