Also "make reformat-dat-files".
The only change worthy of note is that pgindent messed up the formatting
of launcher.c's struct LogicalRepWorkerId, which led me to notice that
that struct wasn't used at all anymore, so I just took it out.
log_statement is issued before query_id can be computed, so properly
clear the value, and document the interaction.
Reported-by: Fujii Masao, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YHPkU8hFi4no4NSw@paquier.xyz
Author: Julien Rouhaud
Previously, it was pg_stat_activity.queryid to match the
pg_stat_statements queryid column. This is an adjustment to patch
4f0b0966c8. This also adjusts some of the internal function calls to
match. Catversion bumped.
Reported-by: Álvaro Herrera, Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210408032704.GA7498@alvherre.pgsql
Use the in-core query id computation for pg_stat_activity,
log_line_prefix, and EXPLAIN VERBOSE.
Similar to other fields in pg_stat_activity, only the queryid from the
top level statements are exposed, and if the backends status isn't
active then the queryid from the last executed statements is displayed.
Add a %Q placeholder to include the queryid in log_line_prefix, which
will also only expose top level statements.
For EXPLAIN VERBOSE, if a query identifier has been computed, either by
enabling compute_query_id or using a third-party module, display it.
Bump catalog version.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210407125726.tkvjdbw76hxnpwfi@nol
Author: Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Nitin Jadhav, Zhihong Yu
Backend status (supporting pg_stat_activity) and command
progress (supporting pg_stat_progress*) related code is largely
independent from the rest of pgstat.[ch] (supporting views like
pg_stat_all_tables that accumulate data over time). See also
a333476b92.
This commit doesn't rename the function names to make the distinction
from the rest of pgstat_ clearer - that'd be more invasive and not
clearly beneficial. If we were to decide to do such a rename at some
point, it's better done separately from moving the code as well.
Robert's review was of an earlier version.
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210316195440.twxmlov24rr2nxrg@alap3.anarazel.de
