Per discussion, the value of fixing these bugs in the back branches
doesn't outweigh the downsides of changing corner-case behavior in
a minor release. Hence, revert commits 217d8f3a1 and 4d864de48 in
the v10 branch and the corresponding commits in 9.3-9.6.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/75DB81BEEA95B445AE6D576A0A5C9E936A73E741@BPXM05GP.gisp.nec.co.jp
While looking at a recent buildfarm failure in the ecpg tests, I wondered
why the pg_regress output claimed the stderr part of the test failed, when
the regression diffs were clearly for the stdout part. Looking into it,
the reason is that pg_regress.c's logic for iterating over three parallel
lists is wrong, and has been wrong since it was written: it advances the
"tag" pointer at a different place in the loop than the other two pointers.
Fix that.
Buildfarm results show that the modern POSIX rule that 1 ^ NaN = 1 is not
honored on *BSD until relatively recently, and really old platforms don't
believe that NaN ^ 0 = 1 either. (This is unsurprising, perhaps, since
SUSv2 doesn't require either behavior.) In hopes of getting to platform
independent behavior, let's deal with all the NaN-input cases explicitly
in dpow().
Note that numeric_power() doesn't know either of these special cases.
But since that behavior is platform-independent, I think it should be
addressed separately, and probably not back-patched.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/75DB81BEEA95B445AE6D576A0A5C9E936A73E741@BPXM05GP.gisp.nec.co.jp
DST law changes in Palestine and Antarctica (Casey Station). Historical
corrections for Portugal and its colonies, as well as Enderbury, Jamaica,
Turks & Caicos Islands, and Uruguay.
Per spec, the result of power() should be NaN if either input is NaN.
It appears that on some versions of Windows, the libc function does
return NaN, but it also sets errno = EDOM, confusing our code that
attempts to work around shortcomings of other platforms. Hence, add
guard tests to avoid substituting a wrong result for the right one.
It's been like this for a long time (and the odd behavior only appears
in older MSVC releases, too) so back-patch to all supported branches.
Dang Minh Huong, reviewed by David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/75DB81BEEA95B445AE6D576A0A5C9E936A73E741@BPXM05GP.gisp.nec.co.jp
The predecessor test boiled down to "PQserverVersion(NULL) >= 100000",
which is always false. No release includes that, so it could not have
reintroduced CVE-2018-1058. Back-patch to 9.4, like the addition of the
predecessor in commit 8d2814f274def85f39fbe997d454b01628cb5667.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180422215551.GB2676194@rfd.leadboat.com
EventTriggerTableRewrite crashed if there were table_rewrite triggers
present, but there had not been when the calling command started.
EventTriggerDDLCommandEnd called ddl_command_end triggers if present,
even if there had been no such triggers when the calling command started,
which would lead to a failure in pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands.
In both cases, fix by doing nothing; it's better to wait till the next
command when things will be properly initialized.
In passing, remove an elog(DEBUG1) call that might have seemed interesting
four years ago but surely isn't today.
We found this because of intermittent failures in the buildfarm. Thanks
to Alvaro Herrera and Andrew Gierth for analysis.
Back-patch to 9.5; some of this code exists before that, but the specific
hazards we need to guard against don't.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5767.1523995174@sss.pgh.pa.us
On further reflection, commit e5d83995e didn't go far enough: pretty much
everywhere in the planner that examines a clause's is_pushed_down flag
ought to be changed to use the more complicated behavior where we also
check the clause's required_relids. Otherwise we could make incorrect
decisions about whether, say, a clause is safe to use as a hash clause.
Some (many?) of these places are safe as-is, either because they are
never reached while considering a parameterized path, or because there
are additional checks that would reject a pushed-down clause anyway.
However, it seems smarter to just code them all the same way rather
than rely on easily-broken reasoning of that sort.
In support of that, invent a new macro RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN that should
be used in place of direct tests on the is_pushed_down flag.
Like the previous patch, back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f8128b11-c5bf-3539-48cd-234178b2314d@proxel.se
In commits e5d83995e et al, I changed the signature of
extract_actual_join_clauses, thinking that it was not called from
anywhere but createplan.c. I missed that postgres_fdw uses it
in the 9.6 branch only.
This opens up the question of whether any third-party modules might
be calling it, and whether we need to take steps to avoid an API break
for them. But for the moment, just get the buildfarm green again.
In some cases a clause attached to an outer join can be pushed down into
the outer join's RHS even though the clause is not degenerate --- this
can happen if we choose to make a parameterized path for the RHS. If
the clause ends up attached to a lower outer join, we'd misclassify it
as being a "join filter" not a plain "filter" condition at that node,
leading to wrong query results.
To fix, teach extract_actual_join_clauses to examine each join clause's
required_relids, not just its is_pushed_down flag. (The latter now
seems vestigial, or at least in need of rethinking, but we won't do
anything so invasive as redefining it in a bug-fix patch.)
This has been wrong since we introduced parameterized paths in 9.2,
though it's evidently hard to hit given the lack of previous reports.
The test case used here involves a lateral function call, and I think
that a lateral reference may be required to get the planner to select
a broken plan; though I wouldn't swear to that. In any case, even if
LATERAL is needed to trigger the bug, it still affects all supported
branches, so back-patch to all.
Per report from Andreas Karlsson. Thanks to Andrew Gierth for
preliminary investigation.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f8128b11-c5bf-3539-48cd-234178b2314d@proxel.se
Commit 54eff5311 did not account for the possibility that we'd have
a transaction snapshot due to default_transaction_isolation being
set high enough to require one. The transaction snapshot is enough
to hold back our advertised xmin and thus risk deadlock anyway.
The only way to get rid of that snap is to start a new transaction,
so let's do that instead. Also throw in an assert checking that we
really have gotten to a state where no xmin is being advertised.
Back-patch to 9.4, like the previous commit.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1ztk3TpQdcUNbxq93pc80FrXUjpDWLGMeVBDx71GHNwZQ@mail.gmail.com
spg_text_leaf_consistent() supposed that it should compare only
Min(querylen, entrylen) bytes of the two strings, and then deal with
any excess bytes in one string or the other by assuming the longer
string is greater if the prefixes are equal. Quite aside from the
fact that that's just wrong in some locales (e.g., 'ch' is not less
than 'd' in cs_CZ), it also risked passing incomplete multibyte
characters to strcoll(), with ensuing bad results.
Instead, just pass the full strings to varstr_cmp, and let it decide
what to do about unequal-length strings.
Fortunately, this error doesn't imply any index corruption, it's just
that searches might return the wrong set of entries.
Per report from Emre Hasegeli, though this is not his patch.
Thanks to Peter Geoghegan for review and discussion.
This code was born broken, so back-patch to all supported branches.
In HEAD, I failed to resist the temptation to do a bit of cosmetic
cleanup/pgindent'ing on 710d90da1, too.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAE2gYzzb6K51VnTq5i5p52z+j9p2duEa-K1T3RrC_GQEynAKEg@mail.gmail.com
Spelling access(2)'s second argument as "2" is just horrid.
POSIX makes no promises as to the numeric values of W_OK and related
macros. Even if it accidentally works as intended on every supported
platform, it's still unreadable and inconsistent with adjacent code.
In passing, don't spell "NULL" as "0" either. Yes, that's legal C;
no, it's not project style.
Back-patch, just in case the unportability is real and not theoretical.
(Most likely, even if a platform had different bit assignments for
access()'s modes, there'd not be an observable behavior difference
here; but I'm being paranoid today.)
We'd throw away the partial result anyway after parsing the error message.
Throwing it away beforehand costs nothing and reduces the risk of
out-of-memory failure. Also, at least in systems that behave like
glibc/Linux, if the partial result was very large then the error PGresult
would get allocated at high heap addresses, preventing the heap storage
used by the partial result from being released to the OS until the error
PGresult is freed.
In psql >= 9.6, we hold onto the error PGresult until another error is
received (for \errverbose), so that this behavior causes a seeming
memory leak to persist for awhile, as in a recent complaint from
Darafei Praliaskouski. This is a potential performance regression from
older versions, justifying back-patching at least that far. But similar
behavior may occur in other client applications, so it seems worth just
back-patching to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAC8Q8tJ=7cOkPePyAbJE_Pf691t8nDFhJp0KZxHvnq_uicfyVg@mail.gmail.com
NISortAffixes() compared successive compound affixes incorrectly,
thus possibly failing to merge identical affixes, or (less likely)
merging ones that shouldn't be merged. The user-visible effects
of this are unclear, to me anyway.
Per bug #15150 from Alexander Lakhin. It's been broken for a long time,
so back-patch to all supported branches.
Arthur Zakirov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/152353327780.31225.13445405496721177988@wrigleys.postgresql.org
The nextOid value is from the start of the checkpoint and may well be stale
compared to values from more recent XLOG_NEXTOID records. Previously, we
adopted it anyway, allowing the OID counter to go backwards during a crash.
While this should be harmless, it contributed to the severity of the bug
fixed in commit 0408e1ed5, by allowing duplicate TOAST OIDs to be assigned
immediately following a crash. Without this error, that issue would only
have arisen when TOAST objects just younger than a multiple of 2^32 OIDs
were deleted and then not vacuumed in time to avoid a conflict.
Pavan Deolasee
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABOikdOgWT2hHkYG3Wwo2cyZJq2zfs1FH0FgX-=h4OLosXHf9w@mail.gmail.com
When selecting a new OID, we take care to avoid picking one that's already
in use in the target table, so as not to create duplicates after the OID
counter has wrapped around. However, up to now we used SnapshotDirty when
scanning for pre-existing entries. That ignores committed-dead rows, so
that we could select an OID matching a deleted-but-not-yet-vacuumed row.
While that mostly worked, it has two problems:
* If recently deleted, the dead row might still be visible to MVCC
snapshots, creating a risk for duplicate OIDs when examining the catalogs
within our own transaction. Such duplication couldn't be visible outside
the object-creating transaction, though, and we've heard few if any field
reports corresponding to such a symptom.
* When selecting a TOAST OID, deleted toast rows definitely *are* visible
to SnapshotToast, and will remain so until vacuumed away. This leads to
a conflict that will manifest in errors like "unexpected chunk number 0
(expected 1) for toast value nnnnn". We've been seeing reports of such
errors from the field for years, but the cause was unclear before.
The fix is simple: just use SnapshotAny to search for conflicting rows.
This results in a slightly longer window before object OIDs can be
recycled, but that seems unlikely to create any large problems.
Pavan Deolasee
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABOikdOgWT2hHkYG3Wwo2cyZJq2zfs1FH0FgX-=h4OLosXHf9w@mail.gmail.com
The other strings, application_name and query string, were snapshotted to
local memory in pgstat_read_current_status(), but we forgot to do that for
client hostnames. As a result, the client hostname would appear to change in
the local copy, if the client disconnected.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Edmund Horner
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMyN-kA7aOJzBmrYFdXcc7Z0NmW%2B5jBaf_m%3D_-77uRNyKC9r%3DA%40mail.gmail.com
One improbable error-exit path in this function used close() where
it should have used CloseTransientFile(). This is unlikely to be
hit in the field, and I think the consequences wouldn't be awful
(just an elog(LOG) bleat later). But a bug is a bug, so back-patch
to 9.4 where this code came in.
Pan Bian
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/152056616579.4966.583293218357089052@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Due to sloppy division of changes between f50c80dbb (which was not
back-patched) and 563a053bd, this piece of code was wrongly backpatched to
REL_10_STABLE and REL9_6_STABLE. This code never causes real error because
its condition is never satisfied, but it's a dead code, which needs to be
removed.
Alexander Korotkov per gripe from Tom Lane
The atomics code asserts proper alignment in various places. That's
mainly because the alignment of 64bit integers is not sufficient for
atomic operations on all platforms. Some ABIs only have four byte
alignment, but don't have atomic behavior when crossing page
boundaries.
The flags code isn't affected by that however, as the type alignment
always is sufficient for atomic operations. Nevertheless the code
asserted alignment requirements. Before 8c3debbb it was only broken on
hppa, after it probably affect further platforms.
Thus remove the assertions for pg_atomic_flag operators.
Per buildfarm animal pademelon.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7223.1523124425@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: 9.5-
The atomics fallback implementation for pg_atomic_flag was broken,
returning the inverted value from pg_atomic_test_set_flag(). This was
unnoticed because a) atomic flags were unused until recently b) the
test code wasn't run when the fallback implementation was in
use (because it didn't allow to test for some edge cases).
Fix the bug, and improve the fallback so it has the same behaviour as
the non-fallback implementation in the problematic edge cases. That
breaks ABI compatibility in the back branches when fallbacks are in
use, but given they were broken until now...
Author: Andres Freund
Reported-by: Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion:
https://postgr.es/m/FB948276-7B32-4B77-83E6-D00167F8EEB4@yesql.sehttps://postgr.es/m/20180406233854.uni2h3mbnveczl32@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 9.5-, where the atomics abstraction was introduced.
Avoid storing the result of PQsocket() in a pgsocket variable; it's
declared as int, and the no-socket test is properly written as "x < 0"
not "x == PGINVALID_SOCKET". This accidentally had no bad effect
because we never got to init_slot() with a bad connection, but it's
still wrong.
Actually, it seems like we should avoid storing the result for a long
period at all. The function's not so expensive that it's worth avoiding,
and the existing coding technique here would fail if anyone tried to
PQreset the connection during the life of the program. Hence, just
re-call PQsocket every time we construct a select(2) mask.
Speaking of select(), GetIdleSlot imagined that it could compute the
select mask once and continue to use it over multiple calls to
select_loop(), which is pretty bogus since that would stomp on the
mask on return. This could only matter if the function's outer loop
iterated more than once, which is unlikely (it'd take some connection
receiving data, but not enough to complete its command). But if it
did happen, we'd acquire "tunnel vision" and stop watching the other
connections for query termination, with the effect of losing parallelism.
Another way in which GetIdleSlot could lose parallelism is that once
PQisBusy returns false, it would lock in on that connection and do
PQgetResult until that returns NULL; in some cases that could result
in blocking. (Perhaps this can never happen in vacuumdb due to the
limited set of commands that it can issue, but I'm not quite sure
of that, and even if true today it's not a future-proof assumption.)
Refactor the code to do that properly, so that it risks blocking in
PQgetResult only in cases where we need to wait anyway.
Another loss-of-parallelism problem, which *is* easily demonstrable,
is that any setup queries issued during prepare_vacuum_command() were
always issued on the last-to-be-created connection, whether or not
that was idle. Long-running operations on that connection thus
prevented issuance of additional operations on the other ones, except
in the limited cases where no preparatory query was needed. Instead,
wait till we've identified a free connection and use that one.
Also, avoid core dump due to undersized malloc request in the case
that no tables are identified to be vacuumed.
The bogus no-socket test was noted by CharSyam, the other problems
identified in my own code review. Back-patch to 9.5 where parallel
vacuumdb was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMrLSE6etb33-192DTEUGkV-TsvEcxtBDxGWG1tgNOMnQHwgDA@mail.gmail.com
Richard Yen reported that pg_upgrade failed if the target cluster had
force_parallel_mode = on, because binary_upgrade_create_empty_extension()
is marked parallel restricted, allowing it to be executed in parallel
mode, which complains because it tries to acquire an XID.
In general, no function that might try to modify database data should
be considered parallel safe or restricted, since execution of it might
force XID acquisition. We found several other examples of this mistake.
Furthermore, functions that execute user-supplied SQL queries or query
fragments, or pull data from user-supplied cursors, had better be marked
both volatile and parallel unsafe, because we don't know what the supplied
query or cursor might try to do. There were several tsquery and XML
functions that had the wrong proparallel marking for this, and some of
them were even mislabeled as to volatility.
All these bugs are old, dating back to 9.6 for the proparallel mistakes
and much further for the provolatile mistakes. We can't force a
catversion bump in the back branches, but we can at least ensure that
installations initdb'd in future have the right values.
Thomas Munro and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=2sNDScSLTfyMYu32Q=ob98ZGW-vM_2oLxinzSABGQ6VA@mail.gmail.com
After processing the filemap to build the list of chunks that will be
fetched from the source to rewing the target server, it is possible that
a file which was previously processed is removed from the source. A
simple example of such an occurence is a WAL segment which gets recycled
on the target in-between. When the filemap is processed, files not
categorized as relation files are first truncated to prepare for its
full copy of which is going to be taken from the source, divided into a
set of junks. However, for a recycled WAL segment, this would result in
a segment which has a zero-byte size. With such an empty file,
post-rewind recovery thinks that records are saved but they are actually
not because of the truncation which happened when processing the
filemap, resulting in data loss.
In order to fix the problem, make sure that files which are found as
removed on the source when receiving chunks of them are as well deleted
on the target server for consistency.
Back-patch to 9.5 where pg_rewind was added.
Author: Tsunakawa Takayuki
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Reported-by: Tsunakawa Takayuki
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F8DAAA2%40G01JPEXMBYT05
tuplesort_gettupleslot() passed back tuples allocated in the tuplesort's
own memory context, even when the caller was responsible to free them.
This created a double-free hazard, because some callers might destroy
the tuplesort object (via tuplesort_end) before trying to clean up the
last returned tuple. To avoid this, change the API to specify that the
tuple is allocated in the caller's memory context. v10 and HEAD already
did things that way, but in 9.5 and 9.6 this is a live bug that can
demonstrably cause crashes with some grouping-set usages.
In 9.5 and 9.6, this requires doing an extra tuple copy in some cases,
which is unfortunate. But the amount of refactoring needed to avoid it
seems excessive for a back-patched change, especially since the cases
where an extra copy happens are less performance-critical.
Likewise change tuplesort_getdatum() to return pass-by-reference Datums
in the caller's context not the tuplesort's context. There seem to be
no live bugs among its callers, but clearly the same sort of situation
could happen in future.
For other tuplesort fetch routines, continue to allocate the memory in
the tuplesort's context. This is a little inconsistent with what we now
do for tuplesort_gettupleslot() and tuplesort_getdatum(), but that's
preferable to adding new copy overhead in the back branches where it's
clearly unnecessary. These other fetch routines provide the weakest
possible guarantees about tuple memory lifespan from v10 on, anyway,
so this actually seems more consistent overall.
Adjust relevant comments to reflect these API redefinitions.
Arguably, we should change the pre-9.5 branches as well, but since
there are no known failure cases there, it seems not worth the risk.
Peter Geoghegan, per report from Bernd Helmle. Reviewed by Kyotaro
Horiguchi; thanks also to Andreas Seltenreich for extracting a
self-contained test case.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1512661638.9720.34.camel@oopsware.de
The listed numbers disagreed with the ones being used in the symbols;
but instead of just fixing the numbers in the comment, use the symbolic
name instead, which seems clearer.
This has been wrong all along, so apply back to 9.5 where BRIN was
introduced.
Reported-by: Tomas Vondra
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5ff514f2-8b1e-6366-b11c-8e2ed442562d@2ndquadrant.com
Section 10.5 didn't say explicitly that multiple UNIONs are resolved
pairwise. Since the resolution algorithm is described as taking any
number of inputs, readers might well think that a query like
"select x union select y union select z" would be resolved by
considering x, y, and z in one resolution step. But that's not what
happens (and I think that behavior is per SQL spec). Add an example
clarifying this point.
Per bug #15129 from Philippe Beaudoin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/152196085023.32649.9916472370480121694@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Extension scripts begin execution with pg_catalog at the front of the
search path, so type names reliably refer to pg_catalog. Remove these
superfluous qualifications. Earlier <programlisting> of this <sect1>
already omitted them. Back-patch to 9.3 (all supported versions).
For years, our makefiles have correctly observed that "there is no correct
way to write a rule that generates two files". However, what we did is to
provide empty rules that "generate" the secondary output files from the
primary one, and that's not right either. Depending on the details of
the creating process, the primary file might end up timestamped later than
one or more secondary files, causing subsequent make runs to consider the
secondary file(s) out of date. That's harmless in a plain build, since
make will just re-execute the empty rule and nothing happens. But it's
fatal in a VPATH build, since make will expect the secondary file to be
rebuilt in the build directory. This would manifest as "file not found"
failures during VPATH builds from tarballs, if we were ever unlucky enough
to ship a tarball with apparently out-of-date secondary files. (It's not
clear whether that has ever actually happened, but it definitely could.)
To ensure that secondary output files have timestamps >= their primary's,
change our makefile convention to be that we provide a "touch $@" action
not an empty rule. Also, make sure that this rule actually gets invoked
during a distprep run, else the hazard remains.
It's been like this a long time, so back-patch to all supported branches.
In HEAD, I skipped the changes in src/backend/catalog/Makefile, because
those rules are due to get replaced soon in the bootstrap data format
patch, and there seems no need to create a merge issue for that patch.
If for some reason we fail to land that patch in v11, we'll need to
back-fill the changes in that one makefile from v10.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18556.1521668179@sss.pgh.pa.us
Count the number of tuples in the index honestly, instead of assuming
that it's the same as the number of tuples in the heap. (It might be
different if the index is partial.)
Back-patch to all supported versions.
Tomas Vondra
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3b3d8eac-c709-0d25-088e-b98339a1b28a@2ndquadrant.com
Count the number of tuples in the index honestly, instead of assuming
that it's the same as the number of tuples in the heap. (It might be
different if the index is partial.)
Fix counting of tuples in current index page, too. This error would
have led to failing to write out the final page of the index if it
contained exactly one tuple, so that the last tuple of the relation
would not get indexed.
Back-patch to 9.6 where contrib/bloom was added.
Tomas Vondra and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3b3d8eac-c709-0d25-088e-b98339a1b28a@2ndquadrant.com
Code that prints out the contents of setconfig or proconfig arrays in
SQL format needs to handle GUC_LIST_QUOTE variables differently from
other ones, because for those variables, flatten_set_variable_args()
already applied a layer of quoting. The value can therefore safely
be printed as-is, and indeed must be, or flatten_set_variable_args()
will muck it up completely on reload. For all other GUC variables,
it's necessary and sufficient to quote the value as a SQL literal.
We'd recognized the need for this long ago, but mis-analyzed the
need slightly, thinking that all GUC_LIST_INPUT variables needed
the special treatment. That's actually wrong, since a valid value
of a LIST variable might include characters that need quoting,
although no existing variables accept such values.
More to the point, we hadn't made any particular effort to keep the
various places that deal with this up-to-date with the set of variables
that actually need special treatment, meaning that we'd do the wrong
thing with, for example, temp_tablespaces values. This affects dumping
of SET clauses attached to functions, as well as ALTER DATABASE/ROLE SET
commands.
In ruleutils.c we can fix it reasonably honestly by exporting a guc.c
function that allows discovering the flags for a given GUC variable.
But pg_dump doesn't have easy access to that, so continue the old method
of having a hard-wired list of affected variable names. At least we can
fix it to have just one list not two, and update the list to match
current reality.
A remaining problem with this is that it only works for built-in
GUC variables. pg_dump's list obvious knows nothing of third-party
extensions, and even the "ask guc.c" method isn't bulletproof since
the relevant extension might not be loaded. There's no obvious
solution to that, so for now, we'll just have to discourage extension
authors from inventing custom GUCs that need GUC_LIST_QUOTE.
This has been busted for a long time, so back-patch to all supported
branches.
Michael Paquier and Tom Lane, reviewed by Kyotaro Horiguchi and
Pavel Stehule
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180111064900.GA51030@paquier.xyz
The original coding of the SP-GiST scan traversalValue feature (commit
ccd6eb49a) arranged for traversal values to be stored in the query's main
executor context. That's fine if there's only one index scan per query,
but if there are many, we have a memory leak as successive scans create
new traversal values. Fix it by creating a separate memory context for
traversal values, which we can reset during spgrescan(). Back-patch
to 9.6 where this code was introduced.
In principle, adding the traversalCxt field to SpGistScanOpaqueData
creates an ABI break in the back branches. But I (tgl) have little
sympathy for extensions including spgist_private.h, so I'm not very
worried about that. Alternatively we could stick the new field at the
end of the struct in back branches, but that has its own downsides.
Anton Dignös, reviewed by Alexander Kuzmenkov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALNdv1jb6y2Te-m8xHLxLX12RsBmZJ1f4hESX7J0HjgyOhA9eA@mail.gmail.com
refresh_by_match_merge() has some issues in the way it builds a SQL
query to construct the "diff" table:
1. It doesn't require the selected unique index(es) to be indimmediate.
2. It doesn't pay attention to the particular equality semantics enforced
by a given index, but just assumes that they must be those of the column
datatype's default btree opclass.
3. It doesn't check that the indexes are btrees.
4. It's insufficiently careful to ensure that the parser will pick the
intended operator when parsing the query. (This would have been a
security bug before CVE-2018-1058.)
5. It's not careful about indexes on system columns.
The way to fix#4 is to make use of the existing code in ri_triggers.c
for generating an arbitrary binary operator clause. I chose to move
that to ruleutils.c, since that seems a more reasonable place to be
exporting such functionality from than ri_triggers.c.
While #1, #3, and #5 are just latent given existing feature restrictions,
and #2 doesn't arise in the core system for lack of alternate opclasses
with different equality behaviors, #4 seems like an issue worth
back-patching. That's the bulk of the change anyway, so just back-patch
the whole thing to 9.4 where this code was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/13836.1521413227@sss.pgh.pa.us
Jeff Janes discovered that commit 7ca25b7de made one of the queries run by
REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY perform badly. The root cause is
bad cardinality estimation for correlated quals, but a principled solution
to that problem is some way off, especially since the planner lacks any
statistics about whole-row variables. Moreover, in non-error cases this
query produces no rows, meaning it must be run to completion; but use of
LIMIT 1 encourages the planner to pick a fast-start, slow-completion plan,
exactly not what we want. Remove the LIMIT clause, and instead rely on
the count parameter we pass to SPI_execute() to prevent excess work if the
query does return some rows.
While we've heard no field reports of planner misbehavior with this query,
it could be that people are having performance issues that haven't reached
the level of pain needed to cause a bug report. In any case, that LIMIT
clause can't possibly do anything helpful with any existing version of the
planner, and it demonstrably can cause bad choices in some cases, so
back-patch to 9.4 where the code was introduced.
Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1z-JoGymHneGHar1cru4F1XDfHqJDzxP_CtK5cL3DOfmg@mail.gmail.com
If a view lacks an INSTEAD OF trigger, DML on it can only work by rewriting
the command into a command on the underlying base table(s). Then we will
fire triggers attached to those table(s), not those for the view. This
seems appropriate from a consistency standpoint, but nowhere was the
behavior explicitly documented, so let's do that.
There was some discussion of throwing an error or warning if a statement
trigger is created on a view without creating a row INSTEAD OF trigger.
But a simple implementation of that would result in dump/restore ordering
hazards. Given that it's been like this all along, and we hadn't heard
a complaint till now, a documentation improvement seems sufficient.
Per bug #15106 from Pu Qun. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/152083391168.1215.16892140713507052796@wrigleys.postgresql.org
