1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-08-28 18:48:04 +03:00
Commit Graph

796 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Andres Freund
d4b34f60c5 Deduplicate PageIsNew() check in lazy_scan_heap().
The recheck isn't needed anymore, as RelationGetBufferForTuple() now
extends the relation with RBM_ZERO_AND_LOCK. Previously we needed to
handle the fact that relation extension extended the relation and then
separately acquired a lock on the page - while expecting that the page
is empty.

Reported-By: Ranier Vilela
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQArA_=J0D5T258xsCY6Xtf6wiH4b=QDPDgVS+WZUN10WDw@mail.gmail.com
2020-03-30 13:56:40 -07:00
Amit Kapila
b61d161c14 Introduce vacuum errcontext to display additional information.
The additional information displayed will be block number for error
occurring while processing heap and index name for error occurring
while processing the index.

This will help us in diagnosing the problems that occur during a vacuum.
For ex. due to corruption (either caused by bad hardware or by some bug)
if we get some error while vacuuming, it can help us identify the block
in heap and or additional index information.

It sets up an error context callback to display additional information
with the error.  During different phases of vacuum (heap scan, heap
vacuum, index vacuum, index clean up, heap truncate), we update the error
context callback to display appropriate information.  We can extend it to
a bit more granular level like adding the phases for FSM operations or for
prefetching the blocks while truncating. However, I felt that it requires
adding many more error callback function calls and can make the code a bit
complex, so left those for now.

Author: Justin Pryzby, with few changes by Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Amit Kapila, Andres Freund, Michael Paquier
and Sawada Masahiko
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20191120210600.GC30362@telsasoft.com
2020-03-30 07:33:38 +05:30
Noah Misch
de9396326e Revert "Skip WAL for new relfilenodes, under wal_level=minimal."
This reverts commit cb2fd7eac2.  Per
numerous buildfarm members, it was incompatible with parallel query, and
a test case assumed LP64.  Back-patch to 9.5 (all supported versions).

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200321224920.GB1763544@rfd.leadboat.com
2020-03-22 09:24:09 -07:00
Noah Misch
cb2fd7eac2 Skip WAL for new relfilenodes, under wal_level=minimal.
Until now, only selected bulk operations (e.g. COPY) did this.  If a
given relfilenode received both a WAL-skipping COPY and a WAL-logged
operation (e.g. INSERT), recovery could lose tuples from the COPY.  See
src/backend/access/transam/README section "Skipping WAL for New
RelFileNode" for the new coding rules.  Maintainers of table access
methods should examine that section.

To maintain data durability, just before commit, we choose between an
fsync of the relfilenode and copying its contents to WAL.  A new GUC,
wal_skip_threshold, guides that choice.  If this change slows a workload
that creates small, permanent relfilenodes under wal_level=minimal, try
adjusting wal_skip_threshold.  Users setting a timeout on COMMIT may
need to adjust that timeout, and log_min_duration_statement analysis
will reflect time consumption moving to COMMIT from commands like COPY.

Internally, this requires a reliable determination of whether
RollbackAndReleaseCurrentSubTransaction() would unlink a relation's
current relfilenode.  Introduce rd_firstRelfilenodeSubid.  Amend the
specification of rd_createSubid such that the field is zero when a new
rel has an old rd_node.  Make relcache.c retain entries for certain
dropped relations until end of transaction.

Back-patch to 9.5 (all supported versions).  This introduces a new WAL
record type, XLOG_GIST_ASSIGN_LSN, without bumping XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC.  As
always, update standby systems before master systems.  This changes
sizeof(RelationData) and sizeof(IndexStmt), breaking binary
compatibility for affected extensions.  (The most recent commit to
affect the same class of extensions was
089e4d405d0f3b94c74a2c6a54357a84a681754b.)

Kyotaro Horiguchi, reviewed (in earlier, similar versions) by Robert
Haas.  Heikki Linnakangas and Michael Paquier implemented earlier
designs that materially clarified the problem.  Reviewed, in earlier
designs, by Andrew Dunstan, Andres Freund, Alvaro Herrera, Tom Lane,
Fujii Masao, and Simon Riggs.  Reported by Martijn van Oosterhout.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20150702220524.GA9392@svana.org
2020-03-21 09:38:26 -07:00
Thomas Munro
fc34b0d9de Introduce a maintenance_io_concurrency setting.
Introduce a GUC and a tablespace option to control I/O prefetching, much
like effective_io_concurrency, but for work that is done on behalf of
many client sessions.

Use the new setting in heapam.c instead of the hard-coded formula
effective_io_concurrency + 10 introduced by commit 558a9165e0.  Go with
a default value of 10 for now, because it's a round number pretty close
to the value used for that existing case.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJUw08dPs_3EUcdO6M90GnjofPYrWp4YSLaBkgYwS-AqA%40mail.gmail.com
2020-03-16 17:14:26 +13:00
Tom Lane
3ed2005ff5 Introduce macros for typalign and typstorage constants.
Our usual practice for "poor man's enum" catalog columns is to define
macros for the possible values and use those, not literal constants,
in C code.  But for some reason lost in the mists of time, this was
never done for typalign/attalign or typstorage/attstorage.  It's never
too late to make it better though, so let's do that.

The reason I got interested in this right now is the need to duplicate
some uses of the TYPSTORAGE constants in an upcoming ALTER TYPE patch.
But in general, this sort of change aids greppability and readability,
so it's a good idea even without any specific motivation.

I may have missed a few places that could be converted, and it's even
more likely that pending patches will re-introduce some hard-coded
references.  But that's not fatal --- there's no expectation that
we'd actually change any of these values.  We can clean up stragglers
over time.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16457.1583189537@sss.pgh.pa.us
2020-03-04 10:34:25 -05:00
Michael Paquier
7d672b76bf Issue properly WAL record for CID of first catalog tuple in multi-insert
Multi-insert for heap is not yet used actively for catalogs, but the
code to support this case is in place for logical decoding.  The
existing code forgot to issue a XLOG_HEAP2_NEW_CID record for the first
tuple inserted, leading to failures when attempting to use multiple
inserts for catalogs at decoding time.  This commit fixes the problem by
WAL-logging the needed CID.

This is not an active bug, so no back-patch is done.

Author: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E0D4CC67-A1CF-4DF4-991D-B3AC2EB5FAE9@yesql.se
2020-02-25 07:55:22 +09:00
Fujii Masao
0074919794 Fix mesurement of elapsed time during truncating heap in VACUUM.
VACUUM may truncate heap in several batches. The activity report
is logged for each batch, and contains the number of pages in the table
before and after the truncation, and also the elapsed time during
the truncation. Previously the elapsed time reported in each batch was
the total elapsed time since starting the truncation until finishing
each batch. For example, if the truncation was processed dividing into
three batches, the second batch reported the accumulated time elapsed
during both first and second batches. This is strange and confusing
because the number of pages in the table reported together is not
total. Instead, each batch should report the time elapsed during
only that batch.

The cause of this issue was that the resource usage snapshot was
initialized only at the beginning of the truncation and was never
reset later. This commit fixes the issue by changing VACUUM so that
the resource usage snapshot is reset at each batch.

Back-patch to all supported branches.

Reported-by: Tatsuhito Kasahara
Author: Tatsuhito Kasahara
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAP0=ZVJsf=NvQuy+QXQZ7B=ZVLoDV_JzsVC1FRsF1G18i3zMGg@mail.gmail.com
2020-02-19 20:37:26 +09:00
Thomas Munro
701a51fd4e Use pg_pwrite() in more places.
This removes some lseek() system calls.

Author: Thomas Munro
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGJ%2BoHhnvqjn3%3DHro7xu-YDR8FPr0FL6LF35kHRX%3D_bUzg%40mail.gmail.com
2020-02-11 17:50:22 +13:00
Alvaro Herrera
15d13e8291 Make vacuum buffer counters 64 bits wide
Using 32 bit counters means they can now realistically wrap around when
vacuuming extremely large tables.  Because they're signed integers,
stats printed by vacuum look very odd when they do.

We'd love to backpatch this, but refrain because the variables are
exported and could cause third-party code to break.

Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud, Tom Lane, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200131205926.GA16367@alvherre.pgsql
2020-02-05 16:59:29 -03:00
Alvaro Herrera
c9d2977519 Clean up newlines following left parentheses
We used to strategically place newlines after some function call left
parentheses to make pgindent move the argument list a few chars to the
left, so that the whole line would fit under 80 chars.  However,
pgindent no longer does that, so the newlines just made the code
vertically longer for no reason.  Remove those newlines, and reflow some
of those lines for some extra naturality.

Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200129200401.GA6303@alvherre.pgsql
2020-01-30 13:42:14 -03:00
Thomas Munro
11da6bccd1 Fix compile error on HP C.
Per build farm animal anole, after commit 6f38d4dac3.
2020-01-28 20:30:40 +13:00
Thomas Munro
6f38d4dac3 Remove dependency on HeapTuple from predicate locking functions.
The following changes make the predicate locking functions more
generic and suitable for use by future access methods:

- PredicateLockTuple() is renamed to PredicateLockTID().  It takes
  ItemPointer and inserting transaction ID instead of HeapTuple.

- CheckForSerializableConflictIn() takes blocknum instead of buffer.

- CheckForSerializableConflictOut() no longer takes HeapTuple or buffer.

Author: Ashwin Agrawal
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Kuntal Ghosh, Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALfoeiv0k3hkEb3Oqk%3DziWqtyk2Jys1UOK5hwRBNeANT_yX%2Bng%40mail.gmail.com
2020-01-28 13:13:04 +13:00
Michael Paquier
f942dfb952 Clarify some comments in vacuumlazy.c
Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200113004542.GA26045@telsasoft.com
2020-01-23 15:56:56 +09:00
Amit Kapila
79a3efb84d Fix the computation of max dead tuples during the vacuum.
In commit 40d964ec99, we changed the way memory is allocated for dead
tuples but forgot to update the place where we compute the maximum
number of dead tuples.  This could lead to invalid memory requests.

Reported-by: Andres Freund
Diagnosed-by: Andres Freund
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila and Dilip Kumar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200121060020.e3cr7s7fj5rw4lok@alap3.anarazel.de
2020-01-22 07:43:51 +05:30
Amit Kapila
40d964ec99 Allow vacuum command to process indexes in parallel.
This feature allows the vacuum to leverage multiple CPUs in order to
process indexes.  This enables us to perform index vacuuming and index
cleanup with background workers.  This adds a PARALLEL option to VACUUM
command where the user can specify the number of workers that can be used
to perform the command which is limited by the number of indexes on a
table.  Specifying zero as a number of workers will disable parallelism.
This option can't be used with the FULL option.

Each index is processed by at most one vacuum process.  Therefore parallel
vacuum can be used when the table has at least two indexes.

The parallel degree is either specified by the user or determined based on
the number of indexes that the table has, and further limited by
max_parallel_maintenance_workers.  The index can participate in parallel
vacuum iff it's size is greater than min_parallel_index_scan_size.

Author: Masahiko Sawada and Amit Kapila
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar, Amit Kapila, Robert Haas, Tomas Vondra,
Mahendra Singh and Sergei Kornilov
Tested-by: Mahendra Singh and Prabhat Sahu
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDTPMgzSkV4E3SFo1CH_x50bf5PqZFQf4jmqjk-C03BWg@mail.gmail.com
https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1J-VoR9gzS5E75pcD-OH0mEyCdp8RihcwKrcuw7J-Q0+w@mail.gmail.com
2020-01-20 07:57:49 +05:30
Michael Paquier
7689d907bb Fix comment in heapam.c
Improvement per suggestion from Tom Lane.

Author: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/FED18699-4270-4778-8DA8-10F119A5ECF3@yesql.se
2020-01-13 17:57:38 +09:00
Robert Haas
ce242ae154 tableam: New callback relation_fetch_toast_slice.
Instead of always calling heap_fetch_toast_slice during detoasting,
invoke a table AM callback which, when the toast table is a heap
table, will be heap_fetch_toast_slice.

This makes it possible for a table AM other than heap to be used
as a TOAST table. It also completes the series of commits intended
to improve the interaction of tableam with TOAST that began with
commit 8b94dab06617ef80a0901ab103ebd8754427ef5a; detoast.c is
now, hopefully, fully AM-independent.

Patch by me, reviewed by Andres Freund and Peter Eisentraut.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZv-=2iWM4jcw5ZhJeL18HF96+W1yJeYrnGMYdkFFnEpQ@mail.gmail.com
2020-01-07 14:36:38 -05:00
Robert Haas
83322e38da tableam: Allow choice of toast AM.
Previously, the toast table had to be implemented by the same AM that
was used for the main table, which was bad, because the detoasting
code won't work with anything but heap. This commit doesn't fix the
latter problem, although there's another patch coming which does,
but it does let you pick something that works (i.e. heap, right now).

Patch by me, reviewed by Andres Freund.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZv-=2iWM4jcw5ZhJeL18HF96+W1yJeYrnGMYdkFFnEpQ@mail.gmail.com
2020-01-07 14:23:25 -05:00
Bruce Momjian
7559d8ebfa Update copyrights for 2020
Backpatch-through: update all files in master, backpatch legal files through 9.4
2020-01-01 12:21:45 -05:00
Michael Paquier
7854e07f25 Revert "Rename files and headers related to index AM"
This follows multiple complains from Peter Geoghegan, Andres Freund and
Alvaro Herrera that this issue ought to be dug more before actually
happening, if it happens.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191226144606.GA5659@alvherre.pgsql
2019-12-27 08:09:00 +09:00
Michael Paquier
1ab41a3c8e Refactor code dedicated to index vacuuming in vacuumlazy.c
The part in charge of doing the vacuum on all the indexes of a relation
was duplicated, with the same handling for progress reporting done.
While on it, update the progress reporting for heap vacuuming in the
subroutine doing the actual work, keeping the status update local.  This
way, any future caller of lazy_vacuum_heap() does not have to worry
about doing any progress reporting update.

Author: Justin Pryzby, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191120210600.GC30362@telsasoft.com
2019-12-26 17:01:23 +09:00
Michael Paquier
8ce3aa9b59 Rename files and headers related to index AM
The following renaming is done so as source files related to index
access methods are more consistent with table access methods (the
original names used for index AMs ware too generic, and could be
confused as including features related to table AMs):
- amapi.h -> indexam.h.
- amapi.c -> indexamapi.c.  Here we have an equivalent with
backend/access/table/tableamapi.c.
- amvalidate.c -> indexamvalidate.c.
- amvalidate.h -> indexamvalidate.h.
- genam.c -> indexgenam.c.
- genam.h -> indexgenam.h.

This has been discussed during the development of v12 when table AM was
worked on, but the renaming never happened.

Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Fabien Coelho, Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191223053434.GF34339@paquier.xyz
2019-12-25 10:23:39 +09:00
Michael Paquier
e5a02e0fc6 Remove duplicated progress reporting during heap scan of VACUUM
This has been introduced by c16dc1a since progress reporting for VACUUM
has been added.  As this issue just causes some extra work and is
harmless, no backpatch is done.

Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191213030831.GT2082@telsasoft.com
2019-12-15 22:05:33 +09:00
Peter Geoghegan
9f0f12ac57 Fix HeapTupleSatisfiesNonVacuumable() comment.
Oversight in commit 63746189b2.
2019-11-20 11:36:54 -08:00
Amit Kapila
14aec03502 Make the order of the header file includes consistent in backend modules.
Similar to commits 7e735035f2 and dddf4cdc33, this commit makes the order
of header file inclusion consistent for backend modules.

In the passing, removed a couple of duplicate inclusions.

Author: Vignesh C
Reviewed-by: Kuntal Ghosh and Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm2Sznv8RR6Ex-iJO6xAdsxgWhCoETkaYX=+9DW3q0QCfA@mail.gmail.com
2019-11-12 08:30:16 +05:30
Andres Freund
aae50236e4 Pass ItemPointer not HeapTuple to IndexBuildCallback.
Not all AMs use HeapTuples internally, making it inconvenient to pass
a HeapTuple. As the index callbacks really only need the TID, not the
full tuple, modify callback to only take ItemPointer.

Author: Ashwin Agrawal
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALfoeis6=8ehuR=VNtHvj3z16cYfCwPdTcpaxU+sfSUJ5QgR3g@mail.gmail.com
2019-11-08 11:49:29 -08:00
Andres Freund
01368e5d9d Split all OBJS style lines in makefiles into one-line-per-entry style.
When maintaining or merging patches, one of the most common sources
for conflicts are the list of objects in makefiles. Especially when
the split across lines has been changed on both sides, which is
somewhat common due to attempting to stay below 80 columns, those
conflicts are unnecessarily laborious to resolve.

By splitting, and alphabetically sorting, OBJS style lines into one
object per line, conflicts should be less frequent, and easier to
resolve when they still occur.

Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191029200901.vww4idgcxv74cwes@alap3.anarazel.de
2019-11-05 14:41:07 -08:00
Peter Eisentraut
f86f46d091 Fix comment
The last argument of smgrextend() was renamed from isTemp to skipFsync
in debcec7dc3, but the comments at two
call sites were not updated.
2019-10-22 09:58:20 +02:00
Michael Paquier
b8e19b932a Flush logical mapping files with fd opened for read/write at checkpoint
The file descriptor was opened with read-only to fsync a regular file,
which would cause EBADFD errors on some platforms.

This is similar to the recent fix done by a586cc4b (which was broken by
me with 82a5649), except that I noticed this issue while monitoring the
backend code for similar mistakes.  Backpatch to 9.4, as this has been
introduced since logical decoding exists as of b89e151.

Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20191006045548.GA14532@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 9.4
2019-10-09 13:30:43 +09:00
Robert Haas
2e8b6bfa90 Rename some toasting functions based on whether they are heap-specific.
The old names for the attribute-detoasting functions names included
the word "heap," which seems outdated now that the heap is only one of
potentially many table access methods.

On the other hand, toast_insert_or_update and toast_delete are
heap-specific, so rename them by adding "heap_" as a prefix.

Not all of the work of making the TOAST system fully accessible to AMs
other than the heap is done yet, but there seems to be little harm in
getting this renaming out of the way now. Commit
8b94dab066 already divided up the
functions among various files partially according to whether it was
intended that they should be heap-specific or AM-agnostic, so this is
just clarifying the division contemplated by that commit.

Patch by me, reviewed and tested by Prabhat Sabu, Thomas Munro,
Andres Freund, and Álvaro Herrera.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZv-=2iWM4jcw5ZhJeL18HF96+W1yJeYrnGMYdkFFnEpQ@mail.gmail.com
2019-10-04 14:24:46 -04:00
Fujii Masao
6d05086c0a Speedup truncations of relation forks.
When a relation is truncated, shared_buffers needs to be scanned
so that any buffers for the relation forks are invalidated in it.
Previously, shared_buffers was scanned for each relation forks, i.e.,
MAIN, FSM and VM, when VACUUM truncated off any empty pages
at the end of relation or TRUNCATE truncated the relation in place.
Since shared_buffers needed to be scanned multiple times,
it could take a long time to finish those commands especially
when shared_buffers was large.

This commit changes the logic so that shared_buffers is scanned only
one time for those three relation forks.

Author: Kirk Jamison
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada, Thomas Munro, Alvaro Herrera, Takayuki Tsunakawa and Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/D09B13F772D2274BB348A310EE3027C64E2067@g01jpexmbkw24
2019-09-24 17:31:26 +09:00
Robert Haas
bd124996ef Create an API for inserting and deleting rows in TOAST tables.
This moves much of the non-heap-specific logic from toast_delete and
toast_insert_or_update into a helper functions accessible via a new
header, toast_helper.h.  Using the functions in this module, a table
AM can implement creation and deletion of TOAST table rows with
much less code duplication than was possible heretofore.  Some
table AMs won't want to use the TOAST logic at all, but for those
that do this will make that easier.

Patch by me, reviewed and tested by Prabhat Sabu, Thomas Munro,
Andres Freund, and Álvaro Herrera.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZv-=2iWM4jcw5ZhJeL18HF96+W1yJeYrnGMYdkFFnEpQ@mail.gmail.com
2019-09-06 10:38:51 -04:00
Robert Haas
8b94dab066 Split tuptoaster.c into three separate files.
detoast.c/h contain functions required to detoast a datum, partially
or completely, plus a few other utility functions for examining the
size of toasted datums.

toast_internals.c/h contain functions that are used internally to the
TOAST subsystem but which (mostly) do not need to be accessed from
outside.

heaptoast.c/h contains code that is intrinsically specific to the
heap AM, either because it operates on HeapTuples or is based on the
layout of a heap page.

detoast.c and toast_internals.c are placed in
src/backend/access/common rather than src/backend/access/heap.  At
present, both files still have dependencies on the heap, but that will
be improved in a future commit.

Patch by me, reviewed and tested by Prabhat Sabu, Thomas Munro,
Andres Freund, and Álvaro Herrera.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZv-=2iWM4jcw5ZhJeL18HF96+W1yJeYrnGMYdkFFnEpQ@mail.gmail.com
2019-09-05 13:15:10 -04:00
Tom Lane
f63a5ead9d Avoid touching replica identity index in ExtractReplicaIdentity().
In what seems like a fit of misplaced optimization,
ExtractReplicaIdentity() accessed the relation's replica-identity
index without taking any lock on it.  Usually, the surrounding query
already holds some lock so this is safe enough ... but in the case
of a previously-planned delete, there might be no existing lock.
Given a suitable test case, this is exposed in v12 and HEAD by an
assertion added by commit b04aeb0a0.

The whole thing's rather poorly thought out anyway; rather than
looking directly at the index, we should use the index-attributes
bitmap that's held by the parent table's relcache entry, as the
caller functions do.  This is more consistent and likely a bit
faster, since it avoids a cache lookup.  Hence, change to doing it
that way.

While at it, rather than blithely assuming that the identity
columns are non-null (with catastrophic results if that's wrong),
add assertion checks that they aren't null.  Possibly those should
be actual test-and-elog, but I'll leave it like this for now.

In principle, this is a bug that's been there since this code was
introduced (in 9.4).  In practice, the risk seems quite low, since
we do have a lock on the index's parent table, so concurrent
changes to the index's catalog entries seem unlikely.  Given the
precedent that commit 9c703c169 wasn't back-patched, I won't risk
back-patching this further than v12.

Per report from Hadi Moshayedi.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAK=1=Wrek44Ese1V7LjKiQS-Nd-5LgLi_5_CskGbpggKEf3tKQ@mail.gmail.com
2019-09-02 16:10:37 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera
f8cf524da1 Fix bogus comment
Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190819072244.GE18166@paquier.xyz
2019-08-20 16:04:09 -04:00
Michael Paquier
c96581abe4 Fix inconsistencies and typos in the tree, take 11
This fixes various typos in docs and comments, and removes some orphaned
definitions.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5da8e325-c665-da95-21e0-c8a99ea61fbf@gmail.com
2019-08-19 16:21:39 +09:00
Michael Paquier
66bde49d96 Fix inconsistencies and typos in the tree, take 10
This addresses some issues with unnecessary code comments, fixes various
typos in docs and comments, and removes some orphaned structures and
definitions.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9aabc775-5494-b372-8bcb-4dfc0bd37c68@gmail.com
2019-08-13 13:53:41 +09:00
Heikki Linnakangas
1169fcf129 Fix predicate-locking of HOT updated rows.
In serializable mode, heap_hot_search_buffer() incorrectly acquired a
predicate lock on the root tuple, not the returned tuple that satisfied
the visibility checks. As explained in README-SSI, the predicate lock does
not need to be copied or extended to other tuple versions, but for that to
work, the correct, visible, tuple version must be locked in the first
place.

The original SSI commit had this bug in it, but it was fixed back in 2013,
in commit 81fbbfe335. But unfortunately, it was reintroduced a few months
later in commit b89e151054. Wising up from that, add a regression test
to cover this, so that it doesn't get reintroduced again. Also, move the
code that sets 't_self', so that it happens at the same time that the
other HeapTuple fields are set, to make it more clear that all the code in
the loop operate on the "current" tuple in the chain, not the root tuple.

Bug spotted by Andres Freund, analysis and original fix by Thomas Munro,
test case and some additional changes to the fix by Heikki Linnakangas.
Backpatch to all supported versions (9.4).

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190731210630.nqhszuktygwftjty%40alap3.anarazel.de
2019-08-07 12:40:49 +03:00
Michael Paquier
8548ddc61b Fix inconsistencies and typos in the tree, take 9
This addresses more issues with code comments, variable names and
unreferenced variables.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7ab243e0-116d-3e44-d120-76b3df7abefd@gmail.com
2019-08-05 12:14:58 +09:00
Peter Eisentraut
fd6ec93bf8 Add error codes to some corruption log messages
In some cases we have elog(ERROR) while corruption is certain and we
can give a clear error code ERRCODE_DATA_CORRUPTED or
ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED.

Author: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/25F6C686-6442-4A6B-BAF8-A6F7B84B16DE@yandex-team.ru
2019-08-01 11:15:26 +02:00
Michael Paquier
eb43f3d193 Fix inconsistencies and typos in the tree
This is numbered take 8, and addresses again a set of issues with code
comments, variable names and unreferenced variables.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b137b5eb-9c95-9c2f-586e-38aba7d59788@gmail.com
2019-07-29 12:28:30 +09:00
Michael Paquier
23bccc823d Fix inconsistencies and typos in the tree
This is numbered take 7, and addresses a set of issues with code
comments, variable names and unreferenced variables.

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/dff75442-2468-f74f-568c-6006e141062f@gmail.com
2019-07-22 10:01:50 +09:00
Robert Haas
554106b116 tableam: Provide helper functions for relation sizing.
Most block-based table AMs will need the exact same implementation of
the relation_size callback as the heap, and if they use a standard
page layout, they will likely need an implementation of the
relation_estimate_size callback that is very similar to that of the
heap.  Rearrange to facilitate code reuse.

Patch by me, reviewed by Michael Paquier, Daniel Gustafsson, and
Álvaro Herrera.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZ6DBPnP1E-vRpQZUJQijJFD54F+SR_pxGiAAS-MyrigA@mail.gmail.com
2019-07-08 14:51:53 -04:00
Peter Eisentraut
7e9a4c5c3d Use consistent style for checking return from system calls
Use

    if (something() != 0)
        error ...

instead of just

    if (something)
        error ...

The latter is not incorrect, but it's a bit confusing and not the
common style.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/5de61b6b-8be9-7771-0048-860328efe027%402ndquadrant.com
2019-07-07 15:28:49 +02:00
Andres Freund
23224563d9 Fix memory corruption/crash in ANALYZE.
This fixes an embarrassing oversight I (Andres) made in 737a292b,
namely missing two place where liverows/deadrows were used when
converting those variables to pointers, leading to incrementing the
pointer, rather than the value.

It's not that actually that easy to trigger a crash: One needs tuples
deleted by the current transaction, followed by a tuple deleted in
another session, all in one page. Which is presumably why this hasn't
been noticed before.

Reported-By: Steve Singer
Author: Steve Singer
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c7988239-d42c-ddc4-41db-171b23b35e4f@ssinger.info
2019-06-18 15:51:04 -07:00
Alvaro Herrera
8b21b416ed Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock
This puts back reverted commit de87a084c0, with some bug fixes.

When two (or more) transactions are waiting for transaction T1 to release a
tuple-level lock, and transaction T1 upgrades its lock to a higher level, a
spurious deadlock can be reported among the waiting transactions when T1
finishes.  The simplest example case seems to be:

T1: select id from job where name = 'a' for key share;
Y: select id from job where name = 'a' for update; -- starts waiting for T1
Z: select id from job where name = 'a' for key share;
T1: update job set name = 'b' where id = 1;
Z: update job set name = 'c' where id = 1; -- starts waiting for T1
T1: rollback;

At this point, transaction Y is rolled back on account of a deadlock: Y
holds the heavyweight tuple lock and is waiting for the Xmax to be released,
while Z holds part of the multixact and tries to acquire the heavyweight
lock (per protocol) and goes to sleep; once T1 releases its part of the
multixact, Z is awakened only to be put back to sleep on the heavyweight
lock that Y is holding while sleeping.  Kaboom.

This can be avoided by having Z skip the heavyweight lock acquisition.  As
far as I can see, the biggest downside is that if there are multiple Z
transactions, the order in which they resume after T1 finishes is not
guaranteed.

Backpatch to 9.6.  The patch applies cleanly on 9.5, but the new tests don't
work there (because isolationtester is not smart enough), so I'm not going
to risk it.

Author: Oleksii Kliukin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B9C9D7CD-EB94-4635-91B6-E558ACEC0EC3@hintbits.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2815.1560521451@sss.pgh.pa.us
2019-06-18 18:23:16 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera
9d20b0ec8f Revert "Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock"
This reverts commits 3da73d6839 and de87a084c0.

This code has some tricky corner cases that I'm not sure are correct and
not properly tested anyway, so I'm reverting the whole thing for next
week's releases (reintroducing the deadlock bug that we set to fix).
I'll try again afterwards.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1hbXKQ-0003g1-0C@gemulon.postgresql.org
2019-06-16 22:24:21 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera
3da73d6839 Silence compiler warning
Introduced in de87a084c0.
2019-06-14 11:33:40 -04:00
Alvaro Herrera
de87a084c0 Avoid spurious deadlocks when upgrading a tuple lock
When two (or more) transactions are waiting for transaction T1 to release a
tuple-level lock, and transaction T1 upgrades its lock to a higher level, a
spurious deadlock can be reported among the waiting transactions when T1
finishes.  The simplest example case seems to be:

T1: select id from job where name = 'a' for key share;
Y: select id from job where name = 'a' for update; -- starts waiting for X
Z: select id from job where name = 'a' for key share;
T1: update job set name = 'b' where id = 1;
Z: update job set name = 'c' where id = 1; -- starts waiting for X
T1: rollback;

At this point, transaction Y is rolled back on account of a deadlock: Y
holds the heavyweight tuple lock and is waiting for the Xmax to be released,
while Z holds part of the multixact and tries to acquire the heavyweight
lock (per protocol) and goes to sleep; once X releases its part of the
multixact, Z is awakened only to be put back to sleep on the heavyweight
lock that Y is holding while sleeping.  Kaboom.

This can be avoided by having Z skip the heavyweight lock acquisition.  As
far as I can see, the biggest downside is that if there are multiple Z
transactions, the order in which they resume after X finishes is not
guaranteed.

Backpatch to 9.6.  The patch applies cleanly on 9.5, but the new tests don't
work there (because isolationtester is not smart enough), so I'm not going
to risk it.

Author: Oleksii Kliukin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/B9C9D7CD-EB94-4635-91B6-E558ACEC0EC3@hintbits.com
2019-06-13 17:28:24 -04:00