Add new comments that spell out what VACUUM expects from heap pruning:
pruning must never leave behind DEAD tuples that still have tuple
storage. This has at least been the case since commit 8523492d, which
established the principle that vacuumlazy.c doesn't have to deal with
DEAD tuples that still have tuple storage directly, except perhaps by
simply retrying pruning (to handle a rare corner case involving
concurrent transaction abort).
In passing, update some references to old symbol names that were missed
by the snapshot scalability work (specifically commit dc7420c2c9).
Add hardening to the heapam index tuple deletion path to catch TIDs in
index pages that point to a heap item that index tuples should never
point to. The corruption we're trying to catch here is particularly
tricky to detect, since it typically involves "extra" (corrupt) index
tuples, as opposed to the absence of required index tuples in the index.
For example, a heap TID from an index page that turns out to point to an
LP_UNUSED item in the heap page has a good chance of being caught by one
of the new checks. There is a decent chance that the recently fixed
parallel VACUUM bug (see commit 9bacec15) would have been caught had
that particular check been in place for Postgres 14. No backpatch of
this extra hardening for now, though.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzk-4_raTzawWGaiqNvkpwDXxv3y1AQhQyUeHfkU=tFCeA@mail.gmail.com
Commit b4af70cb inverted the return value of the function
parallel_processing_is_safe(), but missed the amvacuumcleanup test.
Index AMs that don't support parallel cleanup at all were affected.
The practical consequences of this bug were not very serious. Hash
indexes are affected, but since they just return the number of blocks
during hashvacuumcleanup anyway, it can't have had much impact.
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoA-Em+aeVPmBbL_s1V-ghsJQSxYL-i3JP8nTfPiD1wjKw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 14-, where commit b4af70cb appears.
Commit b4af70cb, which simplified state managed by VACUUM, performed
refactoring of parallel VACUUM in passing. Confusion about the exact
details of the tasks that the leader process is responsible for led to
code that made it possible for parallel VACUUM to miss a subset of the
table's indexes entirely. Specifically, indexes that fell under the
min_parallel_index_scan_size size cutoff were missed. These indexes are
supposed to be vacuumed by the leader (alongside any parallel unsafe
indexes), but weren't vacuumed at all. Affected indexes could easily
end up with duplicate heap TIDs, once heap TIDs were recycled for new
heap tuples. This had generic symptoms that might be seen with almost
any index corruption involving structural inconsistencies between an
index and its table.
To fix, make sure that the parallel VACUUM leader process performs any
required index vacuuming for indexes that happen to be below the size
cutoff. Also document the design of parallel VACUUM with these
below-size-cutoff indexes.
It's unclear how many users might be affected by this bug. There had to
be at least three indexes on the table to hit the bug: a smaller index,
plus at least two additional indexes that themselves exceed the size
cutoff. Cases with just one additional index would not run into
trouble, since the parallel VACUUM cost model requires two
larger-than-cutoff indexes on the table to apply any parallel
processing. Note also that autovacuum was not affected, since it never
uses parallel processing.
Test case based on tests from a larger patch to test parallel VACUUM by
Masahiko Sawada.
Many thanks to Kamigishi Rei for her invaluable help with tracking this
problem down.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reported-By: Kamigishi Rei <iijima.yun@koumakan.jp>
Reported-By: Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Diagnosed-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Bug: #17245
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17245-ddf06aaf85735f36@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211030023740.qbnsl2xaoh2grq3d@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 14-, where the refactoring commit appears.
Commit d168b66682, which overhauled index deletion, added a
pg_unreachable() to the end of a sort comparator used when sorting heap
TIDs from an index page. This allows the compiler to apply
optimizations that assume that the heap TIDs from the index AM must
always be unique.
That doesn't seem like a good idea now, given recent reports of
corruption involving duplicate TIDs in indexes on Postgres 14. Demote
to an assertion, just in case.
Backpatch: 14-, where index deletion was overhauled.
Remove obsolete reference to lazy_vacuum()'s onecall argument. The
function argument was removed by commit 3499df0dee.
Also remove adjoining comment block that introduces the wraparound
failsafe concept. Talking about the failsafe here no longer makes
sense, since lazy_vacuum() (and related functions) are no longer the
only place where the failsafe might be triggered. This has been the
case since commit c242baa4a8 taught VACUUM to consider triggering the
failsafe mechanism during its initial heap scan.
Checking that an offset number isn't past the end of a heap page's line
pointer array was just a defensive sanity check for HOT-chain traversal
code before commit 3c3b8a4b. It's etrictly necessary now, though. Add
comments that reference the issue to code in heapam that needs to get it
right.
Per suggestion from Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f76a292c-9170-1aef-91a0-59d9443b99a3@gmail.com
A broken HOT chain is not an unexpected condition, even when the offset
number points past the end of the page's line pointer array.
heap_prune_chain() does not (and never has) treated this condition as
unexpected, so derivative code in heap_index_delete_tuples() shouldn't
do so either.
Oversight in commit 4228817449.
The assertion can probably only fail on Postgres 14 and master. Earlier
releases don't have commit 3c3b8a4b, which taught VACUUM to truncate the
line pointer array of heap pages. Backpatch all the same, just to be
consistent.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-By: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17197-9438f31f46705182@postgresql.org
Backpatch: 12-, just like commit 4228817449.
All the code paths simplified here were already using a boolean or used
an expression that led to zero or one, making the extra bits
unnecessary.
Author: Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Michael Paquier, Peter Smith
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210428182936.GE27406@telsasoft.com
It doesn't make any sense to report this information, since VACUUM
VERBOSE reports on heap relation truncation directly. This was an
oversight in commit 7ab96cf6, which made VACUUM VERBOSE output a little
more consistent with nearby autovacuum-specific log output. Adjust
comments that describe how this is supposed to work in passing.
Also bring truncation-related VACUUM VERBOSE output in line with the
convention established for VACUUM VERBOSE output by commit f4f4a649.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Backpatch: 14-, where VACUUM VERBOSE's output changed.
The field hasn't been used since commit 3d351d91, which redefined
pg_class.reltuples to be -1 before the first VACUUM or ANALYZE.
Also rename a local variable of the same name ("old_rel_pages"). This is
used by relation truncation to represent the original relation size at
the start of the ongoing VACUUM operation. Rename it to orig_rel_pages,
since that's a lot clearer. (This name matches similar nearby code.)
Most data-corruption reports mention the location of the problem, but
this one failed to. Add it.
Backpatch all the way back. In 12 and older, also assign the
ERRCODE_DATA_CORRUPTED error code as was done in commit fd6ec93bf8 for
13 and later.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202108191637.oqyzrdtnheir@alvherre.pgsql
Adjust track_io_timing related logging code added by commit 94d13d474d.
Make it consistent with other nearby autovacuum and autoanalyze logging
code by removing logic that suppressed zero millisecond outputs.
log_autovacuum_min_duration log output now reliably shows "read:" and
"write:" millisecond-based values in its report (when track_io_timing is
enabled).
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznW0FNxSVQMSRazAMYNfZ6DR_gr5WE78hc6E1CBkkJpzw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 14-, where the track_io_timing logging was introduced.
This order seems more natural. It starts with details that are
particular to heap and index data structures, and ends with system-level
costs incurred during the autovacuum worker's VACUUM/ANALYZE operation.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkzxK6ahA9xxsOftRtBX_R0swuHZsvo4QUbak1Bz7hb7Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 14-, which enhanced the log output in various ways.
This was arguably a minor oversight in commit b4af70cb, which cleaned up
the function signatures of functions that modify IndexBulkDeleteResult
variables.
During a VACUUM or CLUSTER command, the initial output emits a
fully qualified relation path with namespace. The post-action
errmsg only emitted the relation name however, which may lead
to hard to parse output when using multiple jobs with vacuumdb
as the output from different jobs may be interleaved. Include
the full path in the post-action errmsg to be consistent with
the initial errmsg.
Author: Mike Fiedler <miketheman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMerE0oz+8G-aORZL_BJcPxnBqewZAvND4bSUysjz+r-oT1BxQ@mail.gmail.com
They are used in code that runs both during normal operation and during
WAL replay, and needs to behave differently during replay. Move them to
xlogutils.c, because that's where we have other helper functions used by
redo routines.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b3b71061-4919-e882-4857-27e370ab134a%40iki.fi
The idea behind this patch is to design out bugs like the one fixed
by commit 9d523119f. Previously, once one did RelationOpenSmgr(rel),
it was considered okay to access rel->rd_smgr directly for some
not-very-clear interval. But since that pointer will be cleared by
relcache flushes, we had bugs arising from overreliance on a previous
RelationOpenSmgr call still being effective.
Now, very little code except that in rel.h and relcache.c should ever
touch the rd_smgr field directly. The normal coding rule is to use
RelationGetSmgr(rel) and not expect the result to be valid for longer
than one smgr function call. There are a couple of places where using
the function every single time seemed like overkill, but they are now
annotated with large warning comments.
Amul Sul, after an idea of mine.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANiYTQsU7yMFpQYnv=BrcRVqK_3U3mtAzAsJCaqtzsDHfsUbdQ@mail.gmail.com
This has the advantage to make a process more responsive when the
postmaster dies, even if the wait time was rather limited as there was
only a 50ms timeout here. Another advantage of this change is for
monitoring, as we gain a new wait event for the end-of-vacuum
truncation.
Author: Bharath Rupireddy
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev, Thomas Munro, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACU4AdPCq6NLfcA-ZGwX7pPCK5FgEj-CAU0xCKzkASSy_A@mail.gmail.com
The failsafe can trigger when index processing is already disabled.
This can happen when VACUUM's INDEX_CLEANUP parameter is "off" and the
failsafe happens to trigger. Remove assertions that assume that index
processing is directly tied to the failsafe.
Oversight in commit c242baa4, which made it possible for the failsafe to
trigger in a two-pass strategy VACUUM that has yet to make its first
call to lazy_vacuum_all_indexes().
Generalize the INDEX_CLEANUP VACUUM parameter (and the corresponding
reloption): make it into a ternary style boolean parameter. It now
exposes a third option, "auto". The "auto" option (which is now the
default) enables the "bypass index vacuuming" optimization added by
commit 1e55e7d1.
"VACUUM (INDEX_CLEANUP TRUE)" is redefined to once again make VACUUM
simply do any required index vacuuming, regardless of how few dead
tuples are encountered during the first scan of the target heap relation
(unless there are exactly zero). This gives users a way of opting out
of the "bypass index vacuuming" optimization, if for whatever reason
that proves necessary. It is also expected to be used by PostgreSQL
developers as a testing option from time to time.
"VACUUM (INDEX_CLEANUP FALSE)" does the same thing as it always has: it
forcibly disables both index vacuuming and index cleanup. It's not
expected to be used much in PostgreSQL 14. The failsafe mechanism added
by commit 1e55e7d1 addresses the same problem in a simpler way.
INDEX_CLEANUP can now be thought of as a testing and compatibility
option.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznrBoCST4_Gxh_G9hA8NzGUbeBGnOUC8FcXcrhqsv6OHQ@mail.gmail.com
Bugfix commit 5fc89376 effectively made the lock_waiter_detected field
from vacuumlazy.c's global state struct into private state owned by
lazy_truncate_heap(). Finish this off by replacing the struct field
with a local variable.
The extra checks added by the recompression of toast data introduced in
bbe0a81 is proving to have a performance impact on VACUUM or CLUSTER
even if no recompression is done. This is more noticeable with more
toastable columns that contain non-NULL values.
Improvements could be done to make those extra checks less expensive,
but that's not material for 14 at this stage, and we are not sure either
if the code path of VACUUM FULL/CLUSTER is adapted for this job.
Per discussion with several people, including Andres Freund, Robert
Haas, Álvaro Herrera, Tom Lane and myself.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210527003144.xxqppojoiwurc2iz@alap3.anarazel.de
Fix a few places that were using appendStringInfo() when they should have
been using appendStringInfoString(). Also some cases of
appendPQExpBuffer() that would have been better suited to use
appendPQExpBufferChar(), and finally, some places that used
appendPQExpBuffer() when appendPQExpBufferStr() would have suited better.
There are no bugs are being fixed here. The aim is just to make the code
use the most optimal function for the job.
All the code being changed here is new to PG14. It makes sense to fix
these before we branch for PG15. There are a few other places that we
could fix, but those cases are older code so fixing those seems less
worthwhile as it may cause unnecessary back-patching pain in the future.
Author: Hou Zhijie
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716732158B1C4142C6FE375943D9@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Redefine '\0' (InvalidCompressionMethod) as meaning "if we need to
compress, use the current setting of default_toast_compression".
This allows '\0' to be a suitable default choice regardless of
datatype, greatly simplifying code paths that initialize tupledescs
and the like. It seems like a more user-friendly approach as well,
because now the default compression choice doesn't migrate into table
definitions, meaning that changing default_toast_compression is
usually sufficient to flip an installation's behavior; one needn't
tediously issue per-column ALTER SET COMPRESSION commands.
Along the way, fix a few minor bugs and documentation issues
with the per-column-compression feature. Adopt more robust
APIs for SetIndexStorageProperties and GetAttributeCompression.
Bump catversion because typical contents of attcompression will now
be different. We could get away without doing that, but it seems
better to ensure v14 installations all agree on this. (We already
forced initdb for beta2, anyway.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/626613.1621787110@sss.pgh.pa.us
VACUUM FULL and CLUSTER can be used to enforce the use of the existing
compression method of a toastable column if a value currently stored is
compressed with a method that does not match the column's defined
method. The code in charge of decompressing and recompressing toast
values at rewrite left around the detoasted values, causing an
accumulation of memory allocated in TopTransactionContext.
When processing large relations, this could cause the system to run out
of memory. The detoasted values are not needed once their tuple is
rewritten, and this commit ensures that the necessary cleanup happens.
Issue introduced by bbe0a81d. The comments of the area are reordered a
bit while on it.
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Analyzed-by: Andres Freund
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210521211929.pcehg6f23icwstdb@alap3.anarazel.de
The wraparound failsafe mechanism added by commit 1e55e7d1 handled the
one-pass strategy case (i.e. the "table has no indexes" case) by adding
a dedicated failsafe check. This made up for the fact that the usual
one-pass checks inside lazy_vacuum_all_indexes() cannot ever be reached
during a one-pass strategy VACUUM.
This approach failed to account for two-pass VACUUMs that opt out of
index vacuuming up-front. The INDEX_CLEANUP off case in the only case
that works like that.
Fix this by performing a failsafe check every 4GB during the first scan
of the heap, regardless of the details of the VACUUM. This eliminates
the special case, and will make the failsafe trigger more reliably.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-By: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210424002921.pb3t7h6frupdqnkp@alap3.anarazel.de
The percentage of blocks from the table value reported by autovacuum log
output (following commit 5100010ee4) should never exceed 100% because
it describes the state of the table back when lazy_vacuum() was called.
The value could nevertheless exceed 100% in the event of heap relation
truncation. We failed to compensate for how truncation affects
rel_pages.
Fix the faulty accounting by using the original rel_pages value instead
of the current/final rel_pages value.
Reported-By: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210423204306.5osfpkt2ggaedyvy@alap3.anarazel.de
Also "make reformat-dat-files".
The only change worthy of note is that pgindent messed up the formatting
of launcher.c's struct LogicalRepWorkerId, which led me to notice that
that struct wasn't used at all anymore, so I just took it out.
Previously long was used as the data type for some counters in BufferUsage
and WalUsage. But long is only four byte, e.g., on Windows, and it's entirely
possible to wrap a four byte counter. For example, emitting more than
four billion WAL records in one transaction isn't actually particularly rare.
To avoid the overflows of those counters, this commit changes the data type
of them from long to int64.
Suggested-by: Andres Freund
Author: Masahiro Ikeda
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20201221211650.k7b53tcnadrciqjo@alap3.anarazel.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/af0964ac-7080-1984-dc23-513754987716@oss.nttdata.com
It's unusual to have any resjunk columns in an ON CONFLICT ... UPDATE
list, but it can happen when MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK SubPlans are present.
If it happens, the ON CONFLICT UPDATE code path would end up storing
tuples that include the values of the extra resjunk columns. That's
fairly harmless in the short run, but if new columns are added to
the table then the values would become accessible, possibly leading
to malfunctions if they don't match the datatypes of the new columns.
This had escaped notice through a confluence of missing sanity checks,
including
* There's no cross-check that a tuple presented to heap_insert or
heap_update matches the table rowtype. While it's difficult to
check that fully at reasonable cost, we can easily add assertions
that there aren't too many columns.
* The output-column-assignment cases in execExprInterp.c lacked
any sanity checks on the output column numbers, which seems like
an oversight considering there are plenty of assertion checks on
input column numbers. Add assertions there too.
* We failed to apply nodeModifyTable's ExecCheckPlanOutput() to
the ON CONFLICT UPDATE tlist. That wouldn't have caught this
specific error, since that function is chartered to ignore resjunk
columns; but it sure seems like a bad omission now that we've seen
this bug.
In HEAD, the right way to fix this is to make the processing of
ON CONFLICT UPDATE tlists work the same as regular UPDATE tlists
now do, that is don't add "SET x = x" entries, and use
ExecBuildUpdateProjection to evaluate the tlist and combine it with
old values of the not-set columns. This adds a little complication
to ExecBuildUpdateProjection, but allows removal of a comparable
amount of now-dead code from the planner.
In the back branches, the most expedient solution seems to be to
(a) use an output slot for the ON CONFLICT UPDATE projection that
actually matches the target table, and then (b) invent a variant of
ExecBuildProjectionInfo that can be told to not store values resulting
from resjunk columns, so it doesn't try to store into nonexistent
columns of the output slot. (We can't simply ignore the resjunk columns
altogether; they have to be evaluated for MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK to work.)
This works back to v10. In 9.6, projections work much differently and
we can't cheaply give them such an option. The 9.6 version of this
patch works by inserting a JunkFilter when it's necessary to get rid
of resjunk columns.
In addition, v11 and up have the reverse problem when trying to
perform ON CONFLICT UPDATE on a partitioned table. Through a
further oversight, adjust_partition_tlist() discarded resjunk columns
when re-ordering the ON CONFLICT UPDATE tlist to match a partition.
This accidentally prevented the storing-bogus-tuples problem, but
at the cost that MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK cases didn't work, typically
crashing if more than one row has to be updated. Fix by preserving
resjunk columns in that routine. (I failed to resist the temptation
to add more assertions there too, and to do some minor code
beautification.)
Per report from Andres Freund. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Security: CVE-2021-32028
Document VACUUM's soft assumption that any LP_DEAD items encountered
during pruning will become LP_UNUSED items before VACUUM finishes up.
This is integral to the accounting used by VACUUM to generate its final
report on the table to the stats collector. It also affects how VACUUM
determines which heap pages are truncatable. In both cases VACUUM is
concerned with the likely contents of the page in the near future, not
the current contents of the page.
This state of affairs created the false impression that VACUUM's dead
tuple accounting had significant difference with similar accounting used
during ANALYZE. There were and are no substantive differences, at least
when the soft assumption completely works out. This is far clearer now.
Also document cases where things don't quite work out for VACUUM's dead
tuple accounting. It's possible that a significant number of LP_DEAD
items will be left behind by VACUUM, and won't be recorded as remaining
dead tuples in VACUUM's statistics collector report. This behavior
dates back to commit a96c41fe, which taught VACUUM to run without index
and heap vacuuming at the user's request. The failsafe mechanism added
to VACUUM more recently by commit 1e55e7d1 takes the same approach to
dead tuple accounting.
Reported-By: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=Jmtu18PrsYq3EvvZJGOmZqSO2u3bvKpx9xJa5uhNp=Q@mail.gmail.com
It seems like a good idea to bypass heap truncation when the wraparound
failsafe mechanism (which was added in commit 1e55e7d1) is in effect.
Deliberately don't bypass heap truncation in the INDEX_CLEANUP=off case,
even though it is similar to the failsafe case. There is already a
separate reloption (and related VACUUM parameter) for that.
Reported-By: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoDWRh6oTN5T8wa+cpZUVpHXET8BJ8Da7WHVHpwkPP6KLg@mail.gmail.com
heap_update needs to clear any existing "all visible" flag on
the old tuple's page (and on the new page too, if different).
Per coding rules, to do this it must acquire pin on the appropriate
visibility-map page while not holding exclusive buffer lock;
which creates a race condition since someone else could set the
flag whenever we're not holding the buffer lock. The code is
supposed to handle that by re-checking the flag after acquiring
buffer lock and retrying if it became set. However, one code
path through heap_update itself, as well as one in its subroutine
RelationGetBufferForTuple, failed to do this. The end result,
in the unlikely event that a concurrent VACUUM did set the flag
while we're transiently not holding lock, is a non-recurring
"PANIC: wrong buffer passed to visibilitymap_clear" failure.
This has been seen a few times in the buildfarm since recent VACUUM
changes that added code paths that could set the all-visible flag
while holding only exclusive buffer lock. Previously, the flag
was (usually?) set only after doing LockBufferForCleanup, which
would insist on buffer pin count zero, thus preventing the flag
from becoming set partway through heap_update. However, it's
clear that it's heap_update not VACUUM that's at fault here.
What's less clear is whether there is any hazard from these bugs
in released branches. heap_update is certainly violating API
expectations, but if there is no code path that can set all-visible
without a cleanup lock then it's only a latent bug. That's not
100% certain though, besides which we should worry about extensions
or future back-patch fixes that could introduce such code paths.
I chose to back-patch to v12. Fixing RelationGetBufferForTuple
before that would require also back-patching portions of older
fixes (notably 0d1fe9f74), which is more code churn than seems
prudent to fix a hypothetical issue.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2247102.1618008027@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit 6f38d4dac3 failed to heed a warning about the stability of the
value pointed to by "otid". The caller is allowed to pass in a pointer to
newtup->t_self, which will be updated during the execution of the
function. Instead, the SSI check should use the value we copy into
oldtup.t_self near the top of the function.
Not a live bug, because newtup->t_self doesn't really get updated until
a bit later, but it was confusing and broke the rule established by the
comment.
Back-patch to 13.
Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2689164.1618160085%40sss.pgh.pa.us
VACUUM has never needed to call ambulkdelete() for each index in cases
where there are precisely zero TIDs in its dead_tuples array by the end
of its first pass over the heap (also its only pass over the heap in
this scenario). Index vacuuming is simply not required when this
happens. Index cleanup will still go ahead, but in practice most calls
to amvacuumcleanup() are usually no-ops when there were zero preceding
ambulkdelete() calls. In short, VACUUM has generally managed to avoid
index scans when there were clearly no index tuples to delete from
indexes. But cases with _close to_ no index tuples to delete were
another matter -- a round of ambulkdelete() calls took place (one per
index), each of which performed a full index scan.
VACUUM now behaves just as if there were zero index tuples to delete in
cases where there are in fact "virtually zero" such tuples. That is, it
can now bypass index vacuuming and heap vacuuming as an optimization
(though not index cleanup). Whether or not VACUUM bypasses indexes is
determined dynamically, based on the just-observed number of heap pages
in the table that have one or more LP_DEAD items (LP_DEAD items in heap
pages have a 1:1 correspondence with index tuples that still need to be
deleted from each index in the worst case).
We only skip index vacuuming when 2% or less of the table's pages have
one or more LP_DEAD items -- bypassing index vacuuming as an
optimization must not noticeably impede setting bits in the visibility
map. As a further condition, the dead_tuples array (i.e. VACUUM's array
of LP_DEAD item TIDs) must not exceed 32MB at the point that the first
pass over the heap finishes, which is also when the decision to bypass
is made. (The VACUUM must also have been able to fit all TIDs in its
maintenance_work_mem-bound dead_tuples space, though with a default
maintenance_work_mem setting it can't matter.)
This avoids surprising jumps in the duration and overhead of routine
vacuuming with workloads where successive VACUUM operations consistently
have almost zero dead index tuples. The number of LP_DEAD items may
well accumulate over multiple VACUUM operations, before finally the
threshold is crossed and VACUUM performs conventional index vacuuming.
Even then, the optimization will have avoided a great deal of largely
unnecessary index vacuuming.
In the future we may teach VACUUM to skip index vacuuming on a per-index
basis, using a much more sophisticated approach. For now we only
consider the extreme cases, where we can be quite confident that index
vacuuming just isn't worth it using simple heuristics.
Also log information about how many heap pages have one or more LP_DEAD
items when autovacuum logging is enabled.
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoD0SkE11fMw4jD4RENAwBMcw1wasVnwpJVw3tVqPOQgAw@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzmkebqPd4MVGuPTOS9bMFvp9MDs5cRTCOsv1rQJ3jCbXw@mail.gmail.com
Add a failsafe mechanism that is triggered by VACUUM when it notices
that the table's relfrozenxid and/or relminmxid are dangerously far in
the past. VACUUM checks the age of the table dynamically, at regular
intervals.
When the failsafe triggers, VACUUM takes extraordinary measures to
finish as quickly as possible so that relfrozenxid and/or relminmxid can
be advanced. VACUUM will stop applying any cost-based delay that may be
in effect. VACUUM will also bypass any further index vacuuming and heap
vacuuming -- it only completes whatever remaining pruning and freezing
is required. Bypassing index/heap vacuuming is enabled by commit
8523492d, which made it possible to dynamically trigger the mechanism
already used within VACUUM when it is run with INDEX_CLEANUP off.
It is expected that the failsafe will almost always trigger within an
autovacuum to prevent wraparound, long after the autovacuum began.
However, the failsafe mechanism can trigger in any VACUUM operation.
Even in a non-aggressive VACUUM, where we're likely to not advance
relfrozenxid, it still seems like a good idea to finish off remaining
pruning and freezing. An aggressive/anti-wraparound VACUUM will be
launched immediately afterwards. Note that the anti-wraparound VACUUM
that follows will itself trigger the failsafe, usually before it even
begins its first (and only) pass over the heap.
The failsafe is controlled by two new GUCs: vacuum_failsafe_age, and
vacuum_multixact_failsafe_age. There are no equivalent reloptions,
since that isn't expected to be useful. The GUCs have rather high
defaults (both default to 1.6 billion), and are expected to generally
only be used to make the failsafe trigger sooner/more frequently.
Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoD0SkE11fMw4jD4RENAwBMcw1wasVnwpJVw3tVqPOQgAw@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzmgH3ySGYeC-m-eOBsa2=sDwa292-CFghV4rESYo39FsQ@mail.gmail.com
Teach VACUUM to truncate the line pointer array of each heap page when a
contiguous group of LP_UNUSED line pointers appear at the end of the
array -- these unused and unreferenced items are excluded. This process
occurs during VACUUM's second pass over the heap, right after LP_DEAD
line pointers on the page (those encountered/pruned during the first
pass) are marked LP_UNUSED.
Truncation avoids line pointer bloat with certain workloads,
particularly those involving continual range DELETEs and bulk INSERTs
against the same table.
Also harden heapam code to check for an out-of-range page offset number
in places where we weren't already doing so.
Author: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEze2WjgaQc55Y5f5CQd3L=eS5CZcff2Obxp=O6pto8-f0hC4w@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzn6a64PJM1Ggzm=uvx2otsopJMhFQj_g1rAj4GWr3ZSzw@mail.gmail.com
