Previously the exit handling was only able to exit from within the
main loop, and not from within the backend code it calls. Fix that by
using the standard die() SIGTERM handler, and adding the necessary
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() call.
This requires adding yet another process-type-specific branch to
ProcessInterrupts(), which hints that we probably should generalize
that handling. But that's work for another day.
Author: Petr Jelinek
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/fe072153-babd-3b5d-8052-73527a6eb657@2ndquadrant.com
The larger part of this patch replaces usages of MyProc->procLatch
with MyLatch. The latter works even early during backend startup,
where MyProc->procLatch doesn't yet. While the affected code
shouldn't run in cases where it's not initialized, it might get copied
into places where it might. Using MyLatch is simpler and a bit faster
to boot, so there's little point to stick with the previous coding.
While doing so I noticed some weaknesses around newly introduced uses
of latches that could lead to missed events, and an omitted
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() call in worker_spi.
As all the actual bugs are in v10 code, there doesn't seem to be
sufficient reason to backpatch this.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/20170606195321.sjmenrfgl2nu6j63@alap3.anarazel.dehttps://postgr.es/m/20170606210405.sim3yl6vpudhmufo@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: -
The logical replication worker processes now use the normal die()
handler for SIGTERM and CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() instead of custom code.
One problem before was that the apply worker would not exit promptly
when a subscription was dropped, which could lead to deadlocks.
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Reported-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Move the walrcv_disconnect() calls into the before_shmem_exit handler.
This makes sure the call is always made even during exit by signal, it
saves some duplicate code, and it makes the logic more similar to
walreceiver.c.
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Reduce some redundant messages to DEBUG1. Be clearer about the
distinction between apply workers and table synchronization workers.
Add subscription and table name where possible.
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
After the logical replication launcher was told to wake up at
commit (for example, by a CREATE SUBSCRIPTION command), the flag to wake
up was not reset, so it would be woken up at every following commit as
well. So fix that by resetting the flag.
Also, we don't need to wake up anything if the transaction was rolled
back. Just reset the flag in that case.
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Thinko in commit de4389712: this warning message references the wrong
"LogicalRepWorker *" variable. This would often result in a core dump,
but if it didn't, the message would show the wrong subscription OID.
In passing, adjust the message text to format a subscription OID
similarly to how that's done elsewhere in the function; and fix
grammatical issues in some nearby messages.
Per Coverity testing.
Previously the logical replication launcher stored the last timestamp
when it started the worker, in the local variable "last_start_time",
in order to check whether wal_retrive_retry_interval elapsed since
the last startup of worker. If it has elapsed, the launcher sees
pg_subscription and starts new worker if necessary. This is for
limitting the startup of worker to once a wal_retrieve_retry_interval.
The bug was that the variable "last_start_time" was defined and
always initialized with 0 at the beginning of the launcher's main loop.
So even if it's set to the last timestamp in later phase of the loop,
it's always reset to 0. Therefore the launcher could not check
correctly whether wal_retrieve_retry_interval elapsed since
the last startup.
This patch moves the variable "last_start_time" outside the main loop
so that it will not be reset.
Reviewed-by: Petr Jelinek
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwGJrPO++XM4mFENAwpy1eGXKsGdguYv43GUgLgU-x8nTQ@mail.gmail.com
The code was originally written with assumption that launcher is the
only process starting the worker. However that hasn't been true since
commit 7c4f52409 which failed to modify the worker management code
adequately.
This patch adds an in_use field to the LogicalRepWorker struct to
indicate whether the worker slot is being used and uses proper locking
everywhere this flag is set or read.
However if the parent process dies while the new worker is starting and
the new worker fails to attach to shared memory, this flag would never
get cleared. We solve this rare corner case by adding a sort of garbage
collector for in_use slots. This uses another field in the
LogicalRepWorker struct named launch_time that contains the time when
the worker was started. If any request to start a new worker does not
find free slot, we'll check for workers that were supposed to start but
took too long to actually do so, and reuse their slot.
In passing also fix possible race conditions when stopping a worker that
hasn't finished starting yet.
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Reported-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
* Be sure to reset the launcher's pid (LogicalRepCtx->launcher_pid) to 0
even when the launcher emits an error.
* Declare ApplyLauncherWakeup() as a static function because it's called
only in launcher.c.
* Previously IsBackendPId() was used to check whether the launcher's pid
was valid. IsBackendPid() was necessary because there was the bug where
the launcher's pid was not reset to 0. But now it's fixed, so IsBackendPid()
is not necessary and this patch removes it.
Author: Masahiko Sawada
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Reported-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAHGQGwFDWh_Qr-q_GEMpD+qH=vYPMdVqw=ZOSY3kX_Pna9R9SA@mail.gmail.com
Coverity complained because bgw.bgw_extra wasn't being filled in by
ApplyLauncherRegister(). The most future-proof fix is to memset the
whole BackgroundWorker struct to zeroes. While at it, let's apply the
same coding rule to other places that set up BackgroundWorker structs;
four out of five had the same or related issues.
On EXEC_BACKEND builds, this can fail if ASLR is in use.
Backpatch to 9.5. On master, completely remove the bgw_main field
completely, since there is no situation in which it is safe for an
EXEC_BACKEND build. On 9.6 and 9.5, leave the field intact to avoid
breaking things for third-party code that doesn't care about working
under EXEC_BACKEND. Prior to 9.5, there are no in-core bgworker
entrypoints.
Petr Jelinek, reviewed by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/09d8ad33-4287-a09b-a77f-77f8761adb5e@2ndquadrant.com
Add functionality for a new subscription to copy the initial data in the
tables and then sync with the ongoing apply process.
For the copying, add a new internal COPY option to have the COPY source
data provided by a callback function. The initial data copy works on
the subscriber by receiving COPY data from the publisher and then
providing it locally into a COPY that writes to the destination table.
A WAL receiver can now execute full SQL commands. This is used here to
obtain information about tables and publications.
Several new options were added to CREATE and ALTER SUBSCRIPTION to
control whether and when initial table syncing happens.
Change pg_dump option --no-create-subscription-slots to
--no-subscription-connect and use the new CREATE SUBSCRIPTION
... NOCONNECT option for that.
Author: Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Tested-by: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>
There's no really good reason why the autovacuum launcher and logical
replication launcher should announce themselves at startup and shutdown
by default. Users don't care that those processes exist, and it's
inconsistent that those background processes announce themselves while
others don't. So, reduce those messages from LOG to DEBUG1 level.
I was sorely tempted to reduce the "starting logical replication worker
for subscription ..." message to DEBUG1 as well, but forebore for now.
Those processes might possibly be of direct interest to users, at least
until logical replication is a lot better shaken out than it is today.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19479.1489121003@sss.pgh.pa.us
Any logical rep workers must have their subscription entries in
pg_subscription. To ensure this, we need to prevent the launcher
from starting new worker corresponding to the subscription that
DROP SUBSCRIPTION command is removing. To implement this,
previously LogicalRepLauncherLock was introduced and held until
the end of transaction running DROP SUBSCRIPTION. But using
LWLock for that purpose was not valid.
Instead, this commit changes DROP SUBSCRIPTION so that it takes
AccessExclusiveLock on pg_subscription, in order to ensure that
the launcher cannot see any subscriptions being removed. Also this
commit gets rid of LogicalRepLauncherLock.
Patch by me, reviewed by Petr Jelinek
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHGQGwHPi8ky-yANFfe0sgmhKtsYcQLTnKx07bW9S7-Rn1746w@mail.gmail.com
