check_createrole_self_grant and check_synchronized_standby_slots
were allocating memory on a LOG elevel without checking if the
allocation succeeded or not, which would have led to a segfault
on allocation failure.
On top of that, a number of callsites were using the ERROR level,
relying on erroring out rather than returning false to allow the
GUC machinery handle it gracefully. Other callsites used WARNING
instead of LOG. While neither being not wrong, this changes all
check_ functions do it consistently with LOG.
init_custom_variable gets a promoted elevel to FATAL to keep
the guc_malloc error handling in line with the rest of the
error handling in that function which already call FATAL. If
we encounter an OOM in this callsite there is no graceful
handling to be had, better to error out hard.
Backpatch the fix to check_createrole_self_grant down to v16
and the fix to check_synchronized_standby_slots down to v17
where they were introduced.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reported-by: Nikita <pm91.arapov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Bug: #18845
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18845-582c6e10247377ec@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 16
Commit d45597f72f introduced the ability to change a not-null
constraint from NO INHERIT to INHERIT and vice versa, but we included
the SET noise word in the syntax for it. The SET turns out not to be
necessary and goes against what the SQL standard says for other ALTER
TABLE subcommands, so remove it.
This changes the way this command is processed for constraint types
other than not-null, so there are some error message changes.
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kharage <suraj.kharage@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202503251602.vsxaehsyaoac@alvherre.pgsql
This macro allows dynamically loaded shared libraries (modules) to
provide a wired-in module name and version, and possibly other
compile-time-constant fields in future. This information can be
retrieved with the new pg_get_loaded_modules() function.
This feature is expected to be particularly useful for modules
that do not have any exposed SQL functionality and thus are
not associated with a SQL-level extension object. But even for
modules that do belong to extensions, being able to verify the
actual code version can be useful.
Author: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk@omnigres.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/dd4d1b59-d0fe-49d5-b28f-1e463b68fa32@gmail.com
Split ATExecAlterConstraintInternal() into two functions:
ATExecAlterConstrDeferrability() and
ATExecAlterConstrInheritability(). This simplifies the code and
avoids unnecessary confusion caused by recursive code, which isn't
needed for ATExecAlterConstrInheritability().
(This also takes over the changes in commit 64224a834c, as the new
AlterConstrDeferrabilityRecurse() is essentially the old
ATExecAlterChildConstr().)
Author: Amul Sul <amul.sul@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAAJ_b962c5AcYW9KUt_R_ER5qs3fUGbe4az-SP-vuwPS-w-AGA@mail.gmail.com
Small fixes for commit f4e53e10b6: Add missing calls to
InvokeObjectPostAlterHook() and also CacheInvalidateRelcache(). The
former change could have a user-visible effect. The latter omission
might have caused other bugs, but it is not clear whether one actually
existed. With these changes, the code is now more consistent with
similar ALTER CONSTRAINT variants, especially the ones that set the
deferrability.
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAF1DzPVfOW6Kk=7SSh7LbneQDJWh=PbJrEC_Wkzc24tHOyQWGg@mail.gmail.com
This removes a needless special case for Memoize's FORMAT TEXT EXPLAIN
output.
ExplainPropertyText() outputs the same thing in text mode as the
special-case code was doing, so removing the special-case code results in
the same EXPLAIN output, just with less code.
It seems like a good idea to fix this to help prevent future changes in
this area from copying the same pattern.
Author: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya.evdokimov@tantorlabs.com>
Reported-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/88a71bcd-0b5c-4d0b-8107-757e96f402d5@tantorlabs.com
This new parameter works just like the storage parameter of the
same name: if set to true (which is the default), autovacuum and
VACUUM attempt to truncate any empty pages at the end of the table.
It is primarily intended to help users avoid locking issues on hot
standbys. The setting can be overridden with the storage parameter
or VACUUM's TRUNCATE option.
Since there's presently no way to determine whether a Boolean
storage parameter is explicitly set or has just picked up the
default value, this commit also introduces an isset_offset member
to relopt_parse_elt.
Suggested-by: Will Storey <will@summercat.com>
Author: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Z2DE4lDX4tHqNGZt%40dev.null
The new GUC extension_control_path specifies a path to look for
extension control files. The default value is $system, which looks in
the compiled-in location, as before.
The path search uses the same code and works in the same way as
dynamic_library_path.
Some use cases of this are: (1) testing extensions during package
builds, (2) installing extensions outside security-restricted
containers like Python.app (on macOS), (3) adding extensions to
PostgreSQL running in a Kubernetes environment using operators such as
CloudNativePG without having to rebuild the base image for each new
extension.
There is also a tweak in Makefile.global so that it is possible to
install extensions using PGXS into an different directory than the
default, using 'make install prefix=/else/where'. This previously
only worked when specifying the subdirectories, like 'make install
datadir=/else/where/share pkglibdir=/else/where/lib', for purely
implementation reasons. (Of course, without the path feature,
installing elsewhere was rarely useful.)
Author: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Co-authored-by: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com>
Reviewed-by: Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartolini@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Marco Nenciarini <marco.nenciarini@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Niccolò Fei <niccolo.fei@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/E7C7BFFB-8857-48D4-A71F-88B359FADCFD@justatheory.com
Commit cbc127917e introduced tracking of unpruned relids to avoid
processing pruned relations, and changed ExecInitModifyTable() to
initialize only unpruned result relations. As a result, MERGE
statements that prune all target partitions can now lead to crashes
or incorrect behavior during execution.
The crash occurs because some executor code paths rely on
ModifyTableState.resultRelInfo[0] being present and initialized,
even when no result relations remain after pruning. For example,
ExecMerge() and ExecMergeNotMatched() use the first resultRelInfo
to determine the appropriate action. Similarly,
ExecInitPartitionInfo() assumes that at least one result relation
exists.
To preserve these assumptions, ExecInitModifyTable() now includes the
first result relation in the initialized result relation list if all
result relations for that ModifyTable were pruned. To enable that,
ExecDoInitialPruning() ensures the first relation is locked if it was
pruned and locking is necessary.
To support this exception to the pruning logic, PlannedStmt now
includes a list of RT indexes identifying the first result relation
of each ModifyTable node in the plan. This allows
ExecDoInitialPruning() to check whether each such relation was
pruned and, if so, lock it if necessary.
Bug: #18830
Reported-by: Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>
Diagnozed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Diagnozed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18830-1f31ea1dc930d444%40postgresql.org
The existing io_combine_limit can be changed by users. The new
io_max_combine_limit is fixed at server startup time, and functions as a
silent clamp on the user setting. That in itself is probably quite
useful, but the primary motivation is:
aio_init.c allocates shared memory for all asynchronous IOs including
some per-block data, and we didn't want to waste memory you'd never used
by assuming they could be up to PG_IOV_MAX. This commit already halves
the size of 'AioHandleIov' and 'AioHandleData'. A follow-up commit can
now expand PG_IOV_MAX without affecting that.
Since our GUC system doesn't support dependencies or cross-checks
between GUCs, the user-settable one now assigns a "raw" value to
io_combine_limit_guc, and the lower of io_combine_limit_guc and
io_max_combine_limit is maintained in io_combine_limit.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> (earlier version)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2B2T9p-%2BzM6Eeou-RAJjTML6eit1qn26f9twznX59qtCA%40mail.gmail.com
Specifically, add a per-node hook that is called after the per-node
information has been displayed but before we display children, and a
per-query hook that is called after existing query-level information
is printed. This assumes that extension-added information should
always go at the end rather than the beginning or the middle, but
that seems like an acceptable limitation for simplicity. It also
assumes that extensions will only want to add information, not remove
or reformat existing details; those also seem like acceptable
restrictions, at least for now.
If multiple EXPLAIN extensions are used, the order in which any
additional details are printed is likely to depend on the order in
which the modules are loaded. That seems OK, since the user may
have opinions about the order in which output should appear, and the
extension author can't really know whether their stuff is more or
less important to a particular user than some other extension.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYSzg58hPuBmei46o8D3SKX+SZoO4K_aGQGwiRzvRApLg@mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Srinath Reddy <srinath2133@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Modules can use RegisterExtensionExplainOption to register new
EXPLAIN options, and GetExplainExtensionId, GetExplainExtensionState,
and SetExplainExtensionState to store related state inside the
ExplainState object.
Since this substantially increases the amount of code that needs
to handle ExplainState-related tasks, move a few bits of existing
code to a new file explain_state.c and add the rest of this
infrastructure there.
See the comments at the top of explain_state.c for further
explanation of how this mechanism works.
This does not yet provide a way for such such options to do anything
useful. The intention is that we'll add hooks for that purpose in a
separate commit.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYSzg58hPuBmei46o8D3SKX+SZoO4K_aGQGwiRzvRApLg@mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Srinath Reddy <srinath2133@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
We were rejecting non-btree indexes in some cases owing to the
inability to determine the equality operators for other index AMs;
that problem no longer exists, because we can look up the equality
operator using COMPARE_EQ.
Stop rejecting these indexes, but instead rely on all unique indexes
having equality operators. Unique indexes must have equality
operators.
Author: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/E72EAA49-354D-4C2E-8EB9-255197F55330@enterprisedb.com
We were rejecting non-btree indexes in some cases owing to the
inability to determine the equality operators for other index AMs;
that problem no longer exists, because we can look up the equality
operator using COMPARE_EQ. The problem of not knowing the strategy
number for equality in other index AMs is already resolved.
Stop rejecting the indexes upfront, and instead reject any for which
the equality operator lookup fails.
Author: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/E72EAA49-354D-4C2E-8EB9-255197F55330@enterprisedb.com
It doesn't actually work, even with allow_system_table_mods turned on:
the ALTER TABLE operation is rejected by ATSimplePermissions(), so even
the error message we're adding in this commit is unreachable.
Add a test case for it.
Author: Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan@nataraj.su>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1913854.tdWV9SEqCh@thinkpad-pgpro
On Publication rename, we need to only invalidate the RelationSyncCache
entries corresponding to relations that are part of the publication being
renamed.
As part of this patch, we introduce a new invalidation message to
invalidate the cache maintained by the logical decoding output plugin. We
can't use existing relcache invalidation for this purpose, as that would
unnecessarily cause relcache invalidations in other backends.
This will improve performance by building fewer relation cache entries
during logical replication.
Author: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Author: Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hou Zhijie <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OSCPR01MB14966C09AA201EFFA706576A7F5C92@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
The comment in GetTransactionSnapshot() said that you "should call
RegisterSnapshot or PushActiveSnapshot on the returned snap if it is
to be used very long". That felt too unclear to me. Make the comment
more strongly worded.
To enforce that rule and to catch potential bugs where a snapshot
might get invalidated while it's still in use, add an assertion to
HeapTupleSatisfiesMVCC() to check that the snapshot is registered or
pushed to active stack. No new bugs were found by this, but it seems
like good future-proofing. It's not a great place for the check;
HeapTupleSatisfiesMVCC() is in fact safe to call with an unregistered
snapshot, and the assertion won't catch other unsafe uses. But it goes
a long way in practice.
Fix a few cases that were playing fast and loose with that and just
assumed that the snapshot cannot be invalidated during a scan. Those
assumptions were not wrong, but they're not performance critical, so
let's drop the excuses and just register the snapshot. These were
false positives found by the new assertion.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7c56f180-b9e1-481e-8c1d-efa63de3ecbb@iki.fi
Up to now we just punted on showing the window definitions used
in a plan, with window function calls represented as "OVER (?)".
To improve that, show the window definition implemented by each
WindowAgg plan node, and reference their window names in OVER.
For nameless window clauses generated by "OVER (...)", assign
unique names w1, w2, etc.
In passing, re-order the properties shown for a WindowAgg node
so that the Run Condition (if any) appears after the Window
property and before the Filter (if any). This seems more
sensible since the Run Condition is associated with the Window
and acts before the Filter.
Thanks to David G. Johnston and Álvaro Herrera for design
suggestions.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/144530.1741469955@sss.pgh.pa.us
Expose the count of index searches/index descents in EXPLAIN ANALYZE's
output for index scan/index-only scan/bitmap index scan nodes. This
information is particularly useful with scans that use ScalarArrayOp
quals, where the number of index searches can be unpredictable due to
implementation details that interact with physical index characteristics
(at least with nbtree SAOP scans, since Postgres 17 commit 5bf748b8).
The information shown also provides useful context when EXPLAIN ANALYZE
runs a plan with an index scan node that successfully applied the skip
scan optimization (set to be added to nbtree by an upcoming patch).
The instrumentation works by teaching all index AMs to increment a new
nsearches counter whenever a new index search begins. The counter is
incremented at exactly the same point that index AMs already increment
the pg_stat_*_indexes.idx_scan counter (we're counting the same event,
but at the scan level rather than the relation level). Parallel queries
have workers copy their local counter struct into shared memory when an
index scan node ends -- even when it isn't a parallel aware scan node.
An earlier version of this patch that only worked with parallel aware
scans became commit 5ead85fb (though that was quickly reverted by commit
d00107cd following "debug_parallel_query=regress" buildfarm failures).
Our approach doesn't match the approach used when tracking other index
scan related costs (e.g., "Rows Removed by Filter:"). It is comparable
to the approach used in similar cases involving costs that are only
readily accessible inside an access method, not from the executor proper
(e.g., "Heap Blocks:" output for a Bitmap Heap Scan, which was recently
enhanced to show per-worker costs by commit 5a1e6df3, using essentially
the same scheme as the one used here). It is necessary for index AMs to
have direct responsibility for maintaining the new counter, since the
counter might need to be incremented multiple times per amgettuple call
(or per amgetbitmap call). But it is also necessary for the executor
proper to manage the shared memory now used to transfer each worker's
counter struct to the leader.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Reviewed-By: Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com>
Reviewed-By: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkRqvaqR2CTNqTZP0z6FuL4-3ED6eQB0yx38XBNj1v-4Q@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=PKR6rB7qbx+Vnd7eqeB5VTcrW=iJvAsTsKbdG+kW_UA@mail.gmail.com
This change is harmless and does not affect the existing intended
operation. It is necessary for a subsequent patch operation (NOT
ENFORCED foreign keys), where we may need to change the child
constraint to enforced. In this case, we would create the necessary
triggers and queue the constraint for validation, so it is important
to remove any unnecessary constraints before proceeding.
This is a small change that could have been included in the previous
"split tryAttachPartitionForeignKey" refactoring patch (commit
1d26c2d2c4), but was kept separate to highlight the changes.
Author: Amul Sul <amul.sul@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandra Wang <alexandra.wang.oss@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAAJ_b962c5AcYW9KUt_R_ER5qs3fUGbe4az-SP-vuwPS-w-AGA%40mail.gmail.com
This reverts commit 5ead85fbc8.
This commit shows test failures with debug_parallel_query=regress. The
underlying issue needs to be debugged, so revert for now.
Expose the count of index searches/index descents in EXPLAIN ANALYZE's
output for index scan nodes. This information is particularly useful
with scans that use ScalarArrayOp quals, where the number of index scans
isn't predictable in advance (at least not with optimizations like the
one added to nbtree by Postgres 17 commit 5bf748b8). It will also be
useful when EXPLAIN ANALYZE shows details of an nbtree index scan that
uses skip scan optimizations set to be introduced by an upcoming patch.
The instrumentation works by teaching index AMs to increment a new
nsearches counter whenever a new index search begins. The counter is
incremented at exactly the same point that index AMs must already
increment the index's pg_stat_*_indexes.idx_scan counter (we're counting
the same event, but at the scan level rather than the relation level).
The new counter is stored in the scan descriptor (IndexScanDescData),
which explain.c reaches by going through the scan node's PlanState.
This approach doesn't match the approach used when tracking other index
scan specific costs (e.g., "Rows Removed by Filter:"). It is similar to
the approach used in other cases where we must track costs that are only
readily accessible inside an access method, and not from the executor
(e.g., "Heap Blocks:" output for a Bitmap Heap Scan). It is inherently
necessary to maintain a counter that can be incremented multiple times
during a single amgettuple call (or amgetbitmap call), and directly
exposing PlanState.instrument to index access methods seems unappealing.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh@oss.nttdata.com>
Reviewed-By: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=PKR6rB7qbx+Vnd7eqeB5VTcrW=iJvAsTsKbdG+kW_UA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkRqvaqR2CTNqTZP0z6FuL4-3ED6eQB0yx38XBNj1v-4Q@mail.gmail.com
This allows to redefine an existing non-inheritable constraint to be
inheritable, which allows to straighten up situations with NO INHERIT
constraints so that thay can become normal constraints without having to
re-verify existing data. For existing inheritance children this may
require creating additional constraints, if they don't exist already.
It also allows to do the opposite, if only for symmetry.
Author: Suraj Kharage <suraj.kharage@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAF1DzPVfOW6Kk=7SSh7LbneQDJWh=PbJrEC_Wkzc24tHOyQWGg@mail.gmail.com
demo:
CREATE TABLE gtest20a (a int PRIMARY KEY, b int GENERATED ALWAYS AS (a * 2) VIRTUAL);
ALTER TABLE gtest20a ADD COLUMN c float8 DEFAULT RANDOM() CHECK (b < 60);
ERROR: no generation expression found for column number 2 of table "pg_temp_17306"
In ATRewriteTable, the variable OIDNewHeap (if valid) corresponding
pg_attrdef default expression entry was not populated. So OIDNewHeap
cannot be used to call expand_generated_columns_in_expr or
build_generation_expression. Therefore in ATRewriteTable, we can only
use the existing relation to expand the generated expression.
Author: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Srinath Reddy <srinath2133@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CACJufxEJ%3DFoajabWXjszo_yrQeKSxdZ87KJqBW373rSbajKGAA%40mail.gmail.com
DefineRelation was of the opinion that it could usefully pre-fill
atthasdef flags to eliminate work for StoreAttrDefault. This is not
the case, however: the tupledesc that it's filling is not the one that
InsertPgAttributeTuples will work from. The tupledesc used there is
made by RelationBuildLocalRelation, which deliberately doesn't copy
atthasdef. Moreover, if this did happen as the code thinks, it would
be wrong for the case of plain "DEFAULT NULL" clauses, since we detect
and ignore simple-null-Const defaults later on. Hence, remove the
useless code.
It also emerges that it's not really worth a special-case path in
StoreAttrDefault() for atthasdef already being set, because as far as
we can see that never happens: cases where an existing default gets
updated always do RemoveAttrDefault first, so as to clean up
possibly-no-longer-correct dependency entries. If it were the case
the code would still work, anyway.
Also remove a nearby comment made moot by 5eaa0e92e.
Author: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxHFssPvkP1we7WMhPD_1kwgbG52o=kQgL+TnVoX5LOyCQ@mail.gmail.com
If a domain type has a default, adding a column of that type (without
any explicit DEFAULT clause) failed to install the domain's default
value in existing rows, instead leaving the new column null. This
is unexpected, and it used to work correctly before v11. The cause
is confusion in the atthasmissing mechanism about which default value
to install: we'd only consider installing an explicitly-specified
default, and then we'd decide that no table rewrite is needed.
To fix, take the responsibility for filling attmissingval out of
StoreAttrDefault, and instead put it into ATExecAddColumn's existing
logic that derives the correct value to fill the new column with.
Also, centralize the logic that determines the need for
default-related table rewriting there, instead of spreading it over
four or five places.
In the back branches, we'll leave the attmissingval-filling code
in StoreAttrDefault even though it's now dead, for fear that some
extension may be depending on that functionality to exist there.
A separate HEAD-only patch will clean up the now-useless code.
Reported-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Author: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxHFssPvkP1we7WMhPD_1kwgbG52o=kQgL+TnVoX5LOyCQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
Add relallfrozen, an estimate of the number of pages marked all-frozen
in the visibility map.
pg_class already has relallvisible, an estimate of the number of pages
in the relation marked all-visible in the visibility map. This is used
primarily for planning.
relallfrozen, together with relallvisible, is useful for estimating the
outstanding number of all-visible but not all-frozen pages in the
relation for the purposes of scheduling manual VACUUMs and tuning vacuum
freeze parameters.
A future commit will use relallfrozen to trigger more frequent vacuums
on insert-focused workloads with significant volume of frozen data.
Bump catalog version
Author: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>
Reviewed-by: Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/CAAKRu_aj-P7YyBz_cPNwztz6ohP%2BvWis%3Diz3YcomkB3NpYA--w%40mail.gmail.com
Commit 7717f63006 removed NextCopyFromRawFields() from copy.h. While
it was hoped that NextCopyFrom() could serve as an alternative,
certain use cases still require NextCopyFromRawFields(). For instance,
extensions like file_text_array_fdw, which process source data with an
unknown number of columns, rely on this function.
Per buildfarm member crake.
Reported-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Reviewed-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5c7e1ac8-5083-4c08-af19-cb9ade2f16ce@dunslane.net
This commit introduces a new CopyFromRoutine struct, which is a set of
callback routines to read tuples in a specific format. It also makes
COPY FROM with the existing formats (text, CSV, and binary) utilize
these format callbacks.
This change is a preliminary step towards making the COPY FROM command
extensible in terms of input formats.
Similar to 2e4127b6d2, this refactoring contributes to a performance
improvement by reducing the number of "if" branches that need to be
checked on a per-row basis when sending field representations in text
or CSV mode. The performance benchmark results showed ~5% performance
gain in text or CSV mode.
Author: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231204.153548.2126325458835528809.kou@clear-code.com
This commit introduces a new CopyToRoutine struct, which is a set of
callback routines to copy tuples in a specific format. It also makes
the existing formats (text, CSV, and binary) utilize these format
callbacks.
This change is a preliminary step towards making the COPY TO command
extensible in terms of output formats.
Additionally, this refactoring contributes to a performance
improvement by reducing the number of "if" branches that need to be
checked on a per-row basis when sending field representations in text
or CSV mode. The performance benchmark results showed ~5% performance
gain in text or CSV mode.
Author: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231204.153548.2126325458835528809.kou@clear-code.com
Commit ddb17e387a attempted to avoid
confusing users by displaying digits after the decimal point only when
nloops > 1, since it's impossible to have a fraction row count after a
single iteration. However, this made the regression tests unstable since
parallal queries will have nloops>1 for all nodes below the Gather or
Gather Merge in normal cases, but if the workers don't start in time and
the leader finishes all the work, they will suddenly have nloops==1,
making it unpredictable whether the digits after the decimal point would
be displayed or not. Although 44cbba9a7f
seemed to fix the immediate failures, it may still be the case that there
are lower-probability failures elsewhere in the regression tests.
Various fixes are possible here. For example, it has previously been
proposed that we should try to display the digits after the decimal
point only if rows/nloops is an integer, but currently rows is storead
as a float so it's not theoretically an exact quantity -- precision
could be lost in extreme cases. It has also been proposed that we
should try to display the digits after the decimal point only if we're
under some sort of construct that could potentially cause looping
regardless of whether it actually does. While such ideas are not
without merit, this patch adopts the much simpler solution of always
display two decimal digits. If that approach stands up to scrutiny
from the buildfarm and human users, it spares us the trouble of doing
anything more complex; if not, we can reassess.
This commit incidentally reverts 44cbba9a7f,
which should no longer be needed.
Author: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Author: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya.evdokimov@tantorlabs.com>
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoazzVHn8sFOMFAEwoqBTDxKT45D7mvkyeHgqtoD2cn58Q@mail.gmail.com
Stop comparing access method OID values against HASH_AM_OID and
BTREE_AM_OID, and instead check the IndexAmRoutine for an index to see
if it advertises its ability to perform the necessary ordering,
hashing, or cross-type comparing functionality. A field amcanorder
already existed, this uses it more widely. Fields amcanhash and
amcancrosscompare are added for the other purposes.
Author: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/E72EAA49-354D-4C2E-8EB9-255197F55330@enterprisedb.com
Concurrently dropping either the granted role or the grantee
does not stop GRANT from completing, instead resulting in a
dangling role reference in pg_auth_members. That's relatively
harmless in the short run, but inconsistent catalog entries
are not a good thing.
This patch solves the problem by adding the granted and grantee
roles as explicit shared dependencies of the pg_auth_members entry.
That's a bit indirect, but it works because the pg_shdepend code
applies the necessary locking and rechecking.
Commit 6566133c5 previously established similar handling for
the grantor column of pg_auth_members; it's not clear why it
didn't cover the other two role OID columns.
A side-effect of this approach is that DROP OWNED BY will now drop
pg_auth_members entries that mention the target role as either the
granted or grantee role. That's clearly appropriate for the
grantee, since we'll drop its other privileges too. It doesn't
seem too far out of line for the granted role, since we're
presumably about to drop it and besides we're removing all reasons
why it'd matter to be a member of it. (One could argue that this
makes DropRole's code to auto-drop pg_auth_members entries
unnecessary, but I chose to leave it in place since perhaps some
people's workflows expect that to work without a DROP OWNED BY.)
Note to patch readers: CreateRole's first CommandCounterIncrement
call is now unconditional, because this change creates another
case in which it's needed, and it seemed to be more trouble than
it's worth to preserve that micro-optimization.
Arguably this is a bug fix, but the fact that it changes the
expected contents of pg_shdepend seems like not a great thing
to do in the stable branches, and perhaps we don't want the
change in DROP OWNED BY semantics there either. On the other
hand, I opted not to force a catversion bump in HEAD, because
the presence or absence of these entries doesn't matter for
most purposes.
Reported-by: Virender Singla <virender.cse@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAM6Zo8woa62ZFHtMKox6a4jb8qQ=w87R2L0K8347iE-juQL2EA@mail.gmail.com
