1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-11-21 00:42:43 +03:00
Commit Graph

67 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bruce Momjian
50e6eb731d Update copyright for 2025
Backpatch-through: 13
2025-01-01 11:21:55 -05:00
Thomas Munro
9044fc1d45 Monkey-patch LLVM code to fix ARM relocation bug.
Supply a new memory manager for RuntimeDyld, to avoid crashes in
generated code caused by memory placement that can overflow a 32 bit
data type.  This is a drop-in replacement for the
llvm::SectionMemoryManager class in the LLVM library, with Michael
Smith's proposed fix from
https://www.github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71968.

We hereby slurp it into our own source tree, after moving into a new
namespace llvm::backport and making some minor adjustments so that it
can be compiled with older LLVM versions as far back as 12.  It's harder
to make it work on even older LLVM versions, but it doesn't seem likely
that people are really using them so that is not investigated for now.

The problem could also be addressed by switching to JITLink instead of
RuntimeDyld, and that is the LLVM project's recommended solution as
the latter is about to be deprecated.  We'll have to do that soon enough
anyway, and then when the LLVM version support window advances far
enough in a few years we'll be able to delete this code.  Unfortunately
that wouldn't be enough for PostgreSQL today: in most relevant versions
of LLVM, JITLink is missing or incomplete.

Several other projects have already back-ported this fix into their fork
of LLVM, which is a vote of confidence despite the lack of commit into
LLVM as of today.  We don't have our own copy of LLVM so we can't do
exactly what they've done; instead we have a copy of the whole patched
class so we can pass an instance of it to RuntimeDyld.

The LLVM project hasn't chosen to commit the fix yet, and even if it
did, it wouldn't be back-ported into the releases of LLVM that most of
our users care about, so there is not much point in waiting any longer
for that.  If they make further changes and commit it to LLVM 19 or 20,
we'll still need this for older versions, but we may want to
resynchronize our copy and update some comments.

The changes that we've had to make to our copy can be seen by diffing
our SectionMemoryManager.{h,cpp} files against the ones in the tree of
the pull request.  Per the LLVM project's license requirements, a copy
is in SectionMemoryManager.LICENSE.

This should fix the spate of crash reports we've been receiving lately
from users on large memory ARM systems.

Back-patch to all supported releases.

Co-authored-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Reviewed-by: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> (license aspects)
Reported-by: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAO6_Xqr63qj%3DSx7HY6ZiiQ6R_JbX%2B-p6sTPwDYwTWZjUmjsYBg%40mail.gmail.com
2024-11-06 23:17:18 +13:00
Peter Eisentraut
ee4859123e jit: Use opaque pointers in all supported LLVM versions.
LLVM's opaque pointer change began in LLVM 14, but remained optional
until LLVM 16.  When commit 37d5babb added opaque pointer support, we
didn't turn it on for LLVM 14 and 15 yet because we didn't want to risk
weird bitcode incompatibility problems in released branches of
PostgreSQL.  (That might have been overly cautious, I don't know.)

Now that PostgreSQL 18 has dropped support for LLVM versions < 14, and
since it hasn't been released yet and no extensions or bitcode have been
built against it in the wild yet, we can be more aggressive.  We can rip
out the support code and build system clutter that made opaque pointer
use optional.

Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Discussions: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGLhNs5geZaVNj2EJ79Dx9W8fyWUU3HxcpZy55sMGcY%3DiA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-10-01 06:10:15 -04:00
Peter Eisentraut
972c2cd288 jit: Require at least LLVM 14, if enabled.
Remove support for LLVM versions 10-13.  The default on all non-EOL'd
OSes represented in our build farm will be at least LLVM 14 when
PostgreSQL 18 ships.

Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGLhNs5geZaVNj2EJ79Dx9W8fyWUU3HxcpZy55sMGcY%3DiA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-10-01 04:49:11 -04:00
Heikki Linnakangas
5784a493f1 Move resowner from common JitContext to LLVM specific
Only the LLVM specific code uses it since resource owners were made
extensible in commit b8bff07daa. This is
new in v17, so backpatch there to keep the branches from diverging
just yet.

Author: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/fd3a2a00-6605-4e30-a118-48418b478e6e@proxel.se
2024-07-19 10:27:06 +03:00
Thomas Munro
8583b1f993 Run LLVM verify pass on IR in assert builds.
The problem fixed by commit 53c8d6c9 would have been noticed if we'd
been running LLVM's verify pass on generated IR.  Doing so also reveals
a complaint about incorrect name mangling, fixed here.  Only enabled for
LLVM 17+ because it uses the new pass manager API.

Suggested-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRACpVFr7LMdVYENUkScG5FCYMZDDdSGNU-tch%2Bw98OxYg%40mail.gmail.com
2024-07-15 21:48:48 +12:00
Peter Eisentraut
ca89db5f9d Remove dead code
The configure check for HAVE_DECL_LLVMORCREGISTERPERF was removed by
e9a9843e13, but some code guarded by it was left.  (That commit
removed the "register" calls but left the "unregister" calls.)  That
code cannot be reached anymore, so remove it.

Reported-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5539b16c-cff7-46d5-9621-c3fb6b549e9e@iki.fi
2024-04-17 10:48:04 +02:00
Thomas Munro
53c8d6c9f1 Fix illegal attribute propagation in LLVM JIT.
Commit 72559438 started copying more attributes from AttributeTemplate
to the functions we generate on the fly.  In the case of deform
functions, which return void, this meant that "noundef", from
AttributeTemplate's return value (a Datum) was copied to a void type.
Older LLVM releases were OK with that, but LLVM 18 crashes.

Update our llvm_copy_attributes() function to skip copying the attribute
for the return value, if the target function returns void.

Thanks to Dmitry Dolgov for help chasing this down.

Back-patch to all supported releases, like 72559438.

Reported-by: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRACpVFr7LMdVYENUkScG5FCYMZDDdSGNU-tch%2Bw98OxYg%40mail.gmail.com
2024-04-10 12:13:46 +12:00
Thomas Munro
820b5af73d jit: Require at least LLVM 10.
Remove support for older LLVM versions.  The default on common software
distributions will be at least LLVM 10 when PostgreSQL 17 ships.

Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGLhNs5geZaVNj2EJ79Dx9W8fyWUU3HxcpZy55sMGcY%3DiA%40mail.gmail.com
2024-01-25 15:42:34 +13:00
Bruce Momjian
29275b1d17 Update copyright for 2024
Reported-by: Michael Paquier

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZZKTDPxBBMt3C0J9@paquier.xyz

Backpatch-through: 12
2024-01-03 20:49:05 -05:00
Heikki Linnakangas
b8bff07daa Make ResourceOwners more easily extensible.
Instead of having a separate array/hash for each resource kind, use a
single array and hash to hold all kinds of resources. This makes it
possible to introduce new resource "kinds" without having to modify
the ResourceOwnerData struct. In particular, this makes it possible
for extensions to register custom resource kinds.

The old approach was to have a small array of resources of each kind,
and if it fills up, switch to a hash table. The new approach also uses
an array and a hash, but now the array and the hash are used at the
same time. The array is used to hold the recently added resources, and
when it fills up, they are moved to the hash. This keeps the access to
recent entries fast, even when there are a lot of long-held resources.

All the resource-specific ResourceOwnerEnlarge*(),
ResourceOwnerRemember*(), and ResourceOwnerForget*() functions have
been replaced with three generic functions that take resource kind as
argument. For convenience, we still define resource-specific wrapper
macros around the generic functions with the old names, but they are
now defined in the source files that use those resource kinds.

The release callback no longer needs to call ResourceOwnerForget on
the resource being released. ResourceOwnerRelease unregisters the
resource from the owner before calling the callback. That needed some
changes in bufmgr.c and some other files, where releasing the
resources previously always called ResourceOwnerForget.

Each resource kind specifies a release priority, and
ResourceOwnerReleaseAll releases the resources in priority order. To
make that possible, we have to restrict what you can do between
phases. After calling ResourceOwnerRelease(), you are no longer
allowed to remember any more resources in it or to forget any
previously remembered resources by calling ResourceOwnerForget.  There
was one case where that was done previously. At subtransaction commit,
AtEOSubXact_Inval() would handle the invalidation messages and call
RelationFlushRelation(), which temporarily increased the reference
count on the relation being flushed. We now switch to the parent
subtransaction's resource owner before calling AtEOSubXact_Inval(), so
that there is a valid ResourceOwner to temporarily hold that relcache
reference.

Other end-of-xact routines make similar calls to AtEOXact_Inval()
between release phases, but I didn't see any regression test failures
from those, so I'm not sure if they could reach a codepath that needs
remembering extra resources.

There were two exceptions to how the resource leak WARNINGs on commit
were printed previously: llvmjit silently released the context without
printing the warning, and a leaked buffer io triggered a PANIC. Now
everything prints a WARNING, including those cases.

Add tests in src/test/modules/test_resowner.

Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev, Michael Paquier, Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Hayato Kuroda, Álvaro Herrera, Zhihong Yu
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/cbfabeb0-cd3c-e951-a572-19b365ed314d%40iki.fi
2023-11-08 13:30:50 +02:00
Thomas Munro
76200e5ee4 jit: Changes for LLVM 17.
Changes required by https://llvm.org/docs/NewPassManager.html.

Back-patch to 12, leaving the final release of 11 unchanged, consistent
with earlier decision not to back-patch LLVM 16 support either.

Author: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2BWXznXCyTgCADd%3DHWkP9Qksa6chd7L%3DGCnZo-MBgg9Lg%40mail.gmail.com
2023-10-19 05:13:23 +13:00
Thomas Munro
37d5babb5c jit: Support opaque pointers in LLVM 16.
Remove use of LLVMGetElementType() and provide the type of all pointers
to LLVMBuildXXX() functions when emitting IR, as required by modern LLVM
versions[1].

 * For LLVM <= 14, we'll still use the old LLVMBuildXXX() functions.
 * For LLVM == 15, we'll continue to do the same, explicitly opting
   out of opaque pointer mode.
 * For LLVM >= 16, we'll use the new LLVMBuildXXX2() functions that take
   the extra type argument.

The difference is hidden behind some new IR emitting wrapper functions
l_load(), l_gep(), l_call() etc.  The change is mostly mechanical,
except that at each site the correct type had to be provided.

In some places we needed to do some extra work to get functions types,
including some new wrappers for C++ APIs that are not yet exposed by in
LLVM's C API, and some new "example" functions in llvmjit_types.c
because it's no longer possible to start from the function pointer type
and ask for the function type.

Back-patch to 12, because it's a little tricker in 11 and we agreed not
to put the latest LLVM support into the upcoming final release of 11.

[1] https://llvm.org/docs/OpaquePointers.html

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronan Dunklau <ronan.dunklau@aiven.io>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGKNX_%3Df%2B1C4r06WETKTq0G4Z_7q4L4Fxn5WWpMycDj9Fw%40mail.gmail.com
2023-10-18 22:47:23 +13:00
Amit Langote
c8ec5e0543 Revert "Add soft error handling to some expression nodes"
This reverts commit 7fbc75b26e.

Looks like the LLVM additions may not be totally correct.
2023-10-02 13:48:15 +09:00
Amit Langote
7fbc75b26e Add soft error handling to some expression nodes
This adjusts the expression evaluation code for CoerceViaIO and
CoerceToDomain to handle errors softly if needed.

For CoerceViaIo, this means using InputFunctionCallSafe(), which
provides the option to handle errors softly, instead of calling the
type input function directly.

For CoerceToDomain, this simply entails replacing the ereport() in
ExecEvalConstraintCheck() by errsave().

In both cases, the ErrorSaveContext to be used when evaluating the
expression is stored by ExecInitExprRec() in the expression's struct
in the expression's ExprEvalStep.  The ErrorSaveContext is passed by
setting ExprState.escontext to point to it when calling
ExecInitExprRec() on the expression whose errors are to be handled
softly.

Note that no call site of ExecInitExprRec() has been changed in this
commit, so there's no functional change.  This is intended for
implementing new SQL/JSON expression nodes in future commits that
will use to it suppress errors that may occur during type coercions.

Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqE4XTdfb1nW=Ojoy_tQSRhYt-q_kb6i5d4xcKyrLC1Nbg@mail.gmail.com
2023-10-02 11:52:28 +09:00
Daniel Gustafsson
9dce22033d llvmjit: Use explicit LLVMContextRef for inlining
When performing inlining LLVM unfortunately "leaks" types (the
types survive and are usable, but a new round of inlining will
recreate new structurally equivalent types). This accumulation
will over time amount to a memory leak which for some queries
can be large enough to trigger the OOM process killer.

To avoid accumulation of types, all IR related data is stored
in an LLVMContextRef which is dropped and recreated in order
to release all types.  Dropping and recreating incurs overhead,
so it will be done only after 100 queries. This is a heuristic
which might be revisited, but until we can get the size of the
context from LLVM we are flying a bit blind.

This issue has been reported several times, there may be more
references to it in the archives on top of the threads linked
below.

Backpatching of this fix will be handled once it has matured
in master for a bit.

Reported-By: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reported-By: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reported-By: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>
Reported-By: Lauri Laanmets <pcspets@gmail.com>
Author: Andres Freund and Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7acc8678-df5f-4923-9cf6-e843131ae89d@www.fastmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201218235607.GC30237@telsasoft.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPH-tTxLf44s3CvUUtQpkDr1D8Hxqc2NGDzGXS1ODsfiJ6WSqA@mail.gmail.com
2023-09-27 13:02:21 +02:00
Daniel Gustafsson
ef668d8bf5 llvmjit: Make llvm_types_module variable static
Commit b059d2f456 introduced llvm_types_module and accidentally
exported it. As there is no usecase for accessing this variable
externally, this makes it static.

Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221101055132.pjjsvlkeo4stbjkq@awork3.anarazel.de
2023-09-27 13:02:14 +02:00
Daniel Gustafsson
2dad308e73 llvmjit: Remove unnecessary types
These types were added in fb46ac26fe but hasn't been used, so
remove until there is a need for them.

Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221101055132.pjjsvlkeo4stbjkq@awork3.anarazel.de
2023-09-27 13:02:01 +02:00
Michael Paquier
ccfca8ea42 Remove duplicated assignment of LLVMJitHandle->lljit
This duplicated assignment when emiting some code not yet compiled.

Oversight in 6c57f2e.

Author: Matheus Alcantara
Reviewed-by: Gurjeet Singh
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/La1Tfi7wirg9uGbCx_y7Qb9kl2T15mYouDXjCKAFuDqzQWnTRwH7KNLGigLLcxRs91V6dp2ySs1j_7mB4btzEZJ9NIMEAyOjUyAS7Jx-ydQ=@pm.me
2023-07-13 16:44:17 +09:00
Heikki Linnakangas
4f4d73466d Fix leak of LLVM "fatal-on-oom" section counter.
llvm_release_context() called llvm_enter_fatal_on_oom(), but was missing
the corresponding llvm_leave_fatal_on_oom() call. As a result, if JIT was
used at all, we were almost always in the "fatal-on-oom" state.

It only makes a difference if you use an extension written in C++, and
run out of memory in a C++ 'new' call. In that case, you would get a
PostgreSQL FATAL error, instead of the default behavior of throwing a
C++ exception.

Back-patch to all supported versions.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/54b78cca-bc84-dad8-4a7e-5b56f764fab5@iki.fi
2023-07-05 13:13:13 +03:00
Tom Lane
0245f8db36 Pre-beta mechanical code beautification.
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files.

This set of diffs is a bit larger than typical.  We've updated to
pg_bsd_indent 2.1.2, which properly indents variable declarations that
have multi-line initialization expressions (the continuation lines are
now indented one tab stop).  We've also updated to perltidy version
20230309 and changed some of its settings, which reduces its desire to
add whitespace to lines to make assignments etc. line up.  Going
forward, that should make for fewer random-seeming changes to existing
code.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230428092545.qfb3y5wcu4cm75ur@alvherre.pgsql
2023-05-19 17:24:48 -04:00
Peter Eisentraut
470103697a Fix incorrect format placeholders 2023-03-10 07:10:43 +01:00
Michael Paquier
33ab0a2a52 Fix typos in comments, code and documentation
While on it, newlines are removed from the end of two elog() strings.
The others are simple grammar mistakes.  One comment in pg_upgrade
referred incorrectly to sequences since a7e5457.

Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221230231257.GI1153@telsasoft.com
Backpatch-through: 11
2023-01-03 16:26:14 +09:00
Bruce Momjian
c8e1ba736b Update copyright for 2023
Backpatch-through: 11
2023-01-02 15:00:37 -05:00
Thomas Munro
c2ae01f695 Track LLVM 15 changes.
Per https://llvm.org/docs/OpaquePointers.html, support for non-opaque
pointers still exists and we can request that on our context.  We have
until LLVM 16 to move to opaque pointers, a much larger change.

Back-patch to 11, where LLVM support arrived.

Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMHz58Sf_xncdyqsekoVsNeKcruKootLtVH6cYXVhhUR1oKPCg%40mail.gmail.com
2022-10-19 22:18:26 +13:00
David Rowley
8b26769bc4 Fix an assortment of improper usages of string functions
In a similar effort to f736e188c and 110d81728, fixup various usages of
string functions where a more appropriate function is available and more
fit for purpose.

These changes include:

1. Use cstring_to_text_with_len() instead of cstring_to_text() when
   working with a StringInfoData and the length can easily be obtained.
2. Use appendStringInfoString() instead of appendStringInfo() when no
   formatting is required.
3. Use pstrdup(...) instead of psprintf("%s", ...)
4. Use pstrdup(...) instead of psprintf(...) (with no formatting)
5. Use appendPQExpBufferChar() instead of appendPQExpBufferStr() when the
   length of the string being appended is 1.
6. appendStringInfoChar() instead of appendStringInfo() when no formatting
   is required and string is 1 char long.
7. Use appendPQExpBufferStr(b, .) instead of appendPQExpBuffer(b, "%s", .)
8. Don't use pstrdup when it's fine to just point to the string constant.

I (David) did find other cases of #8 but opted to use #4 instead as I
wasn't certain enough that applying #8 was ok (e.g in hba.c)

Author: Ranier Vilela, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvo2j2+RJBGhNtUz6BxabWWh2Jx16wMUMWKUjv70Ver1vg@mail.gmail.com
2022-09-06 13:19:44 +12:00
Tom Lane
23e7b38bfe Pre-beta mechanical code beautification.
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files.
I manually fixed a couple of comments that pgindent uglified.
2022-05-12 15:17:30 -04:00
Bruce Momjian
27b77ecf9f Update copyright for 2022
Backpatch-through: 10
2022-01-07 19:04:57 -05:00
Tom Lane
e9d9ba2a4d Avoid some other O(N^2) hazards in list manipulation.
In the same spirit as 6301c3ada, fix some more places where we were
using list_delete_first() in a loop and thereby risking O(N^2)
behavior.  It's not clear that the lists manipulated in these spots
can get long enough to be really problematic ... but it's not clear
that they can't, either, and the fixes are simple enough.

As before, back-patch to v13.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CD2F0E7F-9822-45EC-A411-AE56F14DEA9F@amazon.com
2021-11-01 16:24:39 -04:00
Andres Freund
edb4d95ddf jit: Do not try to shut down LLVM state in case of LLVM triggered errors.
If an allocation failed within LLVM it is not safe to call back into LLVM as
LLVM is not generally safe against exceptions / stack-unwinding. Thus errors
while in LLVM code are promoted to FATAL. However llvm_shutdown() did call
back into LLVM even in such cases, while llvm_release_context() was careful
not to do so.

We cannot generally skip shutting down LLVM, as that can break profiling. But
it's OK to do so if there was an error from within LLVM.

Reported-By: Jelte Fennema <Jelte.Fennema@microsoft.com>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AM5PR83MB0178C52CCA0A8DEA0207DC14F7FF9@AM5PR83MB0178.EURPRD83.prod.outlook.com
Backpatch: 11-, where jit was introduced
2021-09-13 18:26:15 -07:00
Thomas Munro
9b4e4cfe66 Prepare for forthcoming LLVM 13 API change.
LLVM 13 (due out in September) has changed the semantics of
LLVMOrcAbsoluteSymbols(), so we need to bump some reference counts to
avoid a double-free that causes crashes and bad query results.

A proactive change seems necessary to avoid having a window of time
where our respective latest releases would interact badly.  It's
possible that the situation could change before then, though.

Thanks to Fabien Coelho for monitoring bleeding edge LLVM and Andres
Freund for tracking down the change.

Back-patch to 11, where the JIT code arrived.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGLEy8mgtN7BNp0ooFAjUedDTJj5dME7NxLU-m91b85siA%40mail.gmail.com
2021-06-25 11:28:20 +12:00
Tom Lane
def5b065ff Initial pgindent and pgperltidy run for v14.
Also "make reformat-dat-files".

The only change worthy of note is that pgindent messed up the formatting
of launcher.c's struct LogicalRepWorkerId, which led me to notice that
that struct wasn't used at all anymore, so I just took it out.
2021-05-12 13:14:10 -04:00
Peter Eisentraut
0e392fcc0d Use errmsg_internal for debug messages
An inconsistent set of debug-level messages was not using
errmsg_internal(), thus uselessly exposing the messages to translation
work.  Fix those.
2021-02-17 11:33:25 +01:00
Bruce Momjian
ca3b37487b Update copyright for 2021
Backpatch-through: 9.5
2021-01-02 13:06:25 -05:00
Andres Freund
df99ddc70b jit: Reference function pointer types via llvmjit_types.c.
It is error prone (see 5da871bfa1) and verbose to manually create function
types. Add a helper that can reference a function pointer type via
llvmjit_types.c and and convert existing instances of manual creation.

Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201207212142.wz5tnbk2jsaqzogb@alap3.anarazel.de
2020-12-08 16:55:20 -08:00
Andres Freund
6c57f2ed16 jit: Add support for LLVM 12.
LLVM 12, to be released in a few months, made some breaking changes to
the Orc JIT interface. OrcV2 eventually will make it easier to support
features like concurrent JIT compilation, but this commit only allows
to compile against LLVM 12.

This commit is a bit bigger than desirable. That partially is because
the V2 interface is more granular than V1 interface, but also because
I chose to make some minor changes to < LLVM 12 code to keep the code
somewhat readable.

The LLVM 12 support will need to be backpatched. I plan to do so after
the patch stewed on the buildfarm for a few days.

Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201016011244.pmyvr3ee2gbzplq4@alap3.anarazel.de
2020-11-09 20:01:33 -08:00
Andres Freund
fe2a16d8b3 llvmjit: Work around bug in LLVM 3.9 causing crashes after 72559438f9.
Unfortunately in LLVM 3.9 LLVMGetAttributeCountAtIndex(func, index)
crashes when called with an index that has 0 attributes. Since there's
no way to work around this in the C API, add a small C++ wrapper doing
so.

The only reason this didn't fail before 72559438f9 is that there
always are function attributes...

Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201016001254.w2nfj7gd74jmb5in@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 11-, like 72559438f9
2020-10-15 18:17:00 -07:00
Andres Freund
72559438f9 llvmjit: Also copy parameter / return value attributes from template functions.
Previously we only copied the function attributes. That caused problems at
least on s390x: Because we didn't copy the 'zeroext' attribute for
ExecAggTransReparent()'s *IsNull parameters, expressions invoking it didn't
ensure that the upper bytes of the registers were zeroed. In the - relatively
rare - cases where not, ExecAggTransReparent() wrongly ended up in the
newValueIsNull branch due to the register not being zero. Subsequently causing
a crash.

It's quite possible that this would cause problems on other platforms, and in
other places than just ExecAggTransReparent() on s390x.

Thanks to Christoph (and the Debian project) for providing me with access to a
s390x machine, allowing me to debug this.

Reported-By: Christoph Berg
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201015083246.kie5726xerdt3ael@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 11-, where JIT was added
2020-10-15 14:29:53 -07:00
Robert Haas
bab150045b Register llvm_shutdown using on_proc_exit, not before_shmem_exit.
This seems more correct, because other before_shmem_exit calls may
expect the infrastructure that is needed to run queries and access the
database to be working, and also because this cleanup has nothing to
do with shared memory.

There are no known user-visible consequences to this, though, apart
from what was previous fixed by commit
303640199d and back-patched as commit
bcbc27251d and commit
f7013683d9, so for now, no back-patch.

Bharath Rupireddy

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACWk7j4F2v2fxxYfrroOF=AdFNPr1WsV+AGtHAFQOqm_pw@mail.gmail.com
2020-08-06 14:13:03 -04:00
Andres Freund
b059d2f456 jit: Reference expression step functions via llvmjit_types.
The main benefit of doing so is that this allows llvm to ensure that
types match - previously that'd only be detected by a crash within the
called function. There were a number of cases where we passed a
superfluous parameter...

To avoid needing to add all the functions to llvmjit.{c,h}, instead
get them from the llvm module for llvmjit_types.c. Also use that for
the functions from llvmjit_types already in llvmjit.h.

Author: Soumyadeep Chakraborty and Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADwEdooww3wZv-sXSfatzFRwMuwa186LyTwkBfwEW6NjtooBPA@mail.gmail.com
2020-02-06 22:29:14 -08:00
Bruce Momjian
7559d8ebfa Update copyrights for 2020
Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4
2020-01-01 12:21:45 -05:00
Alvaro Herrera
3974c4a724 Remove useless "return;" lines
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191128144653.GA27883@alvherre.pgsql
2019-11-28 16:48:37 -03:00
Amit Kapila
14aec03502 Make the order of the header file includes consistent in backend modules.
Similar to commits 7e735035f2 and dddf4cdc33, this commit makes the order
of header file inclusion consistent for backend modules.

In the passing, removed a couple of duplicate inclusions.

Author: Vignesh C
Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2Sznv8RR6Ex-iJO6xAdsxgWhCoETkaYX=+9DW3q0QCfA@mail.gmail.com
2019-11-12 08:30:16 +05:30
Alvaro Herrera
558d77f20e Renaming for new subscripting mechanism
Over at patch https://commitfest.postgresql.org/21/1062/ Dmitry wants to
introduce a more generic subscription mechanism, which allows
subscripting not only arrays but also other object types such as JSONB.
That functionality is introduced in a largish invasive patch, out of
which this internal renaming patch was extracted.

Author: Dmitry Dolgov
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Arthur Zakirov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+q6zcUK4EqPAu7XRRO5CCjMwhz5zvg+rfWuLzVoxp_5sKS6=w@mail.gmail.com
2019-02-01 12:50:32 -03:00
Andres Freund
a9c35cf85c Change function call information to be variable length.
Before this change FunctionCallInfoData, the struct arguments etc for
V1 function calls are stored in, always had space for
FUNC_MAX_ARGS/100 arguments, storing datums and their nullness in two
arrays.  For nearly every function call 100 arguments is far more than
needed, therefore wasting memory. Arg and argnull being two separate
arrays also guarantees that to access a single argument, two
cachelines have to be touched.

Change the layout so there's a single variable-length array with pairs
of value / isnull. That drastically reduces memory consumption for
most function calls (on x86-64 a two argument function now uses
64bytes, previously 936 bytes), and makes it very likely that argument
value and its nullness are on the same cacheline.

Arguments are stored in a new NullableDatum struct, which, due to
padding, needs more memory per argument than before. But as usually
far fewer arguments are stored, and individual arguments are cheaper
to access, that's still a clear win.  It's likely that there's other
places where conversion to NullableDatum arrays would make sense,
e.g. TupleTableSlots, but that's for another commit.

Because the function call information is now variable-length
allocations have to take the number of arguments into account. For
heap allocations that can be done with SizeForFunctionCallInfoData(),
for on-stack allocations there's a new LOCAL_FCINFO(name, nargs) macro
that helps to allocate an appropriately sized and aligned variable.

Some places with stack allocation function call information don't know
the number of arguments at compile time, and currently variably sized
stack allocations aren't allowed in postgres. Therefore allow for
FUNC_MAX_ARGS space in these cases. They're not that common, so for
now that seems acceptable.

Because of the need to allocate FunctionCallInfo of the appropriate
size, older extensions may need to update their code. To avoid subtle
breakages, the FunctionCallInfoData struct has been renamed to
FunctionCallInfoBaseData. Most code only references FunctionCallInfo,
so that shouldn't cause much collateral damage.

This change is also a prerequisite for more efficient expression JIT
compilation (by allocating the function call information on the stack,
allowing LLVM to optimize it away); previously the size of the call
information caused problems inside LLVM's optimizer.

Author: Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180605172952.x34m5uz6ju6enaem@alap3.anarazel.de
2019-01-26 14:17:52 -08:00
Andres Freund
774a975c9a Make naming of tupdesc related structs more consistent with the rest of PG.
We usually don't change the name of structs between the struct name
itself and the name of the typedef. Additionally, structs that are
usually used via a typedef that hides being a pointer, are commonly
suffixed Data.  Change tupdesc code to follow those convention.

This is triggered by a future patch that intends to forward declare
TupleDescData in another header - keeping with the naming scheme makes
that easier to understand.

Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190114000701.y4ttcb74jpskkcfb@alap3.anarazel.de
2019-01-14 16:25:50 -08:00
Bruce Momjian
97c39498e5 Update copyright for 2019
Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.4
2019-01-02 12:44:25 -05:00
Andres Freund
4da597edf1 Make TupleTableSlots extensible, finish split of existing slot type.
This commit completes the work prepared in 1a0586de36, splitting the
old TupleTableSlot implementation (which could store buffer, heap,
minimal and virtual slots) into four different slot types.  As
described in the aforementioned commit, this is done with the goal of
making tuple table slots extensible, to allow for pluggable table
access methods.

To achieve runtime extensibility for TupleTableSlots, operations on
slots that can differ between types of slots are performed using the
TupleTableSlotOps struct provided at slot creation time.  That
includes information from the size of TupleTableSlot struct to be
allocated, initialization, deforming etc.  See the struct's definition
for more detailed information about callbacks TupleTableSlotOps.

I decided to rename TTSOpsBufferTuple to TTSOpsBufferHeapTuple and
ExecCopySlotTuple to ExecCopySlotHeapTuple, as that seems more
consistent with other naming introduced in recent patches.

There's plenty optimization potential in the slot implementation, but
according to benchmarking the state after this commit has similar
performance characteristics to before this set of changes, which seems
sufficient.

There's a few changes in execReplication.c that currently need to poke
through the slot abstraction, that'll be repaired once the pluggable
storage patchset provides the necessary infrastructure.

Author: Andres Freund and  Ashutosh Bapat, with changes by Amit Khandekar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181105210039.hh4vvi4vwoq5ba2q@alap3.anarazel.de
2018-11-16 16:35:15 -08:00
Andres Freund
a7aa608e0f Inline hot path of slot_getsomeattrs().
This yields a minor speedup, which roughly balances the loss from the
upcoming introduction of callbacks to do some operations on slots.

Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181105210039.hh4vvi4vwoq5ba2q@alap3.anarazel.de
2018-11-16 10:29:01 -08:00
Andres Freund
b84a6dafbf Move EEOP_*_SYSVAR evaluation out of line.
This mainly de-duplicates code. As evaluating a system variable isn't
the hottest path and the current inline implementation ends up calling
out to an external function anyway, this is OK from a performance POV.

The main motivation for de-duplicating is the upcoming slot
abstraction work, after which there's not guaranteed to be a HeapTuple
backing the slot.

Author: Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181105210039.hh4vvi4vwoq5ba2q@alap3.anarazel.de
2018-11-07 11:08:45 -08:00