Commit 8b08f7d4820f failed to update these modules to at least give
non-broken error messages for partitioned indexes. Add appropriate
error support to them.
Peter G. was complaining about a problem of unfriendly error messages;
while we haven't fixed that yet, subsequent discussion let to discovery
of these unhandled cases.
Author: Michaël Paquier
Reported-by: Peter Geoghegan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkOKptQiE51Bh4_xeEHhaBwHkZkGtKizrFMgEkfUuRRQg@mail.gmail.com
Instead of using our standard macro for this calculation, this code
did it itself ... and got it wrong, leading to incorrect display of
the null bitmap in some cases. Noted and fixed by Maksim Milyutin.
In passing, remove a uselessly duplicative error check.
Errors were introduced in commit d6061f83a; back-patch to 9.6
where that came in.
Maksim Milyutin, reviewed by Andrey Borodin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ec295792-a69f-350f-6287-25a20e8f31d5@gmail.com
The contrib extensions pageinspect, pg_visibility and pgstattuple only
work against regular relations which have storage. They don't work
against foreign tables, partitioned (parent) tables, views, et al.
Add checks to the user-callable functions to return a useful error
message to the user if they mistakenly pass an invalid relation to a
function which doesn't accept that kind of relation.
In passing, improve some of the existing checks to use ereport() instead
of elog(), add a function to consolidate common checks where
appropriate, and add some regression tests.
Author: Amit Langote, with various changes by me
Reviewed by: Michael Paquier and Corey Huinker
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ab91fd9d-4751-ee77-c87b-4dd704c1e59c@lab.ntt.co.jp
Per a report from Tom Lane, the ffactor reported by hash_metapage_info
and the free_size reported by hash_page_stats vary by platform.
Ashutosh Sharma and Robert Haas
Patch by Jesper Pedersen and Ashutosh Sharma, with some error handling
improvements by me. Tests from Peter Eisentraut. Reviewed by Álvaro
Herrera, Michael Paquier, Jesper Pedersen, Jeff Janes, Peter
Eisentraut, Amit Kapila, Mithun Cy, and me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/e2ac6c58-b93f-9dd9-f4e6-d6d30add7fdf@redhat.com
On closer inspection, commit 84ad68d64 broke gin_leafpage_items(),
because the aligned copy of the page got palloc'd in a short-lived
context whereas it needs to be in the SRF's multi_call_memory_ctx.
This was not exposed by the regression test, because the regression
test doesn't actually exercise the function in a meaningful way.
Fix the code bug, and extend the test in what I hope is a portable
fashion.
