> the DTK_MICROSEC case is just like the DTK_MILLISEC case.
> I think this is wrong and it ought to look like
> fsec = rint(fsec * 1000000) / 1000000;
> no?
Tom Lane.
"HAS_LONG_LONG" is defined based on the assumption that
strtol() would return ERANGE if a platform does not support
64-bit integers. In current PostgreSQL 6.5 (and 6.4.2)
distribution, "HAS_LONG_LONG" is defined only if platform
is "alpha". (See include/port/alpha.h) I think the int4
range check should apply to linux_alpha as well. (I have
not tested yet but I guess this might be applicable to
newer Linux/i386 distributions which includes new GCC which
implements long int as 64-bit int.)
with expression_tree_walker-based code. The former failed to cope with
expressions containing SubLinks, and the latter returned TRUE for both
SubLinks and Aggrefs (cut-and-paste bug?). There is a lot more scope for
using expression_tree_walker in this module, but I'll restrain myself
until the 6.6 split occurs from touching not-demonstrably-broken code.
is parse_aggs.c. This fixes its failure to cope with (at least) CaseExpr
and ArrayRef nodes, which is the reason why both of these fail in 6.5:
select coalesce(f1,0) from int4_tbl group by f1;
ERROR: Illegal use of aggregates or non-group column in target list
select sentence.words[0] from sentence group by sentence.words[0];
ERROR: Illegal use of aggregates or non-group column in target list
The array case still fails, but at least it's not parse_agg's fault
anymore ... considering that we now support CASE officially, I think
it's important to fix the first example ...
will gradually replace all of the boilerplate tree-walk-recursion code that
currently exists in O(N) slightly different forms in N subroutines.
I've had it with adding missing cases to these subroutines...
