The replica identity determination was "flawed": it fell back to the
primary key if the marked index was dropped, which is a defensible
choice, but logical decoding has a differing opinion and fails to
provide usable tuple identity data in this case. "Fix" REPACK by
refusing to use the primary key in that case.
This is arguably broken behavior in RelationGetIndexList, but I'll
refrain from changing that at this stage.
Reported-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Author: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Author: Ewan Young <kdbase.hack@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 19
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/apCBRKCH8jwKiaSY@nathan
Previously, running REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) on a materialized view failed
with a confusing "has no identity index" error.
REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) replays changes decoded from WAL, but a
materialized view produces none, since it cannot be modified by DML and
REFRESH rewrites it through a transient heap that is not logically
decoded.
Fix this by reporting a clear error for materialized views upfront,
alongside the existing checks for system catalogs and TOAST tables, and
document the limitation.
Author: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kiran Kaki <itskkpg@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 19
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACXPvy4_LkQ0nHKgbZjAGK9fkDqRYUvXA3hgwxPm_X7Eng@mail.gmail.com
REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) is not an MVCC-safe operation; it doesn't
preserve the visibility information, which logical decoding needs
because it reads user catalog tables under a historic snapshot.
Disallow REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) on user catalog tables. Removing this
check requires making it MVCC-safe and logical rewrite mappings.
Backpatch to v19, where REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) was introduced.
Reported-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Author: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/apBIFWzHYOaG0auN%40nathan
Backpatch-through: 19
Nothing is to be gained from using pgrepack outside of REPACK
(CONCURRENTLY), and it leads to assertion failures in assertion-enabled
builds, and to crashes due to bogus memory lifetime in production
builds. Reject attempts to do that with a clean error report.
Clean up the nearby code a tad while at it. The only functional changes
in that are that the output_writer_private context is allocated and
partially filled by the pgrepack output plugin; and that ->relid therein
is now always present (rather than only in assertion-enabled builds).
Other than that it's just minor code rearrangement and added comments.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reported-by: Nikita Kalinin <n.kalinin@postgrespro.ru>
Suggested-by: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> (older version)
Reviewed-by: Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133@gmail.com> (older version)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19500-38a02529a69353a5@postgresql.org
The coverage report shows that some error cases were not being tested;
add test cases for them.
While at it, move some recently added ones to the test_decoding suite:
the preventative check added in 43649b6a53 now causes servers with
wal_level=minimal to error out earlier than before.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Baji Shaik <baji.pgdev@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ahiwD29RNfVT4tjQ@alvherre.pgsql
Commit 28d534e2ae introduced reform_tuple() with a fast path that
returns the source tuple verbatim when no dropped columns require fixing
up. I (Álvaro) failed to realize that this broke handling of columns
with a 'missingval' defined: after a VACUUM FULL, CLUSTER, or REPACK
operation, the catalogued missingval is thrown away, so the tuples are
no longer correct.
Fix by forcing the rewrite when the tuple is shorter than the tuple
descriptor.
Author: Satya Narlapuram <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHg+QDeoccU5CudrJpmSKZfKZ1gRMNY=5BxSC=JpHgkonzgcOw@mail.gmail.com
These tests sometimes run with wal_level=minimal, which does not allow
to run REPACK (CONCURRENTLY). Move them to test_decoding, which is
ensured to run with high enough wal_level.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/260901.1776696126@sss.pgh.pa.us
