This commit fixes three issues:
1) When a disabled subscription is created with retain_dead_tuples set to true,
the launcher is not woken up immediately, which may lead to delays in creating
the conflict detection slot.
Creating the conflict detection slot is essential even when the subscription is
not enabled. This ensures that dead tuples are retained, which is necessary for
accurately identifying the type of conflict during replication.
2) Conflict-related data was unnecessarily retained when the subscription does
not have a table.
3) Conflict-relevant data could be prematurely removed before applying
prepared transactions on the publisher that are in the commit critical section.
This issue occurred because the backend executing COMMIT PREPARED was not
accounted for during the computation of oldestXid in the commit phase on
the publisher. As a result, the subscriber could advance the conflict
slot's xmin without waiting for such COMMIT PREPARED transactions to
complete.
We fixed this issue by identifying prepared transactions that are in the
commit critical section during computation of oldestXid in commit phase.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS9PR01MB16913DACB64E5721872AA5C02943BA@OS9PR01MB16913.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS9PR01MB16913F67856B0DA2A909788129400A@OS9PR01MB16913.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
This commit allows to log the raw parse tree in the same way we
currently log the parse tree, rewritten tree, and plan tree.
To avoid unnecessary log noise for users not interested in this
detail, a new GUC option, "debug_print_raw_parse", has been added.
When starting the PostgreSQL process with "-d N", and N is 3 or higher,
debug_print_raw_parse is enabled automatically, alongside
debug_print_parse.
Author: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEoWx2mcO0Gpo4vd8kPMAFWeJLSp0MeUUnaLdE1x0tSVd-VzUw%40mail.gmail.com
This set of changes removes the list of available buffers and instead simply
uses the clock-sweep algorithm to find and return an available buffer. This
also removes the have_free_buffer() function and simply caps the
pg_autoprewarm process to at most NBuffers.
While on the surface this appears to be removing an optimization it is in fact
eliminating code that induces overhead in the form of synchronization that is
problematic for multi-core systems.
The main reason for removing the freelist, however, is not the moderate
improvement in scalability, but that having the freelist would require
dedicated complexity in several upcoming patches. As we have not been able to
find a case benefiting from the freelist...
Author: Greg Burd <greg@burd.me>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/70C6A5B5-2A20-4D0B-BC73-EB09DD62D61C@getmailspring.com
When executing a MERGE UPDATE action, if there is more than one
concurrent update of the target row, the lock-and-retry code would
sometimes incorrectly identify the latest version of the target tuple,
leading to incorrect results.
This was caused by using the ctid field from the TM_FailureData
returned by table_tuple_lock() in a case where the result was TM_Ok,
which is unsafe because the TM_FailureData struct is not guaranteed to
be fully populated in that case. Instead, it should use the tupleid
passed to (and updated by) table_tuple_lock().
To reduce the chances of similar errors in the future, improve the
commentary for table_tuple_lock() and TM_FailureData to make it
clearer that table_tuple_lock() updates the tid passed to it, and most
fields of TM_FailureData should not be relied on in non-failure cases.
An exception to this is the "traversed" field, which is set in both
success and failure cases.
Reported-by: Dmitry <dsy.075@yandex.ru>
Author: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1570d30e-2b95-4239-b9c3-f7bf2f2f8556@yandex.ru
Backpatch-through: 15
This commit changes some functions related to the data type numeric to
use the soft error reporting rather than a custom boolean flag (called
"have_error") that callers of these functions could rely on to bypass
the generation of ERROR reports, letting the callers do their own error
handling (timestamp, jsonpath and numeric_to_char() require them).
This results in the removal of some boilerplate code that was required
to handle both the ereport() and the "have_error" code paths bypassing
ereport(), unifying everything under the soft error reporting facility.
While on it, some duplicated error messages are removed. The function
upgraded in this commit were suffixed with "_opt_error" in their names.
They are renamed to "_safe" instead.
This change relies on d9f7f5d32f, that has introduced the soft error
reporting infrastructure.
Author: Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b96No5h5tRuR+KhcC44YcYUCw8WAHuLoqqyyop8_k3+JDQ@mail.gmail.com
pg_lsn includes pg_lsn_in_internal() for the purpose of parsing a LSN
position for the GUC recovery_target_lsn (21f428ebde). It relies on a
boolean called "have_error" that would be set when the LSN parsing
fails, then let its callers handle any errors.
d9f7f5d32f has added support for soft error reporting. This commit
removes some boilerplate code and switches the routine to use soft error
reporting directly, giving to the callers of pg_lsn_in_internal()
the possibility to be fed the error message generated on failure.
pg_lsn_in_internal() routine is renamed to pg_lsn_in_safe(), for
consistency with other similar routines that are given an escontext.
Author: Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAJ_b96No5h5tRuR+KhcC44YcYUCw8WAHuLoqqyyop8_k3+JDQ@mail.gmail.com
Commit 38b602b028 modified this function to allocate enough space
for MAX_NAMED_TRANCHES (256) requests, which is likely far more
than most clusters need. This commit reverts that change so that
it first allocates enough space for only 16 requests and resizes
the array when necessary. While at it, remove the check for too
many tranches from this function. We can now rely on
InitializeLWLocks() to do that check via its calls to
LWLockNewTrancheId() for the named tranches.
Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aLmzwC2dRbqk14y6%40nathan
If an INSERT has an ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE clause, the executor must
check that the target relation supports UPDATE as well as INSERT. In
particular, it must check that the target relation has a REPLICA
IDENTITY if it publishes updates. Formerly, it was not doing this
check, which could lead to silently breaking replication.
Fix by adding such a check to CheckValidResultRel(), which requires
adding a new onConflictAction argument. In back-branches, preserve ABI
compatibility by introducing a wrapper function with the original
signature.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS3PR01MB57180C87E43A679A730482DF94B62@OS3PR01MB5718.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Backpatch-through: 13
The counters saved from pgWalUsage, used for the difference calculations
when flushing the backend WAL stats, are updated when calling
pgstat_flush_backend() under PGSTAT_BACKEND_FLUSH_WAL, and not
pgstat_report_wal(). The comment updated in this commit referenced the
latter, but it is perfectly OK to flush the backend stats independently
of the WAL stats.
Noticed while looking at this area of the code, introduced by
76def4cdd7 as a copy-pasto.
Backpatch-through: 18
There are two ways for shared libraries to allocate their own
LWLock tranches. One way is to call RequestNamedLWLockTranche() in
a shmem_request_hook, which requires the library to be loaded via
shared_preload_libraries. The other way is to call
LWLockNewTrancheId(), which is not subject to the same
restrictions. However, LWLockNewTrancheId() does require each
backend to store the tranche's name in backend-local memory via
LWLockRegisterTranche(). This API is a little cumbersome and leads
to things like unhelpful pg_stat_activity.wait_event values in
backends that haven't loaded the library.
This commit moves these LWLock tranche names to shared memory, thus
eliminating the need for each backend to call
LWLockRegisterTranche(). Instead, the tranche name must be
provided to LWLockNewTrancheId(), which immediately makes the name
available to all backends. Since the tranche name array is
append-only, lookups can ordinarily avoid locking as long as their
local copy of the LWLock counter is greater than the requested
tranche ID.
One downside of this approach is that we now have a hard limit on
both the length of tranche names (NAMEDATALEN-1 bytes) and the
number of dynamically-allocated tranches (256). Besides a limit of
NAMEDATALEN-1 bytes for tranche names registered via
RequestNamedLWLockTranche(), no such limits previously existed. We
could avoid these new limits by using dynamic shared memory, but
the complexity involved didn't seem worth it. We briefly
considered making the tranche limit user-configurable but
ultimately decided against that, too. Since there is still a lot
of time left in the v19 development cycle, it's possible we will
revisit this choice.
Author: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5RZ0vvED3naph8My8Szv6DL4AxOVK3eTPS0qXsaKi%3DbVdW2A%40mail.gmail.com
Commit 6359989654 had it so that the parameter "debug_discard_caches"
did not exist unless DISCARD_CACHES_ENABLED was defined (typically via
enabling asserts). This was a mistake, it did not correspond to the
prior setup. Several tests use this parameter, so they were now
failing if you did not have asserts enabled.
Store the information in guc_tables.c in a .dat file similar to the
catalog data in src/include/catalog/, and generate a part of
guc_tables.c from that. The goal is to make it easier to edit that
information, and to be able to make changes to the downstream data
structures more easily. (Essentially, those are the same reasons as
for the original adoption of the .dat format.)
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reviewed-by: David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/dae6fe89-1e0c-4c3f-8d92-19d23374fb10%40eisentraut.org
SubPlan nodes are typically built very early, before any RelOptInfos
have been constructed for the parent query level. As a result, the
simple_rel_array in the parent root has not yet been initialized.
Currently, during cost estimation of a SubPlan's testexpr, we may call
examine_variable() to look up statistical data about the expressions.
This can lead to "no relation entry for relid" errors.
To fix, pass root as NULL to cost_qual_eval() in cost_subplan(), since
the root does not yet contain enough information to safely consult
statistics.
One exception is SubPlan nodes built for the initplans of MIN/MAX
aggregates from indexes. In this case, having a NULL root is safe
because testexpr will be NULL. Additionally, an initplan will by
definition not consult anything from the parent plan.
Backpatch to all supported branches. Although the reported call path
that triggers this error is not reachable prior to v17, there's no
guarantee that other code paths -- especially in extensions -- could
not encounter the same issue when cost_qual_eval() is called with a
root that lacks a valid simple_rel_array. The test case is not
included in pre-v17 branches though.
Bug: #19037
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Diagnosed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19037-3d1c7bb553c7ce84@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
SLRU bank locks are referred as "bank locks" or "SLRU bank locks" in the
code comments. The comments updated in this commit use the latter term.
Oversight in 53c2a97a92, that has replaced the single ControlLock by
the bank control locks.
Author: Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@free.fr>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aLUT2UO8RjJOzZNq@jrouhaud
Backpatch-through: 17
COPY TO does not support a WHERE clause, and currently fails with the error:
ERROR: WHERE clause not allowed with COPY TO
Since the intended behavior can be achieved by using
COPY (SELECT ... WHERE ...) TO, this commit adds a HINT
to the error message:
HINT: Try the COPY (SELECT ... WHERE ...) TO variant.
This makes the error more informative and helps users
quickly find the alternative usage.
Author: Atsushi Torikoshi <torikoshia@oss.nttdata.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3520c224c5ffac0113aef84a9179f37e@oss.nttdata.com
Previously, duplicate labels in CREATE TYPE AS ENUM were caught by
the unique index on pg_enum, resulting in a generic error message.
While this was evidently intentional, it's not terribly user-friendly,
nor consistent with the ALTER TYPE cases which take more care with
such errors. This patch adds an explicit check to produce a more
user-friendly and descriptive error message.
A potential objection to this implementation is that it adds O(N^2)
work to the creation operation. However, quick testing finds that
that's pretty negligible below 1000 enum labels, and tolerable even
at 10000. So it doesn't really seem worth being smarter.
Author: Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Jones <jim.jones@uni-muenster.de>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20250704000402.37e605ab0c59c300965a17ee@sraoss.co.jp
This commit introduces a new subscription parameter,
max_retention_duration, aimed at mitigating excessive accumulation of dead
tuples when retain_dead_tuples is enabled and the apply worker lags behind
the publisher.
When the time spent advancing a non-removable transaction ID exceeds the
max_retention_duration threshold, the apply worker will stop retaining
conflict detection information. In such cases, the conflict slot's xmin
will be set to InvalidTransactionId, provided that all apply workers
associated with the subscription (with retain_dead_tuples enabled) confirm
the retention duration has been exceeded.
To ensure retention status persists across server restarts, a new column
subretentionactive has been added to the pg_subscription catalog. This
prevents unnecessary reactivation of retention logic after a restart.
The conflict detection slot will not be automatically re-initialized
unless a new subscription is created with retain_dead_tuples = true, or
the user manually re-enables retain_dead_tuples.
A future patch will introduce support for automatic slot re-initialization
once at least one apply worker confirms that the retention duration is
within the configured max_retention_duration.
Author: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716BE80DAEB0EE2A6A5D1F5949D2@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Constraint expressions and statistics expressions loaded from the
system catalogs need to be run through const-simplification, because
the planner will be comparing them to similarly-processed qual
clauses. Without this step, the planner may fail to detect valid
matches.
Currently, NullTest clauses in these expressions may not be reduced
correctly during const-simplification. This happens because their Var
nodes do not yet have the correct varno when eval_const_expressions is
applied. Since eval_const_expressions relies on varno to reduce
NullTest quals, incorrect varno can cause problems.
Additionally, for statistics expressions, eval_const_expressions is
called with root set to NULL, which also inhibits NullTest reduction.
This patch fixes the issue by ensuring that Vars are updated to have
the correct varno before const-simplification, and that a valid root
is passed to eval_const_expressions when needed.
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19007-4cc6e252ed8aa54a@postgresql.org
A proposed patch would place a limit of NAMEDATALEN-1 (i.e., 63)
bytes on the names of dynamically-allocated LWLock tranches, but
GetNamedDSA() and GetNamedDSHash() may register tranches with
longer names. This commit lowers the maximum DSM registry entry
name length to NAMEDATALEN-1 bytes and modifies GetNamedDSHash() to
create only one tranche, thereby allowing us to keep the DSM
registry's tranche names below NAMEDATALEN bytes.
Author: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aKzIg1JryN1qhNuy%40nathan
Show the requested lock level and the object being waited on,
in the same format we use for deadlock reports and similar errors.
This is particularly helpful for debugging lock-timeout errors,
since otherwise the user has very little to go on about which
lock timed out. The performance cost of setting up the callback
should be negligible compared to the other tracing support already
present in WaitOnLock.
As in the deadlock-report case, we just show numeric object OIDs,
because it seems too scary to try to perform catalog lookups
in this context.
Reported-by: Steve Baldwin <steve.baldwin@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1602369.1752167154@sss.pgh.pa.us
Using the LWLockCounter requires first calculating its address in
shared memory like this:
LWLockCounter = (int *) ((char *) MainLWLockArray - sizeof(int));
Commit 82e861fbe1 started this trend in order to fix EXEC_BACKEND
builds, but it could also be fixed by adding it to the
BackendParameters struct. The current approach is somewhat
difficult to follow, so this commit switches to the latter. While
at it, swap around the code in LWLockShmemSize() to match the order
of assignments in CreateLWLocks() for added readability.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aLDLnan9gNCS9fHx%40nathan
It's possible that if the only live partition is concurrently dropped
and try_table_open() fails, that the bms_del_member() will pfree the
live_parts Bitmapset. Since the bms_del_member() call does not assign
the result back to the live_parts local variable, the while loop could
segfault as that variable would still reference the pfree'd Bitmapset.
Backpatch to 15. 52f3de874 was backpatched to 14, but there's no
bms_del_member() there due to live_parts not yet existing in RelOptInfo in
that version. Technically there's no bug in version 15 as
bms_del_member() didn't pfree when the set became empty prior to
00b41463c (from v16). Applied to v15 anyway to keep the code similar and
to avoid the bad coding pattern.
Author: Bernd Reiß <bd_reiss@gmx.at>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6b88f27a-c45c-4826-8e37-d61a04d90182@gmx.at
Backpatch-through: 15
For a child relation, we should not assume that its parent's
unique-ified relation (or unique-ified path in v18) always exists. In
cases where all RHS columns that need to be unique-ified are equated
to constants, the unique-ified relation/path for the parent table is
not built, as there are no columns left to unique-ify. Failing to
account for this can result in a SIGSEGV crash during planning.
This patch checks whether the parent's unique-ified relation or path
exists and skips unique-ification of the child relation if it does
not.
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs49MOdLW2c+qbLHHBt8VBu=4ONpM91D19=AWeW93eFUF6A@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
One mechanism we have for implementing semi-joins is to de-duplicate
the output of the RHS and then treat the join as a plain inner join.
Initial construction of the join's SpecialJoinInfo identifies the
RHS columns that need to be de-duplicated, but later we may find that
some of those don't need to be handled explicitly, either because
they're known to be constant or because they are redundant with some
previous column.
Up to now, while sort-based de-duplication handled such cases well,
hash-based de-duplication didn't: we'd still hash on all of the
originally-identified columns. This is probably not a very big
deal performance-wise, but in the wake of commit a3179ab69 it can
cause planner errors. That happens when join elimination causes
recalculation of variables' attr_needed bitmapsets, and we decide
that a variable mentioned in a semijoin clause doesn't need to be
propagated up to the join level anymore.
There are a number of ways we could slice the blame for this, but the
only fix that doesn't result in pessimizing plans for loosely-related
cases is to be more careful about not hashing columns we don't
actually need to de-duplicate. We can install that consideration
into create_unique_paths in master, or the predecessor code in
create_unique_path in v18, without much refactoring.
(As follow-up work, it might be a good idea to look at more-invasive
refactoring, in hopes of preventing other bugs in this area. But
with v18 release so close, there's not time for that now, nor would
we be likely to want to put such refactoring into v18 anyway.)
Reported-by: Sergey Soloviev <sergey.soloviev@tantorlabs.ru>
Diagnosed-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1fd1a421-4609-4d46-a1af-ab74d5de504a@tantorlabs.ru
Backpatch-through: 18
This has been done historically because of get_database_name (which
since commit cb98e6fb8f belongs in lsyscache.c/h, so let's move it
there) and get_database_oid (which is in the right place, but whose
declaration should appear in pg_database.h rather than dbcommands.h).
Clean this up.
Also, xlogreader.h and stringinfo.h are no longer needed by dbcommands.h
since commit f1fd515b39, so remove them.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202508191031.5ipojyuaswzt@alvherre.pgsql
During an investigation into rather odd aio related errors on macos, observed
by Alexander and Konstantin, we started to wonder if bitfield access is
related to the error. At the moment it looks like it is related, we cannot
reproduce the failures when replacing the bitfields. In addition, the problem
can only be reproduced with some compiler [versions] and not everyone has been
able to reproduce the issue.
The observed problem is that, very rarely, PgAioHandle->{state,target} are in
an inconsistent state, after having been checked to be in a valid state not
long before, triggering an assertion failure. Unfortunately, this could be
caused by wrong compiler code generation or somehow of missing memory barriers
- we don't really know. In theory there should not be any concurrent write
access to the handle in the state the bug is triggered, as the handle was idle
and is just being initialized.
Separately from the bug, we observed that at least gcc and clang generate
rather terrible code for the bitfield access. Even if it's not clear if the
observed assertion failure is actually caused by the bitfield somehow, the bad
code generation alone is sufficient reason to stop using bitfields.
Therefore, replace the enum bitfields with uint8s and instead cast in each
switch statement.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1500090.1745443021@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 18
This patch fixes a bug in how 'load_external_function' handles
'$libdir/ prefixes in module paths.
Previously, 'load_external_function' would unconditionally strip
'$libdir/' from the beginning of the 'filename' string. This caused
an issue when the path was nested, such as "$libdir/nested/my_lib".
Stripping the prefix resulted in a path of "nested/my_lib", which
would fail to be found by the expand_dynamic_library_name function
because the original '$libdir' macro was removed.
To fix this, the code now checks for the presence of an additional
directory separator ('/' or '\') after the '$libdir/' prefix. The
prefix is only stripped if the remaining string does not contain a
separator. This ensures that simple filenames like '"$libdir/my_lib"'
are correctly handled, while nested paths are left intact for
'expand_dynamic_library_name' to process correctly.
Reported-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAFiTN-uKNzAro4tVwtJhF1UqcygfJ%2BR%2BRL%3Db-_ZMYE3LdHoGhA%40mail.gmail.com
Commit 4b754d6c1 introduced the concept of an excludeOnly scan key,
which cannot select matching index entries but can reject
non-matching tuples, for example a tsquery such as '!term'. There are
poorly-documented assumptions that such scan keys do not appear as the
first scan key. ginNewScanKey did nothing to ensure that, however,
with the result that certain GIN index searches could go into an
infinite loop while apparently-equivalent queries with the clauses in
a different order were fine.
Fix by teaching ginNewScanKey to place all excludeOnly scan keys
after all not-excludeOnly ones. So far as we know at present,
it might be sufficient to avoid the case where the very first
scan key is excludeOnly; but I'm not very convinced that there
aren't other dependencies on the ordering.
Bug: #19031
Reported-by: Tim Wood <washwithcare@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19031-0638148643d25548@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
The CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS call in gingetbitmap turns out to be
inadequate to prevent a long uninterruptible loop, because
we now know a case where looping occurs within scanGetItem.
While the next patch will fix the bug that caused that, it
seems foolish to assume that no similar patterns are possible.
Let's do the CFI within scanGetItem's retry loop, instead.
This demonstrably allows canceling out of the loop exhibited
in bug #19031.
Bug: #19031
Reported-by: Tim Wood <washwithcare@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19031-0638148643d25548@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
The Self-Join Elimination SJE feature messes up keeping and removing RowMark's
in remove_self_joins_one_group(). That didn't lead to user-level error,
because the planned RowMark is only used to reference a rtable entry in later
execution stages. An RTE entry for keeping and removing relations is
identical and refers to the same relation OID.
To reduce confusion and prevent future issues, this commit cleans up the code
and fixes the incorrect behaviour. Furthermore, it includes sanity checks in
setrefs.c on existing non-null RTE and RelOptInfo entries for each RowMark.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18c6bd6c-6d2a-419a-b0da-dfedef34b585%40gmail.com
Author: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 18
